Optimising welfare in dog training classes

Optimising welfare in dog training classes

                                       Gaille Perry
                               Delta Society Australia Ltd

Dogs are the most popular companion animal in Australia with 37.8% of households
containing a dog (Australian Companion Animal Council, 2006). Each dog owning
household has an average of 1.43 dogs (Australian Companion Animal Council, 2006).

Dog owners are required by state legislation and local laws, to control the behaviour of
their dogs. In Queensland, the Environmental Protection Regulation 1998 defines a
dog owner’s responsibility to control their dog’s barking. This is administered under
local authority regulations eg the Brisbane City Council’s Animal Local Law 2003. The
Animal Care and Protection Act 2001 requires a duty of care of owners which includes
provision of ability to display normal behavioural patterns. This obviously includes
provision of exercise but as the Brisbane City Council’s Animal Local Law 2003
requires that dogs are walked on leash when in public, except in dog off-leash areas,
owners must determine appropriate methods to provide adequate exercise and
enrichment while complying with council regulations. There are now many more
requirements and restrictions on dog ownership than in the past and this may, in part,
be responsible for the decreasing rate of dog ownership reported by the Australian
Companion Animal Council (2006).

Dogs are social animals and it is probably this aspect of their behaviour, very like ours,
which has resulted in their close relationships with people. They have evolved to live
as part of a group, but, with long working hours and more single person households,
many people do not believe that they spend enough time at home to care for an animal
satisfactorily (Australian Companion Animal Council, 1996). This is supported by the
fact that most dogs reported to the Brisbane City Council for barking did so when their
owners were not home (Perry and Seksel, 2007). The Petcare Information and
Advisory Service (2006) noted an increase in the proportion of dogs showing
undesirable behaviour, despite more owners providing training (38$ had attended
training classes) and general care for their dogs. The most common problems reported
were noise nuisance, jumping up and aggression towards other dogs. To optimise
welfare, owners need appropriate advice on management and enrichment strategies

for improving the welfare of their dogs and, for most dogs and owners, this can be
provided at training classes..

Although there are many places in Australia where dogs other than service dogs
cannot be taken (shops, public buildings, national parks) it seems probable that a well
trained dog which is comfortable in a variety of social settings will be taken out more,
providing more time with its owner and more enrichment activities and thus optimising
its welfare. An owner may also be more likely to give a calm well trained dog access to
the house when they are home, providing more opportunities for interaction. It is
important, therefore, that owners can access suitable classes to achieve this level of
training.

A 1999 study into the reasons owners attended dog training classes found that 82% of
owners wanted to achieve an improvement in their dog’s behaviour and 45% sought a
better relationship with their companion (Perry, 1999). Only 13% of owners were
interested in entering competition obedience and 2% had enrolled because their dog had
a specific problem behaviour. Training should therefore be aimed at teaching the dog
behaviours which are relationship building and teaching owners to manage their dog’s
behaviours so it does not become a problem to them or their neighbours.

The Australian Companion Animal Council (2006) reported that, in 2006, there were
586 dog training establishments operating in Australia, an increase of almost 22% in
the previous three years. This suggests that more owners are seeking help to train and
manage their dog. The curriculum and methods used by these training organisations
vary from pet dog manners training to preparation for participation in competitive
obedience, and from positive, reward based methods to the use of negative
punishment using check chains and positive punishment using physical correction
methods such as electronic collars to achieve compliance.

Positive reinforcement, reward based training involves the use of prompts to encourage
the dog to comply with a request, then rewarding (food, praise, physical interaction) to
make the behaviour more likely to occur under similar conditions in the future. The
behaviour is then generalised to a variety of everyday situations. This is usually
combined with negative punishment, where undesirable behaviour is ignored (Delta
Society, 2006). In pet dog training, this may be used to achieve behaviours such as sit,
drop, come, walk nicely on lead and to reduce undesirable behaviours such as
jumping up.

When negative reinforcement is used in training, the inappropriate behaviour is made
undesirable and the discomfort is removed when the dog performs the correct
behaviour eg removing the pressure on the dog’s neck when it walks beside the owner.
This is often combined with positive punishment, where, if the dog does not comply
with a request, an aversive is applied eg it is forcibly placed in position. Commands
like the more formal heel and stay are often taught using these methods.

The major difference between these methods is the choice the dog is given – for
positive reinforcement it can choose to work for a reward or not, for coercive methods,
it must choose to remove or avoid an unpleasant experience or to experience them. If
stress is defined as the state of an animal when it is not able to act in accordance with
its motivational state (Jensen and Toates, 1997), then reward based training, which
allows the animal to choose whether to work for a reward or not should be less
stressful than aversive training where the choice is to accept or avoid an unpleasant
experience.

In the management of behaviour problems such as aggression, punishment is usually
counterproductive – if the precursors to an attack (growling, snarling, stiffening) are
punished, this behaviour may be reduced but, as the motivational state has not
changed, the result may be a dog which now attacks “without warning”.

Ideally in class, dogs and owners are sufficiently distant from each other that the
presence of other dogs and owners do not cause anxiety. Exercises should maintain
this distance until dogs are sufficiently comfortable to accept a closer proximity. Some
classes do not provide this distance – because of large numbers in a restricted space
or training philosophy they may have dogs and owners too close to each other, or
contain exercises such as having dog and owner weave along the line of dogs and
owners, perhaps with a stop (in which the dog is required to sit) close to another dog.
While this is intended to achieve obedience and teach the dog to accept this close
proximity it may have the opposite effect.

If an anxious dog is forced to remain in a stressful situation (flooding), it may simply
cease to react – this may be interpreted as acceptance but is more likely to be learned
helplessness, defined by Overall (1997) as occurring when an animal is forced to be
exposed to an uncontrollable situation where no change in its behaviour effect a

change in the environment and therefore a serious animal welfare issue.

Blackwell, Twells, Seawright and Casey (2007) found that attendance at any form of
training reduced the incidence of behaviour problems in dogs, with positive reinforcement
training having the greatest reduction. Those dogs which had been informally trained at
home were more likely to have been trained with aversives and showed more behaviour
problems than those which attended classes. Dogs which had been trained using
aversives were more likely to show a fear response to other dogs. This supported the
earlier work of Hiby, Rooney and Bradshaw (2004). In their study the efficacy of various
training methods for 7 common tasks were compared – positive training was more
effective in every case.

Eskeland, Tilung and Baken (2007) found that owners who used high frequency and
harsh punishment and several methods of punishment had a significantly higher level
of training problems and lower obedience, while the use of frequent rewards was
correlated significantly with lower level of training problems and higher level of
obedience. Thus, as well as compromised welfare in the short term by the immediate
pain or distress caused by applying aversive stimuli, the longer term consequences of
aversive training was the expression of problem behaviours.

Serpell (1996) considered that behaviour problems in dogs often reflected a state of
chronic anxiety and could lead to relinquishment or euthanasia. This is supported by
data from RSPCA Queensland where, in 2005, owners on 24% of adult dogs
surrendered to their refuges stated that the primary reason for surrender was a
behavioural issue. Thus appropriate training should reduce the incidence of surrender
and enhance welfare.

Training for those who conduct classes varies – the Animal Care and Management
Training Package (nationally accredited training for the companion animal industry)
contains a competency on conducting training classes and all competencies require
animals to be handled gently and calmly. The individual is required to develop an
empathetic understanding of animals in their care, so that stress and discomfort can be
minimised. Some training organisations, like the Delta Society Australia, conduct this
competency but the interpretation of this statement is in the hands of the person
delivering the course. Most training clubs provide in-house training for prospective
trainers – this is not accredited so the organisational culture determines the training
program conducted and methods used.

Conclusion
Companion dogs are an integral part of the lives of their families, providing
companionship (Australian Companion Animal Council, 2006) and better health
(Headey and Anderson, 1995). To maintain dog ownership and welfare while providing
due consideration to the needs of the community, it is imperative that appropriate
training is available to assist owners to manage their dogs’ behaviour.

References:
Australian Companion Animal Council (2006). Contribution of the Pet Care Industry to
the Australian Economy.

Australian Companion Animal Council (1996). The Power of Pets.

Blackwell, E.J., Twells, C., Seawright, A. and Casey, R.A. (2007) The Relationship
between Training Methods,and the Occurrence of Behaviour Problems in a Population of
Domestic Dogs. In Landsberg, G., Marriello, S. and Mills, D. (eds) Proceeding of the
Sixth International Veterinary Behaviour and European College of Veterinary
Behaviousal Medicine – Companion Animals. European Society of Veterinary Clinical
Ethology.

Delta Society Australia (2006). Delta Canine Good Citizen TM Lifetime Manners Manual.

Eskeland GE, Tilung RH and Baken M, (2007). The Importance of Consistency in the
Training of Dogs. The Effect of Punishment, Rewards, Control and Attitude on
Obedience and Problem Behaviours in Dogs. Landsberg G, Matiello S, Mills D (eds)
Proceeding of the Sixth International Veterinary Behaviour and European College of
Veterinary Behaviousal Medicine – Companion Animals. European Society of
Veterinary Clinical Ethology.

Heady, B. and Anderson, W. (1995). Health Cost Savings: The Impact of Pets on
Australian Health Budgets. Petcare Information and Advisory Service, Melbourne.

Hiby, E.F., Rooney, N.J., and Bradshaw, J.W.S. (2004) Dog Training Methods: their use,
effectiveness and interaction with behaviour and welfare. Anim. Welf. 1313, 62-69.

Jensen, P. and Toates, F.M. (1997) Stress as a state of motivational systems. Appl.
Anim. Behav. Sci. 54, 235-243.

Overall, K.L. (1997). Clinical Behavioral Medicine for Small Animals. Mosby, St Louis.

Perry, G.A. (1999) Attitudes to the Management and Training of Dogs and Cats.

Perry, G.A. and Seksel, K. (2007). A Survey of Barking Dogs in South East Queensland,
Australia. In Landsberg, G., Marriello, S. and Mills, D. (eds) Proceeding of the Sixth
International Veterinary Behaviour and European College of Veterinary Behaviousal
Medicine – Companion Animals. European Society of Veterinary Clinical Ethology.

Petcare Information and Advisory Service (2006). 2006 National People and Pets
Survey – a Decade of Progress.

Serpell, J.A. (1996), Evidence for an association between pet behavior and owner
attachment levels, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci, 47:1-2, 49-60.