ABOUT ME - Checking for Understanding Online - SINGAPORE AMERICAN SCHOOL ASCD PBLWORKS EDUTOPIA - The e-Assessment Association
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
7/15/21 Checking for Understanding Online Assessments in a Virtual Environment Andrew Miller | @betamiller 1 ABOUT ME SINGAPORE AMERICAN SCHOOL ASCD PBLWORKS EDUTOPIA 2 1
7/15/21 Where I’m From Where I Live 3 SESSION OUTCOMES ● Review principles and strategies for formative and summative assessment ● Gain strategies and tools to check for understanding ● Understand how checking for understanding works with and for instructional. 4 2
7/15/21 Gradual Release of Responsibility TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY Focused Instruction “I do” Guided “We do” Instruction Collaborative “You do it together” Learning Independent “You do it Learning alone” STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY 5 Comparing Formative and Summative Assessments Formative Assessments Summative Assessments Improve instruction Purpose? Measure of student Provide student feedback competency Ongoing throughout unit When administered? End of unit or course Self-monitor understanding How do students use Gauge their progress toward results? course or grade level goals and benchmarks Check for understanding How do teachers use Grades, promotion results? 6 3
7/15/21 MAPPING ASSESSMENT TO THE SAS CYCLE OF INQUIRY QUESTION INVESTIGATE CREATE REFLECT Explore exemplars Conduct research Draft Share & reflect Identify topics & Analyze Revise & edit questions Consider audience & purpose Explicit instruction, practice & feedback 7 Assessment Shifts First, assessments are in service of learning (“assessment as learning”), not just for evaluating learning. Second, assessments are performance-based, involving the application of skills and knowledge to meaningful tasks, not just recall of knowledge or concepts. 8 4
7/15/21 SAS Definition of Embedded Performance Assessment ➔ A series of assessment tasks (both formative & summative) that make up a unit; Formative ➔ that lead to the successful application and transfer of knowledge and skills; Formative ➔ that apply to an authentic or “real-world” situation; ➔ that are tailored to a specific audience; Formative ➔ and evaluated by clear standards/criteria for success. Summative 9 PORTFOLIO: Collection of student performance tasks and reflections that exemplify learning and growth along multiple dimensions (skills, knowledge, dispositions) PERFORMANCE TASK: A demonstration of the application of skills and knowledge to a problem or task found in the real world, tailored to a specific audience, and assessed by clear outcomes for success. FORMATIVE TASK: Key pieces of formative work that represent milestones toward the completion of the performance task. E NCE STUDENT WORK REAL-TIME OBSERVATIONS “REAL-TIME” EVIDENCE EV I D Learning activities, drafts of work Student peer discourse Student behaviors/actions OF during learning A R N IN G FORMAL CHECKS FOR UNDERSTANDING CONFERENCES Student-teacher conversations, LE Synthesis and reflection prompts, quizzes, exit slips, etc. student reflections (product, process), planning and progress 10 5
7/15/21 Feed up: establishing purpose Check for understanding: daily monitoring of learning Feed back: providing students with information about their success and needs Feed forward: using student performance for “next steps” instruction and feeding this into an instructional model Fisher & Frey, 2009; Hattie & Timperley, 2007 11 A clear learning target establishes criteria for success 12 6
7/15/21 A Planning Process for Establishing Purpose 1. Unpack the Standard 2. Write the Learning Goal 3. Write the Purpose Statement “Our purpose today is…” 13 Check for Understanding: How am I doing? 14 7
7/15/21 Checking for Understanding involves… • Oral language • Questioning • Written language • Projects and performance • Tests • Common assessments and consensus scoring Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2007). Checking for understanding: Formative assessment techniques for your classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 17 • Oral to Oral – listens to a selection and retells it orally • Oral to Written – listens to a selection and retells it in writing (summary) • Oral to Video – listens to a selection and creates an I-movie • Reading to Oral – reads a selection and retells it orally • Reading to Written Retellings – reads a selection and retells it in writing (summary) • Reading to Video – reads a selection and creates an I-movie • Viewing to Oral – views a film and retells it orally • Viewing to Written – views a film and retells it in writing (summary) • Viewing to Video – views a film and creates an I-movie 18 9
7/15/21 Checking for Understanding through Writing • Interactive writing • Read, Write, Pair, Share • Summary writing • RAFT 19 Checking for Understanding Through Projects and Performances Oral presentations Collaborative learning Portfolios Foldables ™ 20 10
7/15/21 Considerations for Test Design • Use Text-Dependent Questions • Teach integrity and behavior • Match items with purpose – Multiple choice for item analysis – Short answer for recall of information – Dichotomous for sampling wide knowledge – Essay for organizing info, creative responses. 21 22 11
7/15/21 a rd to H e a ch , T a rd t o H Learn 23 Feedback How am I doing? 24 12
7/15/21 “Feedback should cause thinking.” Wiliam, 2011, p. 127 25 kin g Ma E TIM ed back Fe for jects r pro nsure ers o U ts r pap r them. studen thei ve e - to have ks all o k, som s faith ly ar ac er , on hm edb Oth fail to how ed wit h the fe e grade. its, but work. re tu rn d o wit p t th ’s ed tu re he o a r to ce her fu h at ’s w hat it and ac the teac to their ng both w d it re te ge ti e her f, an top the igno duplica nowled , frustra s realiz y teac ore o ill k nues eacher ing aren they ’t sk an eeds m time w mises fully er this conti A sf .T ad d n she bet that that pro our tran is cycle udents t into gr ding, an gure g f Th d st pu an fi good nythin ttle bit o er. h ers an rs they underst time to en do A a li ll teac e hou dents’ list. t se we more d th coup a bes how is th u had know an to re re to be r is in edback - that roving st nly we ly is su e-sa ve at fe nfortu imp t, “If o ents real time ked tim know th ning. U too en lam hat stu out it!” d day oo s ar far er work e overl Teacher and le s have d e u t w g ab a rd time ot H vi o On back. aching acher c to pro rely ethin save e. By feed r te y te isti som r—N ays to iv unt, arte e are w is effect to acco ey use rtant fo condar e it real k, so th ing. Sm k g. se mak feedbac eavy lift for- in o imp y, most to W ork lly, ther feedbac elines arnin ts e natel studen ce-to-fac do the ts with rly, h in k fu at gu id for le y to en la Than sure th owing re time kes. man idual, fa back de stud regu , en and g the fo eate m ll o n mista e, iv fe ed vi ce cr n o unat ind ritten pro forman hours in takin ers can a er th e’re fort else t to er ee ts on w attemp their p l the w mmen teac h rath w ne an o ut un ti ed co errors kes. If someo In ion ab apers stru ct sfers ocus on em ista ves (or mat grade p lly con tran u- 1. F us mak oursel back st they g carefu feed back to f what f All o tch them e of AM n 1:06 writi argin. this typ arning ding o pleted we ca 8/2/ 12 m , le an m 26 the o often ility for underst ents co knew To onsib d little The stu ay they resp ave w the , who h o next. e best ts d th den need to ork in w they signed 2 as 1 the ER 2 0 MB TE EP P / S HI RS DE L LEA NA IO C AT E DU 42 42 ndd 13 y.i -Fre Fish
7/15/21 Feedback is... Timely Specific Understandable Actionable Wiggins, 1998 27 Peer Critique Tips 1) Model, model, model 2) Sentence frames or starters 3) “One or two things” 4) Protocols (Charrette, Post it notes, etc.) 28 14
7/15/21 Don’t Wait!!! 29 Feed forward Where to next? 30 15
7/15/21 Feeding forward involves… Using what students know and do not know to determine what happens next. 31 32 16
7/15/21 33 THANK YOU! Any questions? andrew@andrewkmiller. com twitter @betamiller 34 17
You can also read