Global Information Assurance Certification Paper - GIAC Certifications
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Global Information Assurance Certification Paper Copyright SANS Institute Author Retains Full Rights This paper is taken from the GIAC directory of certified professionals. Reposting is not permited without express written permission. Interested in learning more? Check out the list of upcoming events offering "Security Essentials Bootcamp Style (Security 401)" at http://www.giac.org/registration/gsec
s. Man-In-the-Middle Attack ht rig -A Brief ull f ns Key fingerprint = AF19 FA27 2F94 998D FDB5 DE3D F8B5 06E4 A169 4E46 tai re or th Au Author: Bhavin Bharat Bhansali 2, Submitted on: February 16, 2001 00 -2 00 20 te tu sti In NS SA © Key fingerprint = AF19 FA27 2F94 998D FDB5 DE3D F8B5 06E4 A169 4E46 1 © SANS Institute 2000 - 2002 As part of GIAC practical repository. Author retains full rights.
Objective: The Objective of this document is to understand the Execution of "Man-In-the-Middle" attack. s. Overview: ht The "Man In The Middle" or "TCP Hijacking" attack is a well known attack where an rig attacker sniffs packets from network, modifies them and inserts them back into the network. There are few programs/source codes available for doing a TCP hijack. Juggernaut, T- Sight and Hunt are some these programs. In this paper we shall explore Hunt for ull understanding how TCP Hijacking is deployed on an Ethernet segment. f Hunt is designed by kra kra@gncz.cz. The Hunt source code is available at the following ns URL:fingerprint = AF19 FA27 2F94 998D FDB5 DE3D F8B5 06E4 A169 4E46 Key tai ftp://ftp.gncz.cz/pub/linux/hunt/hunt-1.5.tgz re Relevance: or TCP Hijacking is an exploit that targets the victims TCP based applications like Telnet, th rlogin, ftp, mail application, web browser etc. An attacker can grab unenrcypted confidential Au information from a victim's network based TCP application. He can further tamper the Authenticity and Integrity of the data. 2, Definition of Important Terms: 00 • IP spoofing - IP spoofing involves forging one's source IP address. It is the act of using -2 one machine to impersonate another. Many applications and tools in UNIX systems rely on source IP address authentication. 00 20 • ARP spoofing - ARP spoofing involves forging packet source hardware address (MAC address) to the address of the host you pretend to be. te Simple Active Attack against TCP connections - An attack in which the attacker does tu • not merely eavesdrop but takes action to change, delete, reroute, add, forge or divert sti data. Perhaps the best-known active attack is Man-In-the-Middle. In NS SA © Key fingerprint = AF19 FA27 2F94 998D FDB5 DE3D F8B5 06E4 A169 4E46 2 © SANS Institute 2000 - 2002 As part of GIAC practical repository. Author retains full rights.
The Attack: s. ht rig f ull ns Key fingerprint = AF19 FA27 2F94 998D FDB5 DE3D F8B5 06E4 A169 4E46 tai re or th Au 2, 00 -2 00 20 Attack Scenario involves three hosts: Attacker, Victim, and Target. te • Attacker is the system used by the attacker for the hijack. tu • Victim is the system used by the victim for Telnet client connections to the target sti system. • Target is the target system that the intruder wants to compromise. It is where the In telnetd daemon is running. NS A simple diagram of the network shows the Attacker and Victim hosts are on the same network (which can be Ethernet switched and the attack will still work), while the target system can SA be anywhere. (Actually, either victim or target can be on the same network as attacker: it doesn't matter.) © For the attack to succeed, the victim must use Telnet, rlogin, ftp, or any other non-encrypted TCP/IP utility. Use of SecurID card, or other token-based two-factor authentication is useless as protection against hijacking, as the attacker can simply wait until after the user authenticates, then hijack the session. Key fingerprint The attack = AF19 scenario can beFA27 2F94 as: as simple 998D FDB5 DE3D F8B5 06E4 A169 4E46 1. Attacker: Spends some time determining the IP addresses of target and victim systems. Determining trust relationships can be easily done with utilities like 3 © SANS Institute 2000 - 2002 As part of GIAC practical repository. Author retains full rights.
SATAN, finger, systat, rwho or running who, ps, or last from previously stolen (or wide open "guest" style) accounts. 2. Attacker: Runs hunt as root on attacking host. Waits for hunt to indicate a session has been detected. 3. Attacker: Starts ARP relay daemon1, prepares RST daemon2 entry for use later, sets s. option to enable host name resolution (for convenience). ht 4. Victim: Logs in to target using Telnet. Runs pine to read/compose email. rig 5. Attacker: Sees new connection3; lists active connections to see if this one is potentially "interesting." If it is, attacker can either watch the session (packet sniffing) ull or hijack the session. Decides to hijack. 6. Victim: Sees strange new prompt. Tries pressing RETURN and doesn't know what f to think. Tries web browser and notices that it still works fine (not a network ns problem). Key fingerprint Not sure = AF19 FA27what to think. 2F94 998D FDB5 DE3D F8B5 06E4 A169 4E46 tai 7. Attacker: Finds this is a user session and decides to give it back (resynchronizes TCP/IP stream). re 8. Victim: Sees prompt for keystroke, follows request, gets session back. Puzzled, or decides to log in to root account to take a closer look. 9. Attacker: Turns on RST daemon to prevent new connections, waits to hijack root th session. 10. Victim: Runs ssu to get SecurID protected root shell. Au 11. Attacker: Completes hijack after seeing root login. 2, 12. Victim: Sees strange prompt. Tries pressing RETURN again. Same result as before. 00 Tries web browser again. Same thing. Tries getting a new Telnet session. Fails. Tries ftp. Fails. -2 13. Attacker: Sets up backdoor, disables command history, resets session, turns off RST daemon. 00 14. Victim: Finally gets a new session. Original session is now gone. Assumes network 20 outage or Windows TCP/IP stack corruption. Reboots system and everything is back to "normal". te 15. Attacker: Waits for admin's sessions to all disappear (gone home for the night), then tu logs in using new backdoor. Installs rootkit (more backdoors, sniffer), cleans log sti files. In NS SA © Key fingerprint = AF19 FA27 2F94 998D FDB5 DE3D F8B5 06E4 A169 4E46 1 Pls. refer to th e "ARP Daemon" paragrap h of th e "Brief Overview of the Daemon s / threads that ar e used by the exploi t" topic 2 Pls. refer to the "Res et Daemo n" p aragraph of th e "Brief Overview of th e D aemons / threads that are us ed b y the exploit" to pic 3 Pls. refer to the "Sniff Daemo n" p aragraph of the "Brief Ov erview of th e D aem ons / threads that are us ed b y the exploit" topi c 4 © SANS Institute 2000 - 2002 As part of GIAC practical repository. Author retains full rights.
Design Overview: The development model is based on a packet engine (hunt.c) which runs in its own thread and captures packets from the network. The packet engine collects information of TCP connections/starting/termination, sequence numbers and MAC addresses. It collects the s. MAC addresses and sequence numbers from the server point of view and separate MAC ht addresses and sequence numbers from the client point of view. So it is prepared for hijacking. This information (seq. num., MAC, etc.) is available to modules so they don't have rig to analyze and collect it. ull Modules can register functions with the packet engine, which are then invoked when new f packets are received. A module function determines if the module is interested in a packet or ns not and can place the packet in a module specific list of packets. A module function can also Key send fingerprint some packet= AF19 to theFA27 2F94 network if 998D FDB5 DE3D it is desirable to do itF8B5 very06E4 A169 fast. The 4E46 (usually in module tai some other thread so it needs to be scheduled to be run) then gets packets from the list and re analyzes them. In this way, you can easily develop modules, which perform various activities. Refer to the appendix section for learning the features offered by hunt. or th Brief Overview of the Daemons / threads that are used by the exploit: • Reset daemon Au Reset daemon is used to perform automatic resets of ongoing connections that hunt can see. You can describe which connections should be terminated by giving src/dst 2, host/mask and src/dst ports. 00 -2 • ARP daemon ARP daemon is used to do ARP spoofing of hosts. You enter src and dst addresses and 00 desired src MAC. The dst is then forced to think that src has srcMAC. You can use 20 some fake MAC or better MAC of host that is currently down. te • Sniff daemon tu Sniff daemon can log specified packets. The sniff daemon can also search for a simple sti pattern (string) in the data stream (see the bugs section). You can specify which connection you are interested in, where to search (src, dst, both), what do you want to In search, how many bytes you want to log, from what direction (src, dst, both) and to what NS file should the daemon write. SA • MAC discovery daemon MAC discovery daemon is used to collect MAC addresses corresponding to the specified © IP range. Key fingerprint = AF19 FA27 2F94 998D FDB5 DE3D F8B5 06E4 A169 4E46 5 © SANS Institute 2000 - 2002 As part of GIAC practical repository. Author retains full rights.
References: • Krauz's, Pavel. "HUNT Project." 1.5 - bug fix release. 30th May 2000. URL: http://lin.fsid.cvut.cz/~kra/index.html#HUNT(9th February, 2001) s. ht • Dave, Dittrich. "Session hijack script". 9th Dec 1999. rig URL: http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/talks/agora/script.html ull • Dave, Paras. "TCP Connection Hijacking". URL: http://cs.baylor.edu/~donahoo/NIUNet/hijack.html (12th February, 2001) f ns • Microsoft Key fingerprinttechnical = AF19support. FA27 2F94 998D FDB5 "Microsoft DE3D Security F8B5Microsoft Program: 06E4 A169 4E46 Bulletin Security tai (MS99-046) "December 23, 1999. re URL:http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/security/bulletin/ms99-046.asp(12th February 2001) or th • Stevens, Richard. "TCP Connection Establishment and Termination". October 1993. Au Book Name: TCP/IP illustrated Volume I - The Protocols (7th February 2001). • Kurtz, George. "Session Hijacking". July 28th, 1999. 2, Book Name: HACKING EXPOSED - Network Security Secrets and Solutions (8th 00 February, 2001) -2 00 20 te tu sti In NS SA © Key fingerprint = AF19 FA27 2F94 998D FDB5 DE3D F8B5 06E4 A169 4E46 6 © SANS Institute 2000 - 2002 As part of GIAC practical repository. Author retains full rights.
Appendix Features of the hunt exploit: • Connection Reset - With a single properly constructed packet you can reset the s. connection (RST flag in TCP header). You can reset server, client, or both. When you ht reset only one end the other end is reset when it tries to send data to the first host which rig will response with RST because of the connection reset on it. ull • Connection sniffing/watching - You can watch hunt output for any connection which you choose from the list that hunt displays on the console. f ns • ARP-relay Key fingerprint- = You can FA27 AF19 insert2F94 packets to the 998D network FDB5 DE3D (rerouting) F8B5 06E4 of all A169data4E46 it receives from tai ARP spoofed hosts. re or • Connection Synchronization - This is one of the main features of hunt. If you put some th data to the TCP stream (through simple active attack or ARP spoofing), you desynchronize the stream from the server/original client point of view. After some work Au done on that connection you can just reset it or you can try to synchronize both original ends again. The main goal behind this is to synchronize the sequence numbers on both 2, client and server again. 00 -2 • Switch/Segment traffic rerouting - With ARP spoofing you can force the Switch to send you the traffic for hosts on another segment/switched port. This may not work if the 00 Switch has some security policy and MACs have been explicitly set up on a per port basis but in reality this configuration is hardly done on an "ordinary" network. 20 te • ACK Storm - The ACK storm is caused by majority of TCP stacks Let's imagine that tu you send some data to an ongoing connection to the server (as if sent by the client - with expected seq. numbers, etc.). The server responds with the acknowledgment of the data sti you sent but the original client receives this acknowledgment too. But from the original In client point of view, the server has acknowledged data that doesn't exist on the client. So something strange occurred and the original client sends the "right" sequence number NS with ACK to the server. But the TCP rules say that it is required to generate an immediate acknowledgment when an out-of-order segment is received. This ACK SA should not be delayed. So the server sends the acknowledgment of non-existent data to the client again and the client responds. © - Bhavin Bharat Bhansali - February 16, 2001 Key fingerprint = AF19 FA27 2F94 998D FDB5 DE3D F8B5 06E4 A169 4E46 7 © SANS Institute 2000 - 2002 As part of GIAC practical repository. Author retains full rights.
Last Updated: May 23rd, 2019 Upcoming Training SANS San Antonio 2019 San Antonio, TX May 28, 2019 - Jun 02, 2019 Live Event San Antonio 2019 - SEC401: Security Essentials Bootcamp Style San Antonio, TX May 28, 2019 - Jun 02, 2019 vLive SANS Atlanta 2019 Atlanta, GA May 28, 2019 - Jun 02, 2019 Live Event Mentor Session @work - SEC401 Birmingham, AL Jun 03, 2019 - Jul 08, 2019 Mentor Mentor Session - SEC401 Tysons, VA Jun 08, 2019 - Jul 13, 2019 Mentor SANS Kansas City 2019 Kansas City, MO Jun 10, 2019 - Jun 15, 2019 Live Event SANSFIRE 2019 Washington, DC Jun 15, 2019 - Jun 22, 2019 Live Event Community SANS Raymondville SEC401 Raymondville, TX Jun 17, 2019 - Jun 22, 2019 Community SANS SANSFIRE 2019 - SEC401: Security Essentials Bootcamp Style Washington, DC Jun 17, 2019 - Jun 22, 2019 vLive SANS Cyber Defence Canberra 2019 Canberra, Australia Jun 24, 2019 - Jul 13, 2019 Live Event SANS Cyber Defence Japan 2019 Tokyo, Japan Jul 01, 2019 - Jul 13, 2019 Live Event SANS Charlotte 2019 Charlotte, NC Jul 08, 2019 - Jul 13, 2019 Live Event Community SANS Philadelphia SEC401 Philadelphia, PA Jul 08, 2019 - Jul 13, 2019 Community SANS Community SANS Ottawa SEC401 Ottawa, ON Jul 08, 2019 - Jul 13, 2019 Community SANS SANS London July 2019 London, United Jul 08, 2019 - Jul 13, 2019 Live Event Kingdom SANS Cyber Defence Singapore 2019 Singapore, Singapore Jul 08, 2019 - Jul 20, 2019 Live Event Pittsburgh 2019 - SEC401: Security Essentials Bootcamp Style Pittsburgh, PA Jul 08, 2019 - Jul 13, 2019 vLive SANS Pittsburgh 2019 Pittsburgh, PA Jul 08, 2019 - Jul 13, 2019 Live Event SANS Rocky Mountain 2019 Denver, CO Jul 15, 2019 - Jul 20, 2019 Live Event SANS Columbia 2019 Columbia, MD Jul 15, 2019 - Jul 20, 2019 Live Event SANS San Francisco Summer 2019 San Francisco, CA Jul 22, 2019 - Jul 27, 2019 Live Event Mentor Session - SEC401 Seattle, WA Jul 25, 2019 - Aug 29, 2019 Mentor SANS Boston Summer 2019 Boston, MA Jul 29, 2019 - Aug 03, 2019 Live Event SANS Crystal City 2019 Arlington, VA Aug 05, 2019 - Aug 10, 2019 Live Event SANS Melbourne 2019 Melbourne, Australia Aug 05, 2019 - Aug 10, 2019 Live Event SANS London August 2019 London, United Aug 05, 2019 - Aug 10, 2019 Live Event Kingdom Community SANS Raleigh SEC401 Raleigh, NC Aug 12, 2019 - Aug 17, 2019 Community SANS SANS San Jose 2019 San Jose, CA Aug 12, 2019 - Aug 17, 2019 Live Event SANS Minneapolis 2019 Minneapolis, MN Aug 12, 2019 - Aug 17, 2019 Live Event Minneapolis 2019 - SEC401: Security Essentials Bootcamp Style Minneapolis, MN Aug 12, 2019 - Aug 17, 2019 vLive SANS Virginia Beach 2019 Virginia Beach, VA Aug 19, 2019 - Aug 30, 2019 Live Event
You can also read