EURONAV - UPDATE ON IMO 2020 PREPARATION - WEBINAR SEPTEMBER 5 2019
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS Matters discussed in this presentation may constitute forward-looking statements under U.S. federal securities laws, including the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements reflect the Company’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance and may include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements, which are other than statements of historical facts. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects, projects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including, without limitation, the delivery of vessels, the outlook for tanker shipping rates, general industry conditions future operating results of the Company’s vessels, capital expenditures, expansion and growth opportunities, bank borrowings, financing activities and other such matters, are forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that its expectations stated in this presentation are based on reasonable assumptions, actual results may differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include the failure of counterparties to fully perform their obligations to us, the strength of the world economies and currencies, general market conditions, including changes in tanker vessel charter hire rates and vessel values, changes in demand for tankers, changes in our vessel operating expenses, including dry- docking, crewing and insurance costs, or actions taken by regulatory authorities, ability of customers of our pools to perform their obligations under charter contracts on a timely basis, potential liability from future litigation, domestic and international political conditions, potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents and political events or acts by terrorists. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statement contained in this presentation, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In light of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward looking events discussed in this presentation might not occur, and our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. 2
AGENDA 1. Where did we come from? Assumptions 2018 2. Where are we now? Actual situation Q3 2019 3. What are the risks? 4. What is Euronav doing? 5. What can be done in the future? 3
GLOSSARY HFO Also known as bunker fuel or residual fuel oil, HFO is the result or remnant from the distillation Heavy Fuel oil and cracking process of crude oil and is predominantly used as a fuel source for marine vessel propulsion. HSFO Designated fuel oils which have a maximum sulphur content of 3.5% as permitted under ISO 8217. Heavy Sulphur Fuel Oil LSFO Designated fuel oils which have a maximum sulphur content of 0.5%. Low Sulphur Fuel Oil VLSFO Marine Fuel oil that meets the specifications as per ISO 8217 with a sulphur content of no greater than 0.5% Very Low Sulphur Fuel Oil ULSFO Marine Fuel oil that meets the specifications as per ISO 8217 with a sulphur no greater than 0.1% Ultra Low Sulphur Fuel Oil MGO Defined as gasoil that meets DMA as per ISO 8217, with a max of 0.1% Sulphur. Marine Gas Oil MDO Defined as gasoil that meets DMX or DMA as per ISO 8217, with a max sulphur of 10ppm Marine Diesel Oil Distillates Medium fraction of crude with a boiling range between 250C and 580C (gasoil and diesel oil fall into this category). Spread The difference between two contract months of the same commodity, or the difference between the ultimate value of two different commodities. Spreads are defined as Time Spread, Grade Spreads, Arb Spreads. Crack The difference between crude oil value and an underlying commodity. The Fuel oil crack is Fuel oil value minus Crude oil. Contango Structure in the market where prices for an underlying commodity are cheaper today than in the future. Backwardation Structure in the market where prices for an underlying commodity are more expensive today than in the future.
IMO 2020 COMPLIANCE: A SHIP OWNER’S OPTIONS Distillates 0.1% sulphur content (MGO, Diesel) Very Low Sulphur fuel Oil
THE FACTORS WE CONSIDERED 1. Fleet Profile 2. Fuel oil availability 3. Retrofit & Operational 4. Bunker Price Spread 5. Change in regulation 8
Age of Vessel in Years 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 Hatteras Amundsen Aquitaine Euronav Ardeche Heron Andaman Euronav Aegean Arafura Aral VLCC Source: Euronav Anne Alboran VLCC Alex Drenec Donoussa Fleet Desirade Alice Dia Dominica Antigone Hojo Sonia Ilma Simone Alsace Iris Non Eco VLCC Ingrid Fleet––Average Sandra Sara Hirado Average age Hakone Hakata Eco / Eco type VLCC Newton Noble Nautica Nectar Nucleus Neptun Daishan Navarin Dalma Nautilus Age6.86.8yrsyears TI Hellas 26% Composition Euronav Eco or Eco type VLCC of Euronav VLCC fleet Non Eco VLCC 9 74% VLCC Fleet 1. EURONAV VLCC FLEET – ALREADY EFFICIENT
2. FUEL OIL AVAILABILITY 2018 3rd Quarter 2019 Bunker market size: 60,000 ships Bunker Market Size: 60,000 ships Bunker Global Volume: 3.5 mmbbls Bunker Global Volume: 3.5 mmbbls HSFO Volume (post 2020): 0.6 mmbbls (17%) HSFO Volume (post 2020): 1.0 mmbbls (~30%) 450 ships to have scrubbers (Argus May 2018) 3,505 ships to have scrubbers (DNB August 19) Oil majors: Undeclared policy Oil majors: Exxon, BP, Shell etc.. Independent refiners: Few statements Independent refiners: Valero, Marathon National Oil Co.: No communication National Oil Co.: Sinochem etc Oil/Fuel Oil Traders: Opportunistic Oil/Fuel Oil Traders: Vitol, Trafigura Conclusion: Not enough LSFO will lead to Conclusion: Sufficient LSFO supply price Spikes/Volatility should lead to price stability 10
2. LSFO AVAILABILITY – SUFFICIENT Oil Majors LSFO (0.5% S) Bunker Ports • All majors announced plans for availability across world • For example Exxon patented their compliant fuel Refiners • Most major refiners producing 0.5% fuel already • Expectation plans will accelerate into Q4 2019 Port Authorities & Other • Processes will professionalise the bunker industry = good for all China wild card – Hydrogenation capacity • Specific projects bringing compliant Could see 0.9m bpd HSFO production in 2020 fuel to ports Source: Cockett Marine 11
3. RETROFIT & SCRUBBER MANUFACTURERS 2018 3rd Quarter 2019 Anticipation: Actual: o 3 majors manufacturers o 3 major manufacturers o A few others o 20+ manufacturers in total o Fear of not enough scrubber manufacturing o Plenty of capacity in 2020 and some in capacity 2019 o Major issues during retrofit leading to significant delays especially for the early o A simple kit: it is basically a big shower adopters 12
3. SCRUBBER INVESTMENT 2018 3rd Quarter 2019 Anticipated cost: Actual cost: o Scrubber equipment & Installation: USD 3.5 o Scrubber equipment & Installation: up to USD million for a VLCC 6.5 million for a VLCC Retrofit o Loss of hire: will dependent on your natural o Loss of hire: average 50 days ($1.2m to USD drydocking cycle 2m depending on market conditions) o Deviation and Waiting time: not always o Deviation and Waiting time: is increasing considered hence your loss of hire time o Scrubber OPEX: ~USD 150/day o Scrubber opex incl additional fuel burn : USD 500-1,500/day 13
4. BUNKER PRICE SPREAD – LSFO VS. HSFO 2018 3rd Quarter 2019 HSFO will be available at a very large The price spread for January 2020 has discount in January 2020 narrowed to $200 / MT Bunker Price Forward Curve May 2018 Bunker Price Forward Curve August 2019 USD 400/mt USD 200/mt 14 Source: Argus
4. SCRUBBER UPTAKE CAN INCREASE DEMAND FOR HSFO AND IMPACT PRICE SPREAD Scrubber Order Timing and Cumulative Scrubber Percentage of Total Fleet 300 40% 36% of 35% VLCC fleet % of VLCC , Suezmax fleet with scrubbers 250 30% to have Number of VLCC, Suezmax 200 scrubbers 25% end 2020 150 20% 15% 27% of 100 Suezmax 10% 50 fleet to have 5% scrubbers 0 0% end 2020 Oct-18 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Monthly VLCC order progression Cumulative VLCC scrubber orders Monthly Suezmax order progression Cumulative Suezmax scrubber orders % of VLCC fleet % of Suezmax fleet 15 Source: DNB, DNV
5. REGULATIONS CHANGES 2018 3rd Quarter 2019 Very few areas where OPLS would be banned More than 70 ports where OPLS are banned Norway Latvia Ireland Lithuania China California Belgium Connecticut Hong Kong Hawaii United Arab Emirates India Singapore Australia South Africa1 Source: GARD 29 August 2019 1. GARD note final decision in September 2019 16
WHAT ARE THE RESIDUAL RISKS TODAY LSFO PRICE ROCKETS HSFO PRICE PLUMMETS DURATION OF SPREAD Lack of general availability Demand for HSFO will Scale of spread between or in specific locations may reduce sharply post 1 Jan LSFO and HSFO important see the price rise 2020 and price may need to but so is the time it lasts fall substantially to find clearing level FOR ALL PARTICIPANTS IN THE MARKET 17 17
WHAT HAVE WE DONE TO PREPARE? 18
DEDICATED AND FOCUSED BUNKER PROCUREMENT DESK Establish dedicated fuel & procurement team o Branch office set up in Geneva (fuel trading hub) o Financial and operational human resource added to team o Built experience in an changing fuel market Procure & source Thorough testing Build relations for LSFO Storage & logistics of fuels 2020+ Other initiatives including fuel management and saving projects 19
WHAT HAVE WE DONE IN TERMS OF FUEL OIL? 420,000 tons of compliant fuel oil (0.5 & 0.1) purchased o Covers substantial part of Euronav’s total fuel requirement 2020 Procurement o Average purchase price VLSFO: USD 447 p/t v USD 520 p/t for retail VLSFO o Mix of residual and distillate based materials Compliant fuel purchased & stored on ULCC Oceania o Oceania one of only two operational ULCCs in world Operational o Euronav owns the other 3m barrel vessel currently chartered out o Experience of wholesale procurement and logistics External bank financing drawn against Oceania inventory Financing o Will allow for continued liquidity on our balance sheet o Accounting treatment as inventory 20
PROCUREMENT 420,000 MT Purchased Average Price Paid for Compliant Fuel Protection 100% 700 0.1% Residual 606 90% Fuel Oil 600 566 80% 70% 500 447 $47 per ton $ per ton fuel cost 400 60% 400 0.5% Premium 50% Fuel 300 Paid so 40% far 200 30% 20% 100 10% 0 0% 0.5% Fuel Oil HSFO Bunker 0.1% Resid & MGO price price during Distillate during purchases purchases Source: Euronav 21
OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT o Euronav leveraging our assets and financial capacity to complement our business needs o We are using ULCC as supply platform for fleet o By procuring fuel ahead of 2020 been able to take advantage of emerging 0.5% Sulphur fuel oil market ULCC Oceania o Mediterranean price $35 per ton cheaper than Singapore during procurement period Financing Malta o Working capital covered by specific credit facility of $100m at commercial lending rates Singapore area 22
VLCC BUNKER MAPPING FOR EURONAV Singapore is key fuel hub VLCC SUEZMAX Likely to see c. 70% of bunkering through this core channel in 2020 Source: Euronav 23
BENEFITS OF FORWARD BUYING FUEL Security of Safety & Quality Control Lower Supply Reliability Emissions Scale Provenance Compliance CO2 (compared with Avoid fuel price spikes Testing Compatibility using scrubber) Security Reliability Stability supply Safety Tested 24
LSFO ARBITRAGE TRADING Bunker Arbitrage Trade Flows Current HSFO VLCC trades Potential VLSFO Suezmax trades 25
HSFO OVERSUPPLY TO CREATE FLOATING STORAGE OPPORTUNITIES Tank Farms swapped to LSFO reducing capacity • In traditional storage hubs already switched • Move from HSFO to LSFO to meet new client demand Tank Farms also being used for blending • In order to facilitate blending many tanks used • Putting further pressure on supply of tanks capacity 3.5% HSFO Oversupply to move into Contango • Euronav believes this contango curve will steepen quickly • Driving attractive floating storage economics Floating storage contango goes away once the HSFO market rebalances with increased installed scrubbers in the world maritime fleet 26
CONCLUSION 27
EURONAV POSITION HAS EMBEDDED OPTIONALITY “Second mover” advantage • Experience from first installation cycle • Reduced costs & time with increased availability Potentially procure HSFO & store ourselves • Would enable capture of HSFO at low price • Euronav has proven financial and operational capability Utilise established forward derivative markets • Derivative market to capture value • De-risking speculative investment in scrubber technology 28
CONCLUSION Euronav fleet profile – fuel efficient Fuel Oil Availability – sufficient Scrubber technology – second mover advantage Bunker spreads – narrowed past 12 months Dedicated fuel procurement team established LSFO Quality, Quantity & Supply Security proven > 2020 29
THANK YOU! 30
You can also read