Report to the Oregon Legislative Assembly - ROAD USER FEE TASK FORCE - Oregon State Legislature
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Road User Fee Task Force 2019 Maureen Bock Office of Innovation Manager Director’s Office Oregon Department of Transportation 355 Capitol St NE Salem, OR 97301
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................2 ROAD USER FEE TASK FORCE PROCEEDINGS...............................................................3 OReGO IMPLEMENTATION UPDATES.................................................................................4 PARTNERSHIPS WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS............................................................... 7 CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................9 iii
INTRODUCTION This report is submitted to the Legislative ODOT is also an active and leading Assembly in compliance with ORS 184.843 participant of RUC West. RUC West brings (9), requiring the Road User Fee Task Force together leaders from state transportation (RUFTF) to report to each odd-numbered organizations to share best practices and year regular session of the Legislative research road usage charge.1 Currently, RUC Assembly on the work of the task force, West consists of fourteen states that are the department and the commission in in various stages of exploring road usage designing, implementing and evaluating pilot charge programs. This includes Utah-- programs. which is establishing an operational road usage charge system-- and California and The Oregon State Legislature recognized that Washington, both of which have participated transportation financing would reach a crisis in pilots and are exploring interoperability point, where fuels tax could not continue with Oregon’s road usage charge program. to provide a sustainable funding source for transportation system maintenance, The Federal Highway Administration awarded improvements and construction. In response, ODOT two Surface Transportation System the Legislature created the Road User Fee Funding Alternatives (STSFA) grants. The first Task Force in 2001. The task force has been ODOT grant was used to conduct research instrumental in creating and supporting road regarding RUC enforcement, evaluate new usage charge (RUC) pilots and policymaking technologies to transfer RUC data, partner to explore alternative transportation with other entities, and launch a public financing. education campaign. The second ODOT grant will be used to verify that RUC could be used Following two road usage charge pilots as a local financing option. Additionally, RUC in 2006 and 2012, the 2013 Legislative West received two STSFA grants to explore Assembly passed Senate Bill 810. SB 810 is inter-state interoperability. the foundation for the only ongoing road usage charge program in the nation, OReGO. The operational OReGO program proves The OReGO program launched July 1, 2015, that RUC works: Drivers can accurately pay and since then, the Oregon Department of for their use of the road on a per-mile basis, Transportation (ODOT) has been actively rather than by gallons of fuel consumed. testing the policy and technical possibilities ODOT continues to further research, refine, of RUC. and execute this option of transportation financing. 1 https://www.rucwest.org/about/ 2
ROAD USER FEE TASK FORCE PROCEEDINGS The Road User Fee Task Force has convened and tear on the roads and less revenue. A five times since the last report to the mandatory RUC for automated vehicles could Legislative Assembly in 2017. bridge this funding gap. »» November 2017: The task force received »» June 2018: The task force received an updates on the operational OReGO update on the Oregon-California and program and the status of the California- Oregon-Washington interoperability Oregon interoperability pilot. It also pilots as well as an overview of Utah’s discussed the possible path forward road usage charge statute. It then for a more robust road usage charging discussed possible legislative concepts program in Oregon. that would include enforcement options, an efficiency minimum for enrolling in »» February 2018: The task force received OReGO, and expanding the enhanced updates on the OReGO Program, were registration opt-out provisions for briefed on national momentum for road vehicles that had an efficiency of 40 usage programs and what ODOT is doing miles per gallon. The task force was also to enhance the volunteer experience briefed on an open architecture tolling here in Oregon. system; a concept which would allow for transportation payment services, like The task force also had a policy tolling and road usage charging, to be discussion about: combined on a single billing platform. ~~ Expanding the OReGO program to »» September 2018: The task force received allow high efficiency vehicles other a status update on the operational than fully electric vehicles to opt into OReGO program and its projects, and OReGO in lieu of paying enhanced learned about Minnesota’s approach to registration fees created in House Bill road usage charging. ODOT staff also 2017 (2017), demonstrated the educational tools that are being developed to inform the public ~~ Applying a fuel efficiency minimum for about the need for a more sustainable vehicle enrollment into the program, revenue source. It also approved of and provisions for a legislative concept ~~ Adopting enforcement mechanisms consistent with its previous discussions. for vehicles that were not paying the »» April 2019: The task force received a enhanced registration due to their status update on the OReGO program enrollment in OReGO. and information about the road usage charge pilot taking place in Hawaii. The task force also received a briefing on Representative Lively provided an update automated vehicles and their potential on the task force legislation, House impact on revenue if transportation financing Bill 2881 (2019) that he is sponsoring remains tied to fuels tax. Automated vehicles in the Legislature. The task force also are likely to be deployed in electric fleets had a guest presentation from TriMet and may travel significantly more miles showcasing its app-based payment than conventional driver-operated vehicles. system. This could lead to substantially more wear 3
OReGO IMPLEMENTATION UPDATES The OReGO Program successfully launched on July 1, 2015. Since that time, it has been OReGO 2016 STSFA Grant continually operating and undertaking For the 2016 grant, the OReGO team projects to enhance its functionality and established four objectives: expand the practicality. In 2016 and 2017, ODOT applied market, increase public awareness, evaluate for, and received, grants from the Federal compliance mechanisms, and explore Highway Administration. These grants interoperability. The following projects were were part of the Fixing America’s Surface defined to meet these objectives. Transportation Act (FAST Act) Surface Transportation System Funding Alternatives Program. RUC West also applied for and 1. Expand the market received grants. »» Expand technology options for reporting The FAST Act established the Surface mileage. If RUC is expected to mature Transportation System Funding Alternatives into a mandatory program, it must move Program to provide grants to states, or away from the device that plugs into the groups of states, to demonstrate user-based vehicle and move toward a technology alternative revenue mechanisms that utilize a that is less susceptible to tampering. user fee structure to maintain the long-term solvency of the Highway Trust Fund. The »» Manage the open market by better objectives of the STSFA program are to: managing account manager entrance and exit into the RUC market and »» Test the design, acceptance, and certification of technology. implementation of two or more future user-based alternative mechanisms; »» Develop requirements for a manual mileage reporting option. »» Improve the functionality of the user- based alternative revenue mechanisms; »» Streamline reporting and data sharing with other government entities. »» Conduct outreach to increase public awareness regarding the need for 2. Increase public awareness. alternative funding sources for surface transportation programs and to provide 3. Evaluate program compliance information on possible approaches; mechanisms for account managers and RUC payers. »» Provide recommendations regarding adoption and implementation of user- 4. Explore interoperability by hosting a based alternative revenue mechanisms; multi-state RUC Forum (which was held and in September 2017). »» Minimize the administrative cost of any Of these projects, all but two are complete potential user-based alternative revenue and have final reports as of April 2019. The mechanisms. 2 remaining project related to expanding technology options will conclude by 2 https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/surftransfundaltfs.cfm 4
December 2019, and the project related to is limited by vehicle manufacturer increasing public awareness will conclude by constraints on its availability and usage. December 2020. »» OReGO refined its requirements, which The OReGO Program 2016 FAST Act grant will make it easier for other business was awarded at $4.2 million (fifty percent partners to become certified for funded through federal grants, and fifty participation in the program. percent funded by OReGO), though due to a re-scoping, incorporating efficiencies into »» A manual reporting option process was project plans, and relying more on internal developed but has not been deployed resources, ODOT plans to spend only $2.7 into the operational program. In part, million of that award. A third-party firm was this is due to potential increase in contracted to perform independent Quality administrative costs. It will be deployed Assurance for the overall project, and the when the program is mandated or has Office of the State Chief Information Officer significantly more vehicles. was engaged to provide oversight. »» One account manager became certified OReGO learned many lessons through with the Oregon Department of these projects. The lessons were shared Environmental Quality and can now with the Road User Fee Task Force and are provide remote emissions testing in summarized below. addition to supporting OReGO. This saves OReGO volunteers a trip to emissions »» On-board telematics in vehicles will be testing sites, with the results of the the most reliable and accurate way to remote emissions testing being shared report mileage and fuel usage, however, directly with DMV, thereby streamlining using on-board telematics in OReGO registration renewal. 5
»» Account managers asked OReGO More than ever, local jurisdictions need volunteers if they would share their options to generate revenue to maintain anonymized travel data with ODOT’s their roadways as infrastructure ages. Cities Transportation Development Division and counties with local option fuel tax (TDD) to see if that data could be used programs are facing the same pressures for traffic modeling. The volunteers who on their revenues as ODOT. While OReGO did agree to share data received a small demonstrates that road usage charging incentive from the account manager. works to collect state fees, it remains TDD found the data useful although unproven at the local level, in terms of there were not a significant number of simultaneously collecting both state and participants. local fees and accurately distributing them to the appropriate jurisdictions. ODOT seeks to »» While researching how to increase public demonstrate that RUC will work at the local awareness, OReGO learned that most level to address local option issues, should Oregonians do not understand how the Legislature opt to include a local option transportation infrastructure is currently in a mandatory program. funded. Based on the feedback received during a longitudinal focus group of ODOT partnered with the City of Portland sixty Oregonians from throughout the and Metro on the design of the pilots, which state, we were able to develop new are targeting a May 2020 launch. The pilot communications tools that will be project total budget is $3.5 million and, ODOT deployed later in 2019. is in the process of securing a business partner to collect driving data and administer »» Research was conducted on possible the volunteer accounts. Once a vendor has enforcement mechanisms for both been selected, the schedule and budget can account managers as well as RUC be finalized. payers to help ensure compliance in a mandatory program. This included estimating the costs associated with HOUSE BILL 2017 implementing those mechanisms. IMPLEMENTATION »» The interoperability forum was held in House Bill 2017 (2017) provided that fully 2017. It included both a technical and a electric vehicles enrolled in OReGO were business track. This allowed participants not subject to the enhanced registration to learn, share ideas, and ask questions. surcharge that was established in the bill. The reviews indicated that participants The OReGO Program worked with DMV to liked the format and would appreciate ensure that there was a seamless process having an opportunity to participate in allowing people registering or renewing their similar events at least every other year. fully electric vehicles to avoid paying the surcharge based on OReGO enrollment. OReGO 2017 STSFA Grant – Local Option RUC This OReGO grant will support three pilots for adapting the state’s road usage charge system for localities. ODOT will conduct three local road usage charge area pricing pilots, with up to 100 volunteer participants each. Each pilot will explore the technical feasibility scenarios such as geo-fencing a city, central business district within a city, or county for additional per-mile charges during specific travel times and pricing limited to freeway corridors during certain times of day. 6
PARTNERSHIPS WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS The bill that created OReGO allowed ODOT 1. Created a high-level concept of to enter into agreements with other state operations that all eleven participating departments of transportation, the federal states agreed on, which outlines the government and Canadian provinces for the basic principles of how a regional RUC purposes of: system will function for future pilots. »» Conducting joint research relating to 2. Created detailed system and business road usage charges and development requirements for the Oregon-California programs on a multistate basis; pilot. »» Furthering the development and The total project cost was $1.9 million and operation of single state or multistate was completed by July 31, 2018. road usage charge pilot programs; and The most valuable lesson learned from this »» Developing a program for stakeholder project is that a regional, inter-state RUC outreach and communications related to system is possible. Each state will have its road usage charges.3 own requirements—including different RUC rates, public funds laws, methods of fuels Sharing information with other jurisdictions tax collection and disbursements— but is an invaluable tool. This information this project demonstrated that a regional sharing takes place in the form of regularly system can be built to be agile enough scheduled RUC West meetings, where the to accommodate each states’ needs and fourteen member states share lessons function seamlessly for drivers. learned and fund research that is of interest to the members. Information sharing occurs through less formal means as well, such as when a university or another country reaches RUC West 2017 STSFA out with questions. OReGO has received inquiries from places such as Israel, Paris, Grant: Oregon and Indiana DOT, and the Chicago Metropolitan California Interoperability Planning Council. The information below is about ODOT’s more formal partnerships. The RUC West 2017 STSFA Grant will test interoperability of the Oregon and California RUC systems, creating a platform that other states could join. The pilot is targeting an RUC West 2016 STSFA April 2020 launch with a budget of $4 million. Grant This pilot will collect data from Oregon, The Regional RUC System Definition and California, and possibly dual-registered Pilot Planning Project set the stage for a vehicles, which are those registered in regional RUC system in the Western United both California and Nevada. A successful States. The project accomplished two main regional pilot will demonstrate that systems objectives: can be integrated and standardized to accommodate multiple states’ requirements, processes, systems, rates, and laws. 3 ORS 319.347 7
This pilot will also test the clearinghouse requirements that have been developed to Washington and Oregon ensure that the appropriate data is shared Interoperability with each jurisdiction. In 2016, the State of Washington was This needs to be proven to demonstrate awarded a FAST Act grant that included that road usage charging can expand to exploring the feasibility of an interoperable include more states, and eventually be system. Oregon collaborated with implemented nationwide. Further, the Washington to explore how a RUC system pilot will demonstrate that two funding may operate between two states. The pilot mechanisms—road usage charging and fuels launched in March 2018 and ended in January tax—can operate together. 2019 with over 75 participants enrolled in the OReGO program choosing to participate. As with the Local Area RUC pilot, ODOT will This pilot used simulated payments and secure a business partner to collect driving demonstrated that two states with different data and administer the volunteer accounts. RUC rates and fuel use credits could use the Once a partner is selected, ODOT will finalize same platform to collect data and revenue. the schedule and budget. The pilot was determined to be successful as it provided information that refined business requirements and identified system modifications needed to operate in a multi- jurisdictional RUC. 8
CONCLUSION The Oregon Department of Transportation The local area road usage charge pilot will continues to successfully operate the only be the first of its kind, testing the feasibility fully functional road usage charge program of layering different road usage charge rates in the country while conducting research for in cities and counties and varying that rate a potential mandatory program. Federal by time of day. If proven, this will create an grants have enabled the OReGO program to important policy tool for localities to consider enhance its operations and continue to learn in the future, should the Legislature allow for about how to best administer this type of a local option road usage charge. revenue model. The Road User Fee Task Force, in partnership The regional interoperability pilot between with ODOT, welcomes the opportunity to Oregon and California will be the next share lessons learned from our road usage monumental step among the states. The charge program and provide additional pilot allowed states to reach consensus on information to the Legislature at any time. how a regional road usage charge system could operate by creating a concept of common operations. 9
You can also read