Subdivision Standards One size fits all? - Land Development Engineering Group Forum 14 March 2019 - WIML PowerPoint Presentation Template
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Subdivision Standards One size fits all? Land Development Engineering Group Forum 14 March 2019 Grant Holland Waugh Infrastructure Management Ltd
Agenda Overview of project Observations Recommendations Application to the Forum Project Scope: The key purpose of this appraisal is to identify opportunities for coordination and overall improvement of Engineering (Subdivision) Standards across the Canterbury Region, with a view to potentially establish a common standard. 3
Observations A mountain of documentation District Plans Codes of Practice Design Guides Engineering Standards Technical Drawings Specifications NZS4404:various 4
Observations Where are the Subdivision Controls? Territorial Local Authority Section Ref and Name Kaikoura District Council 13 - Subdivision Hurunui District Council 5.4 & 9.4 Water, Wastewater & Stormwater 5.4 & 8.4 Transport Waimakariri District Council 32. Subdivision Christchurch City Council 11.8 & 8.3.2 - Water, Wastewater & Stormwater 7.4.2 & 8.3.2 - Transport Selwyn District Council Part C Section 12 Living Zone Rules - Subdivision and Section 24 Business Zone Rules – Subdivision Roading and utility rules within sections 5, 6, 17 and 18 Roading requirements detailed in Appendix 13 Ashburton District Council 9 - Subdivision Also refers to section 10 Transport Mackenzie District Council 13 - Subdivision, development and financial contribution rules Timaru District Council 6.3 Subdivision Also refer to section 6.7 Vehicle Access and Loading Waimate District Council 10 – Financial Contributions and Subdivision Waitaki District Council District Plan Section 14 - Subdivision, development and financial contribution rules 5
Observations Varying fit with District Plans Canterbury Councils - District Plan Alignment (2008) Kaikoura District Council Sub. Rev DP Util. (rolling) Huruni District Council E-Plan (2005) DP Rev Waimakariri District Council CoP CoP Util. DP Trans. Christchurch City Council IDS Selwyn District Council E-Plan CoP Sub. Ashburton District Council DP Util. Trans. (2004) Mackenzie District Council DP Rev (2005) Timaru District Council DP Sub. Rev Waimate District Council DP Waitaki District Council DP Rev Prior to July July July July July July July July July July July 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2008 Key: Rev Review Amendment. Sub. = Subdivision, Trans. = Transport, Util. = Utilities Engineering CoP 6
Observations Varying demand on provisions Christchurch Selwyn & Waimakariri Others Does one size fit all? 7
Observations Application/relevance of NZS4404 Adopted Adopted parts of it Adopted with amendments Referred to Requirements based on Which version? 9
Observations Inclusion and/or Referencing of Engineering Standards (RMA 1991) Engineering Standards can be incorporated into District Plans in a number of different ways. The Resource Management Act 1991 Schedule 1, Part 3 as follows covers incorporation of documents by reference in plans and proposed plans. 10
Observations Inclusion and/or Referencing of Engineering Standards (RMA 1991) 30 Incorporation of documents by reference in plans and proposed plans (3) Material incorporated by reference in a plan or proposed plan has legal effect as part of the plan or proposed plan. 31 Effect of amendments to, or replacement of, material incorporated by reference in plans and proposed plans 32 Proof of material incorporated by reference 33 Effect of expiry of material incorporated by reference (Resource Management Act 1991 Schedule 1, Part 3) 11
Observations Provision for utilities: National Planning Standards Model Provisions–Network Utilities addresses this Basis for utilities of district plans (including transportation) in future These provisions (whether standardised or not) should still be demonstrably aligned with the Objectives and Policies included in the District Plan 12
Observations The ugly bits Some things just don’t work Sometime the easy stuff is made more complex than it should be “The Council is …obstructive …unhelpful …inconsistent … “ 13
Observations The ugly bits - Basic issues Parking requirements Property access requirements Sight distances at new accesses Distances between accesses Distances between accesses and intersections Road, footpath and cycle path widths Right of way widths 14
Observations The ugly bits - Other Common Issues Design issues that are subject to variation between authorities/ interpretation Right of way/Access lot limits (i.e. how many properties can share access) Water and sewerage connection requirements for ‘leg in’ sections Use of rider mains or laterals Provision of other utilities Requirements for boundary adjustments 15
Observations Regional Approaches Agreement up front Ongoing commitment to ‘stay together’ Sound governance 16
Observations National Approaches Example: One Network Road Classification Requires assessment of transportation planning – resource management planning interface 17
Observations The Users’ Perspective Clarity – the requirements should be unambiguous; not reliant on staff interpretation Consistent – the documentation should be aligned and not open to variation from one document (or part of) to another Concise – the document need not be overly wordy and the requirements lost in narrative or explanation Comparable – the requirements for the same issue (e.g. vehicle accessway) should not vary between authorities 18
Recommendations (1-3) The go-forward 1. Limit detail in District Plans to the rules that are necessary in terms of the objectives and policies stated. 2. Support the development of the National Planning Standards/Model Provisions – Network Utilities to a point where they are approved, and integrate these into the next DPR/Plan Change. 3. Ensure any subdivision requirements are separated from these provisions. 19
Recommendations (4-6) 4. Ascertain if NZS4404:2010 is a preferred base document for smaller authorities/small developments; clarify and refine for efficient use if required. 5. Common basic issues and common design issues – consider an agreed standard approach 6. Large and Complex Developments - smaller authorities could use the CCC IDS as a guide/means of compliance 20
The Challenges of Rapid Growth Theme: Rapid Development Growth Get it right from the start Do your Infrastructure Strategy and District Plan align? 21
The Challenges of Rapid Growth Theme: Rapid Development Growth Avoid ambiguity & “interpretation” issues Don’t overcook it Seriously consider the benefits of collaborative approaches Are we building the future the community wants? 22
End piece Contact details: grant@waugh.nz www.waughinfrastructure.com Team Working Bee – NZ Raptor Trust (NZ Harrier Hawks, Falcons, and Owls) 23
You can also read