Carbon Transparency Initiative - Surabi Menon () Casey Cronin, Seth Monteith, Dan Plechaty - Ferdi
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
COP 21, December 8, 2015, Le Bourget Carbon Transparency Initiative Surabi Menon (surabi.menon@climateworks.org) Casey Cronin, Seth Monteith, Dan Plechaty
About CTI Carbon Transparency Initiative Highlighting the progress towards building a low-carbon economy through analysis of the driver metrics underpinning decarbonization. METHODOLOGY RESEARCH PARTNERS Bloomberg New Energy Finance, Climate Action Tracker, International Trends and forecasts Council on Clean Transport, International Energy Agency, McKinsey, World Resource Institute and Regional Foundations EF-USA, EF-China, Learning from historic trends while also ECF, and LARCI forecasting technological, policy and economic shifts underway PEER REVIEWERS Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático, Lawrence Berkeley Leading Indicators National Laboratory, Grantham Institute, Stockholm Environmental Institute, Council on Energy, Environment and Water, and California Both a sector and region analysis of driver Environmental Associates and outcome metrics allows a view into the drivers of decarbonization Transparency Data, assumptions and calculations are open and transparent, addressing many of the pitfalls of “black-box” calculations 2
About CTI A bottom-up assessment of emissions and energy The model constructs a national inventory of emissions from sector-based activity and intensity metrics. Economy wide Sectors Sub sectors Driver metrics Intensity Activity Comparisons 3
Macro-level Comparison Decoupling emissions from GDP Patterns of growth differ and a sector-based analysis helps understand why. China EU-28 India USA GDP-PPP Primary Energy Total Emissions Carbon Intensity of GDP -63% -38% -44% -40% 4
Decarbonisation trends - Power sector Decline in power sector carbon intensities Increased penetration of RE and a partial switch from coal to gas generation Emission Factors: Four regions compared to a global 2°C pathway (gCO2e/kWh) 1000 900 Global CAT/ IPCC: 2°C Range Global CAT/ IPCC: 2°C Median 800 IEA historic: India 700 CTI future: India 600 CAT future: India IEA historic: China 500 CTI future: China 400 CAT future: China IEA historic: USA 300 CAT future: USA 200 CTI future: USA IEA historic: EU 100 CAT future: EU 0 CTI future: EU 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 5
Decarbonisation trends - Power sector Growth of Renewables – A success story? CTI projections on par with a WEO 2°C scenario. • Based on Bloomberg New Energy Finance analysis – depends on market forces, assumed lowered costs of technology and wider diffusion. Projections of RE share of Generation 2020 RE% 2030 RE% China EU-28 India USA RE includes hydro, geothermal, biomass, wind and solar Note: Our forecasts do not include modeling of the Clean Power Plan 6
Power Focus: Generation Share in 2030 Despite progress in RE, fossil share dominates in some countries Coal+Oil Gas Nuclear Hydro Other RE 0% 50% 100% 7
Decarbonisation trends - Power sector Structural Transformation in China Can it tip the fossil share? Projections of coal generation in China (TWh) 7000 CTI projects a faster decline in 6000 coal share of generation due to lower demand from industry, 5000 BUT 4000 CTI 2015 Range 3000 This is still 50-73% higher than WEO 2008 (REF) that of WEO’s 2°C pathway. WEO 2010 (CPS) 2000 WEO 2012 (CPS) Some hope though with 1000 WEO 2014 (CPS) reform in country’s electricity Actuals (WEO) distribution prioritizing power 0 generation from wind and solar. 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 8
Decarbonisation trends -- Transport sector Transport emissions are growing GHG emissions from transport for 4 regions (Gt CO2e) 9 Between 2010 and 2030 transport 8 emission grow by 2.8% per year in 7 China, EU, India, and US. 6 • Driven by large growth in India (6.6% per year) and China 5 (5.3% per year). 4 3 2 1 0 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 26% 32.0 Gt CO2e Source CTI: Based on data from the International Council for Clean Transportation. Includes Aviation, Marine, Rail and 9 Road transport for both Freight and Passengers modes
Decarbonisation trends in the Transport sector Decrease in emissions may be possible Depends on types of fuel efficiency standards adopted across countries Growth in zero carbon technologies Emissions Intensity of LDV (gCO2/vkm) Share of electric vehicles (% of total fleet) 300 10% CTI China - historic 250 CTI China - future 8% CTI EU - historic CTI USA - historic 200 6% CTI EU - future CTI USA - future 150 CTI China - CTI EU - historic 4% future CTI USA - 100 CTI EU - future historic 2% CTI USA - future USA - target (new 50 cars) 0% IEA ETP 2014 EU - target (new Global 2DS 0 cars) China - target 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 (new cars) 10 Note: the ETP 2DS target is for a global share of new electric drive vehicles to reach around 4% and this will differ across geographies.
Summary New Report: “Faster & Cleaner” How decarbonization in the power and transport sectors is surpassing predictions and offering hope for limiting warming to 2C.” Decarbonization of the power sector is happening, and faster than predicted Wind and solar growth has dwarfed forecasts; CTI’s predicted RE generation in 4 regions are close to WEO’s 2°C scenario. CTI predicts coal consumption in China will peak (2016 -2020) but will be higher than WEO’s 2°C scenario. ClimateWorks and Passenger vehicle fleets are 1/6th less carbon-intense in the US and EU Climate Action Tracker today than in 2005. (NewClimate, Ecofys & If best-practice emissions standards were implemented more Climate Analytics) broadly, global emissions could be on a 2°C compatible rate of improvement for the next decade. http://www.climateworks.org/report/fastercleaner/ ClimateWorks: Casey Cronin, Surabi Menon, Seth Monteith, Dan Plechaty NewClimate Institute: Markus Hagemann, Niklas Höhne, Sebastian Sterl Ecofys: Pieter van Breevoort, Karlien Wouters; Climate Analytics: Bill Hare, Niklas Roming, Fabio Sferra 11
CTI: Tracking country policies and INDC targets Will we be on track with INDC targets? Solar and wind capacity: India’s INDC versus CTI forecast 2022 Capacity in GW Transformative coalition of countries with right policy 120 incentives could accelerate INDC market uptake to technology, 100 80 CTI spur transformation and 60 catalyze decarbonisation. 40 20 0 Solar Wind capacity capacity 12
Thank you for your time! Surabi.menon@climateworks.org
CTI: Tracking country policies and INDC targets Illustrative example for the US: Are we on track with INDCs? US GHG emissions: New Policies versus INDC Target Preliminary Analysis 7000 GHG Emissions (Mt CO2e) Heavy Duty 6500 truck standards 6000 Methane ruling 5500 5000 Clean Power Plan 4500 INDC target 4000 2015 2020 2025 2030 Source: Preliminary estimates informed by analysis from Rhodium, EPA, BNEF, Climate Action Tracker 14
You can also read