How to Validate that Building a Safe System Road Environment Can Save Lives in Low & Middle Income Countries - Prof. Raphael Grzebieta Transport ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
How to Validate that Building a Safe System Road Environment Can Save Lives in Low & Middle Income Countries Prof. Raphael Grzebieta Transport and Road Safety (TARS) Research Centre University of New South Wales http://www.tars.unsw.edu.au/
World Health Safe System Organisation Approach underpins(WHO) many Safe System roadunderpins Approach country’s WHO’s strategy safety strategy
World Health Safe System Organisation Approach underpins(WHO) many Safe System roadunderpins Approach country’s WHO’s strategy safety strategy
Safe System Principles This evolved from analysis of detailed forensic crash data Newtonian laws of physics the same everywhere Pedestrian or cyclist impact WORK ZONE LIMITS Design impact speed limit for survival – recoverable injury
Make crashes survivable Pedestrian or cyclist impact Any speed above 70 km/h is certain death ? Real world with inadequate speed enforcement
High Risk Crash Locations (potential Black Spots)
High Risk Crash Locations (potential Black Spots)
High Risk Crash Locations (potential Black Spots)
High Risk Crash Locations (potential Black Spots)
High Risk Crash Locations (potential Black Spots)
High Risk Crash Locations (potential Black Spots) Source: Harris P., Application Of Safe System (Safe Roads) To Existing Highways In Developing Countries, Safe System on Highways in Developing Countries http://static1.squarespace.com/static/531176a9e4b0d2c24312b29b/t/5568387ce4b0101076d9f515/1 432893564704/for+Publication_Safe+system+on+highways+of+developing+countries.pdf.
Romania – deadly intersections
Romania – deadly intersections At night car crossing will not be seen because it is side on. Also if low beam on distance ≈ 20 m No lighting 19 m/sec x 1.5 sec ≈ 29 m Side impact at 70 km/h!
Intersection crashes Real world with Side inadequate speed collision enforcement
Head-on crashes
Median wire-rope barrier installation • NZ Centennial Highway – 1996 to 2000: 8 fatalities, 2 serious injury and 7 minor – 2001 to 2004 removed passing lanes & wide yellow double tactile lines & reflectors & signs: 4 fatalities 2 serious injuries 2 minor injuries – 2005 to 2009 installed wire-rope median barriers and dropped speed limit to 80 km/h: No fatalities, No serious injuries, 3 minor injuries. Source: Marsh F. and Pilgrim M., (2010) Performance of Narrow Median Wire Rope Barrier Installation on Centennial Highway, New Zealand, accepted for publication Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety, May.
New Zealand - Centennial Highway Source: New Zealand Transport Agency, Wellington
Wire-rope barrier installation Sweden all road deaths – 2+1 started in 2000 600 500 400 Deaths 300 200 100 0 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year
24 Frontal Crashes Frontal Crashes– head onon – head + run-off-the road + run-off-the into road hard into object hard (tree,object pole, abutment) (tree, pole,≈abutment) 30-50% crashes Frontal crash or hard object crash Real world with inadequate enforcement Design speed impact limit for survival – recoverable injury (mph)
Princess Diana crash 31 August 1997 No barrier Impact into column! At the absolute limits of survivability! Around 85-90 km/h
What is a survivable impact? 28m 24m Hitting a big tree or 20m column 80 km/h is the 16m same speed reached at ground level by a 12m car driving off the roof 8m of a 6 storey building 4m Km/h 80 60 40 20 mph 50 40 30 20 10 0 Murray N.W., When it Comes to the Crunch, The mechanics of Car Collisions, World Scientific, Singapore, 1994
Nilsson’s Power model relationship between speed and casualty risk 50%
Validation – Australia Victoria Speed limits were increased on a number of Victorian regional highways in 1987 from 100 km/h to 110 km/h. This resulted in a 20 per cent annual increase in casualty crashes on those roads. Two years later, the speed limits were returned to 100 km/h, leading to a 20 per cent annual reduction in casualty crashes. Source: Australian Transport Council, National Road Safety Strategy 2011-2020
Validation – Australia South Australia InVictoria July 2003, the speed limit was reduced from 110 km/h to 100 km/h on about 1,100 kilometres of regional arterial Speed limits were increased on a number of roads in South Australia. These were typical arterial roads Victorian with regional typical traffic highways in 1987 from 100 volumes. km/h to 110 km/h. This resulted in a 20 per cent annual The increase casualty crashes in on casualty crashes these roads in the on two those years before roads.and after the change were compared with crashes on 8,600 kilometres of road sections where the speed limit remained at 110 km/h. The evaluation study Two years later, the speed limits were returned concluded that a 20 per cent reduction in casualty to 100onkm/h, crashes leading the affected to could roads a 20 be perattributed cent annual to the reduction lowered speed in limit casualty crashes. Source: Australian Transport Council, National Road Safety Strategy 2011-2020
Validation – Australia New SouthSouth Wales Australia In early 2000, the InVictoria July 2003, the speed speed limit limit on wasa reduced 40 kilometre fromlength of the 110 km/h Great to 100 Western km/h onHighway about 1,100 between Bathurst kilometres and Lithgow of regional was arterial Speed reduced limits from 110were km/h to increased on 100 km/h. This a part number of the Great roads in South Australia. These were typical arterial roads of Victorian Western with regional Highway typical traffic highways is a typical volumes. undividedin 1987 highway regional from 100and provides an important freight function though central west km/h to 110 km/h. This resulted in a 20 per cent NSW. The road passes through undulating countryside with annual The casualty adjacent increase farms, forests in crashes on and casualty these crashes roads bushland. in the There wason two those years substantial before roads.andconcern community after the raisedchange at thewere time; compared however, it with was crashes on 8,600 demonstrated that kilometres increases tooftravel roadtime sections where the were minimal and speed that thelimitlower remained speed atlimit 110 would km/h. The evaluation create a safer study travel Two yearsthat concluded environment for later, all aroad theper speed 20 users. Acent limits were reduction comparison returned in casualty based on before to after and 100on crashes km/h, the speed the leading affectedlimit was to a 20shows lowered roads could perattributed be centhasannual there been to thea 26reduction per cent lowered in limit casualty reduction speed crashes. in casualty crashes. Source: Australian Transport Council, National Road Safety Strategy 2011-2020
31 Questions?
You can also read