PLANET HOME TOWARDS A CLIMATE-FRIENDLY ARCHITECTURE IN CITY AND COUNTRY - Bund Deutscher Architekten
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
PLANET HOME TOWARDS A CLIMATE- FRIENDLY ARCHITECTURE IN CITY AND COUNTRY
PLANET HOME Our imaginations, our visions for how we It’s not only the ecological, but also the want to live in the future, are of utmost social consequences of climate change importance. We’re creating that future that grow increasingly urgent. Climate Towards a Climate- now. The way we conceive cities, infra justice affects all humanity. Internatio structures, residential buildings, manu nally – and even within the European Friendly Architecture in facturing facilities, and offices will deter Union – the far-reaching consequences City and Country mine whether or not humanity can bring of climate change undermine trust in so itself into harmony with the environment. cial and political systems and threaten Architects and urban planners generate our peaceful coexistence. impulses, and their built works can be Prologue catalysts for change. The quality of architecture and construc tion is of fundamental importance. Only The dream of everlasting growth has Ten years ago, in the climate manifesto a building that proves itself over decades come to an end. Reduction is not a fash “Common Sense for the World,” archi of use, far beyond the current “most ion statement, but a necessity for survi tects, urban planners, and engineers for economical” lifespans of 30 to 50 years, val. Ecological overhaul requires creati mulated a voluntary commitment to can truly live up to the concept of sus vity and ideas. work with the construction industry and tainability and thereby be valuable to property owners to achieve ecological society. What kind of legacy do we want to leave change in planning and building (www. behind? Earth is the only home we have. klima-manifest.de). In order to make good on our commit As architects and urban planners, we’re ment, we need an acknowledgement on doing too little to preserve it. Changes have indeed been made in the the part of public and private building intervening years, but they’ve barely owners, the construction industry and scratched the surface of what’s needed craftspeople, and the real estate and for environmental protection. That’s housing industries that something needs partly due to an implicit assignation of to change. The preservation of our exis roles whereby governments are expec tence must not be left to the free play of ted to establish framework conditions markets. beyond which autonomous action fails to materialize. We’ve long since reached the limits of our current approach, a combination of mild contrition, status anxiety, and lack of courage to radically change our everyday reality, which still remains driven by the idea of growth. We must do more to fulfil the responsibi lities of our profession, especially given the relevance of architecture in the face of climate crisis. Architects and planners alone, of course, will not save the world. But our shared responsibility for the glo bal impact of steadily increasing re source consumption requires us to be come pioneers of a climate-friendly architecture. By agitating in one context, we can initiate a rethinking in others.
Postulate I Think politically and get involved III Respect for the existing building stock Enough is enough. Every day, we threa Architecture and planning must make do ten our future existence; every day, so without new construction. Instead, prio cieties and governments threaten our fu rity should be given to the preservation ture existence. The western attitude and development of existing materials, towards life, whereby we feel entitled to rather than their frivolous demolition. do and have anything at any time, must The “gray energy” contained in existing change. We must reorient our lives buildings, from material to transport to around new, more ecologically friendly construction, must become the yardstick criteria. for energy assessment both in the plan ning process and in legal regulations. We We can no longer be patient with hesita need a new culture of maintenance and tion and temporization, driven by lob repair. byists. We must think and act politically; IV we must get involved, develop our own initiatives, practice civil disobedience. We must show that there is an alterna tive to the daily environmental madness Simply intelligent of unchecked sprawl, mobility fetishiza tion, and the prioritization of new buil Technical upgrading to “intelligent buil dings. Otherwise, we need no longer dings” and an excess of often ecologi even think about the future. It’s our turn cally questionable insulation materials to act. will not produce long-lasting and ener getically sustainable construction. II New narratives for the future Through typological, constructive, and thermal structures, climate-friendly ar chitecture exploits and regulates local climatic conditions for the well-being of We’re called upon to imagine, enable, users. Traditional local construction me and design an ecologically responsible thods can serve as a reference. The sim life. With vision, creativity, and concep ple is ultimately superior to the overly tual thinking, architects and urban plan technological. ners can conjure an inspiring image of the future. In order for ecologically responsible be haviors to be accepted and implemen ted, they must be imaginable and tangi ble, sensual and realistic. In both urban and rural contexts, architecture can be a strong motivator for ecological change, allowing it to be experienced not as a loss, but as a gain for both individuals and society.
V Building as material resource VII New forms of mobility IX Culture of experimentation All materials required for construction Mobility is more than just a matter of in Never before has there been such a di must be fully reusable or compostable. frastructure. It determines the quality of versity of ideas and suggestions for cli That is the only way to reduce the enor life in our cities and the environmental mate-friendly living – that is, for ways to mous amount of packaging, secondary impact of the way we move within them. assure succeeding generations a future packaging, and materials used in buil In order for our mobility norms to be on planet earth. ding processes and buildings come fundamentally ecological and cli themselves. mate-friendly, mobility must be under By experimenting and learning, by stood as a conceptual and design task for reworking and updating these ideas, we Architectural design must make creative architects and urban planners. can generate innovations that will facili use of recycled materials in new con tate ecological behavioral change. To structions and renovations and ensure As a guiding principle for holistic de that end, a network of decentralized that building components can later be velopment, the “city of short routes” pri field laboratories can act as catalysts, come resources. This requires an ecologi oritizes pedestrians, cyclists, and public places where architects and urban plan cal approach both to the materials them transport over individual motor traffic. ners can experiment with intelligent and selves and the way that they’re used. Combined with attractive and appealing collective solutions in cooperation with public spaces, it helps ensure that our ci other actors. VI ties remain dynamic. The connection X between city and surrounding area must also be taken into consideration; instead Complete decarbonization of increasing traffic, a new infrastructure must constitute the basis for new forms Political laboratories Decarbonization requires a paradigm of mobility. shift in the use of materials and energy. New ideas cannot be tested without VIII Avoiding materials whose manufacture adequate political laboratories. Experi emits significant amounts of CO2 must mental clauses in legal frameworks cre supersede energy efficiency as an im ate the necessary space for innovation portant ecological criterion. Encourage polycentricism and ensure that policy can be adjusted in the face of new developments. Expe Instead of focusing on energy-intensive Germany’s growing polycentricism must rimental spaces are an important pillar materials like concrete and steel, be encouraged in order to limit the eco of a contemporary politics and adminis emphasis must be placed on natural ma nomy-driven growth of cities on the one tration committed to sustainability. terials like stone, wood, and clay. In ad hand and the rapidly increase of commu dition, emission-free construction ma ter traffic on the other. Small and medi chinery must be used throughout the um-sized cities should be cemented as building process and a CO2-neutral great places to live and work thanks to energy supply secured for the building. their cultural and social offerings and economic foundations. As building blocks for a new ecologically oriented understanding of community and region, urban planning and architec ture can help expand the range of cli mate-friendly living options in Germany.
Looking towards Architects and urban planners are cre Decided at the 15th BDA Day on 25 May ators. Our designs are the physical and 2019 in Halle / Saale the future visible manifestations of a new sense of responsibility. We can strengthen the belief in the future of sustainable de velopment by demonstrating how crea tive omissions and reductions can give rise to new living environments. We thereby insist that a conceptual rethin king of that which already exists in our urban and rural spaces become part of the social narrative – one that doesn’t moralize, but rather makes palpable the benefits of ecological change. To that end, we must exploit the opportunities of new fields of activity and take on the challenge of more complex processes.
Publisher Bund Deutscher Architektinnen und Architekten BDA Federal Headquarter Wilhelmine-Gemberg-Weg 6 10179 Berlin Phone +49 30.2787990 Fax +49 30.27879915 kontakt@bda-bund.de www.bda-architekten.de Berlin 2019 Translation by Jenna Krumminga
You can also read