Intermittent fasting in type 2 diabetes: from fundamental science to clinical applications

Page created by Randall Benson
 
CONTINUE READING
Intermittent fasting in type 2 diabetes: from fundamental science to clinical applications
European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences                               2023; 27: 333-351

Intermittent fasting in type 2 diabetes: from
fundamental science to clinical applications
L. CHEN1, F.-Y. TIAN1, X.-H. HU2, J.-W. WU1, W.-D. XU1, Q. HUANG3
1
 First School of Clinical Medicine, 2Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical
 University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
3
  Department of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University.
 Hangzhou, China

Lan Chen, Fengyuan Tian and Xinhao Hu share first authorship

Abstract. – Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)              diabetes in people aged 20-79 years is estimated
is a huge challenge for global public health sys-        at 10.5% (536.6 million) in 2021, rising to 12.2%
tems. Currently, healthcare policies advocate            (783.2 million) by 20453. However, current T2DM
the prevention of the onset and progression of           medications without lifestyle interventions lack
T2DM by improving individual lifestyles. The in-
creasing benefits of intermittent fasting (IF) as a      comprehensiveness in glycemic control4. In light
dietary intervention have been elucidated. How-          of the limitations of available antidiabetic agents,
ever, the beneficial effects of IF in T2DM re-           alternative treatments are highly recommended.
main inconclusive. We demonstrated the phys-             In recent years, the dietary intervention has be-
iological mechanisms underlying the positive             come a hot topic of research.
effects of IF in T2DM. IF could trigger metabol-            Intermittent fasting (IF) is a dietary pattern
ic transformation to improve systemic metabo-            involving energy restriction and time-restricted
lism and induce tissue-specific metabolic adap-
tations through alterations in the gut microbio-
                                                         fasting5. Alternative invention of energy intake
ta, adipose tissue remodeling, correction of cir-        offers better compliance than continuous energy
cadian rhythm disturbances, and increased au-            restriction (CER)6. Studies5,7,8 in animals and hu-
tophagy in peripheral tissues. The efficacy and          mans have shown that IF has a modulating func-
safety of IF regimens in clinical applications car-      tion in a variety of chronic diseases, including
ry a risk of hypoglycemia and require monitoring         obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, multiple
of blood glucose and timely adjustment of med-           sclerosis, neurodegenerative diseases of the brain,
ications. However, there is limited evidence of a        and cancer.
positive effect of IF in weight loss and improve-
ment of glycemic variables. Overall, IF serves
                                                            In addition to a simple calorie restriction (CR),
as a promising therapeutic target for T2DM and           IF has unique and specific properties, which
needs to be established by a large randomized            could trigger systemic metabolic improvements
controlled trial.                                        through metabolic transformation and induce
                                                         tissue-specific metabolic adaptations including
Key Words:                                               changes in the gut microbiome, adipose tissue
   Intermittent fasting (IF), Type 2 diabetes mellitus   remodeling, correction of circadian rhythm dis-
(T2DM), Metabolic transformation, Gut microbiota,
                                                         turbances, and increased autophagy in peripheral
Adipose tissue, Circadian biology, Autophagy.
                                                         tissues. This review briefly elucidates the posi-
                                                         tive effects of IF on T2DM in these five aspects.
                                                         Furthermore, IF may encourage weight reduction
                  Introduction                           to avoid different diabetes risk factors, including
                                                         lower fasting glucose and fasting insulin and
   The incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabe-         improved insulin sensitivity9. Here, we summa-
tes mellitus (T2DM) continue to rise globally1.          rized the benefits of IF regimens and explored the
T2DM is characterized by hyperglycemia due               efficacy and side effects of IF in prediabetes and
to insulin resistance (IR) or insufficient insu-         T2DM. We intended to provide several sugges-
lin secretion2. International Diabetes Federation        tions for future research and clinical applications
(IDF) estimates that the global prevalence of            of IF.

Corresponding Author: Qi Huang, MD; e-mail: 19843012@zcmu.edu.cn                                       333
L. Chen, F.-Y. Tian, X.-H. Hu, J.-W. Wu, W.-D. Xu, Q. Huang

       Types of Intermittent Fasting                   nificantly higher blood ketone levels, especially
                                                       β-hydroxybutyric acid18. Elevated β-hydroxybu-
   There are various models of intermittent fast-      tyrate further raises increased autophagy and
ing and three of them have been widely used            reduces oxidative stress (Figure 1)19. On the oth-
in clinical practice: alternate daytime fasting        er hand, IF-induced metabolic transformation
(ADF), IF 5:2 (two days of fasting per week), and      also mediates significant alterations in several
time-restricted eating (TRE)10.                        metabolic pathways. These include a decrease
   ADF consists of a feeding day and a fasting         in rapamycin (mTOR) activity and stimula-
day11. Individuals can consume food and beverag-       tion of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)
es without restriction during feeding days and no      (Figure 1)20. Reduced glucose and amino acid
caloric intake during fasting days. Modified ADF       levels during fasting lead to reduced mTOR
involves individuals consuming typically 20-           pathway activity, and inhibition of mTOR ac-
25% (500-800 kcal) of their energy requirement         tivity decreases protein synthesis and stimu-
during fasting days12. The IF 5:2 comprises two        lates increased autophagy and mitochondrial
stages embodying two fasting days (500-1,000           synthesis21. Fasting affects bioenergetic sensors,
kcal per day) and five other days of free feeding13.   especially AMPK, which is activated to pro-
The two restriction days can be consecutive or         mote increased autophagy, thereby eliminating
nonconsecutive. TRE has a time requirement for         damaged proteins and organelles from the body
the diet, i.e., limiting eating to a specific number   and improving mitochondrial function 20. These
of hours per day (usually 4 to 8 hours) and ab-        changes can promote metabolic homeostasis and
staining from water or zero-calorie beverages for      play a role in maintaining glucose homeostasis
the rest of the day14.                                 and improving insulin sensitivity19.
   Other forms of fasting are less common, such
as B2 and 4:3 IF. In the B2 program, the regime
consists of two meals per day, with breakfast                         Gut Microbiota
from 6 am to 10 am and lunch from 12 pm to
4 pm15. 4:3 IF is similar to IF 5:2, except for an        The composition of the gut microbiota is re-
extra day of fasting per week16.                       modeled in response to changes in individual
                                                       dietary habits and nutritional status22. IF leads
                                                       to altered cellular responses, shifting cells from
Physiological Mechanisms Associated                    glucose-dependent to using ketone body carbon
      with Intermittent Fasting                        (KBC), thereby suppressing inflammation and
                                                       altering the gut microbiota23,24. Gut microbiota
   The potential mechanisms for improving              dominates host health and the pathogenesis of
T2DM through IF are complex and can be broad-          metabolic diseases such as obesity and diabe-
ly summarized as follows: metabolic transforma-        tes25-30. The mechanism regulates systemic me-
tion, alterations in the gut microbiota, adipose       tabolism by improving inflammation and reduc-
tissue remodeling, improved circadian rhythms,         ing intestinal permeability31.
and increased autophagy. These alterations can            The earliest epidemiology of obesity and
induce tissue-specific metabolic adaptations that      T2DM-related inflammation dates back to the
allow for remission or even cure of T2DM. We           1960s32,33. Many studies34,35 on T2DM and obe-
summarize the limited evidence and describe            sity have demonstrated a rise in circulating in-
these alterations in detail from animal experi-        flammatory markers. Low-grade inflammation
ments as well as molecular mechanisms.                 is a vital determinant of obesity and diabetes36.
                                                       Inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis
                                                       factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β)
        Metabolic Transformation                       undermine insulin sensitivity and poor glucose
                                                       tolerance and mediate IR37-40. Related studies41
   In the fasting state, triglycerides (TG) are        have shown that obesity and diabetes share an
converted to fatty acids and glycerol through          important common feature, namely, an increased
lipodieresis. The liver then converts fatty acids      proportion of the thick-walled phylum/mycobac-
to ketone bodies, which provide energy to tis-         terial phylum. A high-fat diet (HFD) can induce
sues in various parts of the body17. Animals and       changes in the gut microbiota by promoting the
humans using fasting or IF protocols had sig-          development of Gram-negative bacteria, which

 334
Intermittent fasting in type 2 diabetes: from fundamental science to clinical applications

Figure 1. Physiological mechanisms associated with intermittent fasting. Brown to the beige coloration of AT adipose tissue
due to elevated acetate and lactate and VEGF cycling. Beige adiposity increases the expression of UCP1, which leads to
improved metabolism by promoting the oxidative metabolism of glucose and fat coupled to ATP synthesis. At the same time, a
decrease in TNF-α promoted an increase in IRS-1 and GLUT4 and the polarization of macrophage M2. These changes improve
insulin resistance and AT inflammation, resulting in improved metabolism. On the other hand, TG increases due to IF, and TG
is broken down into ketone bodies in the liver. Ketone bodies increase autophagy in the organism through a decrease in mTOR
activity and activation of AMPK. Elevated HMGB and Sirt-1 similarly increase autophagy. Increased autophagy further
improves metabolism. IF alters the composition of the gut microbiota, thereby increasing the levels of IL-10, IL-11 and SCFA.
IL-10 and IL-22 balance the body’s metabolism by improving IR and inflammation, respectively. SCFA, on the other hand,
improves body metabolism by reducing appetite and intestinal permeability. Finally, AT, gut microbiota and liver influence
the local peripheral clock and regulate the circadian system together with the central clock, thus reducing IR and correcting
metabolic disturbances. IF: intermittent fasting; HMGB: high mobility group box 1; Sirt-1: sirtuin-1; TNF-α: tumor necrosis
factor-alpha; IRS-1: insulin receptor substrate 1; GLUT4: glucose transporter protein type 4; VEGF: vascular endothelial
growth factor; TG: triglycerides; ATP: adenosine triphosphate; mTOR: rapamycin; AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; IR:
insulin resistance; SCFA: short-chain fatty acid; UCP1: uncoupling protein 1; IL: interleukin.

leads to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) production to                  by Lactobacillus paracasei and Faecalibacterium
trigger systemic inflammation42. Furthermore,                    prausnitzii can inhibit the activity of nuclear fac-
changes in the gut microbiota brought on by IF                   tor-κB (NF-κB)52,53.
may lessen T2DM’s inflammatory symptoms43-45.                       On the other hand, IF treatment significantly
For example, interleukin-10 (IL-10) induced by                   increased the levels of the thick-walled phylum
Roseburia guts, Bacteroides fragilis, Akkerman-                  while reducing most other phyla and elevating
sia muciniphila, Lactobacillus Plantarum, and                    short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production, com-
Lactobacillus casei improves glucose metabolism                  pared to ad libitum-fed control animals54. SCFAs
and prevents aging-related IR (Figure 1)46-48. En-               are the product of gut microbiota fermentation
terobacteriaceae can restore insulin sensitivity                 of indigestible foods55. The key factor in mu-
and induce transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)                  cin production (increased mucin expression) and
to suppress intestinal inflammation by increasing                tight junction integrity preservation, SCFAs are
interleukin-22 (IL-22) production (Figure 1)49-                  crucial for limiting increasing intestinal permea-
51
  . The anti-inflammatory molecules produced                     bility (Figure 1). A distinctive feature of T2DM is

                                                                                                                       335
L. Chen, F.-Y. Tian, X.-H. Hu, J.-W. Wu, W.-D. Xu, Q. Huang

the increase in intestinal permeability that leads     the adipose vascular endothelial growth factor
to the transfer of LPS and microbial metabolites       (VEGF) cycle and thus increased WAT browning
into the bloodstream, which in turn causes IR          (Figure 1). Li et al73 demonstrated that IF induces
and metabolic endotoxemia56,57. Entering circu-        inguinal WAT by altering the abundance of intes-
lating LPS interacts with LPS-binding proteins         tinal microbiota and promoting the production of
and membrane-bound cluster of differentiation 14       acetate and lactate. The specific mechanism by
(CD14) receptors. Their complexes interact with        which IF induces adipose browning needs to be
toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) to influence inflam-       further investigated.
matory signals and insulin signaling pathways58.          IF ameliorates inflammation in adipose tissue,
Meanwhile, SCFAs can control energy intake             and some studies79 have shown that IF reduces
through the gut-brain axis59. The gut-derived sa-      pro-inflammatory markers (e.g., macrophages,
tiety hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)         IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, etc.) in subcutaneous white
and peptide YY (PYY) are mainly secreted by            adipose tissue (sWAT) of diet-induced obese
enteroendocrine L cells, with the highest density      (DOI) mice. AT inflammation mediated by ad-
in the ileal and colonic epithelium60-63. SCFAs are    ipose macrophages and their secreted TNF-α
a major stimulator of GLP-1 production by endo-        is shown in Figure 180,81. There is evidence that
crine L cells64. GLP-1 regulates appetite through      TNF-α can inhibit the activity of peroxisome
its effects on opioid melanocortinogen (POMC)          proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) through
and neuropeptide Y (NPY) neurons in the arcuate        multiple pathways82. The classical pathway blocks
nucleus of satiety (ARC) and is known to inhibit       the binding of PPARγ to its downstream response
gastric emptying and gastric acid secretion (Fig-      elements by activating the NF-κB pathway83.
ure 1)65-67. Thus, there is also a link between GLP-   HFD-fed mice treated with PPARγ agonists dis-
1 and reduced hunger during IF68.                      play higher insulin sensitivity and an increase in
   Overall, IF-mediated changes in gut microbio-       the anti-inflammatory phenotype of M2 macro-
ta alleviate inflammation and maintain intestinal      phages84. In addition, circulating free fatty acid
permeability in T2DM. To improve the efficacy          (FFA) levels were increased due to the inhibition
of IF in T2DM, further robust preclinical and          of PPARγ downstream signaling85. And FFA can
clinical studies are needed to standardize the op-     promote the polarization of pro-inflammatory
timal regimen for IF.                                  phenotype M1 macrophages86. TNF-α knockout
                                                       mice avert HFD-induced IR and show lower FFA
                                                       levels87. In addition, TNF-α significantly down-
               Adipose Tissue                          regulates insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1)
                                                       and glucose transporter protein type 4 (GLUT4)
   IF can positively affect T2DM by remodeling         expression and inhibits AMPK activity (Figure
adipose tissue (AT), mainly by the browning of         1)88,89. Activated AMPK induces polarization of
white adipose tissue (WAT), increasing thermo-         M2 macrophages and inhibits IR (Figure 1)86,88,90.
genesis of brown adipose tissue, and reducing in-         Moreover, IF improves insulin sensitivity by
flammation (Figure 1)69-71. We briefly describe the    decreasing inflammatory collagen IV expression
improvement of AT browning and inflammation.           in visceral white adipose tissue (vWAT)91. Thus,
   It was found that IF-induced WAT browning           to further elucidate the specific mechanisms of IF
and beiging increased adipogenic thermogenesis         and adipose tissue remodeling numerous preclini-
and improved HFD-induced obesity and meta-             cal and clinical studies are needed.
bolic dysfunction72-75. AT browning and beiging
increase the expression of uncoupling protein 1
(UCP1), which improves insulin sensitivity by                       Circadian Biology
promoting the oxidative metabolism of glucose
and fat by uncoupling with adenosine triphos-             TRE can increase insulin sensitivity and pos-
phate (ATP) synthesis, resulting in heat produc-       itively affect systemic metabolic disorders by
tion and energy expenditure (Figure 1)76,77. IF-in-    altering the frequency of eating, correcting cir-
duced browning appears to be largely unrelated         cadian rhythm disturbances, and altering the ex-
to the classical differentiation stimuli β-adrener-    pression of biological clock genes. The circadian
gic receptor (β-AR) and fibroblast growth factor       biological system consists of a central brain clock
21 (FGF21)78. Kim et al72 found IF mice promote        in the supraoptic nucleus of the hypothalamus
selective activation of adipose macrophages via        and various peripheral tissue clocks (e.g., similar

 336
Intermittent fasting in type 2 diabetes: from fundamental science to clinical applications

clock oscillators found in peripheral tissues such     ders by regulating circadian rhythms needs to be
as the liver)92. The circadian system plays an im-     demonstrated by additional studies.
portant role in metabolic and energetic physiolog-
ical changes through behavioral interventions93,94.
Light information and feeding time (Zeitgebers)                   Improved Autophagy
are the main temporal cues92. According to the
circadian rhythm disruption hypothesis, synchro-          Autophagy, a process of self-degradation and
nization of feeding with the endogenous clock          cleanup by organisms, has been demonstrated to
can promote the homeostasis of the clock sys-          play a critical role in T2DM112,113. The recovery
tem95. Conversely, it can lead to misalignment         function of autophagy may be severely compro-
of temporal species rhythms, causing circadian         mised in mice on an HFD by IR and T2DM114,115.
rhythm disruption and promoting IR and T2DM            IF has been proven to restore autophagy, attenuate
development96.                                         the effects of metabolic diseases such as T2DM on
   Several clinical trials97-99 have confirmed that    autophagy, and maintain cellular rejuvenation116.
human glucose tolerance is higher in the morning       Similarly, autophagy suppression reduces the in-
than in the evening. Dysregulation of circadian        terventional impact of IF117. In a recent study118,
rhythms leads to a reduction in glucose tolerance      the light chain 3 (LC3)-II/LC3-1 ratio was higher
in humans100. Shift workers have an increased risk     in mice that followed a 4-month fasting inter-
of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)          vention, suggesting enhanced autophagy. On the
compared to people with normal sleep schedules101.     other hand, IF stimulates sirtuin-1 (Sirt-1) activity
The circadian rhythm of glucose tolerance in hu-       and enhances autophagy and serum high mobil-
mans is mediated primarily through the circadian       ity group box 1 (HMGB1) levels119. The role of
rhythm of systemic insulin sensitivity. The cen-       HMGB1 and Sirt-1 in the regulation of autopha-
tral clock plays a major role in systemic insulin      gy has been demonstrated120 in animals and cell
sensitivity through the hypothalamic connection        lines (Figure 1). Autophagy is essential for normal
between sleep/wake and food intake102. The local       β-cell function and survival, and regulation of au-
peripheral clock further finetunes systemic insulin    tophagy, rather than excessive autophagy, may be
sensitivity via the gut clock103, muscle clock104,     a possible mechanism to explain the beneficial ef-
adipose tissue clock105, liver clock106, and pancre-   fects of IF on β-cell function. However, the under-
atic clock (Figure 1)107. Among these, appropriate     lying molecular mechanisms remain unclear121-123.
management of eating behavior, a crucial compo-        IF can result in the remission of β-cell function
nent of rhythmic behavior, might enhance IR to         in T2DM124 and might improve metabolism by
some amount (Figure1)108. Significant changes in       increasing autophagy in humans (Figure 1)125,126.
peripheral clock gene expression levels in skeletal
muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) are
observed in obese women12. A 5-week randomized               Human Intervention Studies
crossover-controlled trial109 of 12 patients with
prediabetes found that TRE (6-h feeding period)           IF is a planned dietary intervention with inten-
improved insulin sensitivity and β-cell respon-        tionally prolonged fasting. The focus of research
siveness compared to 12-h feeding. Consistent          on IF is weight loss. We briefly review some
with this finding, after four days of TRE (6-h         trials conducted in recent years in obese patients
TRE from 8 am to 2 pm) in 11 obese patients, it        (without prediabetes and T2DM) using the three
was reported110 that TRE lowered fasting glucose       main IF regimens (ADF, IF 5:2 and TRE) (Table
and insulin, reduced 24-hour glucose fluctuations,     I). In addition, we summarize the results of stud-
altered biological clock gene expression, and may      ies with different IF regimens in patients with
also increase autophagy and have anti-aging ef-        abnormal glucose metabolism conditions (i.e.,
fects in humans. Notably, however, Lundell et          prediabetes and T2DM) (Table II).
al111 reported that TRE improved lipid and amino
acid rhythmicity but did not interfere with the        Results of Studies Using the IF Protocols
expression of the core clock. It is undeniable that    in Obese Patients (Without Prediabetes
time-restricted fasting has a positive impact on hu-   and T2DM)
man metabolism, which requires further research          The vast majority of IF outcomes reported
in more clinical applications. However, the precise    in randomized trials of obese patients are pri-
mechanism by which IF improves metabolic disor-        marily weight loss and improved body composi-

                                                                                                      337
L. Chen, F.-Y. Tian, X.-H. Hu, J.-W. Wu, W.-D. Xu, Q. Huang

Table I. Trials of IF in obese patients.

  Participants        Trial        Intervention        Body    Energy   Fat     Blood     LDL   HDL      TG   Fasting   Fasting   HOME-   HbA1c   Inflammation   Ref.
                     weeks            groups          weight   intake   mass   pressure                       glucose   insulin     IR
 N = 31, men and     8         ADF (500-kcal fast     ↓b       ↓ 25%    ↓b     NT         ∅     ∅        ∅    ∅         ∅         ∅       NT      ∅ CRP          127

 women, with                   day)
 overweight and
                               Exercise (endurance) ∅          ∅        ↓b     NT         ∅     ∅        ∅    ↓b        ∅         ∅       NT      ∅ CRP
 without T1DM
 or T2DM.                      ADF with exercise      ↓   b
                                                               ↓ 20%    ↓b
                                                                               NT         ∅     ∅        ∅    ∅         ∅         ∅       ∅       ∅ CRP
                               Control (ad libitum    ∅        ∅        ∅      NT         ∅     ∅        ∅    ∅         ∅         ∅       ∅       ∅ CRP
                               intake, no exercise)
 N = 31, men and     12        ADF (600-kcal fast     ↓a       ↓ 35%    ↓a     ∅ SBP      ∅     ↓a       ∅    ∅         ∅         ∅       ∅       NT             128

 women, with                   day)
 overweight and                                                                ↓ DBPa
 without T1DM
 or T2DM.
 N= 37, men and      8         ADF (3 nonconsec-      ↓b       ↓ 30%    ∅      NT         NT    NT       NT   ∅         ↓b        ↓b      NT      NT             12

 women, with                   utive days per week
 overweight and                30% energy require-
 without T1DM                  ments 100% energy
 or T2DM.                      intake on feasting
                               day)
                               ADF (3 nonconsec-      ∅        ∅        ∅      NT         NT    NT       NT   ∅         ∅         ∅       NT      NT
                               utive days per week
                               30% energy require-
                               ments 145% energy
                               intake on feasting
                               day)
 N = 112, men    46            5:2: Fast day (500     ↓b       ↓ 25%    ↓b     ∅          ∅     ∅        ∅    ∅         ∅         ∅       NT      ↓ sCD40Lb      13

 and women, with               kcal)
 overweight and                                                                                                                                   ∅ IL-6
 with MS.                      Feast day (ad libi-
                               tum)                                                                                                               ∅ TNF-α
                               Control (ad libitum)   ∅        ∅        ∅      ∅          ∅     ∅        ∅    ∅         ∅         ∅       NT      ∅ sCD40Lb

                                                                                                                                                  ∅ IL-6

                                                                                                                                                  ∅ TNF-α
                                                                                                                                                              Continued

 338
Intermittent fasting in type 2 diabetes: from fundamental science to clinical applications

Table I (Continued). Trials of IF in obese patients.

     Participants      Trial       Intervention          Body      Energy       Fat       Blood        LDL      HDL     TG     Fasting     Fasting     HOME-       HbA1c       Inflammation       Ref.
                      weeks           groups            weight     intake       mass     pressure                              glucose     insulin       IR
    N = 250, men      52       5:2: Fast day (wom-      ∅          ↓ 26%       ∅         ∅            ∅        ∅        ∅      ∅           ∅           ∅           ∅          ∅ CRP               129

    and women,                 en 500 kcal, men
    overweight and             600 kcal)
    without T1DM
    or T2DM.                   Feast day (ad libi-
                               tum)
                               Mediterranean            ∅          ↓ 20%       ∅         ∅            ∅        ∅        ∅      ∅           ∅           ∅           ↓b         ∅ CRP
                               Paleo                    ∅          ↓ 20%       ∅         ∅            ∅        ∅        ∅      ∅           ∅           ∅           ∅          ∅ CRP
    N = 121, wom-     52       5:2: Fast day (500       ↓a
                                                                   ↓ 34%       ∅         NT           NT       NT       NT     ∅           ∅           ∅           ∅          NT                  130

    en only, with              kcal)
    overweight and
    without T1DM               Feast day (ad libi-
    or T2DM.                   tum)
                               Calorie restriction      ↓a         ↓ 25%       ∅         NT           NT       NT       NT     ∅           ∅           ∅           ∅          NT
                               (1,500 kcal per day)
    N = 58, men and   8        4-h TRE (3-7 pm)         ↓b         ↓ 30%       ↓b        ∅            ∅        ∅        ∅      ∅           ↓b          ↓b          ∅          ∅ IL-6              131

    women, with
    overweight and                                                                                                                                                            ∅ TNF-α
    without T1DM               6-h TRE (1-7 pm)         ↓b
                                                                   ↓ 30%       ↓b
                                                                                         ∅            ∅        ∅        ∅      ∅           ↓b
                                                                                                                                                       ↓b
                                                                                                                                                                   ∅          ∅ IL-6
    or T2DM.
                                                                                                                                                                              ∅ TNF-α
                               Control (no meal         ∅          ∅           ∅         ∅            ∅        ∅        ∅      ∅           ∅           ∅           ∅          ∅ IL-6
                               timing restrictions)
                                                                                                                                                                              ∅ TNF-α
    N = 58, men and   12       8-h TRE (12-8 pm)        ∅          NT          ∅         ∅            ∅        ∅        ∅      ∅           ∅           ∅           ∅          NT                  132

    women, with
    overweight and             Control (no meal         ∅          NT          ∅         ∅            ∅        ∅        ∅      ∅           ∅           ∅           ∅          NT
    without T1DM               timing restrictions)
    or T2DM.
    N = 19, men and   12       10-h TRE (self-se-       ↓a         ↓ 10%       ↓a        ↓ SBPa       ↓a       ∅        ∅      ∅           ∅           ∅           ∅          ∅ ∅ CRP             133

    women, over-               lect)
    weight with MS.                                                                      ↓ DBPa
    N = 20, men and   12       8-h TRE (self-select) ↓b            NT          ∅         ∅            ∅        ∅        ∅      ∅           ∅           ∅           ∅          NT                  134

    women, with
                               Control (no meal         ∅          NT          ∅         ∅            ∅        ∅        ∅      ∅           ∅           ∅           ∅          NT
    overweight and
                               timing restrictions)
    without T1DM
    or T2DM.
a
 p < 0.05, significantly different from baseline (within-group effect). bp < 0.05, significantly different from the control or calorie-restricted group (between-group effect). When the control group is
present, only significant changes versus control are reported. ∅, nonsignificant change; ADF, alternate-day fasting; CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c;
HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; IL, interleukin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MS, metabolic syndrome;
NT, not tested (parameter not measured); ND, data not disclosed; SBP, systolic blood pressure; sCD40L, soluble CD40 ligand; TG, triglyceride; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TRE, time-restricted
eating; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; ↓, decrease in the indicated parameter; ↑, increase in the indicated parameter.

                                                                                                                                                                                                   339
L. Chen, F.-Y. Tian, X.-H. Hu, J.-W. Wu, W.-D. Xu, Q. Huang

Table II. Trials of IF in prediabetes and T2DM patients.

  Participants      Trial     Intervention groups           Body      Energy Fat   Blood        LDL   HDL TG    Fasting   Fasting   HOME-IR   HbA1c   Inflammation   Ref.
                   weeks                                   weight     intake mass pressure                      glucose   insulin
 N = 8, men only, 5          6-h TRE (8 am-2 pm)           ∅          ∅        NT      ↓ SBPb   ∅     ∅    ↑b   ∅         ↓b        ↓b        NT      ∅ CRP          109

 overweight with                                                                       ↓ DBPb                                                         ∅ IL-6
 prediabetes.
                             Control (12-h eating          ∅          ∅        NT      ∅        ∅     ∅    ∅    ∅         ∅         ∅         NT      ∅ CRP
                             window)                                                                                                                  ∅ IL-6
 N = 26, men     12          5:2: Fast day (women 600 ↓a              ↓ 24%    ↓a      NT       ∅     ∅    ∅    ∅         ∅         NT        ↓a      ∅ TNF-α        151

 and women,                  kcal, men 650 kcal)                                                                                                      ∅ IL-6
 overweight with             Feast day (ad libitum)
 prediabetes.
                             5:2: Fast day (women 600 ↓a              ↓ 25%    ↓a      NT       ∅     ∅    ∅    ∅         ∅         NT        ↓a      ∅ TNF-α
                             kcal, men 650 kcal)                                                                                                      ∅ IL-6
                             Feast day (ad libitum)
                             Lacticaseibacillus rham-
                             nosus probiotic
 N = 97, men     52          5:2: Fast day (500 kcal)      ↓a         NT       ↓a      NT       ↓a    ↓a   ↓a   ↓a        ↓a        NT        ↓a      NT             152

 and women,                  Feast day (ad libitum)
 with overweight
 and
 T2DM.
                             CR (1,500 kcal/day)           ↓a         NT       ↓a      NT       ↓a    ↓a   ↓a   ↓a        ↓a        NT        ↓a      NT
 N = 51, men     12          5:2: Fast day (400-600        ↓   a
                                                                      NT       ↓   a
                                                                                       NT       NT    NT   NT   NT        NT        NT        ↓   a
                                                                                                                                                      NT             153

 and women,                  kcal)
 with overweight             Feast day (ad libitum)
 and T2DM.
                             CR (1,200-1,500 kcal/         ↓a         NT       ↓a      NT       NT    NT   NT   NT        NT        NT        ↓a      NT
                             day)

                                                                                                                                                                Continued
 340
Intermittent fasting in type 2 diabetes: from fundamental science to clinical applications

Table II (Continued). Trials of IF in prediabetes and T2DM patients.

  Participants       Trial     Intervention groups           Body      Energy Fat   Blood               LDL    HDL TG        Fasting      Fasting     HOME-IR       HbA1c      Inflammation       Ref.
                    weeks                                   weight     intake mass pressure                                  glucose      insulin
 N = 37, men        12        5:2: Consecutive Fast day ↓a             ↓ ND       ∅        ∅           ∅       ∅       ∅     ↓a          NT           NT            ↓a         NT                 154

 and women,                   (500-600 kcal)
 with T2DM.                    Feast day (ad libitum)
                              5:2: Non-consecutive         ↓a          ↓ ND       ∅        ∅           ↑b      ∅       ∅     ↓a          NT           NT            ↓a         NT
                              Fast day (500-600 kcal)
                               Feast day (ad libitum)
 n = 37, men and 2            4-6-h TRE (8 am-2 pm)        ↓a          ↓ 18%      NT       ∅           NT      NT      NT    ND          ND           ∅             NT         ∅ CRP              155

 women, with
 T2DM.
 n = 32, men and 1            Buchinger (300 kcal/day      ↓b          NT         NT       ↓ SBPb      ∅       ∅       ∅     ∅           ∅            ∅             ∅          NT                 156

 women, with     Anal-        liquid diet)                                                 ↓ DBPb
 MS and T2DM. ysis            Followed by advice for
                 after 4      the Mediterranean diet
                 months
                              Control (advice about the    ∅           NT         NT       ∅           ∅       ∅       ∅     ∅           ∅            ∅             ∅          NT
                              Mediterranean diet)
 n = 54, men and 12           B2 (500 kcal/day 2 meals     ↓b          NT         NT       NT          ∅       ∅       ∅     ↓b          ∅            NT            ∅          NT                 15

 women, with                  per day, breakfast and
 overweight and               lunch only)
 T2DM.
                              A6 (500 kcal/day 6 meals     ∅           NT         NT       NT          ∅       ∅       ∅     ∅           ∅            NT            ∅          NT
                              per day)
 n = 51, men        12        IER (1,400-1,700 kcal/       ∅           NT         ∅        NT          ∅       ∅       ∅     NT          NT           NT            ∅          NT                 16

 only, with                   day)
 overweight and
 T2DM.
                              PPM (1,400-1,700 kcal/       ∅           NT         ∅        NT          ∅       ∅       ∅     NT          NT           NT            ∅          NT
                              day)

a
 p < 0.05, significantly different from baseline (within-group effect). bp < 0.05, significantly different from the control or calorie-restricted group (between-group effect). When the control group is
present, only significant changes versus control are reported. ∅, nonsignificant change; ADF, alternate-day fasting; CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c;
HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; IER, intermittent energy restriction; IL, interleukin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein choles-
terol; MS, Metabolic Syndrome; NT, not tested (parameter not measured); ND, data not disclosed; PPM, proportioned meals; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SSM, self-selected meals; TG, triglyceride;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TRE, time-restricted eating; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; ↓, decrease in the indicated parameter; ↑, increase in the indicated parameter.

                                                                                                                                                                                                   341
L. Chen, F.-Y. Tian, X.-H. Hu, J.-W. Wu, W.-D. Xu, Q. Huang

tion12,13,127-134. Compared to TRE131-134, ADF12,127,128    factors, such as lowering blood pressure, con-
and IF 5:213,129,130 have more clinically significant       trolling blood lipids, decreasing inflammation,
weight loss effects, suggesting that TRE is safe            and reducing oxidative stress13,129,133.
and well-tolerated. It is relatively easy to accept            In conclusion, IF protocols have a positive effect
in elderly or frail patients and there are no weight        on obesity. Educational activities and follow-up for
restrictions135. IF failed to help subjects retain a        patients to maintain an IF diet are necessary.
leaner mass compared to CER130. However, several
studies136-138 that combined TRE with resistance            Results of Studies Using the IF Protocols
training found an increase in fat-free mass (FFM),          in Prediabetes Patients
an increase in skeletal muscle, and an improvement             The use of IF procedures in individuals with
in muscle performance along with weight loss.               prediabetes have been positively impacted by re-
Perhaps this is a direction for future research. The        cent research. To date, two studies109,151 have evalu-
main reason for weight loss in the subjects is a            ated the impact of IF regimens on individuals with
reduction in energy intake. No retaliatory eating           prediabetes. Sutton et al109 conducted a 5-week
was placed while receiving IF therapy, and all IF           trial of TFR (6-h TRE from 8 am to 2 pm) in 8
treatments lowered calorie consumption by more              prediabetic male subjects. The results found that
than 10%13. According to research139, IF 5:2 had a          the subjects decreased fasting insulin and blood
high protein, moderate fat, low carbohydrate, and           pressure, improved insulin sensitivity and β-cell
low fiber consumption composition in terms of diet          responsiveness, and reduced oxidative stress in
quality. The quality of the diet was consistent with        the absence of weight loss, explaining that IF has
what subjects needed during the weight-loss period.         benefits which are independent of weight loss.
Overall, IF is a beneficial way of weight loss.             Tay et al151 obtained similar positive results with
   As part of the IF trials, blood glucose mea-             a 12-week dietary intervention of IF 5:2 (fasting
surements are frequently evaluated. Fasting glu-            2 days per week, 600 kcal per day) in 33 subjects
cose usually remains constant during ADF, IF                with obesity and prediabetes. Subjects had reduced
5:2, and TRE. In normoglycemic subjects, cir-               energy intake, weight loss, less waist circumfer-
culating glucose levels are maintained at steady            ence, and lower HbaA1c. Subjects complied very
levels, and fasting insulin levels are reduced              well in both trials. However, there was no signif-
from baseline in several trials12,128,130,131,140,141. In   icant decrease in fasting glucose, which may be
contrast to those whose baseline insulin lev-               related to the short duration of trials. Additionally,
els were within the normal range, this impact               these two trials109,151 lack awareness of fluctuations
was seen more often in people with increased                without glucose monitoring during IF.
baseline insulin levels (>13 uIU/ml)131. Elevated
fasting insulin levels are a diagnostic criterion           Results of Studies Using the IF Protocols
for IR142, suggesting that IF has a better impact           in T2DM Patients
on reducing fasting insulin in insulin-resistant               Positive outcomes with IF regimens in T2DM
patients, which may be related to the metabolic             patients have been documented15,16,152-156. The most
transformation mechanism17. The effect of IF                used IF regime for T2DM is IF 5:2. A 52-week IF
on insulin sensitivity varies widely, with some             5:2 trial of 137 patients with both obesity and
studies showing improvement12,130,131,141, but most         T2DM yielded positive results152. Post-interven-
had no effect43,128,132,134,139, 143-145. Some studies      tion studies153 showed that weight loss reduced
have reported that prolonged fasting leads to               HbA1c levels and improved fasting glucose and
impaired insulin response146,147, while others              lipid levels, which was consistent with the con-
have shown that IF140 has a good facilitative               tinuous energy restriction (CER) group. The re-
function on insulin sensitivity148,149. In animal           sults are coherent with the prior trial using IF
studies150, IF has been found to improve islet              5:2. Both trials152,153, also performed a medication
pancreatic β-cell quality by increasing β-cell              effectiveness score (MES), which decreased over
progenitor cell neurogenin 3 (Ngn3) expression              time indicating that IF would be beneficial for
and promoting β-cell neogenesis. It requires                T2DM patients in the decrease of the dose of dia-
more in-depth research in more trials. In those             betes medications. Additionally, subjects showed
without T2DM, the majority of investigations on             better adherence in the IF group than in the CER
glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) have shown                  group152. At the end of the 52-week intervention,
no change128,131,132,134. Additionally, IF is advanta-      Carter et al157 conducted a 12-month follow-up
geous for lowering other metabolic disease risk             intervention and found that subjects had a 0.3%

 342
Intermittent fasting in type 2 diabetes: from fundamental science to clinical applications

increase in HbA1c levels from the preinterven-         glycemic parameters and partial reductions in
tion baseline and a 33% weight recovery from           medication intake. IF could improve patient mo-
pre-intervention baseline, suggesting that sus-        tivation and compliance and reduce medication
tained intervention and dietary support are need-      side effects. As no severe hypoglycemic events
ed to maintain positive outcomes. Corley et al154      and other adverse events have been reported, IF
conducted a 12-week trial of IF 5:2 (continuous or     can be considered a relatively safe dietary inter-
noncontinuous fasting) in 37 patients with T2DM        vention for T2DM patients.
and obesity. The results showed a reduction in
overall energy intake, weight loss, lower levels of
fasting glucose and HbA1c, and improved quality             Safety of Intermittent Fasting
of life in the subjects. Meanwhile, no difference
in outcomes between continuous or discontinu-             The safety of intermittent fasting has been ques-
ous fasting is observed. There was a two-fold in-      tioned. Therefore, we tried to find little evidence
crease in the risk of hypoglycemic events during       for the adverse effects of IF regimens. Fasting is
fasting, but no serious hypoglycemic events oc-        barely elite with any long-term gastrointestinal
curred. Therefore, IF 5:2 is feasible to comply        adverse effects such as abdominal pain, diarrhea,
with compliance in patients with T2DM, espe-           nausea, vomiting, or halitosis131. A reduction in
cially in patients who are diet-controlled and not     energy intake was observed without binge eating
taking sulfonylureas and insulin.                      and other eating disorder symptoms. Psychological
   Additionally, the interventions for IF are var-     disorders such as depressive mood or manic mood
ied. Subjects with T2DM who fasted 18-20 hours         are not observed yet160,161. Moreover, there is no
per day for 2 weeks of metformin intervention          clear evidence11,145 of clinically meaningful effects
experienced weight loss and reduced fasting and        on thyroid hormones or reproductive hormones.
postprandial glucose levels155. Postprandial glu-         Common adverse effects of IF are gout, muscle
cose variability, a major marker of glycemic           wasting, and the risk of hypoglycemia. Prolonged
control, was also reduced158. Fifty-four patients      fasting inhibits uric acid excretion, which leads to
with T2DM underwent a 12-week intervention             a rapid increase in serum uric acid162. IF usually
comparing A6 (three large and three small meals        leads to a decrease in overall energy intake and a
per day) vs. B2 (breakfast and lunch) regimen          deficit in overall protein intake, which may lead
with the same daily energy restriction in both         to muscle atrophy163. However, other studies136-138
groups. Eating only breakfast and lunch favors         have combined exercise with IF and achieved
weight loss, liver fat content, fasting glucose,       successful FFM maintenance. IF can avoid hy-
C-peptide, glucagon levels, and oral glucose in-       poglycemic events in normoglycemic subjects,
sulin sensitivity (OGIS). These regimens improve       with the main risk being in patients with T2DM.
insulin sensitivity and β-cell function. Mean-         Despite the reduced dose of diabetes medications,
while, the frequency and timing of eating are          fasting increases the incidence of hypoglycemia.
as important as energy restrictions. After four        Therefore, T2DM patients require close physician
months of the Buchinger diet plan intervention         monitoring during intermittent fasting.
(300 kcal per day via liquid intake only, followed        In conclusion, IF is a safe dietary intervention
by gradual reintroduction of solid food), subjects     option and requires robust coordination with the
showed weight loss, lower HbA1c levels, lower          clinician. However, the safety of intermittent
blood pressure, and improved quality of life156.       fasting remains inconclusive attributed to the
The results of the 12-week 4:3 IF (1,000 kcal per      lack of large randomized controlled trials to test
day for 4 consecutive days per week, with the          the long-term efficacy and side effects of IF in
remaining 3 days eating ad libitum) were similar       patients with well-defined conditions such as
to the above results, reducing triglyceride levels.    metabolic syndrome or mood disorders.
It is worth noting that none of the above dietary
interventions reported severe adverse effects.
   In conclusion, IF, in any form, leads to signifi-         Clinical Implementation
cant weight loss and reduction in the whole body       Considerations for Patients with T2DM
and visceral fat15,16,152-156, and both weight and
visceral fat gain are associated with an increased       The clinical implementation of IF in patients
risk of T2DM159. Since IF intervention, patients       with T2DM requires appropriate medical man-
with T2DM have experienced improvements in             agement. Regular glucose monitoring in the

                                                                                                      343
L. Chen, F.-Y. Tian, X.-H. Hu, J.-W. Wu, W.-D. Xu, Q. Huang

fasting state, two hours before and after each
                                                               Funding
meal and at bedtime on day 7 is recommended. If                This paper is funded by Zhejiang Traditional Chinese Med-
necessary, anti-diabetic medications are reduced               icine Science and Technology Plan (ZZYJ-WTRW-2018-01,
according to physician recommendations to avoid                2020ZZ009) and the national key research and development
fasting hypoglycemia, such as sulfonamides and                 plan “Active Health and Aging Technology Response” key
insulin139,164. The IF intervention should be suspend-         project (2018YFC200200).
ed immediately when a severe hypoglycemic event
occurs. Because of the potential for excessive fluid
intake (e.g., water and tea) on fasting days, diuretics
and SGLT-2 medications may need to be reduced or                                   References
discontinued to reduce the risk of dehydration and
hypotension. The specific medication regimen also               1) Chatterjee S, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Type 2 diabe-
relies on the clinical experience of the endocrinolo-              tes. Lancet 2017; 389: 2239-2251.
gist due to the lack of clinical data. Physicians are           2) Ghislain J, Poitout V. Targeting lipid GPCRs to
                                                                   treat type 2 diabetes mellitus-progress and chal-
advised to work individually with patients on a one-               lenges. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2021; 17: 162-175.
to-one basis 24/7 to minimize the risk of hypogly-
                                                                3) Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M,
cemia. Patients are also advised not to adjust their               Ogurtsova K, Duncan BB, Stein C, Basit A, Chan
medications privately without physician advice164.                 JCN, Mbanya JC, Pavkov ME, Ramachanda-
                                                                   ran A, Wild SH, James S, Herman WH, Zhang P,
                                                                   Bommer C, Kuo S, Boyko EJ, Magliano DJ. IDF
                    Conclusions                                    Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level
                                                                   diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and pro-
                                                                   jections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022;
   According to a growing amount of research, IF                   183: 109119.
provides a wide variety of health advantages. Nu-               4) Siehler J, Blöchinger AK, Meier M, Lickert H. En-
merous studies have shown that the benefits of IF on               gineering islets from stem cells for advanced ther-
glucose homeostasis in T2DM patients and healthy                   apies of diabetes. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2021; 20:
individuals should be further investigated. Almost                 920-940.
all kinds of IF exhibited a weight-reduction impact             5) Clifton KK, Ma CX, Fontana L, Peterson LL. Inter-
in all population study participants. And in patients              mittent fasting in the prevention and treatment of
                                                                   cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 527-546.
with dysglycemia and obesity, IF showed the ability
                                                                6) Barnosky AR, Hoddy KK, Unterman TG, Varady
and potential to lower fasting insulin, HbA1c concen-              KA. Intermittent fasting vs daily calorie restriction
trations, and insulin sensitivity index. The specific              for type 2 diabetes prevention: a review of human
mechanisms are mainly through metabolic trans-                     findings. Transl Res 2014; 164: 302-311.
formation to improve systemic metabolism and in-                7) Varady KA, Cienfuegos S, Ezpeleta M, Gabel
duce tissue-specific metabolic adaptations, including              K. Clinical application of intermittent fasting for
changes in the gut microbiota, remodeling of adipose               weight loss: progress and future directions. Nat
tissue, correction of circadian rhythm disturbances,               Rev Endocrinol 2022; 18: 309-321.
and increased autophagy in peripheral tissues. IF as a          8) Morales-Suarez-Varela M, Collado Sánchez E,
                                                                   Peraita-Costa I, Llopis-Morales A, Soriano JM.
nutritional modifier has a few adverse effects mainly              Intermittent Fasting and the Possible Benefits in
involving the risk of gout, muscle wasting, and hypo-              Obesity, Diabetes, and Multiple Sclerosis: A Sys-
glycemia. In conclusion, IF might act as a safe dietary            tematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.
therapeutic target. However, it remains unclear which              Nutrients 2021; 13: 3179.
diets (ADF, IF 5:2, or TRE) are the best regimen.               9) Hamman RF, Wing RR, Edelstein SL, Lachin JM,
Fortunately, the positive findings so far highlight the            Bray GA, Delahanty L, Hoskin M, Kriska AM,
direction of future research.                                      Mayer-Davis EJ, Pi-Sunyer X, Regensteiner J,
                                                                   Venditti B, Wylie-Rosett J. Effect of weight loss
                                                                   with lifestyle intervention on risk of diabetes. Dia-
Conflict of Interest                                               betes Care 2006; 29: 2102-2107.
The Authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.   10) Varady KA, Cienfuegos S, Ezpeleta M, Gabel K.
                                                                   Cardiometabolic Benefits of Intermittent Fasting.
                                                                   Annu Rev Nutr 2021; 41: 333-361.
Availability of Data and Materials                             11) Stekovic S, Hofer SJ, Tripolt N, Aon MA, Royer P,
The experimental data used to support the findings of this         Pein L, Stadler JT, Pendl T, Prietl B, Url J, Schro-
study are available from the corresponding author upon re-         eder S, Tadic J, Eisenberg T, Magnes C, Stumpe
quest.                                                             M, Zuegner E, Bordag N, Riedl R, Schmidt A,

 344
Intermittent fasting in type 2 diabetes: from fundamental science to clinical applications

    Kolesnik E, Verheyen N, Springer A, Madl T, Sin-          S, Bhapkar M, Martin CK, Gilhooly CH, Hollo-
    ner F, de Cabo R, Kroemer G, Obermayer-Pi-                szy JO, Hadley EC, Roberts SB. A 2-Year Ran-
    etsch B, Dengjel J, Sourij H, Pieber TR, Madeo            domized Controlled Trial of Human Caloric Re-
    F. Alternate Day Fasting Improves Physiological           striction: Feasibility and Effects on Predictors of
    and Molecular Markers of Aging in Healthy, Non-           Health Span and Longevity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci
    obese Humans. Cell Metab 2019; 30: 462-476.e6.            Med Sci 2015; 70: 1097-1104.
12) Zhao L, Hutchison AT, Wittert GA, Thompson CH,        23) Chung H, Chou W, Sears DD, Patterson RE,
    Lange K, Liu B, Heilbronn LK. Intermittent Fasting        Webster NJG, Ellies LG. Time-restricted feeding
    Does Not Uniformly Impact Genes Involved in Cir-          improves insulin resistance and hepatic steato-
    cadian Regulation in Women with Obesity. Obesi-           sis in a mouse model of postmenopausal obesity.
    ty (Silver Spring) 2020; 28: S63-S67.                     Metabolism 2016; 65: 1743-1754.
13) Guo Y, Luo S, Ye Y, Yin S, Fan J, Xia M. Intermit-    24) de Cabo R, Mattson MP. Effects of Intermittent
    tent Fasting Improves Cardiometabolic Risk Fac-           Fasting on Health, Aging, and Disease. N Engl J
    tors and Alters Gut Microbiota in Metabolic Syn-          Med 2019; 381: 2541-2551.
    drome Patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021;         25) Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V,
    106: 64-79.                                               Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut
14) de Oliveira Maranhão Pureza IR, da Silva Ju-              microbiome with increased capacity for energy
    nior AE, Silva Praxedes DR, Lessa Vasconce-               harvest. Nature 2006; 444: 1027-1031.
    los LG, de Lima Macena M, Vieira de Melo IS,          26) Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, Rey FE, Cheng J, Duncan
    de Menezes Toledo Florêncio TM, Bueno NB. Ef-             AE, Kau AL, Griffin NW, Lombard V, Henrissat B,
    fects of time-restricted feeding on body weight,          Bain JR, Muehlbauer MJ, Ilkayeva O, Semenkov-
    body composition and vital signs in low-income            ich CF, Funai K, Hayashi DK, Lyle BJ, Martini MC,
    women with obesity: A 12-month randomized clin-           Ursell LK, Clemente JC, Van Treuren W, Walters
    ical trial. Clin Nutr 2021; 40: 759-766.                  WA, Knight R, Newgard CB, Heath AC, Gordon
15) Kahleova H, Belinova L, Malinska H, Oliyarnyk             JI. Gut microbiota from twins discordant for obe-
    O, Trnovska J, Skop V, Kazdova L, Dezortova M,            sity modulate metabolism in mice. Science 2013;
    Hajek M, Tura A, Hill M, Pelikanova T. Eating two         341: 1241214.
    larger meals a day (breakfast and lunch) is more      27) Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, Can-
    effective than six smaller meals in a reduced-en-         tarel BL, Duncan A, Ley RE, Sogin ML, Jones
    ergy regimen for patients with type 2 diabetes: a         WJ, Roe BA, Affourtit JP, Egholm M, Henrissat B,
    randomised crossover study. Diabetologia 2014;            Heath AC, Knight R, Gordon JI. A core gut micro-
    57: 1552-1560.                                            biome in obese and lean twins. Nature 2009; 457:
16) Ash S, Reeves MM, Yeo S, Morrison G, Carey D,             480-484.
    Capra S. Effect of intensive dietetic interventions   28) Wen L, Ley RE, Volchkov PY, Stranges PB, Ava-
    on weight and glycaemic control in overweight             nesyan L, Stonebraker AC, Hu C, Wong FS, Szot
    men with Type II diabetes: a randomised trial. Int        GL, Bluestone JA, Gordon JI, Chervonsky AV. In-
    J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003; 27: 797-802.              nate immunity and intestinal microbiota in the de-
17) Anton SD, Moehl K, Donahoo WT, Marosi K,                  velopment of Type 1 diabetes. Nature 2008; 455:
    Lee SA, Mainous AG, Leeuwenburgh C, Mattson               1109-1113.
    MP. Flipping the Metabolic Switch: Understanding      29) Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, Zhang F, Liang S,
    and Applying the Health Benefits of Fasting. Obe-         Zhang W, Guan Y, Shen D, Peng Y, Zhang D, Jie
    sity (Silver Spring) 2018; 26: 254-268.                   Z, Wu W, Qin Y, Xue W, Li J, Han L, Lu D, Wu P,
18) Sleiman SF, Henry J, Al-Haddad R, El Hayek L,             Dai Y, Sun X, Li Z, Tang A, Zhong S, Li X, Chen
    Abou Haidar E, Stringer T, Ulja D, Karuppagound-          W, Xu R, Wang M, Feng Q, Gong M, Yu J, Zhang
    er SS, Holson EB, Ratan RR, Ninan I, Chao MV.             Y, Zhang M, Hansen T, Sanchez G, Raes J, Fal-
    Exercise promotes the expression of brain de-             ony G, Okuda S, Almeida M, LeChatelier E, Re-
    rived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) through the ac-          nault P, Pons N, Batto JM, Zhang Z, Chen H,
    tion of the ketone body β-hydroxybutyrate. Elife          Yang R, Zheng W, Li S, Yang H, Wang J, Ehrlich
    2016; 5: e15092.                                          SD, Nielsen R, Pedersen O, Kristiansen K, Wang
                                                              J. A metagenome-wide association study of gut
19) Finkel T. The metabolic regulation of aging. Nat          microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 2012; 490:
    Med 2015; 21: 1416-1423.                                  55-60.
20) Hardie DG. AMPK: positive and negative regula-        30) Karlsson FH, Tremaroli V, Nookaew I, Bergström
    tion, and its role in whole-body energy homeosta-         G, Behre CJ, Fagerberg B, Nielsen J, Bäckhed F.
    sis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2015; 33: 1-7.                   Gut metagenome in European women with nor-
21) Dall KB, Færgeman NJ. Metabolic regulation of             mal, impaired and diabetic glucose control. Na-
    lifespan from a C. elegans perspective. Genes             ture 2013; 498: 99-103.
    Nutr 2019; 14: 25.                                    31) Tremaroli V, Bäckhed F. Functional interactions
22) Ravussin E, Redman LM, Rochon J, Das SK,                  between the gut microbiota and host metabolism.
    Fontana L, Kraus WE, Romashkan S, Williamson              Nature 2012; 489: 242-249.
    DA, Meydani SN, Villareal DT, Smith SR, Stein         32) Ogston D, McAndrew GM. FIBRINOLYSIS IN
    RI, Scott TM, Stewart TM, Saltzman E, Klein               OBESITY. Lancet 1964; 2: 1205-1207.

                                                                                                           345
L. Chen, F.-Y. Tian, X.-H. Hu, J.-W. Wu, W.-D. Xu, Q. Huang

33) Grace CS, Goldrick RB. Fibrinolysis and body                abolically Healthy Obese Adults: A Randomized
    bulid. Interrelationships between blood fibrino-            Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177: 930-
    lysis, body composition and parameters of lipid             938.
    and carbohydrate metabolism. J Atheroscler Res        44)   Griffin NW, Ahern PP, Cheng J, Heath AC, Ilka-
    1968; 8: 705-719.                                           yeva O, Newgard CB, Fontana L, Gordon JI. Pri-
34) Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Lowe G, Pepys                 or Dietary Practices and Connections to a Human
    MB, Thompson SG, Collins R, Danesh J. C-re-                 Gut Microbial Metacommunity Alter Responses
    active protein concentration and risk of coronary           to Diet Interventions. Cell Host Microbe 2017; 21:
    heart disease, stroke, and mortality: an individual         84-96.
    participant meta-analysis. Lancet 2010; 375: 132-     45)   Dey N, Wagner VE, Blanton LV, Cheng J, Fontana
    140.                                                        L, Haque R, Ahmed T, Gordon JI. Regulators of
35) Rohm TV, Meier DT, Olefsky JM, Donath MY. In-               gut motility revealed by a gnotobiotic model of di-
    flammation in obesity, diabetes, and related dis-           et-microbiome interactions related to travel. Cell
    orders. Immunity 2022; 55: 31-55.                           2015; 163: 95-107.
36) Burcelin R, Garidou L, Pomié C. Immuno-micro-         46)   Plovier H, Everard A, Druart C, Depommier C,
    biota cross and talk: the new paradigm of meta-             Van Hul M, Geurts L, Chilloux J, Ottman N,
    bolic diseases. Semin Immunol 2012; 24: 67-74.              Duparc T, Lichtenstein L, Myridakis A, Delzenne
37) Guilherme A, Virbasius JV, Puri V, Czech MP. Ad-            NM, Klievink J, Bhattacharjee A, van der Ark
    ipocyte dysfunctions linking obesity to insulin re-         KC, Aalvink S, Martinez LO, Dumas ME, Mait-
    sistance and type 2 diabetes. Nat Rev Mol Cell              er D, Loumaye A, Hermans MP, Thissen JP, Bel-
    Biol 2008; 9: 367-377.                                      zer C, de Vos WM, Cani PD. A purified mem-
                                                                brane protein from Akkermansia muciniphila or
38) Eguchi K, Manabe I, Oishi-Tanaka Y, Ohsugi M,               the pasteurized bacterium improves metabolism
    Kono N, Ogata F, Yagi N, Ohto U, Kimoto M, Mi-              in obese and diabetic mice. Nat Med 2017; 23:
    yake K, Tobe K, Arai H, Kadowaki T, Nagai R.                107-113.
    Saturated fatty acid and TLR signaling link β cell
    dysfunction and islet inflammation. Cell Metab        47)   Shen Z, Zhu C, Quan Y, Yang J, Yuan W, Yang Z,
    2012; 15: 518-533.                                          Wu S, Luo W, Tan B, Wang X. Insights into Rose-
                                                                buria intestinalis which alleviates experimental
39) Stienstra R, Joosten LAB, Koenen T, van Tits
                                                                colitis pathology by inducing anti-inflammatory re-
    B, van Diepen JA, van den Berg SAA, Rensen
                                                                sponses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 33: 1751-
    PCN, Voshol PJ, Fantuzzi G, Hijmans A, Ker-
                                                                1760.
    sten S, Müller M, van den Berg WB, van Rooijen
    N, Wabitsch M, Kullberg BJ, van der Meer JWM,         48)   Chen P, Zhang Q, Dang H, Liu X, Tian F, Zhao J,
    Kanneganti T, Tack CJ, Netea MG. The inflam-                Chen Y, Zhang H, Chen W. Antidiabetic effect of
    masome-mediated caspase-1 activation controls               Lactobacillus casei CCFM0412 on mice with type
    adipocyte differentiation and insulin sensitivity.          2 diabetes induced by a high-fat diet and strepto-
    Cell Metab 2010; 12: 593-605.                               zotocin. Nutrition 2014; 30: 1061-1068.
40) Vandanmagsar B, Youm YH, Ravussin A, Galgani          49)   Hoffmann TW, Pham HP, Bridonneau C, Aubry
    JE, Stadler K, Mynatt RL, Ravussin E, Stephens              C, Lamas B, Martin-Gallausiaux C, Moroldo M,
    JM, Dixit VD. The NLRP3 inflammasome insti-                 Rainteau D, Lapaque N, Six A, Richard ML, Far-
    gates obesity-induced inflammation and insulin              gier E, Le Guern ME, Langella P, Sokol H. Mi-
    resistance. Nat Med 2011; 17: 179-188.                      croorganisms linked to inflammatory bowel dis-
                                                                ease-associated dysbiosis differentially impact
41) Beli E, Yan Y, Moldovan L, Vieira CP, Gao R,
                                                                host physiology in gnotobiotic mice. ISME J 2016;
    Duan Y, Prasad R, Bhatwadekar A, White FA,
                                                                10: 460-477.
    Townsend SD, Chan L, Ryan CN, Morton D, Mol-
    dovan EG, Chu FI, Oudit GY, Derendorf H, Adorini      50)   Zhu C, Song K, Shen Z, Quan Y, Tan B, Luo W,
    L, Wang XX, Evans-Molina C, Mirmira RG, Boul-               Wu S, Tang K, Yang Z, Wang X. Roseburia intes-
    ton ME, Yoder MC, Li Q, Levi M, Busik JV, Grant             tinalis inhibits interleukin‑17 excretion and pro-
    MB. Restructuring of the Gut Microbiome by In-              motes regulatory T cells differentiation in colitis.
    termittent Fasting Prevents Retinopathy and Pro-            Mol Med Rep 2018; 17: 7567-7574.
    longs Survival in Mice. Diabetes 2018; 67: 1867-      51)   Wang X, Ota N, Manzanillo P, Kates L, Zava-
    1879.                                                       la-Solorio J, Eidenschenk C, Zhang J, Lesch
42) Blasco-Baque V, Serino M, Vergnes JN, Riant                 J, Lee WP, Ross J, Diehl L, van Bruggen N,
    E, Loubieres P, Arnal JF, Gourdy P, Sixou M,                Kolumam G, Ouyang W. Interleukin-22 alleviates
    Burcelin R, Kemoun P. High-fat diet induces                 metabolic disorders and restores mucosal immu-
    periodontitis in mice through lipopolysaccharides           nity in diabetes. Nature 2014; 514: 237-241.
    (LPS) receptor signaling: protective action of es-    52)   Sun KY, Xu DH, Xie C, Plummer S, Tang J, Yang
    trogens. PLoS One 2012; 7: e48220.                          XF, Ji XH. Lactobacillus paracasei modulates
43) Trepanowski JF, Kroeger CM, Barnosky A, Klem-               LPS-induced inflammatory cytokine release by
    pel MC, Bhutani S, Hoddy KK, Gabel K, Freels S,             monocyte-macrophages via the up-regulation of
    Rigdon J, Rood J, Ravussin E, Varady KA. Effect             negative regulators of NF-kappaB signaling in
    of Alternate-Day Fasting on Weight Loss, Weight             a TLR2-dependent manner. Cytokine 2017; 92:
    Maintenance, and Cardioprotection Among Met-                1-11.

 346
Intermittent fasting in type 2 diabetes: from fundamental science to clinical applications

53) Breyner NM, Michon C, de Sousa CS, Vilas Boas          64) Martin CR, Osadchiy V, Kalani A, Mayer EA. The
    PB, Chain F, Azevedo VA, Langella P, Chatel                Brain-Gut-Microbiome Axis. Cell Mol Gastroen-
    JM. Microbial Anti-Inflammatory Molecule (MAM)             terol Hepatol 2018; 6: 133-148.
    from Shows a Protective Effect on DNBS and             65) Fukuda T, Bouchi R, Takeuchi T, Amo-Shiinoki
    DSS-Induced Colitis Model in Mice through Inhi-            K, Kudo A, Tanaka S, Tanabe M, Akashi T, Hi-
    bition of NF-κB Pathway. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:          rayama K, Odamaki T, Igarashi M, Kimura I, Ta-
    114.                                                       nabe K, Tanizawa Y, Yamada T, Ogawa Y. Im-
54) Klement RJ, Pazienza V. Impact of Different                portance of Intestinal Environment and Cellular
    Types of Diet on Gut Microbiota Profiles and Can-          Plasticity of Islets in the Development of Post-
    cer Prevention and Treatment. Medicina (Kaunas)            pancreatectomy Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2021;
    2019; 55: 84.                                              44: 1002-1011.
55) Tan J, McKenzie C, Potamitis M, Thorburn AN,           66) Bercik P. The Brain-Gut-Microbiome Axis and Irri-
    Mackay CR, Macia L. The role of short-chain fatty          table Bowel Syndrome. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N
    acids in health and disease. Adv Immunol 2014;             Y) 2020; 16: 322-324.
    121: 91-119.                                           67) Zhao L, Zhang F, Ding X, Wu G, Lam YY, Wang
56) Ding S, Lund PK. Role of intestinal inflamma-              X, Fu H, Xue X, Lu C, Ma J, Yu L, Xu C, Ren Z, Xu
    tion as an early event in obesity and insulin resis-       Y, Xu S, Shen H, Zhu X, Shi Y, Shen Q, Dong W,
    tance. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2011; 14:            Liu R, Ling Y, Zeng Y, Wang X, Zhang Q, Wang
    328-333.                                                   J, Wang L, Wu Y, Zeng B, Wei H, Zhang M, Peng
57) Xiao S, Fei N, Pang X, Shen J, Wang L, Zhang B,            Y, Zhang C. Gut bacteria selectively promoted by
    Zhang M, Zhang X, Zhang C, Li M, Sun L, Xue Z,             dietary fibers alleviate type 2 diabetes. Science
    Wang J, Feng J, Yan F, Zhao N, Liu J, Long W,              2018; 359: 1151-1156.
    Zhao L. A gut microbiota-targeted dietary inter-       68) Iepsen EW, Lundgren J, Holst JJ, Madsbad S,
    vention for amelioration of chronic inflammation           Torekov SS. Successful weight loss maintenance
    underlying metabolic syndrome. FEMS Microbiol              includes long-term increased meal responses of
    Ecol 2014; 87: 357-367.                                    GLP-1 and PYY3-36. Eur J Endocrinol 2016; 174:
58) Zhang X, Zhao Y, Xu J, Xue Z, Zhang M, Pang                775-784.
    X, Zhang X, Zhao L. Modulation of gut microbi-         69) Chen P, Wang YY, Chen C, Guan J, Zhu HH,
    ota by berberine and metformin during the treat-           Chen Z. The immunological roles in acute-on-
    ment of high-fat diet-induced obesity in rats. Sci         chronic liver failure: An update. Hepatobiliary
    Rep 2015; 5: 14405.                                        Pancreat Dis Int 2019; 18: 403-411.
59) Canfora EE, Jocken JW, Blaak EE. Short-chain           70) Hatori M, Vollmers C, Zarrinpar A, DiTacchio L,
    fatty acids in control of body weight and insu-            Bushong EA, Gill S, Leblanc M, Chaix A, Jo-
    lin sensitivity. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2015; 11: 577-         ens M, Fitzpatrick JAJ, Ellisman MH, Panda S.
    591.                                                       Time-restricted feeding without reducing calor-
60) Jorsal T, Rhee NA, Pedersen J, Wahlgren CD,                ic intake prevents metabolic diseases in mice
    Mortensen B, Jepsen SL, Jelsing J, Dalbøge LS,             fed a high-fat diet. Cell Metab 2012; 15: 848-
    Vilmann P, Hassan H, Hendel JW, Poulsen SS,                860.
    Holst JJ, Vilsbøll T, Knop FK. Enteroendocrine K
                                                           71) Zarrinpar A, Chaix A, Yooseph S, Panda S. Diet
    and L cells in healthy and type 2 diabetic individ-
                                                               and feeding pattern affect the diurnal dynamics of
    uals. Diabetologia 2018; 61: 284-294.
                                                               the gut microbiome. Cell Metab 2014; 20: 1006-
61) Lebrun LJ, Lenaerts K, Kiers D, Pais de Bar-               1017.
    ros JP, Le Guern N, Plesnik J, Thomas C, Bour-
                                                           72) Kim KH, Kim YH, Son JE, Lee JH, Kim S, Choe
    geois T, Dejong CHC, Kox M, Hundscheid IHR,
                                                               MS, Moon JH, Zhong J, Fu K, Lenglin F, Yoo JA,
    Khan NA, Mandard S, Deckert V, Pickkers P,
                                                               Bilan PJ, Klip A, Nagy A, Kim JR, Park JG, Hus-
    Drucker DJ, Lagrost L, Grober J. Enteroendo-
                                                               sein SM, Doh KO, Hui CC, Sung HK. Intermit-
    crine L Cells Sense LPS after Gut Barrier Inju-
                                                               tent fasting promotes adipose thermogenesis and
    ry to Enhance GLP-1 Secretion. Cell Rep 2017;
                                                               metabolic homeostasis via VEGF-mediated alter-
    21: 1160-1168.
                                                               native activation of macrophage. Cell Res 2017;
62) Lewis JE, Miedzybrodzka EL, Foreman RE,                    27: 1309-1326.
    Woodward ORM, Kay RG, Goldspink DA, Gribble
    FM, Reimann F. Selective stimulation of colonic L      73) Li G, Xie C, Lu S, Nichols RG, Tian Y, Li L, Pa-
    cells improves metabolic outcomes in mice. Dia-            tel D, Ma Y, Brocker CN, Yan T, Krausz KW,
    betologia 2020; 63: 1396-1407.                             Xiang R, Gavrilova O, Patterson AD, Gonzalez
                                                               FJ. Intermittent Fasting Promotes White Adipose
63) Sun EW, Iepsen EW, Pezos N, Lumsden AL, Mar-               Browning and Decreases Obesity by Shaping
    tin AM, Schober G, Isaacs NJ, Rayner CK, Nguy-             the Gut Microbiota. Cell Metab 2017; 26: 672-
    en NQ, de Fontgalland D, Rabbitt P, Hollington             685.e4.
    P, Wattchow DA, Hansen T, Holm JC, Liou AP,
    Jackson VM, Torekov SS, Young RL, Keating DJ.          74) Liu B, Page AJ, Hutchison AT, Wittert GA, Heil-
    A Gut-Intrinsic Melanocortin Signaling Complex             bronn LK. Intermittent fasting increases energy
    Augments L-Cell Secretion in Humans. Gastroen-             expenditure and promotes adipose tissue brown-
    terology 2021; 161: 536-547.e2.                            ing in mice. Nutrition 2019; 66: 38-43.

                                                                                                           347
You can also read