Energy-Efficiency-Contracting: Example: University of Cologne - Oliver Diehl, Köln
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Energy-Efficiency-Contracting: Example: University of Cologne Oliver Diehl, Köln Konferenz: Energieeffizienzmarkt und -dienstleistungen in Deutschland und Frankreich Di. 6. März 2018 - Berlin
AGENDA Chapter 1 Motivation for energy-efficiency-contracting Chapter 2 How does energy-efficiency-contracting work? An example of energy-efficiency-contracting: Chapter 3 University of Cologne - BioZ
Reasons for energetic renovation Technology and facade are in need of renovation High energy costs Legal requirements: • ENEV • e.g. energetic inspection for HVAC and cooling systems • Energy management - DIN EN ISO 50.001 06.03.2018 Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com) 4
energy renovation: customer aims low investment cost sustainability low operating cost simple low energy consumption Optimal building / facility increased low comfort / care expenses safety high availability 06.03.2018 Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com) 5
Process of a common renovation process selection of one planning tender offer & implementation idea or more process award / construction planners Planners & technical trades, that usually work together during an energy renovation project: • HVAC, sanitary engineering • electric • control • structural engineer • construction services • fire protection • Other topics / reviewers Many individual trades / partners that need to be coordinated Project controller or general planner 06.03.2018 Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com) 6
Technical interfaces during a usual planning process Evaluation of the situation: • Bad documentation • Not all piping / cable route can be inspected • assumptions to be made at certain points Technical coordination of the individual trades, during the planning phase or execution phase is difficult. After putting-into-operation: Both, planners and executing companies, usually abandon the site after approval and final invoice. There is no re-optimization of the system !! 06.03.2018 Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com) 7
Where do the individual participants earn their money? Planner / project controller • %-rate of investment / lump sum • additional services Executive ev. Building • construction of the plant • supplements • usage of alternative products 06.03.2018 Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com) 8
James Watt: father of energy-efficiency-contracting The basic idea of energy service contracting can be attributed to James Watt, inventor and mechanical engineer . To market his steam engine, his strategy was not to sell it, but to make it available only for hire. He guaranteed his customers that the cost using his steam engine would not exceed the cost of their cattle/horse feed. This basic idea is the principle of so-called energy-efficiency-contracting. (James Watt, 1736 - 1819) 06.03.2018 Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com) 10
Goals and characteristics of energy-efficiency-contracting 600.000 Laufzeit Contracting Energiekosten Nettoenergiekosten [€/a] 500.000 Haushaltsentlastung 400.000 des Kunden 300.000 Refinanzierung der Investition 200.000 Betriebs- und Brennstoffkosten 100.000 IST-Kosten 0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Zeitverlauf [a] Investitionszeitpunkt des Übergabe an den Kunden Contractors Immediate budget relief right from the beginning of the contract Another increase of savings after the end of contracting due to the elimination of the contracting rate 11 06.03.2018 Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com) 11
Expiration of a energy-efficiency-contracting Selection of an Implementation / idea ESCo rough analysis detailed analysis savings phase construction consultant ESCo-consultant • Create a baseline • Create a very rough inventory • Determine mandatory measure Rough analysis • competition phase • Competition of different savings concepts? Target determination of the concept with the highest utility value (profitability) for the customer detailed analysis / construction / savings phase • a contractor is responsible for planning, implementation and achieving savings (guarantee). • Energetically optimal operation of the plant / building. 06.03.2018 Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com) 12
Our approach savings phase • financing implementation • monitoring • reduction • planning certificate • realization detailed analysis rough analysis 06.03.2018 Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com) 13
Advantages of the energy-efficiency-contracting • Fixed costs over the contract period savings • Guaranteed savings guarantee • Competition in the rough analysis determines the most economical concept for the customer Most economical • No "unnecessary" investments concept • Full cost analysis (maintenance and service included) • Planning and implementation from a single source • Full responsibility of the contractor over all cycles of the ESCo Fewer interfaces 06.03.2018 Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com) 14
Example of a energy-efficiency- contracting: University of Cologne - BioZ
Baseline Kosten 2013 Einheit Menge Baseline je Einheit Fernwärme (Arbeit gesamt - 2013) MWh 2.900,0 66,5430 EUR 192.974,70 EUR Strom (Arbeit gesamt - 2013) MWh 8.389,4 146,7305 EUR 1.230.981,15 EUR Gesamtkosten 1.423.955,85 EUR Specific consumption: main floor space: 14.800 m² - Heat: 195,9 kWh/m²xa - electricity: 566,9 kWh/m²xa
offer data FA FA Angebots- mit LED-Technik ohne LED-Technik übersicht (Pflanzen) (Pflanzen) Basisverbrauch: 1.423.809,12 €/a 1.423.809,12 €/a Einspargarantie: 560.199,40 €/a 39,35% 491.943,52 €/a 34,55% Haushaltsentlastung Kunde: 89.285,31 €/a 15,94% 118.339,98 €/a 24,06% Contractingrate: 470.914,09 €/a 84,06% 373.603,54 €/a 75,94% Kaufpreis: 3.044.603,55 € 2.356.741,69 € davon Planung / Engineering 371.760,00 € 12,2% 337.920,00 € 14,3% davon Technische Geräte, Anlagen, Sachen 2.672.843,55 € 87,8% 2.018.821,69 € 85,7% Statischer ROI (Kaufpreis/Einspargarantie): 5,43 Jahre 4,79 Jahre Vertragslaufzeit: 10,0 Jahre 10,0 Jahre Überschießende Einsparung: 50,0 % (AG) 50,0 % (AG)
offer data Energien Zusammenfassung Energien Basis ESC Einsparung Arbeit Leistung Arbeit Leistung Arbeit Leistung Fernwärme 2.900,0 MWh/a - kW 1.572,9 MWh/a - kW 1.327,1 MWh/a 45,8% - kW Strom 8.389,4 MWh/a - kW 5.173,4 MWh/a - kW 3.216,0 MWh/a 38,3% - kW Kosten (Preisbasis 2013) Zusammenfassung Kosten Basis ESC Einsparung Arbeit Leistung Summe Arbeit Leistung Summe Arbeit Gesamt Fernwärme 192.975 €/a - €/a 192.975 €/a 104.668 €/a - €/a 104.668 €/a 88.307 €/a 45,8% 88.307 €/a 45,8% Strom 1.230.981 €/a - €/a 1.230.981 €/a 759.089 €/a - €/a 759.089 €/a 471.893 €/a 38,3% 471.893 €/a 38,3% Summe 1.423.956 €/a - €/a 1.423.956 €/a 863.756 €/a - €/a 863.756 €/a 560.199 €/a 39,3% 560.199 €/a 39,3% CO2 CO2-Äquivalente Einsparung CO2-Minderung Minderung t/MWh MWh/a t/a Elektroenergie 0,57636 3.216,0 1.853,6 Fernwärme 0,219 1.327,1 290,6 Summe: 2.144,2 39,2% C02-saving
fresh air intake tender: ─ Installation of two new intake towers 1 Position Ort Geschwindigkeit ∆p 1 Wetterschutzgitter 2,4 m/s 32 Pa 2 Filterwand 2,3 m/s 90 Pa 3 Kanal links 9,5 m/s 124 Pa 4 Kanal rechts 7,5 m/s 75 Pa 2 3 4
Digestories - daytime operation daytime operation 8-times * air change Operation via timer program 8:00 - 18:00 o'clock Additionally: Presence detector installation, if present above time schedual Tagbetrieb Abluft 480 m³/h ERR 8/4-facher Luftwechsel Abluft 50 m³/h Zuluft 480 m³/h Dauer EIN ZSP 06.03.2018 Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com) 20
Digestories - nighttime operation Time switch program / presence detector inactive => halves the air exchange Interlocking alarm message Digestories Nachtbetrieb - abgesenkt Abluft 240 m³/h ERR 2/4-facher Luftwechsel Abluft 50 m³/h Zuluft 240 m³/h Dauer EIN ZSP Verriegelung Alarmmeldung 06.03.2018 Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com) 21
Optimization of refrigeration KM 1: – Quantum X120 Installation of magnetically-levated turbocompressor – 1000 kW cooling capacity (Quantum X120) + Free cooling KM 2: – Carrier 30HXC345.133 Trockenrückkühler – 1000 kW cooling capacity Free cooling: 6+7 4+5 1+2+3 – Change at outside temperature < 4°C – 200 kW cooling capacity Recooling plants: – 7 dry coolers – Condensation capacity: 2516 kW Verteiler Sammler KM1 KM2 Puffer- speicher Carrier WT Glykol/ Quantum Wasser
building lighting Installation of modern LED technology on a total of 1,737 lights
plant lighting
Projekt des Monats der EnergieAgentur NRW (März 2018) http://www.energieagentur.nrw/eanrw/energieverbrauch_reduziert_biozentrum_der_uni_koeln_spart_500.000_euro_pro_jahr Energieverbrauch 06.03.2018 reduziert – Biozentrum der Uni Köln spart 500.000 Euro pro Jahr durch Contracting.htm25 Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com)
Thank you for your attention 06.03.2018 Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com) 26
You can also read