FORT WORTH DISTRICT I-35W TECHNICAL WORK GROUP MEETING - TEJAS SONI, P.E. TXDOT - PROJECT MANAGER - THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FTP ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
FORT WORTH DISTRICT I-35W Technical Work Group Meeting Tejas Soni, P.E. TxDOT – Project Manager Matt Craig, P.E. Halff Associates, Inc. – Project Manager I-35W Project May May7, 7, 2020 2020
Webex Conference Call Protocol Please Mute your Audio Post questions using the Webex chat function Questions will be addressed periodically during the presentation This presentation is not being recorded I-35W Project May 7, 2020 2
Agenda 1 Project Overview 2 Prior Technical Work Group - Summary 3 City of Fort Worth Review Meeting – Summary 4 City of Burleson Review Meetings - Summary 5 Proposed Ramping Concepts 6 Alternatives 7 Project Schedule 8 Questions & Review of Exhibits I-35W Project May 7, 2020 3
I-35W Project Overview Future Project to South Rendon Altamesa Everman Crowley Pkwy Project Limit Blvd Renfro St Renfro N Project Limit Project Limit North of I-20 Renfro St I-35W Project May 7, 2020 4
Prior Technical Work Group Summary ▪ Met June 26th 2019 ▪ Requested everyone to share their comments and concerns ▪ Cities were going to share the latest thoroughfare plans ▪ Halff to set up the website for the public in advance of future Public Meeting / Technical Work Groups ▪ Still evaluating Express Lanes (No Toll Lanes considered) ▪ Accommodated shared use path in the project I-35W Project May 7, 2020 5
Express Lanes Alternatives ▪ Analysis of traffic projections ▪ Determination of alternatives to further analyze ▪ Analysis of impacts ▪ Operational analysis I-35W Project May 7, 2020 6
Traffic Analysis ▪ Draft Methodology – Approved by TPP ▪ Existing and Future (2045) No-Build Projected Volumes ▪ Proposed Build Projected (2045) Volumes TBD After Alternative is Determined I-35W Project May 7, 2020 7
City of Fort Worth Coordination Meeting Summary ▪ Met September 16th 2019 ▪ Incorporate City of Fort Worth Thoroughfare Plan and Active Transportation Plan components such as bike lanes, shared use paths and trails into schematic typical sections ▪ Coordinate with adjacent City of Fort Worth project on Risinger Road and accommodate future widening to the North ▪ Facilitate early coordination on ROW impacts in areas of future development such as the development between FM 1187 & McAlister Road I-35W Project May 7, 2020 8
City of Burleson Coordination Meetings Summary ▪ Met September 26th 2019 – Emphasized safety on the corridor – SH 174 Redevelopment Plans/Initiative – Consider NB I-35W to SB SH 174 direct connector – City of Burleson to review initial SH 174 concepts and brainstorm other solutions – 10 Mile regional bike loop ▪ Met January 14th 2020 – Introduced additional concepts at SH 174 interchange – Discussion regarding SH 174 improvements I-35W Project May 7, 2020 9
Proposed Ramping Concepts N Garden Acres Rendon Crowley Alsbury Blvd McAlister Rd N I-35W Project May 7, 2020 11
Proposed Ramping Concepts Renfro N N I-35W Project May 7, 2020 12
FM 1187 Alternatives ▪ Diverging Diamond ▪ Traditional Intersection ▪ Partial Cloverleaf ▪ Diverging Diamond with Alternative Ramping ▪ Traditional Intersection with Direct Connector ▪ Hybrid Displaced Left Turn I-35W Project May 7, 2020 13
FM 1187 ALT – Diverging Diamond ▪ Pro: – Reduces Congestion – Provides access to Huguley Blvd ▪ Con: – Driver inexperience with innovative configuration – No access to FM 1187 Corner Properties I-35W Project May 7, 2020 14
FM 1187 ALT – Traditional Intersection ▪ Pro: – Driver expectancy – Provides access to FM 1187 Corner Properties ▪ Con: – Reduces Congestion less than other Alternatives I-35W Project May 7, 2020 15
FM 1187 ALT - Partial Cloverleaf ▪ Pro: – Reduces Congestion Most ▪ Con: – Complicated – No U-turn on North side of FM 1187 – No access to FM 1187 Corner Properties I-35W Project May 7, 2020 16
FM 1187 ALT - Diverging Diamond with Alternative Ramping ▪ Pro: – Reduces Congestion – Improved access over regular DDI. – Individual on-ramp for major Eastbound to Northbound traffic movement ▪ Con: – Driver inexperience with innovative configuration – No access to FM 1187 Corner Properties – No NB 35W access from McAlister – More expensive than regular DDI I-35W Project May 7, 2020 17
FM 1187 ALT - Traditional Intersection with Direct Connector ▪ Pro: – Driver expectancy – Provides access to FM 1187 Corner Properties – Reduces Congestion more than just traditional ALT ▪ Con: – Expensive I-35W Project May 7, 2020 18
FM 1187 ALT – Hybrid Displaced Left Turn ▪ Pro: – Reduces Congestion – Retains some traditional design ▪ Con: – Driver inexperience with innovative configuration – Provides access to corner properties only on East side I-35W Project May 7, 2020 19
I-35W/SH 174 Interchange Alternatives ▪ Traditional Interchange w/o NB 35W to SB 174 Direct Connector ▪ Main Lane Direct Connector ▪ Frontage Road Direct Connector ▪ Frontage Road Box ▪ Frontage Road Couplet I-35W Project May 7, 2020 20
IH 35W / SH 174 Interchange ALT - Traditional Interchange ▪ Pro: – Improved access compared to existing ▪ Con: – Not fully directional I-35W Project May 7, 2020 21
IH 35W / SH 174 Interchange ALT – Mainlane Direct Connector ▪ Pro: – Improved Connectivity ▪ Con: – High Cost for Low Volume Movement I-35W Project May 7, 2020 22
IH 35W / SH 174 Interchange ALT – Frontage Road Direct Connector ▪ Pro: – Improved Connectivity ▪ Con: – High Cost for Low Volume Movement I-35W Project May 7, 2020 23
IH 35W / SH 174 Interchange ALT – Frontage Road Box ▪ Pro: – Improved Local Connectivity – Reduces Renfro St congestion ▪ Con: – Medium Cost I-35W Project May 7, 2020 24
IH 35W / SH 174 Interchange ALT – Frontage Road Couplet ▪ Pro: – Improved Local Connectivity – Reduces Renfro St congestion ▪ Con: – Medium Cost I-35W Project May 7, 2020 25
SH 174 Alternatives ▪ Highway with Renfro Overpass ▪ Arterial that stops at Renfro ▪ Limited reconstruction that stops at Hillery St I-35W Project May 7, 2020 26
SH 174 ALT - Highway with Renfro Overpass ▪ Pro: – Reduces congestion – Improves Renfro St intersection – Addresses drainage issues – Pedestrian friendly ▪ Con: – Costly – Limited local access I-35W Project May 7, 2020 27
SH 174 ALT – Arterial that stops at Renfro ▪ Pro: – More local access ▪ Con: – Does not reduce congestion – Safety concerns I-35W Project May 7, 2020 28
SH 174 ALT - Limited Reconstruction that stops at Hillery St ▪ Pro: – Keeps existing SH 174 as is – Low Cost ▪ Con: – Poor local connectivity – Does not address existing problems I-35W Project May 7, 2020 29
I-35W Project Delivery & Estimated Schedule 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 TASK Months > Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Data Collection/Base Mapping/ DSR/DCC Traffic Volume Projections/LOS Eval. Criteria / Alternatives Analysis Conceptual & Draft 30% 60% 90% Schematics Draft/Final Schematic Review Final Schematic Env. Constraints/ Env. Scoping Tool Env. Analyses/Tech Reports Draft Env. Document Final Env. Document Env. Document Approval Public Involvement Public Meetings/Hearing I-35W Project May 7, 2020 30
Q and A ▪ Exhibits are shared through Google Drive for a limited time ▪ They are only viewable and cannot be downloaded or printed ▪ Access Exhibits now at: https://bit.ly/I35WTWG In case of technical difficulties use: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/ 1d5uLQUfQtktU8cMfrH20dSO3ZNCBCnBD I-35W Project May 7, 2020 31
For More Information… Tejas Soni, P.E. Texas Department of Transportation Fort Worth District Tel: (817) 370-6852 I35WSeg1@txdot.gov www.txdot.gov keywords: “35W corridor study” I-35W Project May 7, 2020 32
You can also read