Smoothie's - Glass half full or half empty? - May 2011
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Smoothie’s – Glass half full or half empty?
May 2011
Contents
Market Environment
Market size & forecast
• Having seen exponential growth of 159% in volume sales between 2005 and 2007, the smoothies
market then saw a dramatic reversal in fortunes with a 36% decline between 2007 and 2009 as
consumer spend became increasingly squeezed
• Mintel forecasts that this decline will slow in 2010 and the market will experience slow but steady
growth thereafter, however not to the extent seen in the mid-2000s where Innocent almost single-
handedly grew the category from scratch
Market trends and forecast for smoothie value (current prices) and volume sales, 2005-2015
100 250
80 200
m litres
£m
60 150
40 100
20 50
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
(est)
Volume sales (litres) - left axis Value sales (£m) - right axis
Source: Mintel
Market share • It has been an incredibly tough three years for Innocent which has seen its value cut by a third • While, this has mostly been due to the recession, its brand equity has also taken a number of hits which may make it more difficult to recover in the long-term • Innocent is increasingly focusing on its kids products which now account for a fifth of its retail sales. This is a growing market and one which Ella’s Kitchen, while tiny in comparison, has done well to exploit • Pepsico’s presence in the market has been curtailed by the failure of Tropicana smoothies to fill the gap left by its decision to pull PJs • Ironically, this means that Innocent has increased its share of the market (now 80%) despite losing revenue
Ad Market & Traffic Trends
Smoothies Search Traffic KPIs
Traffic
• Searches for smoothies and smoothie
related terms (including brands) increased
by +2% in 2010 compared to 2009.
• Searches for smoothie terms increased by
+89% Jan to March 2011 v Jan to March
2010.
Insights:
• The term ‘smoothies’ is the highest traffic
driving term. However, this is closely
followed by the brand ‘Innocent Smoothies’
which shows how the Innocent brand has
impacted consumer behaviour when
searching for a specific smoothie product.
1. Microsoft Advertising Intelligence Tool
Smoothie Demographics and Daily Trends
Wednesday has been the largest traffic
driving day over the last 2 months followed
closely by Monday’s.
Potential incremental targeting opportunities
would include up-weighting target campaigns
on certain days of the week
The 18-24 and 25-34 age brackets are the
main age groups for traffic with 34% and
31% respectively.
Gender breakdown tends to focus on
Females with 65% of searches being
female vs. 33% male. 2% remains as
‘unknown gender’.
1.Microsoft Advertising Intelligence Tool – December 2010 to Feb 2011 data
Industry Insights
Internal Market Environment
• Consumers are now demanding a lot more from brands and
• Smoothies have struggled to convince consumers of their value credentials and are
therefore viewed as a non-essential luxury
• Despite UK consumers having less money to spend, the desire for more
premium and healthy products remains a key driver for the soft drinks
sector - and smoothies remains well-placed to meet these needs
• Smoothies have been damaged by negative publicity around their health
credentials
• E.g. damage to teeth and high calorie-intake despite scientific evidence to the contrary
• However, smoothies are still seen by consumers as a healthy product and the
drive towards making sure kids have a healthier diet is playing to their
advantage
• Increased consumer choice means that penetration of individual soft
drink types has been in decline for the past five years for all but
energy/sports drinks
• The economic downturn has had a huge impact on the dynamics of the
market with previously growing categories such as smoothies, bottled
water and premium soft drinks experiencing a sharp drop in salesPrice-point as a barrier to consumer usage of smoothies
Mintel’s analysis shows that litre cartons of Innocent are at roughly the right price-point but that the
impulse 250ml bottles need to come down to stimulate mainstream consumer purchasing. With Coca
Cola now the majority stake-holder in Innocent, it has the opportunity to grow the company so that they
can leverage scale to reduce these prices
Price positioning of selected soft drinks, based on packaging size
£3.50
Innocent smoothie
£3.00
Fentiman's rose
Expensive
lemonade
£2.50
Tropicana pure fruit juice
£2.00 Schloer
Innocent smoothie
Lucozade
£1.50 Red Bull Tropicana
pure fruit juice Glaceau mineral water
£1.00 Value
Lucozade Alert RTD ribena Coca Cola
£0.50
Evian
Coca Cola
£0.00
250ml 330ml 500ml 750ml 1 litre 1.25 litres
Source: mysupermarket.com/Mintel (August 2010)
All prices from Tesco.com in August 2010.Consumption & most popular brands
Out of the total fruit drink/ vegetable drink/ smoothie market in the UK Innocent ranks 3rd with 14% of
consumers saying it is one of their most often consumed brands.
The relatively high price of smoothie/ fruit drinks market means one can conclude that they could be
considered a ‘treat’ or luxury by consumers, which is why almost 7 out of 10 consume them 2/3 times
a week or less.
Consumption: Heavy, Medium, Low Brand
Answered yes to ‘consume
most often’
Tesco 20.07
Tropicana Juices 19.15
8.01%
Innocent 14.35
Heavy (More than once Asda 12.79
a day)
23.59% Sainsbury's 12.49
Medium (Once a day)
Other Brands 9.39
Low (2-3 times a week Other Supermarket's Own Brand 9.32
or less)
68.40%
Ocean Spray Cranberry Classic 8.28
Morrisons 7.89
Capri-Sun 7.76
Ribena 7.3
Base: Smoothie consumers in the last 12 months
Source: TGI GB Q1 2011Consumer attitudes to smoothies
• The convenience of smoothies in contributing towards people’s five-a-day is considered a huge
benefit by consumers and this has been a focal point for Innocent’s recent communications
• However, smoothie drinkers are equally enthusiastic about something less widely publicised - the
exciting flavours of smoothies
Attitudes towards smoothies, July 2010
They are a convenient way to get part of my 5-a-day 77%
They have an exciting range of flavours 76%
They are expensive for what they are 73%
They come in a convenient range of carton/bottle sizes 72%
They taste good compared to other soft drinks 69%
They are healthier than pure fruit juice 52%
They provide me with an energy boost 51%
Brands are better quality than own-label 49%
They are like a meal in themselves 40%
I am put off by their high sugar content 34%
They are not as healthy as they claim to be 33%
I would rather just eat fruit than drink a smoothie 27%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Base: 16+ smoothie drinkers in the past 12 months (265)
Source: Toluna/MintelConsumer attitudes to smoothies
In an ideal world, consumers would like the nutrition of smoothies without the sugar:
“Health professionals often perceive that juices and smoothies are relatively high in calories and sugar compared
with whole fruit, and that consumption should be discouraged in order to prevent a rise in sugar intake. This is an
erroneous belief in the case of smoothies which contain around 30g of total sugar per serving, a similar amount
found in one banana and a portion of mango or cherries .” `Ruxton CHS (2008), British Nutrition Bulletin
Which of the following factors, if any, would persuade you to buy one smoothie brand over another?
If it has the vitamins from fresh fruit but 57%
without the sugar
A lack of additives/artificial flavourings 51% Key
purchase
If it has a wide variety of different fruits for
50% drivers
the best health balance
If it contains superfruits 45%
If it is fresh but lasts longer 38%
Secondary
If the company is ethical 31% purchase
drivers
If it has been made locally 26%
If the packaging information is clearer 24%
If it contains one fruit flavour only 15%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Base: 16+ smoothie drinkers in the past 12 months (265)
Source: Toluna/MintelYou can also read
