Focal Point Meeting External evaluation of the focal point network - 19 May 2021 - EFSA
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Contents of the presentation Methodology and main tasks (performed and still to be done) Communication and coordination with EFSA Next steps
Methodology and main tasks We are here
Methodology and main tasks Task 2 -Involvement Inception phase Task 1 – Literature of AF and FP Task 3 – Evaluation search through dedicated and proposal interviews and survey ▪ N+6 months ▪ N+2 weeks ▪ N+2 months ▪ N+3 months ▪ Answers to the ▪ Initial meetings and ▪ Agree on the list of ▪ Interviews with evaluaton questions consultations documents available representatives of based on inputs from ▪ Aligning the ▪ Agree on what needs EFSA (managing the Tasks 1 and 2 + understanding of the to be provided by FP network – ENCO, intervention logic study EFSA DATA, COM), senior analysis, CBA, ▪ Refining the ▪ In the literature management, benchmarking, methodology search include representatives of SWOT, scenario already possible MB, AF memebers analysis ▪ Refining the work benchmarking ▪ Survey with FP ▪ Proposal of different plan examples scenarios for FPs ▪ D2 – Report on ▪ D1 – Report on interviews and survey ▪ D3 – Final report with literature search (delivered 12/05/2021) proposal for FP (delivered 12/04/2021) network optimization
Criteria No. Evaluation question Relevance 1 How relevant are implemented operations in relation to originally planned? 2 Were all originally planned operations implemented? 3 Did implementation of operations increased workload for FP's? Effectiveness Is the current operational model fit for purpose to establish cooperation of EFSA and 4 the MS in terms of stable partnerships, as required by the Transparency regulation? Efficiency 5 What was efficiency of operations? (value for money, difference between FP's) What was value added of FPs in priority areas of EFSA, in particular data collection, 6 Art.36, scientific divergence, duplication of work? Added Value 7 Were there synergies in FP/scientific networks cooperation? 8 Where any unexpected positive results recorded?
Deliverable 1: Overview of the literature search Activity started with signing of Main documents consulted: ✓ FP annual reports 2018-2020 contract i.e. after Inception ✓ Ammendment to Multi-annual FP Agreement meeting (22/02/2021) ✓ EFSA Annual Activity Reports ✓ Guidelines for new FPs EFSa website + ENCO unit made ✓ Main fwk for new FP Grant Agreements 2019-2022 available all neccessary ✓ List of indicators documentation ✓ Scientific Cooperation Annual Reports ✓ FP review 2013 ✓ Independent evaluaton of EFSA (2017) ✓ Transparency regulation ✓ EFSA Strategy
Involvement of AF and FP through dedicated interviews and survey EFSA Advisory Forum Focal points ▪ Interviews with EFSA ▪ Interviews with all AF ▪ On-line survey on staff managing the FP members (possible implementation network (ENCO, focus groups, capacities and DATA, COM); EFSA regional) challenges, senior management; ▪ Focus on cooperation communication with MB with national food national food safety ▪ Focus on operations, safety authorities, authorities, competent capacities, challenges their own cooperation organizations and and value added of and exchanges of scientific networks; FPs practices, challenges investigate in their work internat.cooperation ▪ If needed – additional interviews
Involvement of AF and FP through dedicated interviews and survey Interviews Activity was implemented as planned In total, expert team has implemented 17 interviews with EFSA representatives and 14 with AF members (31 in total): EFSA Units/Departments/Senior Management – 12 interviews with EFSA Units/Departments + 5 interviews with Senior management Interviews were implemented in period 25/03/2021-26/04/2021 AF members – 14 group interviews, 1-3 MS per interview Interviews were implemented in period 20/04/2021-18/05/2021 All interviews were implemented using Microsoft Teams
Involvement of AF and FP through dedicated interviews and survey On line survey Activity was implemented as planned During regular coordination meetings it was agreed that expert team use EU survey as an EC approved tool for online surveys FP’s received survey questions in advance (before actual publishing) Draft version of online survey was delivered to EFSA at 19/04/2021, online survey was published and invitations were sent to FP’s on 22/04/2021 Reminders were sent on 29/04/2021 Deadline for participation was 03/05/2021 At request of some FPS, the survey (as agreed at FP info session) was prolonged until 07/05/2021 In total, 26 out of 29 FP’s sent their responses
Communication and coordination with EFSA Regular (1-2x weekly) project team internal consultation Ad-hoc calls/mails whenever needed Minutes of all the meetings drafted by Ecorys (max 3 days after the meeting) In total: Initial meeting with EFSA (22/02/2021) 13 operational coordination meetings with ENCO representatives (cut-off date 11/05/2021) Expert team has participated in two FP meetings Additional two info sessions with FP’s were organised (30&31/03/2021)
Next steps (May-August 2021) Analysing qualitative data from interviews and survey results (May, June) SWOT, CBA, benchmarking, scenario analysis (June) Conclusions and recommendations per evalution question, incl. validation workshop (July) Final report with proposal for FP network optimization (11 August 2021)
Thank you!
You can also read