Sector financial position - Craig Stobo, Chairman Mark Butcher , Chief Executive New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency - Local Government ...

Page created by Victoria Lynch
 
CONTINUE READING
Sector financial position - Craig Stobo, Chairman Mark Butcher , Chief Executive New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency - Local Government ...
Sector financial position
           Craig Stobo, Chairman
       Mark Butcher , Chief Executive
New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency
LGFA - December 2014 quarter developments
>   New debt issued by LGFA of $295 million vs. average quarterly issuance of $379 million
     >   $15 million of 2017s, $30 million of 2019s, $50 million of 2020s, $35 million of 2021s and $165
         million of 2023s
>   Total debt on issue now $4.545 billion
     >   largest issuer of NZD debt securities after the New Zealand Government
>   Long term financing costs continuing to decline (and further falls in January 2015)
     >   LGFA 2021s yield in December 2014 tender of 4.31% compared to 5.50% in December 2013 tender
>   Growing interest in LGFA bonds by offshore investors – over 22% of outstandings
    compared to only 2% a year earlier
>   Fitch affirm LGFA credit ratings at AA+ and place on positive outlook – linked to the NZ
    Government credit rating
LGFA – 2014 year borrowing themes
                                      2014 calendar year issuance by LGFA
               Apr-15        Dec-17        Mar-19         Apr-20         May-21         Apr-23          Total
               $10 million   $45 million   $70 million   $265 million   $280 million   $825 million   $1495 million

     2014 Themes                                         LGFA 2019 yield
•    Council refinancing of existing
     shorter dated debt rather than
     substantial new debt issuance
•    Issuance of longer dated debt to
     benefit from
     o   Low nominal interest rates
     o   Tight credit margins
     o   Provide certainty of borrowing
         cost
Local Government Sector – stable to improving credit quality

 > Credit Ratings
     > Currently 20 councils have credit ratings from either S&P, Fitch or Moody’s
     > Ratings range over three notches between AA and A+
     > Stable ratings – no downgrades and one upgrade (Western Bay of Plenty
       District Council) in 2014
     > LGFA ratings affirmed by S&P and Fitch at AA+ and the same as the NZ
       Government
  > Debt levels below forecast while revenue in line with forecast over 2014
  > Councils who are LGFA members - financial covenants improved over 2014
Local Government Sector – 2014 financial metrics
  Revenue from 2014 Council Annual Financial Statements
  > Total revenue increased 4.42% from 2013
     > $8.08 billion from $8.437 billion
 > Total rates revenue (including metered water charges) increased 4.38%
     > $4.925 billion from $4.718 billion
     > Range of increases from -5.4% to 12.5%
  > NZ population forecast to have increased by 1.53% over the June 2013-14 year (Statistics NZ)
  > CPI increase in June 2012-14 year of 1.6% but the inflation increase on council basket of
    goods and services was x.xx%
  > Total revenue in line with forecasts but rates revenue collected less than in Annual Plan
Local Government Sector – 2014 financial metrics
 Assets and Debt Levels from 2014 Council Annual Financial Statements
 >   Total assets increased by 4.72% from 2013
      >   $117.407 billion from $112.114 billion
 >   14 councils have zero gross debt or gross debt less than $500k
 >   30 councils (38% of sector by number) increased their debt in the June 2013-14 year
 >   Total gross debt (at parent level) of the sector increased 6.81%
      >   $10.880 billion from $10.186 billion
 >   Total gross debt (at parent level) of the sector excluding Auckland Council decreased 0.79%
      >   $5.441 billion from $5.484 billion
 >   Gross debt levels below forecast
 >   Gross debt reduced across the total sector (excluding Auckland)
 >   Lower debt improves financial situation and covenants but does not tell the entire story
Compliance with LGFA Financial Covenants

                         LGFA member councils as at June 2014
LGFA Financial Covenants – member councils with a credit rating (17)                                             • LGFA councils operating within
Covenant                       Net Debt / Total Revenue   Net Interest / Total Revenue    Net Interest / Rates     financial covenants
Financial reporting and prudential benchmarks- 2014
 Rates affordability benchmarks                                  Debt servicing benchmark
 1.   Actual rates income = or < each limit on rates             Borrowing cost as % or revenue
 2.   Actual rates increases = or < each limit on                 1. If population forecast to grow at or faster
      rate increases                                                   than national population growth then < 15%
 Outcome:                                                         2. If population forecast to grow less than
                                                                       national population growth rate then < 10%
 • Less than 5 councils did not meet one of the
   two benchmarks e.g. penalty rates not included                 Outcome:
   or an additional growth charge not planned                     •   Only two councils did not meet – were high
                                                                      growth councils and now in low growth
                                                                      category

Debt affordability benchmarks                                    Debt control benchmark
1. Net debt as a % of total revenue
                                                                 1. Actual net debt is = or < planned net debt
2. Net interest as a % of total revenue
3. Net interest as a % of rates income                           Outcome:
Outcome:                                                         • All councils met – generally due to lower actual
• Only 2 councils did not meet all the benchmarks –                capex relative to planned capex.
  forecast to be within in the future and one due to
  plan too low

                        Note: based on 43 LGFA member councils
Financial reporting and prudential benchmarks- 2014
Operations control benchmark                                                Essential services benchmark
1. Actual net cash flow from operations is = or                             1. Capital expenditure on network services = or >
   > planned net cash flow from operations                                     depreciation on network services
Outcome:                                                                    Outcome:
• Large variance in outcomes                                                • Large variance in outcomes
• Volatility due to timing of grants, insurance                             • Most councils (29) met benchmark
  and earthquake recoveries                                                 • A single year not a good indicator
• Most (30 councils) met benchmark                                          • Discussion needed over
                                                                                        – quality of capex
                                                                                        – need to have capex > depreciation
                                Balanced budget benchmark                               – accounting life of assets
                                1. Revenue = or > operating expenditure
                                Outcome:
                                • 28 councils met benchmark
                                • Of those who didn’t – most were very close
                                                                                 Note: based on 43 LGFA member councils
                                  to meeting the benchmark so analyse over a
                                  number of years
                                • Some impact from non cash items e.g. asset
                                  write-downs and higher depreciation charges
The next six months : Council Long Term Plans 2015-25
Long Term Plan requirements                 LGFA interest
Under the Local Government Act 2002         •   30-year Infrastructure Strategy – that the council is
   each local authority is required to:           o   providing infrastructure that meets the needs of the
1. A long-term plan must be adopted                   community
    before the commencement of the                o   meeting or will meet legal requirements
    first year to which it relates, and           o   not under investing in infrastructure
    continues in force until the close of   •   Disclosure of risk management arrangements
    the third consecutive year to which           o   adequate insurance cover
    it relates (30 June 2015).              •   The financial strategy of the council
2. A local authority must, within 1               o   planed level of rate increases that are affordable to
    month after the adoption of its                   the community.
    long-term plan make its long-term       •   That the council’s financial projections are consistent
    plan publicly available (31 July            with LGFA financial covenants over the life of the LTP.
    2015).                                  •   Consistency with the previous LTP – if there are major
                                                changes what are these?
                                            •   Council specific issues.
                                            •   Population trends.
Summary
• LGFA councils taking advantage of low interest rate environment to prudentially lengthen the term of their debt
• Council borrowings less than planned and sector debt (excluding Auckland) declined in the June 2014 year.
• Credit quality of local government sector is improving
       • Debt reduction
       • Revenue up
       • Interest expense will be lower going forward
       • All councils operating within financial covenants and financial headroom for most councils
• All councils are not the same - incorrect to lump all together and to make detailed comparisons or to create
  league tables
• Use of financial prudence and benchmarking a positive step for the sector
• Council Long Term Plans and 30 Year Infrastructure Strategy issues
       • Demographic issues
       • Long term cost of deferrals, underinvestment or lack of renewals
       • Prioritisation of projects
       • Affordability of rate increases vs. the need to provide infrastructure and maintain service levels
You can also read