CODEX COMMITTEE ON FOOD ADDITIVES (CCFA) AND THE CODEX GENERAL STANDARD FOR FOOD ADDITIVES (GSFA) - ANNETTE MCCARTHY, PHD LASHONDA T. CURETON, PHD
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
CODEX Committee on Food Additives (CCFA) and the Codex General Standard for Food Additives (GSFA) Annette McCarthy, PhD LaShonda T. Cureton, PhD Members of the US Delegation Codex Committee on Food Additives IFAC Mid‐Year Meeting June 15, 2021
Outline • CCFA Terms of Reference • What is the GSFA? • The Structure of the GSFA • Food Additive Requirements • Outcome of 51st Meeting • Agenda of the 52nd Meeting • Topics of Interests 2
Why is CCFA Important? • Increasingly important for international trade as countries adopt the General Standard for Food Additives (GSFA), as their national legislation in whole, or in part • Food additives currently in international trade have been banned in some countries if they are not adopted in the GSFA • Participation helps to open up developing markets • Developed countries putting more influence on what goes into the GSFA 3
CCFA Terms of Reference • Establish or endorse acceptable maximum levels for food additives (General Standard for Food Additives (GSFA), commodity committees) • Prepare priority lists of food additives for risk assessment by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) • Assign functional classes to food additives (International Numbering System (INS)) • Recommend specifications for identity and purity for food additives for adoption by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) • Elaborate standards for related subjects (e.g., labeling of food additives) 4
What is the GSFA? • Main priority of CCFA • Single authoritative reference point for food additives internationally • General Principles of the GSFA (Preamble) – Protect the health of consumers: • Only lists food additives determined to be safe by JECFA • Sets criteria for verifying the compatibility of the listed maximum use levels with the JECFA ADI – considers use in all foods – Provides criteria for justification of use of food additives: • Ensure fair practices in food trade: • Only lists food additives subject to an INS designation • Sets forth use conditions of additives in all foods • Identifies foods in which additives may not be used 5
What is the GSFA? GSFA scope • Deals solely with Food Additives: – “any substance… the intentional addition of which to food for a technological purpose… may be reasonably expected to result… in it or its by‐products becoming a component of or otherwise affecting the characteristics… of such foods.” 6
Requirements for Inclusion in the GSFA Exposure Assessment eWorking Groups (JECFA or Annex A) JECFA ADI Technological Justification GSFA INS Number Additive Use Level JECFA Food Category (CX-Stan., Codex Members) Specifications System Monograph 7
How does CCFA work? • Electronic Working Groups (eWGs) – Inter‐sessional – Led by Codex Member – Open to all Codex Members and Observers • Physical or Virtual Working Groups (pWGs or vWGs) – Meet immediately prior to or during plenary session – Led by Codex Member – Open to all Codex Members and Observers • Discussion Papers – Prepared by one or more Codex Members – Considered at the Plenary • Plenary Session 8
Input from Industry is Vital to the Success of the GSFA • Codex Member country delegations are experts on their regulations • Industry and Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) are experts on how food additives are used and the technological justification for the use of those additives. • Advancement of the justified use of food additives in international trade is only possible through active involvement of industry and NGOs in electronic working groups, as well as attendance of NGOs at physical or virtual working groups and Codex Committee meetings. 9
Working Groups for CCFA51 (2019) • Electronic Working Groups (eWGs) – GSFA (USA) – Alignment of food additive provisions in commodity standards and the GSFA (Australia, USA and Japan) – International Numbering System (INS) (Belgium and Iran) – To develop wording for an alternative to Note 161 relating to the use of sweeteners (EU and USA) • Physical Working Groups (pWGs) – GSFA (USA) – Endorsement/Alignment of Commodity Standards (Australia) – INS (Belgium) – Priority List for JECFA (Canada) • Discussion Papers – Discussion Paper on use of the terms “plain” and “unprocessed” (Russian Federation) – Use of Nitrates (INS 251, 252) and Nitrites (INS 249, 250) (EU and Netherlands) 10
CCFA51 Highlights ‐ GSFA 10000 9000 As of CCFA52: 8000 Adopted provisions in the GSFA: 4412 7000 Provisions in the step process (Step 2‐Step 7): 1503 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Pending Provisions Projected 11
CCFA51 Highlights ‐ GSFA • The Committee completed work on 106 draft and proposed draft provisions • For the first time in 10 years, CCFA advanced for adoption provisions for colors without Note 161 – Total adopted color provisions in the GSFA: 1056 • Color provisions remaining in the step process: 924 – Total adopted sweetener provisions in the GSFA: 459 • Sweetener provisions remaining in the step process: 303 12
Alternative to Note 161 for the Use of Sweeteners • Committee agreed to adopt 2 alternative replacement notes; • Forward to CAC42 for adoption 111 revised provisions for sweeteners in different food categories, accounting for approximately 25% of all adopted provisions which contain Note 161; and • Continue the work on replacing Note 161 by considering recommendations for replacements notes for additional food categories 13
CCFA51 Highlights ‐ Alignment • Over 70 provisions forwarded to CAC41 for adoption – Aligned 23 Commodity Standards, primarily addressing standards for Sugars; Natural mineral waters; Cereals, pulses and legumes; Vegetable proteins; and Ripened‐ cheese – Revised adopted provisions in FCs 13.1.1, 13.1.2 and 13.1.3 for ascorbyl palmitate (INS 304) and ascorbyl stearate (INS 305) 14
CCFA51 Highlights – INS and JECFA INS JECFA • Endorsed: • The JECFA priority list was – Methacrylate copolymer, basic ‐ updated to include: functional class of carrier – 21 food additives and – Change the name of INS 160a(iv) to – 29 entries for processing aids β‐carotene‐rich extract from (enzymes) Dunaliella salina • Additives removed from the INS list: – Distarch glycerol (INS 1411) – Red 2G (INS 128) 15
CCFA51 Highlights – Other Discussions • Nitrates (INS 251, 252) and Nitrites (INS 249, 250) – Agreed to issue Circular Letter to collect general information on the availability of occurrence data and/or dietary exposure of nitrates and nitrites and surveys of natural occurrence levels and levels occurring from use as additives and – Agreed to circulate all provisions (adopted and in the step process) to request ingoing amounts and residual amounts in specific products • Use of the terms “plain” and “unprocessed” – Agreed to discontinue the work due to lack of broad support 16
CCFA52 (2021) 17
CCFA52 Agenda Highlights – Matters Referred • Provision for the use of trisodium citrate (INS 331(iii)) in FC 01.1.1 “Fluid milk (plain)” • JECFA (at its 87th meeting (2019)) evaluated the safety of six food additives, including one group of food additives (carotenoids) • Framework for developing specifications for steviol glycosides by method of production 18
CCFA52 Agenda Highlights – GSFA • Specific draft and proposed draft provisions for use as a glaze or in a glaze/coating or wax for surface treatment in food categories 04.1.1.2 and 04.2.1.2 • Draft and proposed draft provisions for acesulfame potassium (INS 950) in food categories 14.1.4 and 14.1.5 and saccharins (INS 954(i)‐(iv)) in food category 14.1.4 and its subcategories • Draft and proposed draft provisions with the functional class of color in food category 14.1.4 and its subcategories • Draft, proposed draft and adopted provisions with the functional class of color (including colors with Note 161 in food categories 01.0 through 03.0 and their subcategories • Provisions in the step process for Table 3 additives assigned an ADI not specified at 86th JECFA, endorsed for consideration by CCFA47 and with sweetener function in food category 14.1.5 • Provisions which CCFA50 added into the Step process or endorsed for recirculation to obtain technological justification 19
CCFA52 Agenda Highlights – Endorsement • The 29th Session of the Codex Committee on Processed Fruits and Vegetables – 5 standards submitted by CCPFV is included in CL 2021/23‐FA – Anticipate the food provisions in the commodity standards will be aligned with the GSFA at CCFA53 20
CCFA52 Agenda Highlights – Alignment • 3 Key issues requiring consideration by the Committee, initially via the Alignment virtual WG – Issue 1 – Development of Table 3 Notes – Issue 2 – Proposed amendments to Codex Standard titles list in Annex C of GSFA – Issue 3 – Use of general processing aid sentence be added to all cheese commodity standards, or all dairy standards • Aligning nearly 30 commodity standards (including dairy standards with the assistance of IDF) • Recommendations on the avoiding future divergence between the GSFA and Commodity Standards 21
CCFA52 Agenda Highlights – INS and JECFA INS JECFA – Received Eleven (11) – The JECFA priority list was proposals updated to include: • International Association of • D‐Allulose 3‐epimerase from Color Manufacturers (IACM) Arthrobacter globiformis requests the addition of the expressed in Escherichi coli color ‘butterfly pea flower • Flavoring substances extract’ 22
CCFA52 Agenda Highlights – Note 161 • Continue the work on replacing Note 161 by considering recommendations for replacements notes for additional food categories 23
CCFA52 Agenda Highlights – Other Discussions • General information on the occurrence data and/or dietary exposure of nitrates and nitrites • Updates to the GSFA online system 24
Further Information GSFA is available at the Codex website: http://www.fao.org/fao‐who‐codexalimentarius/home/en/ Versions of the full GSFA (including draft and adopted provisions) are made available as information documents in PDF format prior to each meeting of the CCFA: http://www.fao.org/fao‐who‐ codexalimentarius/committees/committee/en/?committee=CCFA 25 25
You can also read