LITTER-BED PIG HOUSE SYSTEM: CARING FOR BOTH THE ANIMAL AND THE ENVIRONMENT

Page created by Philip Mitchell
 
CONTINUE READING
LITTER-BED PIG HOUSE SYSTEM: CARING FOR BOTH THE ANIMAL AND THE ENVIRONMENT
LITTER-BED PIG HOUSE SYSTEM: CARING FOR BOTH
            THE ANIMAL AND THE ENVIRONMENT

                                     Shao-Yi Sheen
                          Division of Livestock Management
            Livestock Research Institute (LRI), Council of Agriculture (COA)
                      112 Muchan, Hsinhua, Tainan, Taiwan ROC

                                                  ABSTRACT

The litter-bed pig house, made up of a conventional concrete floor and a litter-bed area, serves a
dual purpose: pig raising and pig waste treatment. It was developed by the Taiwan Livestock
Research Institute (TLRI) to make full use of animal manure and exempt it from wastewater
treatment. In the study conducted on the growth performance of pigs in the litter-bed pigpen, the
pigs’ growth was as good as those in the conventional concrete floor, be it for piglets or for
growing-finishing pigs. As long as the litter was kept dry, the temperature of the litter-bed was
maintained and the odor of the pig farms was controlled. The management of the litter-bed pig
farm also paid great attention to animal and environment welfare.

Key words: litter-bed pig pen, Taiwan, animal waste disposal, pig waste treatment, litter

                 INTRODUCTION                              Water Management Act, Air Pollution Control
                                                           Act, and their implementation rules. The animal
Taiwan was first known to the western world                producers, especially the pig farmers, have to
as “Formosa,” which meant beautiful island,                put great effort into animal waste treatment or
rich in natural resources and abundant with                they may be charged with a stiff penalty.
varieties of plants and animals. However, since            Therefore, it is better for pig farmers to shift
its people and their activities increased during           their management strategy from efficient and
the country’s development, the harmonious                  profitable management to an environmentally
relationship between man and the environment               friendly management.
declined. The same has been true in the case                     Generally speaking, the choice of disposal
of Taiwan’s animal industry. It developed                  of animal wastes is highly dependent on the
rapidly the past few decades, was transformed              housing design and the method of waste
from backyard farming to sideline profession,              cleaning used. Therefore, planning for the
and     has    transformed       into  intensive           waste treatment scheme before constructing the
management-run mass production business. At                animal house is advised. Through reduction,
the end of 2004, the number of animals raised              recycle, and recovery of the animal wastes, the
in farms were as follows: cattle, 145 thousand             management of animal farms can be more
head; pigs, 6.82 million head; goats, 249                  economical and pollution can be kept at a
thousand head; chicken, 108 million birds;                 state of low or zero discharge. By doing so,
ducks, 9.8 million birds; etc. (COA 2005). Such            the animal industry can be accepted as a
dense populations of animals inevitably                    healthy and environmentally friendly industry.
resulted in the occurrence of pollution
problems.                                                           LITTER-BED ANIMAL HOUSES
      In Taiwan, the implemented environmental
laws and regulations concerning animal waste               The litter-bed pigpen has a normal,
disposal include the following: Environmental              conventional concrete floor where pigs can eat
Impact Assessment Act, Water Pollution                     and rest and another part is covered with a
Control Act, Waste Disposal Act, Drinking                  bedding material to absorb pig manure. The pig

                                                                                                          1
house is constructed for dual purpose: pig             LAYOUT OF A LITTER-BED PIG FARM
raising and pig waste treatment. Such a layout
can produce a manure-litter mixture that retains   TLRI researchers have been conducting studies
feces and urine in the confined area in the        on manure-bed pig houses since 1987 (Hong et
pigpen for a period of time. Once the pigs are     al. 1989; Hong et al. 1990; Hong et al. 1994;
sold, the manure-litter mixture is removed from    Hong et al. 1995). The results showed that the
the confined area and is composted to make         average daily body weight gain, feed
organic fertilizer. This pig house is especially   conversion ratio, and the survival rate of the
suitable for small pig farms, where wastewater     piglets raised in the manure-bed pigpens were
treatment investment is not economical.            all superior to those raised in the conventional
      In brief, the litter-bed pigpen has two      concrete-floor pig houses. In 1997, five
parts: 1) a 30-40 cm deep pit floor covered        conventional pig houses were remodeled to set
with a bedding to absorb the pig manure, and       up a complete litter-bed pig farm, including one
2) a concrete floor for feeding and other          breeding pig house, one farrowing pig house,
activities. Rice husk and dry compost are the      two growing-finishing pig houses and one
common bedding materials. The addition of          composting house (Fig. 1).
probiotics or microbial products as bedding             The pig houses are situated on an east-
supplement is not required at all. Neither         west alignment to receive proper sunshine in
wastewater nor annoying odor is generated          southern Taiwan. The litter-bed pigpens can be
when enough litter-bed area is provided.           simplified into two kinds: 1) ordinary litter-bed
Generally speaking, each finishing pig requires    pig pens for boars, gilts/dry sows, and
about 0.4-0.6 m2 x 40 cm (deep) of litter-bed      growers/finishers, though the required spaces
space.                                             for different pigs varied (Table 1); and 2)
                                                   farrowing litter-bed pigpens for farrowing pigs
                                                   and weaners.
                                                        In the ordinary litter-bed pigpen, the
                                                   concrete floor with a concrete wall is located
                                                   on the northern side and the litter-bed with
                                                   tubular fronts is on the southern side (Fig. 2).

                                                                  Fig. 1. A full view of the
                                                                          litter-bed pig farm.

2
Table 1. Space requirements for different types of pigs in litter-bed houses
       Pig                              Concrete floor                       Litter-bed

                                             m2/pig                          m2 x m/pig
                                                                           (area x depth)
       Boar                                 7.0–9.0                        0.6–0.8 x      0.4
       Sow                                  2.0–2.4                        0.6–0.8 x      0.4
       Grower                               0.8–1.0                        0.3–0.5 x      0.25
       Finisher                             1.0–1.2                        0.5–0.6 x      0.4
       Farrowing                            4.0–5.0                        2.0 x 0.1

             Fig. 2.   A litter-bed pigpen for breeding and growing-finishing pigs.

The drinker is installed on the tubular fronts,       newborn piglets warmer for them to grow
while the feed trough is placed on the                healthier. The sow is moved to the farrowing
concrete floor. This layout helps train the pigs      house one week before delivery. At weaning,
to dung on the litter-bed. The beddings are           the sow is moved back to the breeding house.
added to keep the water content of the litter at      The weaned pigs stay in the farrowing house
less than 40%. The dry beddings provide               until six to eight weeks of age and then
comfortable and clean air environment for the         moved to the growing-finishing houses. This
pigs. No daily wash is required. The rainwater        arrangement can prevent the weaned pigs from
and the spilled drinking water are collected          the multiple stresses of weaning, moving, and
separately from the pig wastewater. The tubular       regrouping at the same time.
fronts can be rolled backward to the concrete               This type of pig house has many
floor when the dung-litter mixture needs to be        advantages. Its simple structure entails low
cleaned out (Fig. 3). The liquid waste from the       construction and labor cost and no wastewater
farrowing house is collected in the storage           discharge. It is suggested that the operation
tank and added to the litter mixture during           of litter-bed pig farms be divided into three
composting. Therefore, this farm generates no         stages: dry and pregnant sows, farrowing pigs,
wastewater.                                           and growing-finishing pigs.
     The major difference between the litter-bed            Since a litter-bed pig farm needs no
farrowing house and the conventional one is           regular washing, sanitation and disinfection are
that two 10-cm-deep litter-beds are located on        particularly important. A routine, once-a-week
both sides of the farrowing crate (Fig. 4). The       parasiticide application for disinfection is
beddings in the litter-bed can keep the               needed.

                                                                                                     3
Fig. 3. The tubular front is moved                   Fig. 4.   A farrowing pigpen.
        backward for litter cleaning.

      GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF PIGS                          THE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT
      IN THE LITTER-BED PIG HOUSES
                                                     The high temperature and the offensive odor
To investigate the growth performance of pigs,       generated from the litter-bed during the hot
257 hogs from 28 litters, produced by 14 sows        season are the frequent complaints on the
sired by a Duroc (D) boar, were evaluated.           litter-bed system. Controlling the water content
Sows used in the study included five Landrace        of litter at less than 40% can solve both
(L) females and nine offspring of Landrace           problems. The dry litter does not allow the
sows crossed with Yorkshire boars (LY). The          microbes to carry out fermentation in the litter-
average daily gains of barrows and gilts from        bed. Fig. 5 shows the temperatures of the
70 to 150 days of age were 0.73-0.75 kg and          top, center, and bottom litter compared with
0.73-0.74 kg, respectively (Table 2) (Sheen et al.   the ambient temperature. It was found that
2001). Littering performances of sows were           during the pig-raising period, the room
also evaluated.       Litter size born alive,        temperatures were always higher than the litter
percentages of preweaning (3-4 weeks of age)         temperatures, while the temperature of the top
survival, and percentages of piglet survival         litter was the lowest. Thus, the pigs will not
from 3-4 weeks to 70 days of age were 9.18           suffer from heat stress in the hot season.
piglets/sow/litter, 97.7%, and 98.4%,                       The odor at the boundary of the litter-bed
respectively.                                        pig farm was also monitored for successive 10
     Hong et al. (1995) carried out pig-raising      months. The results showed that under proper
field tests in a farm located in Ur-Lueen            management, the odor measurements at the
Township, Yunglin County, starting from              boundary met the legal restriction, which is 50
October 1994 to May 1995. The performance of         for the agriculture and animal husbandry area
the conventional slatted farrowing pens and          (Table 4). Regardless of the big varied
manure-bed (filled with rice husks) farrowing        background data, the odor-monitored results
pens were compared. Table 3 shows that, when         throughout the year were satisfied.
the piglets were five weeks of age, the average             The relationship between odor emission
gain of live weight and percentages of piglet        and nitrification of litter material was also
survival in the manure-bed farrowing pens were       studied in litter-bed pigpens paved with rice
higher than those in the conventional farrowing      husk and mature compost for bedding, and in
pens, but they were not significantly different.     an empty pigpen as control. The odor
This finding was similar to that of Hong et al.      measurements of the bedding surface were 17-
(1994).                                              30, 167 ± 117, and 203 ± 145 for the control,

4
Table 2.       Performances of piglets and hogs raised in the litter-bed pig housesa,           b, c

      Item             Survival                     Barrow                               Gilt
                          %                          Breed                              Breed
                                           LD                    LYD            LD               LYD

Body weight,
   kg
                                                                1.73±          1.76±            1.60±
    At Birth              --         1.87±0.059(49)
                                                                0.04(84)       0.05(53)         0.04(71)

                                                                5.86±          5.48±            5.46±
    3 weeks               --         5.82±0.14(49)
                                                                0.10(81)       0.13(52)         0.11(71)

                                                                21.0±          20.1±            20.2±
    70 days               --         20.7±0.7(26)
                                                                0.6(43)        0.6(34)          0.6(34)

                                                                80.0±          80.0±            78.7±
    150 days              --         82.8±3.0(10)
                                                                2.0(20)        3.1(9)           2.1(16)

                                                                12.1±          102.2±           105.6±
    At marketing          --         104.8±2.3(27)
                                                                1.9(41)        2.6(22)          2.1(34)

Age of                                                          199.6±         198.1±           197.8±
marketing                 --         197.7±2.5(27)
days                                                            2.0(41)        2.8(22)          2.2(34)
    Daily gain, kg                                              0.20±          0.18±            0.18±
    Birth -3/4         97.7%         0.19±0.01(49)
    weeks                                                       0.00(81)       0.01(52)         0.00(71)
    3/4 weeks -                                                 0.31±          0.29±            0.30±
    70 days            98.4%         0.30±0.01(26)
                                                                0.01(43)       0.01(34)         0.01(34)

    70 days -             --                                    0.73±          0.73±            0.74±
    150 days                         0.75±0.03(10)
                                                                0.02(20)       0.03(9)          0.02(16)
a
  The experiments were conducted from March 1999 to July 2000.
b
  Mean± SD.
c
  The numbers shown in the parentheses are the numbers of the tested pigs.
Source: Sheen et al. 2001.

compost, and rice husk group, respectively,               related to the nitrification of the bedding in
while concentrations of NH3, H2S, and (CH3)3N             litter-bed pigpen. The measured pH, EC, TN, P,
in the center of the compost group’s bedding              K, Cu, Zn of the compost group were higher
were higher than those of the rice husk group.            than those of the rice husk group, even
Monitoring the distribution of TN, NO 3- and              though the variation trends during the
NO2- among different layers of litter bedding,            experiment period of the two experimental
the highest concentration was found in the                groups were similar. The concentrations of the
bottom layer, the center layer next, and the              rice husk group were higher than those of the
bedding surface, the lowest for both                      compost group. Therefore, in addition to the
experimental groups. Therefore, it was expected           rice husks, the mature and dry compost can be
that the odor emission of the litter bed was              used as good beddings.

                                                                                                           5
Table 3.                     Performances of the manure-bed and the conventional farrowing pens

                                                             Litter-bed                 Conventional floor

No. of litters                                                21                            21
After farrowing
   Piglets survival per litter (head)                         10.3±1.3                      9.5±1.3
   Live weight (kg)                                           1.43±0.26                     1.48±0.28
Three-week-old
   Piglets survival per litter (head)                         10.1±1.2                      9.3±1.1
   Survival (%)                                               98.1                          97.9
   Live weight (kg)                                           5.37±0.43                     5.55±0.53
Five-week-old
   Piglets survival per litter (head)                         10.0±1.2                      9.1±1.1
   Survival (%)                                               97.1                          95.8
   Live weight (kg)                                           9.46±0.63                     9.16±0.69

Source: Hong et al. 1995.

                             35
       Te mpe rature (C)

                             30

                             25

                                                                        Top              Center
                                                                        Bottom           Ambient

                             20
                                  6    24       50      69         88             105      125         144
                                                               Days
      Fig. 5. The temperature changes of rice-husk litter in the litter-bed pig house

Table 4. The odor monitoring of the litter-bed pig farm
                                                                                 Odor
                           Date                        Upwind                                      Downwind
                                                     background                                     boundary

                           0306                         71                                           36
                           0331                         10                                           24
                           0425                         10                                           21
                           0522                         10                                           30
                           0620
Table 5.    Changes of the constituents of the litter during composting
Com-       pH      Moisture     Organic     TN      NH4+-N       NO2--N       NO3--N      TKN
posting                         matter
time

days                        %                                    ppm

0          6.4       62.6        77.7        2.8       95          0.77       689         796
15         5.7       62.7        77.2        3.1      137          0.40       129         510
20         5.1       60.6        76.7        3.6      199          0.56       120         538
29         6.4       59.4        75.3        3.8      221          0.69       151         577
37         6.7       54.7        74.0        3.5      289          1.13        87         650
44         6.7       50.0        72.6        3.7      233         29.38        78         443
51         6.7       47.7        70.6        3.6      188         46.88       120         359
70         6.6       28.6        69.8        4.1      216          7.30       118         381

           COMPOSTING THE LITTER                   house help to keep the newborn piglets warm.
                                                   The not-so-humid environment in the farrowing
After the pigs are sold or when the litter-bed     house will contribute to the microbe control
needs to be emptied of its litter, the tubular     and healthy growth of the pigs.
fronts are rolled backward to the concrete
floor. The emptied litter mixture is then                          CONCLUSION
stacked for composting. The wind rows are
turned once a week to supply air to the            The animal industry in Taiwan is faced with
compost and to mix the compost more                the double stresses of improving profit
homogeneously.                                     efficiency and ensuring environmental
      In the study, from 45 days to marketing      protection. To maintain the competitiveness of
age, each growing-finishing pig consumed           the business, animal farmers have to adjust
44.9 kg of rice husks for bedding and              their management strategy from being product-
generated 180 kg litter (contained 40.8%           directed to creating the environment-efficiency
moisture). After 70 days of composting, the        balance and to build up a business that is
litter ripened into mature compost with 28.6%      cost-effective and low-discharge. The best
moisture, 69.8% organic matter, and 4.1% total     strategy for this challenge is to follow the 4R
nitrogen (Table 5) (Sheen 2001). This compost      principle – reduction, recycle, recovery, and
is a good organic fertilizer.                      reuse. The litter-bed pig system was developed
                                                   according to this principle. The results proved
                 ANIMAL WELFARE                    that it is not only about caring for good
                                                   animal production, but also for the welfare of
In the litter-bed pig farm, daily washing is       the animal and the environment. By this we
omitted. Thus the construction of wastewater       can achieve a harmonious and sustainable
treatment facilities is consequently not           animal business.
necessary. The pigs will not be bothered by
the washing, enjoying the extra litter-bed area                    REFERENCES
saved from the wastewater treatment. The
rainwater and spilled drinking water collection    Council of Agriculture. 2005. Agricultural
devices help to keep the litter and the floor         statistics yearbook.
dry, and provide the pigs with a dry and           Hong, C. M.; T. W. Lin; M. S. Lee; C. H. Su.
comfortable environment.                              1989. Studies on manure-compost hog
     The sow is moved into the farrowing              houses. J. of Chinese Soc. of Animal Sci.
house one week before delivery and is moved           18 (1-2): 99-110.
out at weaning. Thus, for each delivery, the
sow is kept in the crate for only five weeks.      Hong, C. M.; T. W. Lin; M. S. Lee; N. T. Yen.
In addition, the beddings in the farrowing            1990. Performance of growing-finishing pig

                                                                                                 7
raised in manure-bed pens. J. of Chinese      Hong, C. M.; C. H. Su; , B. Y. Wang. 1997.
  Soc. of Animal Sci. 19 (3-4): 191-206.           Research and development of manure-
Hong, C. M.; T. W. Lin; C. C. Cheng; M. S.         bedded pig houses. J. of Chinese Soc. of
  Lee; N. T. Yen; Y. S. Cheng; C. Tai. 1991.       Animal Sci. 26 (Suppl.): 224.
  Construction and management of manure-        Sheen, S. Y. 2003. The strategy of the
  bedded pig houses. Special edition, Number       management of the eco-animal industry —
  11, Taiwan Livestock Research Institute,         Turning the wastes into resources. In:
  Taiwan, ROC.                                     Chou, C. H. and S. S. Yang (eds.), pp. 25-
Hong, C. M.; N. T. Yen; M. C. Lee; G. S.           38, The challenges of agriculture in
  Tsai; T. W. Lin. 1994. Performance of            production, life and ecology. ISBN 957-01-
  piglets on composting-manure farrowing           5866-2. Taipei, Taiwan.
  beds. J. of Taiwan Livestock Res. 27 (1):     Sheen, S. Y.; C. M. Hong; M. T. Koh; C. C.
  61-67.                                           Su. 1994. Swine waste treatment in Taiwan.
Hong, C. M.; M. S. Lee; T. W. Lin; P. K.           FFTC Book Series No. 145/1994 pp. 87-97.
  Lei; C. Tai. 1995. A field study of manure-   Sheen, S.Y.; C. C. Su; M. S. Lee; H. L. Chang;
  bedded farrowing pens. Research report           C. M. Hong. 2001. Study on the
  published by Taiwan Livestock Research           management model of litter bedded pig
  Institute.                                       houses. Livestock Research 34,2: 69-78.

8
You can also read