UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) ARCHITECTURE - FINAL DRAFT UFC 3-100-10 FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)
FINAL DRAFT
ARCHITECTURE
APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITEDUFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)
CRITERIA FORMAT STANDARD
Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use.
Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the
copyright holder.
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (Preparing Activity)
AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPORT AGENCY
Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ ... /1/)
Change No. Date Location
This UFC supersedes UFC 3-100-10N, Design: General Architectural and Interior
Design Guide, dated August 2004;Technical Instruction TI 800-01, Design Criteria,
Chapter 6, Architectural; MIL HDBK 1190, Facility Planning and Design; the
Atlantic Division Architectural Design Guide and Interior Design Guide, dated
July 2002;SODIV-TG-1001, dated March 1997; and SODIV-TG-1007, dated August
1997.
The format of this document does not conform to UFC 1-300-01.UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
FOREWORD
The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides
planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and
applies to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities
in accordance with USD(AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for
all DoD projects and work for other customers where appropriate. All construction
outside of the United States is also governed by Status of forces Agreements (SOFA),
Host Nation Funded Construction Agreements (HNFA), and in some instances, Bilateral
Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.) Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure
compliance with the more stringent of the UFC, the SOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as
applicable.
UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available
to users as part of the Services’ responsibility for providing technical criteria for military
construction. Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE), Naval Facilities
Engineering Command (NAVFAC), and Air Force Civil Engineer Support Agency
(AFCESA) are responsible for administration of the UFC system. Defense agencies
should contact the preparing service for document interpretation and improvements.
Technical content of UFC is the responsibility of the cognizant DoD working group.
Recommended changes with supporting rationale should be sent to the respective
service proponent office by the following electronic form: Criteria Change Request (CCR).
The form is also accessible from the Internet sites listed below.
UFC are effective upon issuance and are distributed only in electronic media from the
following source:
• Whole Building Design Guide web site http://dod.wbdg.org/.
Hard copies of UFC printed from electronic media should be checked against the current
electronic version prior to use to ensure that they are current.
AUTHORIZED BY:
______________________________________ ______________________________________
DONALD L. BASHAM, P.E. DR. JAMES W WRIGHT, P.E.
Chief, Engineering and Construction Chief Engineer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Naval Facilities Engineering Command
______________________________________ ______________________________________
KATHLEEN I. FERGUSON, P.E. Dr. GET W. MOY, P.E.
The Deputy Civil Engineer Director, Installations Requirements and
DCS/Installations & Logistics Management
Department of the Air Force Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense
(Installations and Environment)UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)
NEW DOCUMENT SUMMARY SHEET
Description of Changes: UFC 3-100-10 unifies the architectural criteria for DOD.
Reasons for Changes:
• Maximizes use of industry standards to meet DOD requirements.
• Incorporates critical architectural text from Military Handbook 1109,
“FACILITY PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDE”, dated September, 2002.
Impact: There are negligible cost impacts. However, the following benefits should be
realized.
• By using the industry standards, on-going revision due to industry
changes will minimize the need for future revisions.
iiUFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 1
1-1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE. .............................................................................. 1
1-2 APPLICABILITY............................................................................................. 1
1-3 REFERENCES. ............................................................................................. 1
1-3.1 More Stringent Requirements. ....................................................................... 1
1-3.2 Facilities Located Off Military Installations. .................................................... 2
1-4 DESIGN AGENCY AND USING ACTIVITY. .................................................. 2
1-5 COORDINATION WITH GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL. .............................. 2
1-5.1 Government Review. ..................................................................................... 2
1-6 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.................................................................... 2
1-7 DESIGN STANDARDS. ................................................................................. 2
1-8 PERMITS – CONSTRUCTION, ENVIRONMENTAL & OTHER..................... 3
1-9 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE. ................................................................... 3
1-10 INTERIOR DESIGN. ...................................................................................... 3
1-11 WHOLE BUILDING DESIGN GUIDE............................................................. 3
1-12 INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM OF UNITS......................................................... 4
1-13 FACILITY DEFINITIONS. .............................................................................. 4
CHAPTER 2 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ..................................................... 6
2-1 DESIGN EXCELLENCE. ............................................................................... 6
2-1.1 Building Locations and Orientation ................................................................ 6
2-2 ARCHITECTURAL STYLE AND CHARACTER............................................. 6
2-2.1 Appropriate Architecture. ............................................................................... 6
2-2.2 Installation Exterior Architectural Guidelines.................................................. 6
2-2.3 Historic Architecture....................................................................................... 7
2-2.4 Projects in the National Capitol Region (NCR). ............................................. 7
2-3 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN. ................................................................................ 7
2-4 QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION.................................................................... 8
2-5 LOCAL CONSTRUCTION METHODS, MATERIALS AND SKILLS............... 8
2-6 USE OF STANDARD OR STOCK PRODUCTS. ........................................... 8
2-7 ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY SUBMITTAL / PRESENTATION......... 8
2-7.1 Architectural Review Board............................................................................ 8
2-7.2 Exterior Finish and Color Schedule................................................................ 8
2-8 ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. ............................................................. 8
2-8.1 Waivers from the Accessibility Requirements. ............................................... 9
2-8.2 Military Exclusions. ........................................................................................ 9
2-8.3 U.S. Access Board......................................................................................... 9
2-8.4 Section 504.................................................................................................... 9
2-8.5 Vending Facilities for the Blind....................................................................... 9
2-9 ANTI-TERRORISM AND SECURITY. ......................................................... 10
2-10 OCCUPANT SAFETY.................................................................................. 10
2-11 DoD EXPLOSIVE SAFETY BOARD (DDESB) ............................................ 10
2-12 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE. ............................................................ 10
iiiUFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
2-12.1 Hazardous Materials - Environmental. ......................................................... 10
2-12.2 Mold – Environmental .................................................................................. 11
2-13 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN. ............................................................................ 11
2-13.1 Air Force Projects. ....................................................................................... 11
2-13.2 Navy and Marine Corps Projects. ................................................................ 12
2-13.3 Army Projects. ............................................................................................. 12
2.14 PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING. ............................................................ 12
2-14.1 Space Planning Criteria. .............................................................................. 12
2-15 BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS............................................................. 12
2-15.1 Navy and Marine Corps Projects ................................................................. 12
2-15.2 Air Force and Army Projects ........................................................................ 13
2-15.3 Calculation of Gross Area. ........................................................................... 13
2-15.4 Block Plan Example ..................................................................................... 16
2-16 MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL/TELECOMMUNICATION ROOMS. .............. 17
2-17 BUILDING INSULATION ............................................................................. 17
2-18 FENESTRATION ......................................................................................... 17
CHAPTER 3 BUILDING SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS................................ 18
3-1 LESSONS LEARNED. ................................................................................. 18
3-2 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION.................................................................. 18
3-3 COLD FORMED FRAMING......................................................................... 18
3-4 WATER VAPOR ANALYSIS. ....................................................................... 18
3-5 MASONRY CONTROL AND EXPANSION JOINTS. ................................... 18
3-5.1 Building Analysis.......................................................................................... 18
3-5.2 Brick Institute of America Recommendations. ............................................. 19
3-5.3 Location of Joints. ........................................................................................ 19
3-5.4 Symmetrical Location................................................................................... 19
3-5.5 Structural Concrete Frame........................................................................... 19
3-5.6 Anchors and Wall Ties. ................................................................................ 19
3-5.7 Bond Break. ................................................................................................. 19
3-6 CAVITY/VENEER WALLS AND FLASHING................................................ 19
3-6.1 Limiting Water Penetration........................................................................... 19
3-6.2 Flashing Details. .......................................................................................... 20
3-6.3 Plastic and Membrane Through-Wall Flashing. ........................................... 20
3-6.4 Severe Exposure Locations. ........................................................................ 20
3-6.5 Antifreeze Admixtures in Mortar................................................................... 20
3-6.6 Masonry Dampproofing................................................................................ 20
3-6.7 Clearance Between Insulation and Masonry Wythes / Steel Studs. ............ 21
3-6.8 Flashing at Penetrations and Projections..................................................... 21
3-6.9 Location of Weep Holes............................................................................... 21
3-6.10 Non-Continuous Flashing. ........................................................................... 21
3-7 EXTERIOR INSULATION AND FINISH SYSTEMS..................................... 21
3-8 ROOFING SYSTEMS. ................................................................................. 21
3-8.1 Minimum Slope. .......................................................................................... 22
3-8.2 Roof-Mounted Equipment. ........................................................................... 22
3-8.3 Roof Systems. ............................................................................................. 22
3-8.4 Roof Access................................................................................................. 22
ivUFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
3-8.5 Roof Drainage.............................................................................................. 22
3-8.6 Roof Warranty.............................................................................................. 23
3-8.7 Repair of Existing Roofing. .......................................................................... 23
3-8.8 Concrete Roof Decks................................................................................... 23
3-8.9 Flashing. ...................................................................................................... 23
3-9 PAINT SELECTION. .................................................................................... 23
3-10 GYPSUM BOARD CONSTRUCTION.......................................................... 23
CHAPTER 4 PRE-DESIGN, DESIGN AND POST-DESIGN SERVICES.... 24
4-1 PRE-DESIGN SERVICES. .......................................................................... 24
4-1.1 Programming, Planning and DD Form 1391 Preparation............................. 24
4-2 DESIGN SERVICES. ................................................................................... 24
4-2.1 Function Analysis Concept Development (FACD) & Design Charrettes. ..... 24
4-2.2 Architectural Compatibility Submittal............................................................ 24
4-2.3 Architectural Basis of Design. ...................................................................... 26
4-2.4 Specifications............................................................................................... 30
4-2.5 Architectural Drawings. ................................................................................ 30
4-2.6 Color Boards and Binders............................................................................ 34
4-3 POST DESIGN SERVICES. ........................................................................ 34
APPENDIX A - REFERENCES.................................................................... 35
APPENDIX B – BEST PRACTICES............................................................. 39
APPENDIX C – ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................ 40
vUFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1-1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE.
The purpose of this document is to provide technical guidance for the more typical
aspects of architectural design services. Architects are to utilize the information in this
guide in the development of construction contract documents and Design-Build
Request for Proposals (RFP) and serve as the minimum architectural requirements.
Project conditions may dictate the need for design that exceeds these requirements.
1-2 APPLICABILITY.
This document applies to all agencies of the U.S. Armed Services and their contractors
that are preparing construction contract documents for all projects on military
installations and Department of Defense-funded projects on non-military property.
These criteria are applicable in the fifty states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico,
U.S. territories and possessions, and as far as practical, at installations in foreign
countries. This document applies to all types of construction regardless of funding,
including properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic
Places, as well as National Guard and Reserve projects constructed on military
installations or non-military DoD property. Certain specialized facilities, such as health
facilities, carry more stringent requirements. See the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) or
other criteria that are applicable to the respective specialized facility that is being
designed. This document is applicable to the traditional architectural services
customary for Design-Bid-Build design services and for Design-Build construction
contracts.
1-3 REFERENCES.
All design and construction shall comply with UFC 1-200-01, General Building
Requirements, which references the International Building Code (IBC), as applicable,
except as modified herein. Furthermore, Appendix A of this document contains the list
of references used in this document. These other publications, standards, and technical
data referenced herein form a part of this criteria to the extent referenced. In the case
of conflicts between the IBC and other military criteria, use the military criteria.
1-3.1 More Stringent Requirements.
For projects in overseas locations, host nation building codes, regulations, and
international agreement requirements apply when more stringent than the criteria and
standards contained in this document.
1UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
1-3.2 Facilities Located Off Military Installations.
Where facilities are located off military installations, if the local jurisdiction utilizes a
building code other than IBC, confirm which code will be utilized with the Government
project manager.
1-4 DESIGN AGENCY AND USING ACTIVITY.
The terms “design agency” or “contracting agency” used in this document means the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) command, Naval Facilities Engineering
Command (NAVFAC), or other Government contracting agency. The term “using
activity” means the military unit (company, battalion, brigade, or headquarters unit) or
other organization that is, or will be, the end user of a building or facility.
1-5 COORDINATION WITH GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL.
Maintain direct communication with the Government’s project manager and architectural
reviewer. This may avoid unnecessary re-submittal of plans and specifications due to a
misunderstood comment. The reviewer’s name, phone number and email address can
be found on the comment sheets.
1-5.1 Government Review.
The Government reviewer(s) will provide comments regarding corrections or
clarifications to be incorporated into contract documents or other design submittals.
Ensure that all comments are incorporated into the subsequent submittal, or thoroughly
describe the reason for not incorporating the comment. The Army and the Navy utilize
a web-based Government review management system called DrChecks, which must be
utilized if called for in the contract with the architect.
1-6 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
When performing work for different Activities, regional or service specific requirements
may differ from those included herein. Refer to Appendices for regional requirements or
service specific requirements that take precedent over the guidance included herein.
1-7 DESIGN STANDARDS.
Provide documents that satisfy each of the following for each project:
1. Provide a facility that meets the functional requirements of the user.
2. Fully indicate the Scope of Work in the contract documents
3. Comply with all applicable codes, regulations and laws
4. Provide a facility within funding limits
5. Provide a facility within Scope of Work limits
6. Provide an effective barrier against the elements
7. Provide a facility with coordinated systems (structural, interior design,
mechanical, electrical, etc.)
2UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
8. Provide complete, accurate, and coordinated construction documentation
for the Project
9. Provide a facility considerate of the ecological, physical and visual
features of the site
10. Comply with applicable environmental requirements
11. Provide a facility that is designed in accordance with sustainable design
principles.
12. Provide a facility that is compatible with architectural guidelines at the
installation.
1-8 PERMITS – CONSTRUCTION, ENVIRONMENTAL & OTHER.
Identify the permits necessary for environmental, construction and operation of facilities.
Identify fees associated with each permit.
1-9 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE.
Landscaping is a critical part of good building design, and plays a vital role blending
architecture into its surroundings. Careful coordination between the landscape architect
and the architect is crucial to good design. Refer to UFC 3-210-01A, UFC 3-210-02,
UFC 3-210-03A, UFC 3-210-04, UFC 3-210-05FA, and UFC 3-210-06A for site planning
and design criteria. For Air Force Projects, refer to the Air Force Landscape Design
Guide.
1-10 INTERIOR DESIGN.
Interior Design is an integral part of good building design, inseparable from the
architectural design. The interior designer is a crucial part of the team. Comply with
UFC 3-120-10, “Interior Design”.
1-11 WHOLE BUILDING DESIGN GUIDE
The Whole Building Design Guide (http://www.wbdg.org) is a gateway to up-to-date
information on a holistic approach to integrated design of facilities. It is a valuable
resource for information on “Design Objectives” such as accessibility, aesthetics, cost
effective design, functional requirements, historical preservation, productivity, security,
and sustainable design. Additionally, it contains information on and links to “Building
Types” such as armories, aviation facilities, educational facilities, libraries, office
buildings, parking facilities, and warehouses, and building products. It is the site where
online access to all Construction Criteria Base (CCB) criteria, standards and codes
through the HIS system, Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC), Unified Facilities Guide
Specifications (UFGS), Performance Technical Specifications (PTS), design manuals,
and specifications will reside for the DoD Military Departments, National Aeronautics
and Space Administration (NASA), and others.
3UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
1-12 INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM OF UNITS
See Mil-Std-3700E, Standard Practice for Unified Facilities Criteria and Unified Facilities
Guide Specifications, for policy on systems of weights and measures.
1-13 FACILITY DEFINITIONS.
The following definitions are to be used to identify buildings and related facilities by type
of construction:
Permanent Construction. Buildings and facilities designed and constructed to serve a
life expectancy of more than 25 years. They shall be energy efficient, and have
finishes, materials, and systems selected for low maintenance and low life cycle cost.
Semi-permanent Construction. Buildings and facilities designed and constructed to
serve a life expectancy of more than five years but less than 25 years. They shall be
energy efficient, and have finishes, materials, and systems selected for an average
degree of maintenance based on life cycle cost.
Temporary Construction. Buildings and facilities designed and constructed to serve a
life expectancy of five years or less using low cost construction, with finishes, materials,
and systems selected with maintenance factors as secondary considerations.
Mobilization and Emergency Construction. Building and facilities designed and
constructed to serve a mobilization or emergency requirement. Buildings shall be
austere to minimize design and construction time and maximize conservation of critical
materials and funds. Maintenance factors and longevity are secondary considerations.
Contingency Construction. Structures erected during combat or contingency
operations, as defined in 10 USC 101 (a) (13) that are intended to meet a temporary
operational requirement to facilitate military operations. Such structures may not be
used for the purpose of satisfying requirements of a permanent nature at the conclusion
of combat or contingency operations.
Building System and Subsystems. An assembly of dimensionally and functionally
pre-coordinated subsystems which, when combined, produces an essentially complete
building. A subsystem is one of many building components designed and manufactured
to be integrated with other subsystems to produce an entire building system.
Manufactured and Pre-engineered Buildings. Manufactured or pre-engineered
buildings are defined as those buildings in various configurations and sizes that are
available from manufacturers as a standard stock item. These building modules may be
connected together to form an entire structure. This type of construction should be
considered where it meets the quality, performance, and functional requirements of the
project, when it will be architecturally compatible with adjacent structures, and when
justified by life cycle cost.
4UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
Relocatable Buildings. Buildings designed to be readily moved, erected,
disassembled, stored and reused to fill a temporary requirement.
Portable Buildings. Buildings designed to be easily moved intact.
5UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
CHAPTER 2 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
2-1 DESIGN EXCELLENCE.
Excellence in design is a primary goal for all projects. Reaching this goal requires a
commitment by the Government and designers to quality that includes the relationship
of architecture and land use to the surrounding community, as well as to the details of
design that affect the users of buildings and facilities. This commitment to enhance our
value to the public is mandated by Executive Order (E.O.) 12512. Quality architectural
design vitally improves facility operating efficiency, sustainability, attractiveness,
livability, life cycle economics, and, ultimately, the productivity of the users.
2-1.1 Building Locations and Orientation
Buildings must not be located in floodplains, wetlands, over active geological faults,
unstable areas subject to landslides or rockslides and soil liquefaction. Do not place
buildings over subsurface utilities. Orient buildings to allow as much day lighting as
possible, when balanced against other site constraints.
2-2 ARCHITECTURAL STYLE AND CHARACTER.
Designs require architectural compatibility with the local environment, functional
requirements, economy of construction, energy conservation, interior and exterior
detailing, and life cycle cost considerations. Additionally, facilities will be designed in
harmony with the architectural character of existing facilities that are to remain and are
considered to be historically or architecturally significant to the environment. Design all
facilities to be compatible with the surrounding base architecture. The following issues
affect building design:
2-2.1 Appropriate Architecture.
Appropriate architecture for military facilities is equally respectful of image, function,
environment, and economy. Architectural design shall be timeless, rational, respectful
and compatible with its surroundings, and cost effective. Ornamentation, if provided on
buildings, must serve a function other than adornment.
2-2.2 Installation Exterior Architectural Guidelines.
Most military installations have some published design guidelines that contain criteria
relative to achieving, maintaining and emphasizing a positive exterior visual
environment. These documents include Comprehensive Regional Planning Instructions,
Regional Plans (Navy), Master Plans (Marines), Base Exterior Architecture Plans
(BEAPs), Installation Appearance Plans (IAP) as part of the Installation Architectural
Guidelines (IAG), and Base Design Guides. The Air Force may have General Plans,
Major Command (MAJCOM) and Facilities Excellence Guides/Plans, Architectural
Compatibility Plans (ACP), as well as Housing Community Plans, Area Development
Plans, and Landscape Development Plans. Follow the design guidance contained in
these documents carefully since these are published under the authority of the
6UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
Secretaries of the military services. The Design Contracting Agency must give direction
in writing to deviate from these documents. In the absence of such guidelines, design
facilities to harmonize with the character of existing facilities considered historically or
architecturally significant to the area.
2-2.3 Historic Architecture.
DoD Directive 4710.1, Archaeological and Historic Resources Management, provides
policy, prescribes procedures, and assigns responsibilities for managing archaeological
and historic resources in and on waters and lands under DoD control. DoD components
shall identify, evaluate, protect, preserve and manage historic properties and cultural
resources in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as
amended, and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act. Repair or renovation of
historic facilities and new construction near historic facilities shall follow the Secretary of
Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic
Buildings. Coordinate all projects involving historic properties with the State Historic
Preservation Officer prior to entering design. If there is a question of the historic
significance of a project, notify the Government project manager to obtain guidance.
For additional information on historic preservation, see the Historic Preservation” page
of the Whole Building Design Guide (http://www.wbdg.org).In overseas locations, it may
be necessary to coordinate the rehabilitation of older, historically significant buildings
with the local or regional governments.
2-2.4 Projects in the National Capitol Region (NCR).
In accordance with the National Capital Planning Act of 1952, as amended, and DoD
Directive 4165.61, submit all master plans and designs for proposed construction
projects in the NCR to the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) for
appropriate reviews and approvals. Additionally, in accordance with E.O. 1259, E.O.
1862, E.O. 3524, and the Shipstead-Luce Act, similar submissions must be made to
The Commission of Fine Arts (CFA) for comment and advice, as established by Public
Law 61-181. The NCR is defined as the District of Columbia and suburban Virginia and
Maryland. The Designer of Record will prepare the submissions and make
presentations to the NCPC with the cooperation of the using agency. For Army
Projects, see UFC 2-000-01: Army Planning and Design Execution in the National
Capital Region..
2-3 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN.
Facility designs must be governed by the functional requirements of the projects,
conform to existing criteria and standards, and be consistent with applicable
congressional cost limitations. Provide facilities at the lowest reasonable construction
cost while achieving the optimum life cycle cost.
7UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
2-4 QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION.
Provide the highest quality of construction that is appropriate for the type of facility being
designed, within funding limitations, taking into account life cycle cost considerations.
2-5 LOCAL CONSTRUCTION METHODS, MATERIALS AND SKILLS.
Include design economies that are affected by the use of suitable local construction
methods, materials and skills that are consistent with the intent of these criteria. This is
particularly important in overseas locations, where local materials may not be common
to architects from the United States.
2-6 USE OF STANDARD OR STOCK PRODUCTS.
Use commercially available standard or stock equipment, fixtures and materials when
they meet functional requirements.
2-7 ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY SUBMITTAL / PRESENTATION.
If the Scope of Work or Statement of Work for a project requires an Architectural
Compatibility Submittal, it must meet the requirements herein. On high visibility projects
the A&E may be asked to provide a presentation of this submittal. If a project does not
require a separate Architectural Compatibility Submittal, the Architect must address
exterior building design and compatibility in the Basis of Design, as defined herein,
using installation and major command architectural compatibility guides/plans.
2-7.1 Architectural Review Board.
An Architectural Review Board reviews the Architectural Compatibility Submittal. The
Architectural Review Board is a panel of architects, engineers, and landscape architects
at the respective design or contracting agency, who review Architectural Compatibility
Submittals. The Review Board shall include a member or members of the using activity
(user) of the building or facility.
2-7.2 Exterior Finish and Color Schedule.
The Architect is responsible for selection and coordination of all final exterior finish and
color selections using installation architectural guidelines, after obtaining input from the
using activity and the Government’s architectural reviewer. Indicate these selections on
a comprehensive schedule located on the contract drawings. In no case shall the
selection of colors or finishes be left up to the Contracting Officer or his representative.
2-8 ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.
Provide barrier-free design in accordance with the requirements of the DEPSECDEF
Memorandum “Access for People with Disabilities” dated Oct 31, 2008. The
memorandum updates the DoD standards for making facilities accessible to people with
disabilities. The US Access Board issued an update of the accessibility guidelines
which the DEPSECDEF Memorandum implements with military unique requirements
8UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
specified in the memorandum attachment. The new DoD, “ABA (Architectural Barriers
Act) Accessibility Standard” and the DEPSECDEF Memorandum are located at
http://www.access-board.gov/ada%2Daba/aba-standards-dod.cfm . See the
“Accessible” page of the Whole Building Design Guide. The following laws and
guidelines affect the design of new, renovated, and leased facilities:
2-8.1 Waivers from the Accessibility Requirements.
Waivers for accessibility requirements are used primarily for deviations from the
standard and not used for interpretations. For example, an accessible ramp may only
be able to achieve 1:7.5 (13.3%) slope and not 1:8 (12.5 %) as required by the
standard. Only in extraordinary circumstances are waivers approved and must not be
relied upon as a means to avoid accessibility requirements. Provide justification for not
including provisions for the disabled. Submit waiver requests to the Design Contracting
Agency, who recommends approval or disapproval. The request will be passed on to
the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense and acted upon. Since this can
be a time-consuming process and can affect project scope and schedule, waiver
requests must be submitted by the using activity early in the planning process.
2-8.2 Military Exclusions.
Obtain a signed letter from the Commanding Officer of the activity (Navy or Army) or the
Base Civil Engineer or the Wing Commander (Air Force) to document the military
exclusion. This exclusion only applies to functional areas within facilities used
exclusively by able-bodied military personnel. This letter will be submitted to the Design
Contracting Agency as part of the project file.
2-8.3 U.S. Access Board.
The U. S. Access Board, also known as the Architectural and Transportation Barriers
Compliance Board, is an independent Government agency whose mission is to develop
minimum guidelines and requirements for standards issued under the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA). The Access Board is
also responsible for enforcing the Architectural Barriers Act. The Access Board can be
contacted for publications and technical assistance. Their toll free telephone number is
1-800-872-2253, and the fax is 1-202-272-5447. See the Access Board web site at
http://www.access-board.gov.
2-8.4 Section 504.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination based on
disabilities to programs and services funded by the Federal Government. It applies
primarily to existing facilities and usually triggers the initiation of a project for compliance
with barrier free requirements.
2-8.5 Vending Facilities for the Blind.
9UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
Verify with the using activity the program requirement to comply with the Randolph-
Sheppard Act, DoD Directive 1125.3 This requires that space be provided in buildings
over 1400 sm (15,000 SF) that will contain over 100 employees, priority will be
extended to the blind to establish and operate vending facilities.
2-9 ANTI-TERRORISM AND SECURITY.
Design the facility to comply with UFC 4-010-01, DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards
for Buildings. For the Navy, when directed, and to ensure that appropriate physical
security is included, design the facility to comply with Mil Hdbk 1013/1A, Military
Handbook Design Guidelines for Physical Security of Military Facilities. For the Army
and Air Force, utilize UFC’s 4-020-01, 02, and 03 DoD Security Engineering Facilities
Planning Manuals (these documents reside on a website requiring access
authorization).
Additional requirements may apply for overseas facilities or facilities in high-threat
areas.
2-10 OCCUPANT SAFETY.
Design facilities to eliminate or prevent hazards to using personnel. Employ the safety
concepts described on the Whole Building Design Guide Website. To locate the 29
CFR Occupational Safety and Health Act requirements, access the Whole Building
Design Guide at http://wbdg.org, choose “Design Guidance”, choose “Design
Objectives”, choose,” Secure/Safe”, and finally choose “Ensure Occupant Safety and
Health”.
2-11 DOD EXPLOSIVE SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)
Site plans and facility designs for the construction or modification of ammunition and
explosives facilities or any planned facilities near ammunition and explosives facilities
shall be reviewed the appropriate service arm of the DDESB in accordance with DoD
Directive 6055.9. Currently, the Navy group concerned with facilities involved with
explosive safety is the Navy Ordnance Safety and Security Activity (NOSSA). The
Army equivalent is the U.S. Army Technical Center for Explosives Safety (a secure
website, requiring authorized access) located in McAlester, Oklahoma, and the Air
Force equivalent is the Air Force Safety Center at Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico.
2-12 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE.
When designing projects, facilitate compliance with pollution prevention and
environmental regulatory requirements. For Navy projects, refer to OPNAVINST
5090.1B. For Air Force projects comply with AFI 32-7040, Air Quality Compliance, AFI
32-7041, Water Quality Compliance, and AFI 32-7042, Solid and Hazardous Waste
Compliance.
2-12.1 Hazardous Materials - Environmental.
10UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
When designing projects that involve renovations of buildings or remediation of
hazardous materials, the design must consider the effects of hazardous materials, such
as lead-based paint and asbestos, which may be present. These contaminants can
cause harm to construction workers and future building occupants. Comply with local,
state and federal laws and ordinances relating to hazardous materials. For Navy
projects, refer to UFC 3-800-10N, Environmental Engineering for Facility Construction.
Pay particular attention to lead and asbestos particulates, which may be lying on top of
materials to be removed. Do not specify products that contain asbestos.
2-12.2 Mold – Environmental
The presence of moisture in the materials of a project can promote the growth of fungi
or mold and pose a hazard to the occupants, construction workers, and the design
team. During construction, plan for moisture intrusion prevention and remove wet
products subject to mold development. A UFC for mold is currently under development
and when completed will provide primary guidance. For Navy projects, refer to UFC 3-
800-10N, Environmental Engineering for Facility Construction. Basic criteria and
information governing the assessment and remediation of Navy projects is FY03-04
NAVFAC Mold Response Manual (at http://www.wbdg.org/references/pa_dod_ic.php ).
2-13 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN.
Executive Order (E.O.) 13101, 14 Sep 98, Greening the Government Through Waste
Prevention, Recycling and Federal Acquisition and Executive Order (E.O.) 13123, 3 Jun
99, Greening the Government Through Efficient Energy Management requires that
Federal Agencies adopt the concept of sustainable development and its supporting
principles. In accordance with E.O. 12873, DoD Components are challenged to rethink
the facility delivery process to ensure the best relationship of the built environment to
the natural environment. E.O. 12873 also requires preference shall be given to
materials, products, systems, or services that use recycled or recovered materials and
products that are environmentally preferable as defined therein. Ensure that an
integrated design process is used to obtain the maximum benefit from sustainable
design techniques and technologies. Specify Energy Star or other energy efficient
products whenever they are life cycle cost effective and available, as required by
Federal Acquisition Regulation 23.203. Consider solar energy systems when practical
and economically feasible, as mandated by Public Law 97-214. See the “Sustainable”
page of the Whole Building Design Guide.
2-13.1 Air Force Projects.
The U.S. Green Building Council’s (USGBC) Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design (LEED) Rating System is the Air Force’s preferred self-assessment metric tool
to apply sustainable principles. Submission to the U.S. Green Building Council
(USGBC) for actual LEED certification is at Major Command (MAJCOM) discretion.
Consult the Air Force Sustainable Facilities Guide for process guidance and the Whole
Building Design Guide “Sustainable” section for technical guidance. For more
information on the Air Force policy, see HQ USAF/ILE Memo, “Sustainable
Development Policy”.
11UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
2-13.2 Navy and Marine Corps Projects.
To reduce total ownership cost of facilities, NAVFAC INSTRUCTION 9830.1 adopts the
U.S. Green Building Council’s (USGBC) Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design (LEED) Rating System as a tool to apply sustainable principles and as a metric
to measure the sustainability achieved through the planning, design and construction
process. The Navy will determine the level of sustainable tracking required for a
project.
2-13.3 Army Projects.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers utilizes the Sustainable Project Rating Tool, SPiRiT,
for sustainable design. SPiRiT is derived from the U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED
Rating System. The Army will be changing to the LEED System in FY 2008. For more
information on SPiRiT and for access to guidance, tools and resources supporting
sustainable design initiatives, visit the CERL Sustainable Design and Development
Resource.
2.14 PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING.
2-14.1 Space Planning Criteria.
In accordance with Executive Order (E.O.) 12512, determine facility sizes based on a
functional analysis of activities to be accommodated to determine the actual amount of
space required. Facility planning shall be based on specific requirements for each
project, to include all functional, technical, and economic considerations, instead of
arbitrary allowances. To obtain the most economical and efficient use of space, design
facilities based on the functional organization of adequately sized spaces. The following
publications contain tables of allowances for general planning purposes, but the final
size of each project shall be based on actual requirements:
• AFH 32-1024, Standard Facility Requirement (Air Force)
• TM 803-5, Installation Design (Army)
• NAVFAC P-80, Facility Planning (Navy)
2-15 BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS.
Include in the Basis of Design the building area calculation to confirm scope and criteria
compliance. Include a block diagram indicating the building outline and all areas that
contribute to the building area. Calculations must conform to this document for definition
and calculation of gross area. Provide calculations applying the appropriate factor for
full or half area to each area as defined herein. The sum of these areas must not
deviate from the authorized building area as indicated on the project form DD 1391
without express written approval from the appropriate contracting agency. Calculations
may be in metric or inch-pound at the discretion of the Government project manager.
Do not use dual dimensions.
2-15.1 Navy and Marine Corps Projects
12UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
After approval by Congress, it is not authorized to exceed the MILCON project allowable
building area. However, building area may be reduced up to 25% from that shown on
the DD 1391 to stay within budget, with written concurrence from the Project Manager.
For non-MILCON projects, there are no Congressional limitations. Subsequently
revised areas will require area re-tabulation submittals at the 100% and final design
submittals. Use this direction unless directed otherwise by specific facility requirements.
2-15.2 Air Force and Army Projects
The following table outlines approval authority for building size, building and cost
changes, as provided in paragraph 9.4.3, of AFI 65-601, Volume 1, Budget Guidance
and Procedures:
Approval Authority for MILCON Scope and Cost Changes.
Situation Approval Authority
Scope increase greater than 25%, and cost increase greater OSD and
than 25% of programmed amount or $2M dollars, whichever is Congressional
less. (SAF/FMBIC policy is to apply Title 10, Section 2853 notification
threshold, unless further restricted by annual legislative
language.) (Although Title 10 does not require notification for
scope increase greater than 25%, Air Force policy is to submit
for Congressional notification.)
Scope increase greater than 10% but no greater than 25% of HQ USAF/ILEC
authorized scope.
Scope increase no greater than 10% of authorized scope. MAJCOM/CE
Scope decrease no greater than 25% of authorized scope. MAJCOM/CE
Scope decrease greater than 25% of authorized scope. OSD and
Congressional
notification
2-15.3 Calculation of Gross Area.
Other Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) for specialized facilities such as medical facilities,
or BEQs dictate how to calculate the gross area of those facilities. For all other
facilities, calculate the gross area of a building using the following:
a. Enclosed spaces: The gross area includes the total area of all floors,
including mezzanines, basements, penthouses, and other enclosed
spaces as determined by the outside dimensions of the building.
Enclosed stairwells, elevators, utility chases, and mechanical rooms are
included as part of the floor area which they occupy.
b. One-Half Spaces: Include one-half of the area in the gross area for
balconies and porches, covered but not enclosed entrances, covered
raised loading platforms, covered ground level or depressed loading
facilities, covered but not enclosed walks or passageways, covered and
uncovered but not enclosed exterior stairs, and covered ramps.
13UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
c. Excluded Spaces: Exclude enclosed crawl and utility spaces such as
tunnels, raceways, and trenches with an average ceiling height of less
than 7 feet (2.1 meters); exterior uncovered walks, ramps, stoops, loading
platforms or facilities, either depressed, ground level, or raised; open
courtyards; open paved terraces; and roof overhangs and soffits from the
gross area.
14UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
ARCHITECTURAL BASIS OF DESIGN
PROJECT TITLE
PROJECT LOCATION
GROSS AREA CALCULATION * (SEE BLOCK PLAN EXAMPLE)
AREA A
Area A 124’-5” x 52’-4” = 6512 sf
AREA A TOTAL 6512 sf
AREAS A1 thru A5 (Exterior Covered – ½ Area)
Area A1 17’-0” x 7’-0” / 2= 59.5 sf
Area A2 42’-4” x 7’’-0” / 2= 147.5 sf
Area A3 22’-8” x 7’-0” / 2= 79 sf
Area A4 17’-0” x 7’-0” / 2= 59.5 sf
Area A5 10’-6” x 9’-0” / 2= 47 sf
AREAS A1 thru A5 TOTAL 392.5 sf
AREA B
Area B 9’-0” x 32’-4” = 291 sf
AREA B1 (Exterior Covered – ½ Area)
Area B1 8’-9” x 5’-0” / 2= 23.5 sf
AREA B1 TOTAL 23.5 sf
BUILDING TOTAL GROSS 7,219 sf
SCOPE TOTAL MAX. ALLOWABLE GROSS AREA* 7,225 sf
(PER DD FORM 1391 DATED xx xxxx xx)
*Calculations may be in metric or Inch-pound, as directed by the Government project
manager.
15UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
2-15.4 Block Plan Example
16UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
2-16 MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL/TELECOMMUNICATION ROOMS.
When designing projects, provide adequate space for mechanical rooms and
electrical/telecommunication rooms. For mechanical room sizing, coordinate with the
mechanical designer at the earliest stage. For telecommunications rooms, coordinate
with the electrical designer also. Also, for Navy projects, see UFC 3-500-10N, Electrical
Engineering, and MIL-HDBK-1012/3; for Air Force projects, comply with Engineering
Technical Letter (ETL) 02-12, Communications and Information System Criteria for Air
Force Facilities.
2-17 BUILDING INSULATION
Insulate Buildings to conserve energy conforming to the energy budget of the facility.
Indicate the method, location, and type of on the contract documents. Coordinate the
insulation values with the mechanical engineer to ensure that the energy budget is met.
Coordinate insulation and its installation with the moisture analysis required under
paragraph(s) below in Chapter 3. Provide insulation to prevent condensation in
unheated spaces.
2-18 FENESTRATION
Select window and glazing materials based on life cycle cost considerations, as well as
human comfort considerations. Studies have shown that people are more productive
working in daylight environments with a view to the outdoors. Operable windows shall
be provided for occupied facilities, unless not allowed by security considerations or
specifically deleted by the customer and the project manager. Indicate the type of
window and glazing material on the contract documents.
17UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
CHAPTER 3 BUILDING SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
3-1 LESSONS LEARNED.
This chapter lists areas of architectural design where problems have arisen on past
projects. Though not intended to be all-inclusive, these lessons learned from these past
projects dictate that certain critical elements of building systems deserve special
attention, due to their critical nature.
3-2 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION.
Set finished ground floor elevations with respect to the finished grades. Place the
finished floor no less than 200 mm (8 inches) above the finished grade for slab-on-
grade construction, 460 mm (18 inches) for frame construction. The finished grade is
defined as the final grade elevation adjacent to the exterior including any planting beds.
Locate weeps above the level of the finished grade, including landscape mulching, to
prevent the weeps from becoming clogged with foreign material.
3-3 COLD FORMED FRAMING.
The Project Architect must consult with the Structural Engineer for the design of cold-
formed framing for all architectural uses (interior partitions, secondary framing
members, support systems for architectural finishes, etc.).
3-4 WATER VAPOR ANALYSIS.
Perform a job specific vapor transmission analysis based on project specific climate and
specified wall components and materials. Indicate the temperature and relative humidity
for the inside and the outside of the building, a complete listing of building components,
their thickness, thermal resistance and permeance, as well as building location and use.
Utilize ASHRAE Handbook Fundamentals, Chapters 20, “Thermal Insulation and Vapor
Retarders – Fundamentals,” 21, “Thermal Insulation and Vapor Retarders –
Applications,” and 23- “Thermal and Moisture Control in Insulated Assemblies” as a
minimum for the analysis. The use of numerical models, such as Oak Ridge National
Laboratory’s WUFI-ORNL/IBP or NIST’s MOIST is preferred.
3-5 MASONRY CONTROL AND EXPANSION JOINTS.
Non-load bearing exterior masonry walls are often thermally isolated from the building
by insulation and are therefore subjected to differential movement. Design a series of
vertical and horizontal expansion joints to permit this differential movement. Masonry
damage happens most often when insufficient or improper expansion and control joints
are provided.
3-5.1 Building Analysis.
No single recommendation for positioning and spacing of vertical expansion joints can
be applicable to all structures. Analyze each building to determine the potential
18UFC 3-100-10
FINAL DRAFT JULY 2006
horizontal movements, and make provisions to relieve excessive stress that might be
expected to result from such movement.
3-5.2 Brick Institute of America Recommendations.
Comply with the Brick Industry Association technote 7, technote 18A, and technote 21B
for specific brick masonry recommendations and other topic-specific technotes as
applicable.
3-5.3 Location of Joints.
Place expansion and/or crack control joints in accordance with Brick Institute of America
technote 18A.
3-5.4 Symmetrical Location.
Place expansion joints symmetrically on building elevations. Indicate expansion joints
on the contract drawings.
3-5.5 Structural Concrete Frame.
A structural concrete frame requires special consideration and must be designed to
allow for the isolation of the structural frame without overstressing masonry.
3-5.6 Anchors and Wall Ties.
Design anchors and wall ties to accommodate the expected movement without
obstruction or becoming disengaged.
3-5.7 Bond Break.
To accommodate differential expansion and avoid masonry or concrete damage,
provide a bond breaker between masonry and concrete.
3-6 CAVITY/VENEER WALLS AND FLASHING.
Comply with Brick Institute of America Technote 21B for brick cavity/veneer wall design
and construction, unless superseded by this document.
3-6.1 Limiting Water Penetration.
Successful performance of an exterior masonry wall depends on limiting the amount of
water penetration and controlling any water that enters the wall system. Design all
components of the wall system to control moisture and to preclude water penetration of
the barrier wall construction. Components of the wall assembly include, but are not
limited to, mortar mix, integral water repellent admixtures, through-wall flashing, weep
holes, insulation, dampproofing, vapor retarders, air barriers, sealant joints, paints,
coatings and other finishes. Where such are required, select vapor retarders in
accordance with ASTM C 755, “Selection of Vapor Retarders for Thermal Insulation.”
19You can also read
