NEP Australia - The Andrews Hub - A case study for IP-based video production TU Ilmenau - Media Event, 20.11.2018
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
NEP Australia – The Andrews Hub A case study for IP-based video production TU Ilmenau – Media Event, 20.11.2018 Johannes Kuhfuss, Head of Product Management, LAWO 30.11.2018
Project History Request for proposal (RFP) released to market for the provision of centralised production facilities in August 2016 The key drivers were: Production Efficiency • Utilising Production Personnel across different geographic locations without moving them • Utilising Production Personnel for a full work day, or in some cases more than one in a day Cost • Minimise Production Personnel travel time • Minimise Per Diems • Minimise Hotel Accommodation • Minimise Air Travel There could be no compromise in the quality on air, either technical or production NEP embarked in one of the most comprehensive, and ground breaking broadcast projects. The “anyone anywhere” concept was born
Highlights • HUBs and iOBs form production centers as needed for each production • 29 Venues are connected to the Andrews HUB today • Diverse and fully redundant 50Gbs Network at 90% of the 29 Venues • SMPTE 2110 and/or VC2 as required by bandwidth availability • SMPTE 2059 (PTP) for System Wide Timing • VSM Control and monitoring of multicast streams • NEP clients are connected by 100Gbs Hitless Network to the Andrews HUB, meaning they are able to be uncompressed and hitless from the venue to the broadcaster
Why IP? • NEP’s concept of ‘anyone anywhere’, this only works in an IP environment • Transport from the venue to the hub is IP anyway Twice this much cable • It saves cost and time in deployment @ 40Gbps • NEP needs to innovate and move technology forward • NEP COULD NOT HAVE BUILT THIS IN TIME IN SDI! A single connector
Sydney • Existing facility − Two 750Sq/m television studios − significant support areas − One central control room • New facility − Discreet “The Hub” reception area − 4 x Production Galleries − 4 x Audio Control Rooms − 5 x overflow multi purpose rooms − 2 x Large 25sq/m studio/commentary suites − 2 x Production offices including meeting rooms − 1 x bookable meeting room − MCR and central camera control areas − Indoor and outdoor breakout areas − Central Apparatus Room − 100% redundant power and UPS system − On-site electronic and mechanical maintenance − Site specific car parking − Secure access control by room − Cafes, restaurants and public transport on the doorstep
V__matrix C100 Core Processing Module SOFTWARE SDI, IP ENGINE I/O DEFINED 2 x 40GE MSC, etc. DE-/ENCAPSULATION FUNCTIONALITY 9
iOB – Outside 11
VSM – Control For the end user, the experience is the same. We have changed almost every single device behind this control panel, the way the signals move and the distance we move them. Can you see the difference? 12
Standards • SMPTE ST2022-6 – for essence transport (V, A, MD all-in-one) • SMPTE ST2110 (-10, -20, -30, -31) – for essence transport (V, A, MD separately) and synchronization • SMPTE ST2022-7 – for path redundancy (seamless protection switching, hitless merge) • SMPTE ST2059-2 – for timing (SMPTE Profile for IEEE1588 PTPv2) The nice thing about standards is that you have so many to choose from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum 13
ST2022-6 vs ST2110 AUDIO -30 / -31 VIDEO SMPTE 2022-6 -20 / -21 ANCILLARY DATA -40 Bandwidth consumption: -10 1080p50 @ ST 2022-6 ~ 3,1Gbps SMPTE2110 2110 1080p50 @ ST 2110-20 ~ 2,2Gbps
Challenges – Scale 8K@120fps, 4:4:4 12bit ~140 GBit/s 4K 12 Gbit/s 3G 3.0 Gbit/s HD 1.5 Gbit/s SD 270MBit/s 15
Challenges – Network • ST2110 • 1 SDI signal → 18 multicast streams (1 video stream, 4-16 audio streams, 1 HANC/VANC metadata stream) • Switching speed: • SDI router max 3 frames for any number of input / output combinations • Network ~20-40ms per stream, scales linearly (300 signals = 300*18 flows = 216 seconds [5400*40ms] switch time) • PTP transport over WAN links • Bandwidth management 16
Challenges – Security 17
Challenges – Monitoring IT infrastructures are… ➢ entirely abstract ➢ extremely powerful ➢ highly dynamic Monitoring is key! 18
Outlook / Trends • 100GbE → 200GbE → 400GbE → more! • Virtualization • Broadcast as a Service • Automated production • Programmatic network control 19
Questions? Questions? 20
www.lawo.com
You can also read