Making Sense of the Bible - WEF January, 2015
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Why is it… Well meaning Christians interpret the same passage in the Bible in such radically different ways?
Adam Hamilton addresses these issues in Making Sense of the Bible Section One ~ The Nature of Scripture Section Two ~ Making Sense of the Bible’s Challenging Passages
The Bible is a long and complex book… Depending upon whose Bible you read … there are 66 books… Almost 1200 chapters… … Over 31,000 verses! Written over a period of at least one thousand years in languages and in a culture foreign to ours!
Week One ~ What does it mean to say the Bible is inspired? How is it different from other inspired words? Week Two ~ Are there mistakes, and if so, how do we know what to believe?
Week Three ~ What does it mean to take the Bible seriously in our lives? Tonight ~ Putting these lessons to work with case studies from the pages of Scripture.
“All scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness…” II Timothy 3:16
Observations: Biblical texts are written by real humans in real historical situations addressing real issues of their time. These writers also reflect their own biases and limitations.
Key Insights: To speak of the Bible as inspired does not mean it was dictated by God to robotic human writers. In situations where the Bible is difficult to interpret, it is Jesus who serves as the final Word by which other words of scripture are to be judged.
A High View of Scripture: Assumes you read and study the Scriptures! Assumes that your life is shaped by God through the Scriptures!
An Observation: “We are all a bit spiritually hard of hearing. Our own convictions sometimes get intermingled with what we believe God is saying to us… This is in part why the God of preachers who are staunch Republicans inevitably sounds like a Republican and the God of preachers who are staunch Democrats sounds like a Democrat.” p. 155
An Observation: We all “pick and choose” what Scripture we read and what Scripture informs our life. Even Jesus and the apostles did that! (Ezra, Esther, Song of Songs, Lamentations, Obadiah, Nahum, Zephaniah are never cited in the NT)
A Case Study: Science, the Bible, and the Creation Stories ~Were Adam and Eve Real People? ~Were There Dinosaurs on the Ark? (Chapters 19, 20, & 22) These questions raise issues of the conflict of modern archeology and the Biblical record of Adam and Eve’s creation, along with the historicity of the story of the flood.
Science and the Bible Issues raised: How old is the earth? Are the two creation stories consistent? Were Adam and Eve historic figures? Was there really a flood over all the earth?
Science and the Bible The larger question: What is the purpose of the creation stories in Genesis? Is the purpose of Genesis to teach science, or to teach about God and humanity?
Science and the Bible “Science teaches one kind of truth, and it is really important and wonderful. The Bible teaches another kind of truth – about the meaning of our existence, the nature of God, and what it means to be human. The latter, in my experience, is the kind of truth that I draw upon every day.” p. 192.
Science and the Bible The Hebrew word “Adam” means human… the word “Eve” means life. Are they meant to be real historical figures… or are they meant to represent each of us? The Biblical language is of God breathing and they become “living beings.” The scientific language is of an evolving species of hominids.
Science and the Bible Similarly, the flood describes both a scientific phenomena and a biblical truth. How do we define truth in the Bible? Is a story true because it teaches us about God and humanity or is it true because it occurred in history?
Science and the Bible “That (the story of the flood) is filled with truth is relevant for today, but the important truth found in this story has little to do with the size of Noah's ship, the number of animals it could contain, or whether the floodwaters literally covered the entire earth. Once more we find in Genesis an archetypal story that reveals who God is and who God calls us to be.” p. 205
A Case Study: God’s Violence in the Old Testament (chapter 22) Many of these OT texts give credence to the argument that religion is the source of much violence in our world. They gave rise to the heresy of Marcion that split OT/NT god.
God’s OT Violence Three categories: 1. Death penalty for certain infractions. 2. God’s anger and wrath. 3. Genocide in the name of God.
God’s OT Violence 1. Death penalty for certain infractions. •Sacrificing to another god •Persistent rebellion of a child •Child who hits/curses parent •Working on the Sabbath •Sex with maried person •Premarital sex •Male homosexual intimacy
God’s OT Violence 2. God’s anger and wrath. Exodus 32 … And he said to them, “Thus says the Lord God of Israel, ‘Put your sword on your side each of you, and go to and fro from gate to gate throughout the camp, and each of you kill his brother and his companion and his neighbor.’” And the sons of Levi did according to the word of Moses. And that day about three thousand men of the people fell.
God’s OT Violence 3. Genocide in the name of God. I Samuel 15:3 “Now go and strike Amalek and devote to destruction all that they have. Do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.”
God’s OT Violence Hamilton suggests two categories of responses: 1. For those who support verbal, plenary inspiration, the emphasis is on the need of God “to demonstrate a firm hand to the Israelites.”
God’s OT Violence For others, there are other options: 1. Those who perpetuated this violence were representing the culture in which they lived rather than the will of God.
God’s OT Violence For others, there are other options: 2. Those who perpetuated this violence were recognized as needed heroes in the history of Israel’s development.
God’s OT Violence “Where a particular teaching in scripture is at odds with what Jesus said, we are right to consider that the passage may reflect the culture, worldview, or the perspective of the human author of scripture rather than the timeless heart, character, and will of God.” p. 216
God’s OT Violence Not reading these passages, or ignoring them, is not an acceptable solution! We need to be careful that they are not used to justify war and bloodshed in our day.
God’s OT Violence “Ultimately, the violence – affirming passages of the OT serve as a reminder of how easily we might still be led to invoke God’s name as a justification of violence in our world.” p. 217
Final Thoughts: “You are not dishonoring God by asking questions of Scripture that seems inconsistent with modern scientific knowledge or geography or history. And you are not being unfaithful to God if you ask questions of a verse that seems inconsistent with the picture of God seen in the life, teachings death, and resurrection of Jesus.” p. 299
Final Thoughts: “Daily I hear God speaking to me as I read the scriptures. Its words, with few exceptions, are life giving… Through the Bible, God has spoken and continues to speak to the human race. It contains every truth we need to know God and God’s will for our lives… I love the Bible… and sometimes I wrestle with it.” p. 299-300
You can also read