E.A.T. Initiative: Taste Lab - JASMINE OLVANY
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
The Driving Force of My Project Question: Is it possible to expose the psychological connection between flavor and satiety through a Taste Lab experiment? The information would be given to Metz for new plant forward dishes Approached with two types of testing: strict sample based testing, and individual self-preference testing
Introduction to Experimentation Biweekly in Fall 2016 and Spring 2017 a Taste Lab was conducted. Each Lab was designed around a certain traditional “taste sense” or cuisine profile Some examples: Sweet vs Spicy, Sweet vs. Sour, Italian vs Asian, and Plain vs Flavored
Methodology To adhere to normal sensory science practice the lab followed these guidelines: Hedonic scale for preference rating Sterile environment for tasting Randomized number system for samples Availability to entire student population
Survey Appearance SAMPLE RATING SURVEY SELF PREFERENCE QUESTIONS
Analysis All of the sample based questions were Date: 11/1/16 Dislike Extremely Dislike Very Dislike Moderately Dislike Slightly Neither Like or Like Slightly Like Moderately Like Very Like Extremely Total Number submitted to the following tests: mean Much Dislike Much of Tests score, standard deviation, and variance. Italian 2 1 1 2 2 1 12 9 1 31 Asian 1 5 3 4 5 5 5 1 2 31 The descriptor comments were also looked at for trends The self preference questions were either Figure 1: Asian vs Italian Cuisine Preference looked at the same way or with percent 14 Number of Responses answered. 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Hedonic Scale Italian Asian
Comment Examples Comments: the shell was very tasty and I thought the shell had a good 472- Italian Cuisine texture to add to the dish, but I wasn't a big fan of the aftertaste of the shell that contained the rice/orzo. Italian flavor, healthy but tasty Reoccurring comments: Strong herb tasting, good taste, a little bland, Crunch A little cold, good mix of veggies and grains, liked the Flavorful tomato on top for flavor, crunchy but also soft, good texture Tomato This dish had zucchini with really good seasoned rice. Lots of Herbs Slightly tangy, sweet, salty, slight tomato flavor, very juicy Tastes like oregano Tastes a little sweet, lemony, slightly salty Fresh pesto, crisp vegetables, a chewy ingredient, herbal/flavorful aftertaste Squash with herb and pesto rice Tastes like too much effort It tastes like spicy rice inside a vegetable Little bit of a salad dressing taste. Tastes fresh but still not a taste I would necessarily prefer
Juxtaposition of Self Identification and Data SELF REPORTED TASTE DATA Figure 2: Self Reported Bean Figure 1: Green Bean Preference Preference Chart 20 Steamed Green Beans Amount of Responses Spiced Green Beans 15 10 5 32% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 68% Hedonic Scale Spiced Green Bean Steamed Green Beans
Mass Survey Attempt WHICH ARE YOU MORE LIKELY TO CRAVE?
Examples of the Taste Lab
Figure 1: Sweet vs Sour Taste Preference 8 7 Case #1 Ideal 6 Scenario Number of Responses 5 Taste Lab designed to test student’s 4 preference between sweet and sour. 3 Applied to dining hall’s cold salad offerings. 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Hedonic Scale Sour Sweet
Figure 2: Sweet/Spicy Curry Comparison Case #2 Student 18 Population 16 14 Number of Responses 12 Taste Lab designed to test the preference between sweet, spicy, or 10 the combination. 8 6 Results seemed skewed by participating population 4 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Hedonic Scale Sweet Spicy Combination
Degrees of Sweetness Test 2.5 Case #3 Chef vs 2 Scientist Number of Responses 1.5 Taste Lab designed to test how sweet is too sweet for student’s savory 1 dishes. Found differences in execution based 0.5 on person’s discipline. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Hedonic Scale Brown Sugar Apricot Teryaki
Spice Gradient Taste Lab 6 Case #4 5 Attendance Solution 4 Number of Responses 3 Taste Lab designed to be an iteration of the spicy test, but one variable was changed. 2 1 Found that more traffic did not equal more results. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Hedonic Scale Mild Medium Hot
Works Cited Bradley, Ralph A. Some Statistical Methods in Taste Testing and Quality Evaluation. Charles, Spence. Carmel, A. Levitan, Maya U. Massimiliano, Zampini. Does Food Color Influence Taste and Flavor Perception in Humans? Chemosensory Perception, 2010. Online. Holt, S. H. Miller, J. C. Petocz, P. and Farmakalidis, E. A satiety index of common foods. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1995. Online. Jian, Bi. Similarity testing in sensory and consumer research. Food Quality and Preference Journal, 2005. Online. Lawless, Harry T. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices (2nd Edition). Spinger Publisher, 2010. Print. (Pending ILLiad request) Masic, Una. Yeomans, Martin R. Umami flavor enhances appetite but also increases satiety. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2014. Online. Millward, Joe D. The nutritional value of plant-based diets in relation to human amino acid and protein requirements. Proceedings of Nutrition Society, 1999. Online. Neumark-Sztainer, D. Story, M. Perry, C. Casey, M. A. Factors influencing food choices of adolescents: findings from focus-group discussions with adolescents. Journal of American Diet Association, 1999. Online. Rolls, Edmund T. Brain mechanisms underlying flavor and appetite. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 2006. Online Shannon, C. Story, M. Fulkerson, J. A. French, S.A. Factors in the school cafeteria influencing food choices by high school students. Journal of School Health, 2002. Online. Shepard, G. M. Neurogastronomy: How the Brain Creates Flavor and Why it Matters. Columbia University Press, New York, 2012. Print. Spence, C. Piqueras-Fiszman, B. The Perfect Meal: The Multisensory Science of Food and Dining. Wiley-Blackwell Press, Hoboken, 2013. Print.
You can also read