Branding the Beatles Ryan Acosta
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Every individual at any corner in this planet can identify the picture on this cover page. Some don’t know their names while others can give individual names, match names to faces, retell stories and biographies. Even people who weren’t born in the Beatles’ era (such as myself) and others who aren’t interested in the Beatles ironically still know who the Beatles are. While the Beatles were known for their musical talent, phonetically pleasing music and unique personalities, the image of the band overshadows each and every one of them. While their personalities is probably what made them famous, there is something about the band that leaves an indelible mark on today’s culture and society. Since I am a Business and Non-‐Profit Management Major, I am particularly interested in writing about the Beatles public image. This essay will investigate and discuss the Beatles from a branding perspective; how manager Brian Epstein was able to brand the Beatles into a national and international icon. There are so many things that can affect a person or bands public image but I will stick to their physical appearance and their personalities. I will also cover the branding process of the Beatles until the album Help!. Before I get into the Beatles image, I think it is important to talk about their personalities because it defines them as a band and contributed to their success. I will not discuss every individuals personality because I could write a novel on that topic alone. The Beatles in retrospect of the era they became famous in were known for having “unorthodox personalities” and “cheeky attitudes” (Emerick, page 40). This in part could be a reflection of the current situation they found themselves in. 1
The Beatles were all raised in Liverpool, which was a post industrial city that had suffered the bad recession caused by the loss of industrial jobs. The Beatles were humble, middle to lower class citizens that grew up with little to nothing. Despite the circumstances they were raised in, the Beatles were able to create unique personalities; the Beatles were positive, determined, humorous, joyful and witty but yet serious. The Beatles were never afraid of a challenge, both musically and approach to the media; the Beatles were beyond honest with their feelings and often expressed what they thought/felt. The Beatles didn’t need anymore character than what they already had; they possessed all the characteristics (and more) to become a popular band. The Beatles didn’t always rock the black and white suits, the grey collarless tailored suits by George Millings or the mop tops hair design (Barker, page 1). In fact, there was a time in which the Beatles didn’t. Early in their career, when the Beatles played in Hamburg in 1960, the Beatles lived a “fierce fashion style” (as described by Barker, page 1); the Beatles wore “motorcycle jackets, jeans or leather pants, cowboy boots and slick pampadours”. This style was “a Brylcreem-‐and-‐ popped-‐collar homage to their musical heroes: Gene Vincent and Elvis Presley” (Barker, page 1). This fashion style also resembles the type of lifestyle they were living; Hamburg was a temptation for the Beatles social life. Even though they were young and curious, Hamburg gave the Beatles the freedom to do what ever they pleased and this was evident in the way they acted. The Beatles would swear, drink, smoke cigarettes and display other unprofessional behavior on stage (Frontani, page 10). After events, the Beatles would stay up late and party. Nevertheless, 2
Hamburg proved to be the place where the Beatles started to create a sense of group identity as well as a big step towards a more improved quality of musical creation. In the midst of this “bad ass” appearance that the Beatles had inherited from the lifestyle and attitudes while performing in Hamburg and later in Liverpool, Brian Epstein joined the band in 1962 as manager of the band. It was Brian Epstein who cleaned the Beatles, “sanitizing the rougher, more rebellious image that had been developed in Liverpool’s Cavern Club and on Hamburg’s Reeperbahm” (Frontani, page 10). Epstein would introduce the suit and tie teen image, which was a standardized image for commercial musicians at the time. There were few things that differentiated them from the rest, which were the mop top hairstyle, “length of their hair and their Britishness” (Frontani, page 10). It is quite the mystery how Epstein was able to accomplish this feat. He took a bunch of young musicians that were known to be rebellious in terms of behavior and he was able to straighten them. The taming of the Beatles is in fact part of the whole “story” behind the phenomenon (Frontani, page 10). The Beatles spent much of their life under Epstein’s relentless control. The reason why Epstein had done this was because he wanted to associate the Beatles with a new type of image; he wanted to change the public’s image of the Beatles into “wholesome entertainers”. The Beatles music had changed over time. Along with the Beatles music, the Beatles image had also changed over time. I was able to illustrate the changes in physical appearance that went along the changes in personalities. These changes over time depicted the maturation of the Beatles as they grew older. I had stopped talking about the Beatles at or around the time of the album Help!. The following 3
years to come would be another stepping stone in their public image. In order for the Beatles to be as successful as they were and recognizable decades after their discontinuance, they needed a strong public image, appealing music, and the personality traits of great people. If one of those three factors does not take place, the Beatles wouldn’t be as influential as they are. “It’s the combustion triggered by bundling them together that gives brands life and true ingenuity” (Graj, page 1). Sources: Emerick, Geoff, and Howard Massey. Here, There and Everywhere: My Life Recording the Music of the Beatles. Penguin, 2006. Gould, Jonathan, and Richard Aspel. Can't Buy Me Love. Bolinda Audio, 2013. Barker, Olivia. How The Beatles brought Fab fashion to our closets. USA Today, February 3, 2014. http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/music/2014/02/03/beatles-‐fab-‐fashion-‐ collarless-‐suits-‐moptops/5193987/ Frontani, Michael R. The Beatles: Image and the media. Univ. Press of Mississippi, 2009. Braj, Simon. The Beatles: The Brand Behind The Band. Forbes: CMO Network. June 25, 2012. http://www.forbes.com/sites/simongraj/2012/06/25/the-‐ beatles-‐the-‐brand-‐behind-‐the-‐band/ 4
You can also read