Northeast Gas Association 2014 Sales and Marketing Conference Government Initiatives on Natural Gas Expansion - March 14, 2014
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Northeast Gas Association 2014 Sales and Marketing Conference Government Initiatives on Natural Gas Expansion March 14, 2014
State Agencies Involved throughout Gas Expansion Process Market, Challenges, Policies and Implementation Potential Benefits Costs Programs • Market studies • Customer • Financing • Planning conversion costs • Economic • Incentives • Reporting benefits • Regulatory requirements policies • Rate design • Environmental benefits • Investment • Economic • Gas supply and development pipeline capacity 2
Example – Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources Gas distribution expansion study Opportunities Challenges & barriers Strategies, policy options, rate/regulatory models Economic and environmental analysis Collaborative stakeholder process 3
1. Define Market Potential By regions Communities By access On-main Off-main New communities By end user Residential Commercial Industrial http://www.rural.palegislature.us/documents/reports/Natural-Gas-Infrastructure-SR29.pdf 4
1. Identify Customer Interest DOER study, 2nd stakeholder meeting 5
1. Quantify Potential Benefits Fuel savings Pennsylvania • Fuel savings of approximately $1,500/year for converting customers; • $15.2 million/year of additional GDP; and • $7.1 million/year of disposable personal income injected into the state economy. Environmental benefits Reduce carbon emissions Economic development Pennsylvania • 3,100 additional job-years from 2014 through 2040. Energy efficiency 6
2. Identify Challenges to Achieve Benefits Customer challenges Upfront cost • New heating system • Contributions (CIAC) Conversion process • Can be cumbersome LDC challenges Policies that prohibit cross-subsidies Gas supply and capacity constraints Other challenges Permits 7
2. Upfront Cost is a Challenge for Off-Main Projects DOER study, 2nd stakeholder meeting 8
3. Develop Policies and Programs – Setting a Framework High Upfront Cost Low High Access to Natural Gas 9
3. Develop Policies and Programs – Estimating Impacts DOER study, 2nd stakeholder meeting 10
3. Policies and Programs: Financing Lower upfront cost through financing No- or low-interest financing options Financing of equipment costs and/or the CIAC Repayment through the utility (on-bill repayment), or a third-party bank (loans) Market Primarily On-Main Example Southwest Gas offers a Residential Amortization Program, which allows customers to pay their CIAC interest-free through an on-bill surcharge. This type of financing is similar to zone rates. Many utilities partner with third-party banks to provide low-interest loans for equipment purchases, such as the HEAT Loan Program in Massachusetts, which focuses on high energy efficiency boilers and heaters. 11
3. Policies and Programs (cont.): Financial Incentives Lower upfront cost through incentives Rebates, grants, and tax credits Funding sources from utilities and government agencies Market Primarily On-Main Example Puget Sound Energy offers up to $3,550 in incentives for customers switching from the utility’s electric service to the natural gas heating service, along with additional rebates (up to $800) for installing higher energy efficient equipment. The conversion incentive amount can be applied to the equipment and installation, but is limited to 75% of the total cost. 12
3. Policies and Programs (cont.): Free Service Lines Lower upfront cost through free service lines Market Primarily On-Main Promotes the connection of Low-Use customers, which increases the likelihood of that customer’s future conversion to natural gas. Example Many; according to AGA study, at least 49 utilities 13
3. Policies and Programs (cont.): Low-Cost Bonds and Grants Lower cost of expansion through financial support in areas where capital is limited or unwilling to invest Market Off-Main Example - North Carolina LDCs in North Carolina have used $200 million in natural gas bond funds (in addition to $115 million in expansion funds paid for by all gas customer in the state) to expand access to the natural gas system in rural parts of the state. These funds were used to expand service to 31 counties, increasing the total number of counties in the state with access to 96 (out of 100). Other States where Implemented or Proposed ME, NC, PA 14
3. Policies and Programs (cont.): Zone Rates Lower upfront cost by spreading expansion costs over a pool of new customers, and recovering costs over a longer period of time through a rate surcharge on new customers Market Primarily Off-Main Illustrative Example Florida Public Utilities Company (“FPUC”) has increased its customer base by nearly 20% since implementing zone rates in 1995. FPUC’s Area Expansion Program allows new customers that are part of an expansion project to pay a $5.00 per dekatherm surcharge for 10 years. Other States where Implemented or Proposed CT, DE, FL, MN, NY, PA, UT 15
3. Policies and Programs (cont.): Blended Rate Lower upfront cost by spreading expansion costs over all customers, and recovering costs over a longer period of time through a rate surcharge on all customers Recognizes the importance of having access to natural gas Market Primarily Off-Main Example AGL Resources’ Strategic Infrastructure Development and Enhancement (STRIDE) program in Georgia allows the utility to invest $400 million over ten years in infrastructure improvements, including expansion to meet forecasted growth. This program was merged with the company’s existing Pipeline Replacement Program (which was initiated in 1998) to ease implementation. Other States where Implemented or Proposed CT, GA, MN, MS, NC, NE, TX, VT 16
3. Policies and Programs (cont.): Illustrative Summary 17
4. Monitor and Track Implementation Market Potential Planning & Reporting Policies and Results Programs 18
Thank You! Tim Lyons Partner Sussex Economic Advisors 802-497-0761 802-598-1651 tlyons@Sussex-advisors.com 19
About Sussex Sussex Economic Advisors, LLC is a management and economic advisory firm providing consulting services to regulated industries such as natural gas, electricity, water, and thermal energy distribution. The firm’s Partners have held senior positions in utility companies, competitive energy suppliers, management consulting firms, and business-focused academic institutions. Our Consulting Staff, Executive Advisors, and Affiliated Experts have substantial experience and training in matters relating to regulatory strategy and policy development, gas supply planning and capacity portfolio optimizing, energy market analysis and assessments, financial and economic analysis, rate proceedings and regulatory compliance, due diligence and valuation, and management reviews and audits. Sussex has a long list of clients including natural gas distribution companies, electric utilities, combination utilities, electric transmission providers, natural gas pipeline companies, state agencies, and non-regulated energy market participants. 20
You can also read