Council Meeting City of Nassau Bay, Texas February 14, 2022 - Bob Warters Mayor Don Matter
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Council Meeting
City of Nassau Bay, Texas
February 14, 2022
Bob Warters
Mayor
Don Matter Phil Johnson
Position 1 Position 2
Ashley Graves Bryce Klug
Position 3 Position 4
Sandra Mossman Matt Prior
Position 5 Position 6
AGENDA – REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF NASSAU BAY, TEXAS, TO BE HELD ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY
14, 2022 AT 7:00 PM IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER, CITY HALL, 1800 SPACE PARK
DRIVE, SUITE 200, NASSAU BAY, TEXAS.
Portions of this agenda item may be conducted by videoconference whereby a quorum is
present at the regular posted location when the matter arises on the agenda and any
member who participates remotely strictly complies with the requirements of Texas
Government Code Section 551.127 a-1, including the use of video and audio feed of the
remote member’s participation in the meeting, which audio and video participation must
be broadcast live at the meeting. Failure of the member or the equipment to comply with
these requirements shall prohibit the remote member’s vote from counting.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 30.07, PENAL CODE (TRESPASS BY LICENSE HOLDER
WITH AN OPENLY CARRIED HANDGUN), A PERSON LICENSED UNDER
SUBCHAPTER H, CHAPTER 411, GOVERNMENT CODE (HANDGUN LICENSING
LAW), MAY NOT ENTER THIS PROPERTY WITH A HANDGUN THAT IS CARRIED
OPENLY.
CONFORME A LA SECCIÓN 30.07 DEL CÓDIGO PENAL (TRASPASAR PORTANDO
ARMAS DE FUEGO AL AIRE LIBRE CON LICENCIA) PERSONAS CON LICENCIA
BAJO DEL SUB-CAPITULO H, CAPITULO 411, CODIGO DE GOBIERNO (LEY DE
PORTAR ARMAS), NO DEBEN ENTRAR A ESTA PROPIEDAD PORTANDO UNA
ARMA DE FUEGO AL AIRE LIBRE.
The City Council reserves the right to meet in closed session on any of the below items
should the need arise and if applicable, pursuant to authorization by Title 5, Chapter 551
of the Texas Government Code.
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
2. PLEDGES OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE U.S. AND TEXAS FLAGS
(Texas Pledge: “Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one
state under God, one and indivisible.”)
3. APPOINTMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS, PRESENTATIONS, AWARDS
A. Recognition of City Employee Elias Sauceda for 20 Years of Service to
the City of Nassau Bay
4. PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION ITEMS FROM PUBLIC HEARING: None
5. CITIZENS’ REQUEST FOR HEARING BEFORE CITY COUNCIL
The privilege of speaking at this time is limited to the following persons:
residents, persons having an ownership interest in property or a business located
within the City, or their attorneys.
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 1 of 72A statement of no more than 3 minutes may be made on items of general
relevance. There will be no yielding of time to another person. State law prohibits
the Mayor and members of the City Council from commenting on any statement
or engaging in dialogue without an appropriate agenda item being posted in
accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Law. Comments should be directed to
the entire Council, not individual members. Engaging in verbal attacks or
comments intended to insult, abuse, malign, or slander any individual shall be
cause for termination of time privileges and removal from Council Chambers.
6. COUNCILMEMBERS’ COMMENTS/REPORTS
Announcements concerning items of community interest. No action will be taken
or discussed.
7. MAYOR’S COMMENTS/REPORTS
Announcements concerning items of community interest. No action will be taken
or discussed.
8. REPORTS FROM STAFF MEMBERS & COMMITTEES
Announcements concerning items of community interest. No action will be taken
or discussed.
A. Interim City Manager
B. Police Department
C. Fire Department
D. Public Works Department
E. Parks & Recreation Committee
9. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes:
1. Joint City Council, Planning Commission, and UDC Workshop on
November 8, 2021
2. Special Meeting on December 20, 2021
3. Special Meeting on December 28, 2021
4. Regular Meeting on January 10, 2022 Ham
B. Consider and take action on an ordinance calling the May 7, 2022 City
Officers’ Election for the purpose of electing a Mayor and three
Councilmembers, Positions 2, 4, and 6 (second and final readings).
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 2 of 72(Considerar y tomar acción sobre la ordenanza que convoque el dia 7 de
Mayo del 2022 como Elección de Oficiales de la ciudad con el fin de elegir
a un alcalde y tres concejales, posiciones 2, 4 y 6). Ham
10. NEW BUSINESS
A. Consider and take action on a resolution renaming "Point Lookout Drive"
from the entrance of David Braun Park, through the entire length of the
park, a public street in the City of Nassau Bay, Texas, and calling it "Upper
Bay Road.” Ludanyi / Stelly
B. Consider and take action on authorizing the Interim City Manager to sign
an Engagement Letter with Lloyd Gosselink for legal services related to a
CenterPoint Gas Franchise Agreement. Ham / Ludanyi
C. Discussion and update on the status of the modification of a previously
executed Separation Agreement between former City Manager Jason
Reynolds and the City of Nassau Bay in order to remove the gag rule.
Johnson
11. EXECUTIVE (CLOSED) SESSION
A. Executive Session as authorized by Texas Government Code, Chapter
551, Open Meetings, Subchapter D, Exceptions to Requirement that
Meetings be Open.
1. §551.074 Personnel – Discussion of membership of the Nassau
Bay Planning Commission.
12. ACTION ITEMS FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION
1. Consider and take action on a resolution appointing / reappointing
individuals to the Nassau Bay Planning Commission as discussed
in Executive Session.
13. ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Nassau Bay will provide for
reasonable accommodations for disabled persons attending City Council Meetings. Requests
should be received at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled meeting by contacting the City Secretary’s
office at 281.333.4211 or by Fax at 281.333.2301.
I, the undersigned authority, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the governing
body of the City of Nassau Bay is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted said Notice
on the bulletin board, in the City Hall of said City, a place convenient and readily accessible to the
general public at all times, and said Notice was posted on Friday, February 11, 2022 by 11:00am
and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said
Meeting.
_____________________________
Sandra V. Ham
City Secretary
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 3 of 72MINUTES
JOINT PLANNING WORKSHOP
CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF NASSAU BAY, TEXAS
NOVEMBER 8, 2021
6:00 PM
MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Bob Warters, Mayor Pro Tem Don Matter,
Councilmembers Phil Johnson, Ashley Graves, Bryce Klug, and Sandra Mossman
MEMBERS OF COUNCIL ABSENT: Councilmembers Matt Prior
MEMBERS OF PLANNING COMMISSION PRESENT: Chairman Roscoe Lee,
Commissioners Louis Nguyen, Jeff Horton, Arlene Phillips, Omar Abotteen, and Angela
Braun
MEMBERS OF PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENT: Commissioner John Nugent
OTHERS PRESENT: City Attorney Chris Gregg, City Manager Jason Reynolds, City
Secretary Sandra Ham, Finance Director Csilla Ludanyi, Police Chief Tim Cromie, Public
Works Director Paul Lopez, Fire Chief Tom George, and Director of Communications &
Tourism Kristin Edwards
PRESIDING: Mayor Bob Warters
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
Mayor Bob Warters called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m.
A quorum of City Council was present with six Councilmembers in attendance.
A quorum of the Planning Commission was present with six Commissioners in
attendance.
CITIZENS’ REQUEST FOR HEARING BEFORE CITY COUNCIL
Public Hearing was opened at 6:03 p.m.
There being no one wishing to speak, the Public Hearing was immediately closed.
CITIZENS’ REQUEST FOR HEARING BEFORE PLANNING COMMISSION
Public Hearing was opened at 6:03 p.m.
There being no one wishing to speak, the Public Hearing was immediately closed.
PLANNING WORKSHOP
City Council, the Planning Commission, the Nassau Bay Unified Development Code
Advisory Committee, Kendig Keast Collaborative, and Staff conudcted a planning
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 4 of 72session and meeting to discuss the Code Diagnostic, Annotated Table and Zoning
Conversion Table in regards to the development of the Unified Development Code.
Steve Sizemore, Senior Associate, along with Brian Mabry, Code Practice Leader for
Kendig Keast Collaborative, begin the discussion with an overview of the City’s Unified
Development Code (UDC). Mr. Sizemore provided background information on Kendig
Keast Collaborative, and indicated they were a multidisciplinary team with community
planning specialists and plan implementation experts.
Through the development of the UDC, Kendig Keast will build on past efforts, specifically
the Plan 2040 focus areas of Neighborhood of Dreams, Recharge Our Corridor, Safe
and Peaceful Community, Vibrant Environments, and Renewed Infrastructure.
Mr. Sizemore described how the UDC will be organized, and how it is most used often
for causal users and power users. He presented the organization’s objectives through
the process, which include the development of a Unified Development Code,
preservation and enhancement of the City’s character, integration of best practices,
compliance with the Constitution and State Statutes, and the creation of logical structure
and enhanced formatting of the code.
Through this process, it is expected that there will be one source for all development
regulations. Additionally, it will provide procedural streamlining and the UDC will be user-
friendly and easily navigable.
Mr. Sizemore continued with the project approach. Kendig Keast Collaborative’s goal is
to ensure simplification of the process by drafting in plain terms using graphics and
tables, as well as creating flexibility and certainty for applicants and neighbors. Through
the process the UDC will balance City policies and the market to achieve objectives,
while also providing for alternative compliance.
Continuing, the UDC will create value, by streamlining the review procedures and
incorporating best practices for responsible development, all while conserving the
character and quality of neighborhoods. Mr. Sizemore ensured that Kendig Keast will
calibrate the code administration based on staffing capabilities, while understanding the
development climate and regulatory tolerance.
Mr. Sizemore continued his comments by overviewing the project process, as the UDC
is currently in the stakeholder listening sessions step, and City Council and Planning
Commission introductory meetings. Kendig Keast is developing the first deliverables and
identifying areas for development and critique. Important in the process, the UDC will
take guidance from City Council on items for preservation. Kendig Keast indicated the
timeline for adoption of the UDC is November 2022.
Continuing his presentation, Mr. Sizemore indicated the project is divided into two UDC
modules. The first module contains Basic Provisions, Zoning Districts, Land Uses of
permitted, conditional, or special use, Building and Site Design Standards, Subdivision
Standards, Environmental Management, and Use Definitions.
The second module is a technical and administrative component. This module defines
the administrative bodies and provisions, develops review procedures, defines
nonconformities, develops enforcement and remedies, provides rules of construction
and abbreviations, and presents general definitions. Mr. Sizemore indicated this
M211108 Joint City Council & Planning Commission Workshop | Page 2 of 4
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 5 of 72information is already contained with the Nassau Bay code, but the UDC better outlines
the process, and makes it more easily accessible and navigable.
Mr. Sizemore noted that the UDC is currently in the Code Diagnostic phase, which
involves regulatory critique, annotated outline, and stakeholder input. In January to June
of 2022, the UDC will undergo iterative drafting, which includes the two UDC modules,
staff and OAC review, along with presentations. There will be a public review in
September 2022.
The goal of the UDC process is to create a customized, modern code, and also to
remove any vague language or ambiguity within the code. Mr. Sizemore provided the
overall benefits of an updated UDC, which include:
1. Updated language to address common issues, reflection of the community’s
vision, and incorporation of industry best practices
2. Consolidation of source of review procedures, standards, and definitions
3. Production of consistency from such consolidation
4. Provision of a user-friendliness code for staff and lay persons
5. Organization of the flow of the review process, from zoning change to subdivision
review, to site plan to building permit and certificate of occupancy
There was continued discussion on a request for input regarding the process items for
consideration. Additionally, there were comments on future development and how the
UDC works in working with developers. Mr. Sizemore indicated the City utilizes the PUD
process effectively to address items not in the City’s code.
Councilmember Sandra Mossman emphasized a need for the City to ensure that
Nassau Bay is a safe community, and overriding each decision should be the
importance of safety within the City. Mr. Sizemore indicated that the UDC can assist with
providing predictability in the code. Councilmember Phil Johnson indicated that often
safety is viewed as a response to an emergency event. Mr. Sizemore indicated the code
can also address resiliency in terms of specific events, like coastal storms.
City Manager Jason Reynolds briefly discussed the topic of “tiny homes”, and how the
code can be used to address these types of homes, as well as short-term rental issues.
Councilmember Bryce Klug requested assurance that City Council can examine certain
issues on a case by case basis, and overall asked for Council discretion, as some
trends, such as “tiny homes” may not be a good fit for the City.
Planning Commission Chairman Roscoe Lee commented on the State’s restrictions
which have reduced the City’s tools in development. He overviewed the PUD process for
the Nassau Bay Town Square, which elevated the standard for development and serves
as a baseline for other commercial developments. He prefers the SUP and PUD process
for allowing development within the City. Additionally, Chairman Lee believes there
should be continued discussion on home elevations. Overall, Mr. Lee looks forward to
the new streamlined process.
City Manager Reynolds was in agreement and indicated that often there are
requirements in the City’s code that can be in conflict with the City’s homeowner
associations. Mr. Reynolds also commented on changes that can be created within the
code to ensure preservation of the City’s character.
M211108 Joint City Council & Planning Commission Workshop | Page 3 of 4
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 6 of 72There was a brief conversation on the number of restrictions that can be placed within
the UDC, which is approved by City Council. Chairman Lee cautioned against too many
restrictions, as the City may look adverse to outside developers.
Councilmember Ashley Graves inquired up Kendig Keast for success stories of cities
who have recently completed their UDC. Mr. Brian Mabry referenced Dayton, Texas,
which introduced zoning and control of land use. This helped the City address any
problems in a coordinated manner.
Ending the discussion, there were additional comments emphasizing the City’s desire for
preservation and focus on the City’s history.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m.
Minutes approved as submitted and/or amended this 14th day of February, A.D. 2022.
CITY OF NASSAU BAY, TEXAS
___________________________
Robert L. Warters
ATTEST: Mayor
______________________
Sandra V. Ham
City Secretary
M211108 Joint City Council & Planning Commission Workshop | Page 4 of 4
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 7 of 72SPECIAL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF NASSAU BAY, TEXAS
DECEMBER 20, 2021
5:00 PM
MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Bob Warters, Mayor Pro Tem Don Matter,
Councilmembers Phil Johnson, Ashley Graves, Bryce Klug, Sandra Mossman, and Matt
Prior
MEMBERS OF COUNCIL ABSENT: None
OTHERS PRESENT: City Attorney Chris Gregg, Interim City Manager / Police Chief Tim
Cromie, City Secretary Sandra Ham, Finance Director Csilla Ludanyi, Public Works
Director Paul Lopez, Human Resources Manager Chani Honeycutt, and Planning
Commission Chairman Roscoe Lee
PRESIDING: Mayor Bob Warters
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
Mayor Bob Warters called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. and announced a quorum of
Council was present with all elected officials in attendance.
CITIZENS’ REQUEST FOR HEARING BEFORE CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Warters announced a Public Hearing for citizens to address Council regarding
any issues and concerns.
The Public Hearing was opened at 5:02 p.m.
These individuals were in attendance and stated these comments during the Citizens’
Request for Hearing.
Roscoe Lee, 1631 Antigua Lane, expressed concerns regarding Council’s decisions on
transparency, specifically referencing the discussion on broadcasting and live streaming
the City Council meetings. At the last Council meeting, when the opportunity to table
further discussion on broadcasting the meeting, Mr. Lee questioned Council’s decision to
let the motion fail, rather than table for discussion at a future Council meeting. Mr. Lee
argued the lack of support to be indicative of Council’s lack of desire for transparency.
Continuing his comments, Mr. Lee questioned Council’s appointment of a selection
committee for a new City Manager, as there did not seem to be a consensus on which
members of Council should be appointed. He voiced belief that there was a “block” of
votes by Council that continued to defy the wishes of the residents, which has created
much anger and dissent in the community.
Lara Forde, 1911 Back Bay Court, voiced support of Councilmember Phil Johnson for
his sentiments towards transparency, and for his attempts to release the “gag order”
related to the separation agreement with former City Manager Jason Reynolds.
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 8 of 72Jim Stoa, Hereford Lane, recognized the volunteers of Holiday in the Park and
specifically acknowledged the volunteers of Toys for Tots. Mr. Stoa believed it was a
great tradition to have at the special event.
Brian Brown, 1454 Davon Ln, voiced his concerns regarding the City Manager
process, as there are many upcoming large projects to occur in the City, including the
significant utility upgrades. Mr. Brown stated it was unfortunate for the City to be in a
situation without a strong City Manager at the helm. He believed the City Manager role
to be imperative during this strong season of projects, including the playground, sand
filter rehabilitation, sewer and water line project, home elevation program, street paving
project, and more. Continuing, he noted that residents would implement broadcasting of
the City Council meetings. Although not the highest quality, the video transmission will
be secure and will not incur bandwidth issues. He ended his comments by noting it
should be a simple process to offer this service to the Nassau Bay residents.
Boris Berezin, 1815 Davon Lane, commented on the Nassau Bay art monument near
the Hilton Hotel, which he understands to be symbolic of a shuttle launch. He asked for
consideration of a replicated monument at the Town Square. Mr. Berezin also
commented on the storage container in view at the church, and requested to Council
that it be removed, as residents object to the eyesore.
Michelle Weller, 1833 Saxony Lane, understood there were many residents who could
not make the meeting, many of which who agreed with the termination of former City
Manager Reynolds. Ms. Weller continued her comments by arguing against the use of
Facebook for livestreaming the City Council meetings. She believes there is an
opportunity for the video transmission to be comprised, or possibly censored on the
social media site. She does not support resident tax dollars to be spent on broadcasting
Council meetings.
Phil Johnson, 2011 Back Bay Court, referenced the discussions regarding
transparency, as he understands there are a number of residents interested in promoting
the video transmission of City Council meetings. Mr. Johnson encouraged the City to
review the process utilized by Gloria De Lutheran Church in their video streaming of their
services. Continuing, he stated his support of removing the “gag rule” within the
separation agreement with former City Manager Jason Reynolds. He emphasized that
any amendments to the agreement to release information need to be mutually agreed
upon by both parties, and believed it was not good for the Nassau Bay community to
have restrictions within the release of information. Mr. Johnson stated his desire to
continue to push for transparency in the process.
Bryce Klug, 18639 Cape Charles Lane, wished to recognize George Abbey, who
recently celebrated the renaming of NASA’s Rocket Park to the George W.S. Abbey
Rocket Park.
Lisa Brooks, 18635 Cape Charles Lane, voiced her discomfort with utilization of
Facebook, and voiced concern regarding the possibility of Council meetings being cyber-
attacked. Additionally, she voiced concerns that Facebook as an organization could no
longer exist, and the City would lose data stored by the company. Continuing her
comments, Ms. Brooks questioned who Mr. Reynolds was, and why there continues to
be controversy regarding his separation with the City. She stated support of the elected
officials, and argued the City’s priorities should shift to other issues, such as the
M211220 Special Meeting | Page 2 of 5
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 9 of 72electrical outages issues recently experienced by many, in which she was personally
without power for 16 hours.
These individuals submitted comments to be read under the Citizens’ Request for
Hearing.
Matthew Brooks, 18635 Cape Charles Lane, submitted his statement which was read
verbatim: “My name is Matthew Brooks and we live at 18635 Cape Charles Lane in
Nassau Bay. While I have not been attending the council meetings, I learned this
weekend that a motion was made to stream these meetings on Facebook Live. I agree
with the need for transparency and that streaming would enable more to be fully
educated on the current issues. I have serious concerns about Facebook as I am
writing to ask that they consider a different platform to ensure broader access and
security.
First, we cannot guarantee that these meetings are fully safe from being corrupted or
cooped by outside entities that do not have the best interest of Nassau Bay at heart.
Hacking into systems stories are very relevant in these times as well. Cyber security
should be paramount in the effort to have a seamless and informative meeting. I am for
transparency, but I am also for placing a higher regard for the security and sanctity of
that process.
Second, in suggesting streaming on Facebook, it could and would alienate those
community folks in Nassau Bay that just don't want to participate or join Facebook
outright. There are many other platforms that can be used that do not require
membership to access their sites and in some cases are a onetime event. We need to
think about getting as many residents involved and making sure that access is broad
and less cumbersome for all Nassau Bay residents. Just wanted to share my input on
this matter. Thank you and Happy Holidays to all of our Nassau Bay residents.”
Sara Plunk, 18639 Prince William Lane, submitted her statement which was read
verbatim: “My name is Sara Plunk and I live at 18639 Prince William Ln. I am sorry I
couldn't make it this evening but hope to watch the recording of the meeting, ideally in
real time. As you know, it is important for a lot of the citizens of Nassau Bay to feel like
they are a part of the city government. Part of the draw of this city is that it is such a
close-knit community. I would request that the council reconsider their position on
streaming the council meetings or making the recordings available without a request.
I know several of you expressed concern over logistics. However, proof of concept has
already been established during the covid streaming. We are not asking for perfect
quality, just to be included. The omicron variant has started to shut things down again.
However, beyond Covid, there are many citizens in NB that are homebound, elderly,
immune compromised, have small children, and/or have busy work schedules. All of
these people should not be excluded from participating and staying involved in city
government.
Throughout my time as a resident, I have heard many elected officials lament about the
lack of involvement in city government and participation. Why then would we deny
people every opportunity to do so? Failing to give everyone access to these meetings is
a failure at being inclusive. It is a failure at getting people involved. It is failing to create
community.
M211220 Special Meeting | Page 3 of 5
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 10 of 72At least 3 of you stated at the last meeting that there should be a workshop on how best
to accomplish live streaming of the council meetings. However, when the motion was
presented, not one of you seconded. If you wouldn't second the very thing you had just
said we needed, it is obvious that you never really intended to do it. Quit beating around
the bush and gaslighting people with made up reasons about why this won't work. It has
worked. It does work. The videos already exist. If there is an actual reason why you
don't want to live stream the meetings to include as many people as possible, let's hear
it. If not, I hope to see the item on the agenda at the next meeting. Thank you for your
time and your service to the citizens of Nassau Bay.”
Omar Abotteen, 18327 Barbuda Lane, submitted his statement which was read
verbatim: “Like other Nassau Bay citizens I'm writing tonight to voice my disappointment
in the city council's recent decisions and lack of transparency. We all make mistakes
and unfortunately it feels like council is currently knee deep in them. As if the debacle
with the release of our last city manager wasn't enough, council seems focused on
continuing the streak with their latest round of decisions.
Let's start with the simple request for citizens' ability to view council meetings remotely.
It's hard to understand why this request is so difficult to accommodate given it's already
been done, both for City Council meetings and Coffee with the City Manager. It's easy
to hide behind the excuses that a previous City Council meeting was "hacked", or the
quality won't be great, or it will cost too much, but those comparisons are not equal to
what is being requested. I'm not sure if Council is aware of how technology works but
there is zero chance of someone hacking into a meeting if it is simply being recorded
and broadcasted virtually. Nobody is asking for movie level quality nor the ability to
virtually raise their hand and ask questions during the meeting - they literally just want to
see it without needing to submit a federally binding request. Hopefully we have a few
citizens in person tonight who are livestreaming the meeting for those of us who could
not attend a 5pm city council meeting.
Going back to the City Manager mess, it's disheartening to hear the voting majority of
a committee charged with finding a new City Manager is comprised of people directly
responsible for the release of our former City Manager. Was it too much to ask for even
one person who supported the last City Manager to be on the selection committee? I'm
guessing a fully unbiased and transparent committee was totally out of the question? If
Council's agenda wasn't apparent before, it's painfully obvious now. Luckily city
councilmembers can be voted in and out when needed but installing an inadequate City
Manager will produce damaging effects that extend past councilmembers' terms.
As if these issues weren't enough, there's also the Kid Course fiasco, the baseball fields
that remain in shambles, the art monument money pit, Swan Lagoon's disintegrating
playground, illegally parked vehicles in front yards, near-constant water line breaks as
well as a short list of other problems that given the day council is either ignoring or
hyper-focused on. Council currently has a lot of irons in the fire, no clear direction on
which one to take out and just fired the person most equipped to keep the city on-track.
It's my hope that council will use the upcoming holiday break to pause, look back on their
recent decisions, see past their own personal and combined agendas, and finally start
doing what is right for city.”
There were no other public comments, and the Public Hearing was closed at 5:27 p.m.
M211220 Special Meeting | Page 4 of 5
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 11 of 72EXECUTIVE (CLOSED) SESSION
Executive Session as authorized by Texas Government Code, Chapter 551, Open
Meetings, Subchapter D, Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open
Meeting recessed to Executive Session at 5:27 p.m. as authorized by Texas
Government Code, Chapter 551, Open Meetings, Subchapter D, Exceptions to
Requirement that Meeting be Open, with Mayor Warters reading from the posted agenda
the following topic to be discussed in Executive Session:
1. §551.074 Personnel – Discuss the employment, evaluation,
compensation, goals, and duties of the Interim City Manager.
Meeting returned to Open Session at 5:40 p.m.
ACTION ITEMS FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION
Authorization of the Mayor to execute an employment contract with Police Chief
Tim Cromie for the Interim City Manager position, and the appointment of Tim
Cromie as Interim City Manager for the City of Nassau Bay, Texas, effective
January 1, 2022, as discussed in Executive Session
It was moved by Councilmember Bryce Klug, seconded by Councilmember Matt Prior, to
authorize Mayor Bob Warters to execute an employment contract with Police Chief Tim
Cromie for the Interim City Manager position, and to appoint Tim Cromie as Interim City
Manager for the City of Nassau Bay, Texas, effective January 1, 2022, as discussed in
Executive Session.
Motion passed 7 – 0.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:43 p.m.
Minutes approved as submitted and/or amended this 14th day of February A.D. 2022.
CITY OF NASSAU BAY, TEXAS
_________________________
Robert L. Warters
Mayor
ATTEST
_________________________
Sandra V. Ham
City Secretary
M211220 Special Meeting | Page 5 of 5
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 12 of 72SPECIAL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF NASSAU BAY, TEXAS
DECEMBER 28, 2021
5:00 PM
MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tem Don Matter, Councilmembers
Phil Johnson, Ashley Graves, Bryce Klug, Sandra Mossman, and Matt Prior
MEMBERS OF COUNCIL ABSENT: Mayor Bob Warters (arrived 5:32 p.m.)
OTHERS PRESENT: City Attorney Dick Gregg, Jr., City Attorney Chris Gregg, Interim
City Manager / Police Chief Tim Cromie, City Secretary Sandra Ham, Finance Director
Csilla Ludanyi, and Planning Commission Chairman Roscoe Lee
PRESIDING: Mayor Pro Tem Don Matter
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
Mayor Pro Tem Don Matter called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. and announced a
quorum of Council was present with six elected officials in attendance.
CITIZENS’ REQUEST FOR HEARING BEFORE CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Pro Tem Matter announced a Public Hearing for citizens to address Council
regarding any issues and concerns.
The Public Hearing was opened at 5:06 p.m.
These individuals were in attendance and stated these comments during the Citizens’
Request for Hearing.
Roscoe Lee, 1631 Antigua Lane, was gratified to hear there would be discussion
regarding the release of the separation agreement between the City and former City
Manager Jason Reynolds. If the release is authorized by City Council, Mr. Lee
suggested Council consider hosting a Town Hall meeting to answer citizen questions
regarding the separation, in order to allow full transparency around the situation.
Brian Brown, 1454 Davon Lane, expressed appreciation for Council’s consideration of
transparency with former City Manager Reynolds’ separation, although he
acknowledged throughout the process several requests for disclosure of public
information have been denied. He continued by overviewing the citizen video broadcast
of City Council meetings and detailed the number of viewers participating in each of the
broadcasted meetings. Mr. Brown indicated there to be demand for watching these
meetings and overall citizen interest in transparency.
Sara Plunk, 18639 Prince William Lane, stated appreciation to Council for opening
dialogue regarding Mr. Reynolds’ separation. For the upcoming City Council meeting,
Ms. Plunk request Council’s consideration in allowing the livestream broadcast of
Council meetings. Additionally, she suggests placing these meetings to be viewed on the
City’s website by utilizing the already existing equipment and processes in place.
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 13 of 72Jim Stoa, 18315 Hereford Lane, announced an upcoming kayak event that will be held
in Clear Lake. This event will raise awareness for veterans suffering from post-traumatic
stress disorder.
Mary Abraham, 1814 Antiqua Lane, commented on the recent citizen survey results for
the site location of the KidCourse 1800 playground. She indicated that the David Braun
Park site had five locations, for total cumulative results of 126 votes. In comparison,
Howard Ward Park had two location options, for total cumulative results of 93 votes.
Overall, with David Braun Park having a total of more votes, she requested that Council
consider the final location for the playground at David Braun Park. She referenced
feedback from citizens near Swan Lagoon Park, and requested Council also consider
the feedback from those residents near Howard Ward Park.
Boris Berezin, 1815 Davon Lane, commented that the playground issue is rather a
magnification of large issues within the City, specifically issues on transparency. He
inquired whether the City had budgeted funds for the KidCourse 1800 apparatus and
requested that Council not choose Howard Ward Park as the final installation site.
Diana Clark, 1415 Antiqua Lane, expressed appreciation to all that donated to the Toys
for Tots bins at City Hall and the Holiday in the Park special event. The Galveston area
chapter of Toys for Tots raising over 12,000 toys for children in need. Additionally,
residents donated $422 towards the cause.
Ashley Graves, 18211 Hereford Lane, read her prepared statement, which stated:
“What does transparency mean? Transparency means operating in such a way that it is
easy for
others to see what actions are performed. Transparency implies openness,
communication, and accountability. There has been discussion regarding the removal of
the so-called “gag order” in the separation agreement made between our city manager
Jason Reynolds and Council. If lifted, this would allow for both Jason Reynolds and
members of the Council to discuss the separation situation more openly with citizens.
But is this full transparency? Or the green light on dispersing constructed narratives that
some may wish to cultivate? I question the level of full transparency here.
We are a city that put a human on the moon. Our citizens are well-educated and highly
intelligent people. We owe our citizens full transparency. We owe it to them to allow
them access to all the documents and information pertaining to the lead-up and
execution of the separation agreement. Our citizens deserve the opportunity to have full
transparency, to have access to all the information so that they can come to their own
conclusion and find the answers they seek based on evidence, documents and facts, not
constructed narratives.
In an effort to see actual, full transparency I urge Council to not only remove the so-
called “gag order” in the separation agreement. I also urge Council to release all
documents pending before the Attorney General in a request to withhold those
documents filed by the city attorney. There is no reason our citizens should be denied
these documents and emails as they were requested through the Freedom of
Information Act, if the Council intends to provide actual FULL transparency. Partial
transparency is not transparency.”
M211228 Special Meeting | Page 2 of 5
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 14 of 72Phil Johnson, 2011 Back Bay Court, expressed satisfaction that Council would be
voting on the potential release of the separation agreement with former City Manager
Reynolds. He stated a desire for full disclosure regarding the separation process.
Continuing, Mr. Johnson thanked the Parks & Recreation Committee for their efforts with
the citizen survey regarding the KidCourse 1800 playground. Overviewing the survey
results, he stated a majority of citizens were in favor of the playground, with only five
residents voting against. Additionally, 58% of respondents chose David Braun Park. Mr.
Johnson noted the KidCourse 1800 playground would be addressed at the January 10th
City Council meeting.
There were no other public comments, and the Public Hearing was closed at 5:27 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS
Approval of a resolution authorizing the Finance Director to execute a
Government Obligation Contract between KS State Bank (Obligee) and City of
Nassau Bay, Texas (Obligor) for the acquisition of three vehicles
Finance Director Csilla Ludanyi stated that as a part of the FY2022 Budget and CIP, City
Council approved the replacement of two Police Interceptor Units and the EMS response
vehicle. These vehicles are being purchased and financed over four years. The vehicles
have been delivered to the City and are currently being upfitted or are scheduled to be
upfitted in the coming weeks as parts are received from various suppliers.
Finance Director Ludanyi noted that the General Obligation Contract for these vehicles
has compiled all the costs into one obligation totaling $161,878.65. The City is using
Leasecure of Houston, Texas and the financing bank is KS StateBank, as the City has
done over the last seven years for Police Department vehicle purchases. Ms. Ludanyi
indicated that older units will be sold via auction and the proceeds will be returned to the
Fleet Fund to offset purchase costs. The resolution authorizes the Finance Director to
sign the documents for the financing of these vehicles.
Mayor Pro Tem Don Matter requested City Attorney review of the obligation contract,
with City Attorney Dick Gregg, Jr. confirming he has reviewed and approved. City
Attorney Gregg affirmed that the City is utilizing a legal bid process for the purchase of
these vehicles.
Councilmember Bryce Klug inquired whether the vehicle purchases were budgeted, with
Finance Director Ludanyi indicating them to be budgeted.
Mayor Pro Tem Matter affirmed the City’s position on transparency and highlighted that
the City’s check register in available on the City’s website for all to view regarding the
City’s finances.
The caption of the resolution reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NASSAU
BAY, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A GOVERNMENT
OBLIGATION CONTRACT BETWEEN KS STATEBANK (OBLIGEE) AND
THE CITY OF NASSAU BAY, TEXAS (OBLIGOR) FOR THE
ACQUISITION OF THREE VEHICLES.
M211228 Special Meeting | Page 3 of 5
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 15 of 72(Said Resolution is of record in Resolution Book No. 19 of the City of
Nassau Bay, Texas, being Resolution No. R2021-2239.)
It was moved by Councilmember Bryce Klug, seconded by Councilmember Sandra
Mossman, to approve the resolution authorizing the Finance Director to execute a
Government Obligation Contract between KS State Bank (Obligee) and City of Nassau
Bay, Texas (Obligor) for the acquisition of three vehicles.
Motion passed 6 – 0.
Due to issues with the teleconference, Mayor Bob Warters was not counted present until
his audio and video issues were resolved. Mayor Warters was marked in attendance at
5:32 p.m.
EXECUTIVE (CLOSED) SESSION
Executive Session as authorized by Texas Government Code, Chapter 551, Open
Meetings, Subchapter D, Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open
Meeting recessed to Executive Session at 5:32 p.m. as authorized by Texas
Government Code, Chapter 551, Open Meetings, Subchapter D, Exceptions to
Requirement that Meeting be Open, with Mayor Pro Tem Don Matter reading from the
posted agenda the following topic to be discussed in Executive Session:
1. §551.071 (2) – On a matter in which the duty of the Attorney to the
governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional
Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with this Chapter.
Meeting returned to Open Session at 5:59 p.m.
ACTION ITEMS FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION
Action on the modification of a previously executed Separation Agreement
between Jason Reynolds and the City of Nassau Bay to allow public discourse
and access to the agreement
It was moved by Councilmember Phil Johnson, seconded by Councilmember Bryce
Klug, to authorize Councilmember Phil Johnson and City Attorney Dick Gregg to
negotiate with former City Manager Jason Reynolds and his legal team to modify the
previously executed Separation Agreement to allow public discourse and access to the
agreement.
Motion passed 6 – 1, Warters opposed.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:04 p.m.
Minutes approved as submitted and/or amended this 14th day of February A.D. 2022.
M211228 Special Meeting | Page 4 of 5
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 16 of 72CITY OF NASSAU BAY, TEXAS
_________________________
Robert L. Warters
Mayor
ATTEST
_________________________
Sandra V. Ham
City Secretary
M211228 Special Meeting | Page 5 of 5
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 17 of 72REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF NASSAU BAY, TEXAS
JANUARY 10, 2022
7:00 PM
MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Bob Warters, Mayor Pro Tem Don Matter,
Councilmembers Phil Johnson, Ashley Graves, Bryce Klug, Sandra Mossman, and Matt
Prior
MEMBERS OF COUNCIL ABSENT: None
OTHERS PRESENT: City Attorney Dick Gregg, Jr., Chris Gregg, Interim City Manager /
Police Chief Tim Cromie, City Secretary Sandra Ham, Finance Director Csilla Ludanyi,
Public Works Director Paul Lopez, Fire Chief Tom George, Human Resources Manager
Chani Honeycutt, Director of Communications & Tourism Kristin Edwards, and Planning
Commission Chairman Roscoe Lee
PRESIDING: Mayor Bob Warters
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
Mayor Bob Warters called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and announced a quorum of
Council was present with all elected officials in attendance.
PLEDGES OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE U.S. AND TEXAS FLAGS
Park Place Commandery #106 performed the Flag presentation. Nassau Bay Officer
Hank Hughes, who is a member of Park Place Commandery #106, provided a brief
overview of the organization. Mayor Bob Warters issued Park Place Commandery #106
a Certificate of Appreciation to the organization and posed for a photo.
After the Flag presentation, Interim City Manager Chief Cromie provided a special
recognition to Officer Henry “Hank” Hughes for 40 years of service with the City of
Nassau Bay. Mr. Cromie noted that a local citizen wanted to recognize Officer Hughes
for his service to Nassau Bay and his dedication to his “bus runs” during the school year.
A CANBE Legacy brick was purchased in honor of him and is placed in David Braun
Park, with the wording “Nassau Bay Bus Guardian Officer Hank Hughes.”
APPOINTMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS, PRESENTATIONS, AWARDS
Presentation of a Check to Bay Area Houston Ballet and Theatre
Mayor Warters presented Jill Reason of the Bay Area Houston Ballet and Theatre a
check in the amount of $1,000 from the Hotel/Motel Tax fund. Ms. Reason provided an
overview of the Theatre’s events throughout the year, including the holiday ballet show,
which these funds help support. A photo was taken of Mayor Warters and Ms. Reason.
Presentation of a Check to Clear Creek Environmental Foundation
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 18 of 72Mayor Bob Warters recognized the Clear Creek Environmental Foundation (CCEF) for
their annual efforts in the Nassau Bay Peninsula Cleanup. He announced a $2,000
contribution to the CCEF for this year’s volunteer efforts on February 12th and invited
several audience members to provide additional comments on the event. Long-time
Peninsula Cleanup volunteer Mark Denman provided additional details on the clean-up
efforts, with the focus of CCEF this year to be the Nassau Bay peninsula. Parks &
Recreation Committee Chairman Roscoe Lee also described the online volunteer sign-in
process and encouraged all to join the event on February 12th.
CITIZENS’ REQUEST FOR HEARING BEFORE CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Warters announced a Public Hearing for citizens to address Council regarding
any issues and concerns.
The Public Hearing was opened at 7:22 p.m.
These individuals were in attendance and stated these comments during the Citizens’
Request for Hearing.
Jonathan Amdur, 17 Leeward Lane, referenced his belief of poor decision making by
City Council and noted a need for Council to make corrections to increase transparency
and citizen trust. Mr. Amdur voiced concerns regarding the recent KidCourse 1800
playground decision, with a need for Council to engage the community in the process.
He requested returning the playground equipment as an option for Council to choose, or
to let plurality decide on the location of the playground. Continuing, he suggested open
meeting violations amongst several members of Council in regards to the separation of
the former City Manager. Ending his comments, he voiced concerns that the employees
of the Public Works Department to be overworked, and that Council should provide
additional assistance to the Public Works crews in order to reduce staff turnover.
James Simpson, 18347 Cape Bahamas, allowed his daughter to speak on his behalf,
who urged City Council to not consider returning the KidCourse 1800 playground
equipment, as she currently has to travel to Taylor Lake Village to use more challenging
and age appropriate equipment.
Jim Benson, 1802 Davon Lane, stated that as a retired attorney that there should be
discussions regarding public nuisance laws, specifically referencing the KidCourse 1800
playground installation in Howard Ward Park. As many residents are opposed to the
Howard Ward Park possible site location, financial charges could be brought to the City
under this nuisance law. Mr. Benson provide a description of “public nuisance” in terms
of installation in Howard Ward Park, and strongly recommended that City Council
research more into this law. Ending his comments, he cast his vote for no installation in
Howard Ward Park.
Sara Plunk, 18639 Prince William, indicated she reached out to all City Council
members in favor of the KidCourse 1800 playground to solicit further information on their
vote for the playground. She overviewed a conversation with one member of Council, in
which she felt a negative response was received. Ms. Plunk urged Council to listen to
those concerned on both sides, and noted there may not be a good option for installation
at any location within the City.
M220110 Regular Meeting | Page 2 of 15
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 19 of 72Lara Forde, 1911 Back Bay Court, stated that she was a mother of a nine-year who
was enthusiastic about the KidCourse 1800 playground. She indicated there has been
more positive feedback on the park equipment than ever. Ms. Forde overviewed her
interactions throughout the process in acquiring the playground, and believed the
KidCourse 1800 to provide more options than the previously purchased Stadium ninja-
style model. She voiced support for the community’s children to have a more challenging
playground and was sadden that the playground had become a political issue.
Michelle Weller, 1833 Saxony Lane, referenced her involvement in the playground
issues due to the possibility of Howard Ward Park being selected as a possible site. She
noted that although an option from David Braun Park did not receive the most votes
during the citizen survey, overall, David Braun Park had more total votes than Howard
Ward Park. She voiced support for the playground, and believed it would attract more
families to Nassau Bay. Without an investment in the City’s children, she believes there
will be reduced interaction among the community, especially significant as the pandemic
has greatly affected children and families. Ms. Weller provided a petition of 146 names
of those in support of the KidCourse 1800 playground.
Lisa Shulte, Back Bay Court, stated that as a teacher she has seen how COVID has
affected the mental health of her students. Ms. Shulte emphasized that outdoor
interaction is needed, as children learn to socialize with others during this period of
social isolation. She stated a need for park options appropriate for all ages, which
includes more challenging playground equipment that will increase social interaction. As
an educator of children, Ms. Shulte emphasized a need for the KidCourse 1800
playground.
Lucy Johannes, 1503 Davon Lane, stated that she as a mother of two children, she
has noticed that families are increasing becoming attracted to Nassau Bay. Reviewing
the City’s financials, she believes there to be no financial issues related to not
purchasing the KidCourse 1800 playground. Ms. Johannes stated at the existing
playground she does not allow her older 11-year-old child to play on the same
equipment as her 5-year-old, as she believes it to be a danger for older children to play
with younger children. Due to this, she urges Council to consider the need for the larger
KidCourse 1800 playground.
Emily Simpson, 18347 Cape Bahamas Lane, indicated she is a mother of two children,
and wanted to initially express appreciation to City staff, City volunteers, and City
Council for all of the meeting discussions regarding the playground issue. Ms. Simpson
believes the playground decision to be important, as it is an outlet for her children during
the pandemic. As she has recently undergone some health issues, the playground is a
safe area that her children can bike to within the City. The KidCourse 1800 will be an
age-appropriate playground option her children can look forward to while undergoing
their personal family difficulties.
Mary Abraham, 1814 Antigua Lane, commented her desire for what is best for the
neighborhood. She referenced the foul language by teenagers playing on the nearby
basketball court at Howard Ward Park, and emphasized the large KidCourse 1800
playground would attract the same behaviors and language, ergo, it did not belong at
Howard Ward Park. Ms. Abraham believed this large playground should be installed at
David Braun Park. Ms. Abraham urged Council to consider the feedback from residents
around Howard Ward Park, similar to their decision regarding Swan Lagoon Park.
M220110 Regular Meeting | Page 3 of 15
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 20 of 72Boris Berezin, 1815 Davon Lane, stated he has lived across from Howard Ward Park
for 15 years, and although he is speaking in regards to his personal best interest, he
argued that the playground turmoil is a litmus test for a larger issue going on within the
City. He urged Council to not ruin the serenity of Howard Ward Park. He believes there
is a lack of accountability from Council, as he has felt dismissed by several members.
Mr. Berezin believes Nassau Bay deserves the best, and emphasized that election
season is in full swing.
Daniel Young, 18731 Martinique Drive, provided comments on the recent KidCourse
1800 citizen survey results, and inquired on several locations, as related to drainage and
square footage fit. He encouraged further study on any location chosen in David Braun
Park, as most citizen feedback appears to be in favor of this park.
These individuals submitted comments to be read under the Citizens’ Request for
Hearing.
Gloria Summey, 18610 Carriage Court, submitted her statement which was read
verbatim: “Mayor and City Council, I voted for the Kids Course 1800 and continue to
support the forward progress with its placement. Unfortunately, I did not get the
opportunity to vote on location but support the majority vote on placement. I am
saddened to hear the talk of cancelling this project altogether. I feel it is important to
continue to support our youth and encourage outdoor physical activity with age-
appropriate equipment. I hope the parks committee continues to be transparent in its
future endeavors in support our wonderful community and to avoid political
conflict. Please do not kill the playground equipment. Concerned parent and resident.”
Lynn Osina, 18311 Hereford, submitted her statement which was read verbatim: “Dear
Mayor and City Council, I understand a small group of people are trying to cancel the
(already budgeted and paid for) Kid Course 1800 playground after a vote on location
(with the majority of votes for David Braun park). I did not even know there was a vote
for the equipment as I understand out of 4,000 Nassau Bay only a small group of people
were notified of the voting and only 219 voted. I am furious the entirety of the community
was not included in this and if I ever find out a member of the council hand selects who
they are going to ask to vote on an important issue I will immediately start a campaign to
impeach them. This truly underhanded.
When you only receive 219 votes you should not assume the vote opportunity has
gotten where it should go. Two hundred nineteen people do not speak for 4000.
Common sense tells you that. If I could vote I would have said YES! I agree with City
Council’s purchase of the Kids Course 1800 and I would choose David Braun park next
to the basketball court. If we can supply not one, but two dog parks surely we can
certainly provide a place for our children to play. I would like to see the playground
equipment in one place for children of all ages to enjoy. We need places for our kids to
play! You have a duty not to kill the playground equipment!”
Rhonda Kay Velders, 18303 Blanchmont Ln, submitted her statement which was read
verbatim: “Dear Mayor and City Council, It has come to my attention that some people
are attempting to cancel the Kidscourse 1800 playground that was voted to be in David
Braun Park because it was a ‘duplicate’ of the Stadium equipment. I would like to say
that I strongly support sitting City Council’s vote to KEEP BOTH playgrounds (Stadium
M220110 Regular Meeting | Page 4 of 15
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 21 of 72and Kidscourse1800) in David Braun Park and will explain why kids need MORE
playground equipment.
My husband and I moved to this neighborhood for the sweet amenities it had to offer.
We purchased our beautiful home in the fall of 2015 knowing we would have a place to
take our future grandchildren. The parks were a major attraction in making the decision
to find the right neighborhood. And Nassau Bay is/was the place we chose.
As a professional in the mental health field, I work with children and adolescents as they
try to navigate through life and this pandemic, we all have found ourselves to learn and
manage through. In my practice, I continue to see fearful, isolated, and severe cases of
depression and anxiety in our young people. As part of my treatment for my clients, I
urge them to get outside to play and exercise whenever possible. Often times, I take my
young people to the park to provide a healthy interaction where they can play on the
equipment. The new idea of the KidCourse 1800 sounds like an amazing way to allow
for our young people to get out and not only soak up the natural vitamin D from the sun,
but to allow the brain to release serotonin and dopamine from engaging in healthy play.
I see way too often clients who play on gaming systems for hours or isolate in their
rooms because they are lonely and depressed. Nassau Bay has a great opportunity to
help turn around the rise in mental health issues with our young people. This will also
provide the avenue for parents to get out and walk their children to the park or
participate with their pre-teens/teens at the park once the KidCourse 1800 is installed.
Throughout the pandemic there has been a rise in suicidal ideation due to isolation and
inactivity and KidCourse 1800 could actually help their mental well-being. I believe that
we can all work together to develop a strong presence in our neighborhood that says we
love our children and teens by giving them as many opportunities as possible through
achieving a sense of accomplishment when completing a challenging course that is both
mental and physical. Please do not kill KidCourse 1800 ‘ninja’ playground. The
challenges of implementing it will be well worth it. We need to do all we can to provide
healthy outlets to stabilize mental health in our young people.
I voted for the area next to the basketball court in David Braun Park.”
Brian Brown, 1454 Davon Ln, submitted his statement which was read verbatim:
“Happy New Year, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, city staff and fellow citizens of
Nassau Bay! Over the past several council meetings, the big buzzword has been
“Transparency”. Folks have stood here at the podium and explained what it means,
provided examples, and even called for it countless times. Tonight, this council has a
golden opportunity to show transparency in action when you all vote on the renegotiated
verbiage pertaining to the non-disclosure parts of the Separation Agreement with the
former City Manager, Jason Reynolds. While the vote can go either way (this is why
votes are held), anything short of a unanimous vote to release the City and Jason from
the “gag order” would show that Transparency is just a buzzword, and not a guiding
principle of a governing body that has the best interests of its people in mind.
As for the live-streaming efforts, from the Special Meeting on December 28th, the
Facebook Live feed was watched 124 times with 84 unique viewers, 12 of those viewers
joined us for the live broadcast itself. The video was also uploaded to YouTube where it
received 130 views in the first 24 hours, and currently sits at 155 total views. With the
first two citizen broadcasts covering special meetings during the holiday season, we
M220110 Regular Meeting | Page 5 of 15
February 14, 2022 City Council Meeting | Page 22 of 72You can also read
