Planning Commission Presentation | April 14, 2021 - City of ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Housing Action Plan Process We Are Here Fall 2020 Winter 2021 Spring 2021 July 2021 Clarify and Identify strategies Create an quantify housing and policy implementation needs solutions plan Housing Action Plan Review and Adoption Engage community and stakeholders The final Housing Action Plan will include strategies identified during this process. 4
Community Input Activities ▪ Interviews ▪ Community Survey ▪ Ideas Wall 5
Key Findings Overall Growth and Demand Quotes • “This exercise will make the most ▪ Vacancy rates are too low. sense if it is carried out in the ▪ Interest in increasing density. context of a larger vision for the Rental Market city.” ▪ Rents are unaffordable for households with lower incomes. • “There is a struggle to find units Homeownership Market within multifamily and find ▪ Homeownership feels unattainable for many residents. affordable single-family units.” Demand for Smaller Units •“Race is embedded in this ▪ Significant interest in ADUs and DADUs. conversation. The issue of housing exists at the intersection of Need for housing type variety economics, environment and ▪ Existing housing stock does not meet residents’ diversity of needs. equity.” Barriers or Equity Implications ▪ Additional hardships for BIPOC, people with disabilities. 6
Survey Distribution ▪ November 9, 2020 through January 15, 2021. ▪ English and Spanish. ▪ Primarily online, with paper versions distributed via service providers. ▪ Publicized through community groups and Spanish media (print, online, and radio). ▪ Narrated videos on city website. Above: Spanish print ad, English print survey, and Spanish online banner. 7
Survey Respondents Survey Respondents’ ZIP Codes ▪ 534 survey respondents. of Residence (512 responses) Other ❑ 96% live in Puyallup. 5% 98375 8% ❑ 36% work in Puyallup. 98371 28% 98373 13% 98372 98374 23% 23% 8
Demographics: Who responded? Race and Ethnicity Age ▪ No major differences in responses when ▪ The survey overrepresents the cohort disaggregated by race or ethnicity. from 35 to 49 years of age. ▪ No youth (under 18 years of age) Race or Ethnicity of Survey Respondents (480 responses) responded to the survey. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Asian 4% 4% Age of Survey Respondents (523 responses) 45% 4% 40% Black or African American 41% 2% 35% Hispanic or Latino 10% 8% 30% 4% 25% Native American or Alaska Native 27% 1% 24% 20% 2% 21% 20% 20% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 15% 19% 1% 10% White 85% 82% 5% 10% 9% 2% 7% 0% Other, Two or More, Self-describe 12% 0% 9% Under 18 or 20* 18-34 or 20-34* 35-49 50-64 65-74 75 or older Survey Respondents Puyallup Residents Survey Respondents Puyallup Residents Sources: American Community Survey B02001 5-Yr Estimates, 2018; BERK, 2021. Sources: American Community Survey S0101 5-Yr Estimates, 2014-2018; BERK, 2021. Note: Survey respondents could select multiple races or ethnicities. Census data used for citywide * Available citywide data and the survey used different age brackets for youth. The survey used the brackets “Under demographics does not allow selection of multiple races or ethnicities. 18” and “18 – 34,” whereas citywide data uses brackets “15-19” and “20-24.” All other data brackets are identical. 9
Respondent Priorities What survey respondents want the HAP to Prioritize (534 responses) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Housing affordable to those who work in the community. 42% 31% 8% 9% 9% Affordable ownership housing options. 45% 28% 8% 10% 9% Resources to keep homes in good repair and energy efficient/weatherized to support fixed income, poor, vulnerable and at-risk households from housing instability 35% 36% 13% 7% 8% Affordable housing options. 47% 22% 4% 14% 13% Variety in housing to meet a greater variety of housing need in the community. 37% 26% 6% 16% 15% Flexibility for single-family homeowners to build “accessory dwelling units” such as backyard cottages 33% 25% 18% 11% 12% Smaller housing options for smaller households. 29% 29% 16% 13% 12% Supportive housing for residents at risk of homelessness. 32% 25% 13% 13% 18% Emergency housing options and services. 33% 22% 15% 12% 19% Housing for older community members. 22% 26% 22% 20% 10% Apartments and other rental housing options. 22% 20% 10% 20% 28% Tenant protections for renter households. 24% 17% 22% 16% 20% Larger homes for housing large or extended families. 18% 15% 28% 25% 12% Strongly agree Agree No opinion Disagree Strongly disagree 10
Respondent Solutions Survey respondents’ opinion on the viability of potential housing solutions (532 responses) Ensure existingEnsure housing existingishousing in good condition is in good condition 70% 70% 16% 16% 14% 14% Providing support for older Providing supportcommunity members for older community members 67% 67% 22% 22% 12% 12% Providing support Providingfor working support families for working who families who areare paying paying a large a large share of their 66% 66% 15% 19% incomes for housing and fixed income households 15% 19% share of their incomes for housing and fixed income households Helping households whohouseholds Helping face barriers who faceto access barriers housing to access housing 62% 62% 18% 18%20% 20% Building and preserving dedicated affordable housing units. 57% 57% 15% Building and preserving dedicated affordable housing units. 15% 28% 28% Protecting residents from being displaced or forced out of their current Protecting residents from being displaced housing or forced out of their 51% 22% 27% 51% 22% 27% current housing Building a greater diversity of housing other than single family homes, such Building a greater diversity of housing other than single family as attached housing units. 49% 18% 33% 49% 18% 33% homes, such as attached housing units. Increasing the overall supply of housing. 45% 20% 34% Increasing the overall supply of housing. 45% 20% 34% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 10 This is a good solution that should be considered. No opinion/Unsure This is not a good solution and should not be considered. This is a good solution that should be considered. No opinion/Unsure This is not a good solution and should not be considered. 11
Goals & Strategies
Goals of the Housing Action Plan 1. Livability 2. Attainability* 3. Supply &Variety 4. Equity 5. Stability Promote livable Preserve the Build a diverse Remove barriers Encourage housing neighborhoods. affordability and range of new and constraints for people quality of existing housing. that limit access to experiencing housing. housing. homelessness, older adults, and people with disabilities. * Preferred term to affordability. 13
Preliminary Priority Strategies 1. Explore strategic rezones in areas to allow more density and missing middle housing types. 2. Explore residential infill pilot program. 3. Consider incentives for attainable housing. ▪ Provide fee waivers for affordable housing ▪ Provide expedited permitting for developments with attainable set- aside housing units. 4. Expand MFTE program ▪ Outside of downtown core to South Hill Regional Growth Center and/or River Road Mixed Use Center and other areas. 5. Make strategic infrastructure investments. 14
Second Priority Strategies 1. Review existing zoning districts and approval processes. ▪ streamline site plan and SEPA review thresholds, design review. 2. Make it easier to build ADUs by revising standards and creating pre- approved plans. 3. Expand City support for housing services and programs: ▪ Programs to repair credit and help with first and last deposit. ▪ Down payment assistance ▪ Need-based rehabilitation assistance. 4. Encourage permanent supportive housing. 5. Support mobile home parks. 6. Use surplus or city-owned land for attainable housing. 15
Third Priority Strategies 1. Consider actions to preserve existing attainable housing ▪ Track affordable rental properties facing expiring affordable housing use. ▪ Adopt a Notice of Intent to Sell / Sale Ordinance. ▪ Pursue strategic acquisition and financing of existing multi-family housing. 2. Consider an affordable housing bond/trust fund. 3. Adopt Just Cause eviction protections. 4. Consider developer agreements to require inclusion of diverse housing types, flexible space or affordable housing units. 16
Discussion Questions ▪ Do these seem like the right priority strategies? ▪ Any other strategies to consider for prioritization? 17
Top Priority Strategies Next Steps
Upcoming Milestones ▪ Early May – Draft Plan for public review ▪ Early May – Online Open House and survey to collect public comment ▪ May 26 Planning Commission meeting 19
You can also read