The Mars Microphone onboard Supercam for the Mars 2020 rover

Page created by Scott Salinas
 
CONTINUE READING
The Mars Microphone onboard Supercam for the Mars 2020 rover
The Mars Microphone
onboard Supercam for the
Mars 2020 rover
David M im oun 1 , Sylvestre Maurice 2 , Anthony Sournac 1 , Alexandre
Cadu 1 , Marti Bassas 1 , Murdoch Naomi 1 , Baptiste Chide 1 , Jérémie
Lasue 2 , Ralph Lorenz 4 , Roger W iens 3 and the SuperCam team

(1) Université de Toulouse, ISAE-Supaero, DEOS/SSPA, Toulouse,
    France (david.mimoun@isae.fr),
(2) IRAP, CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France,
(3) LANL, Los Alamos, NM
(4) APL                                                                  1
The Mars Microphone onboard Supercam for the Mars 2020 rover
A Short History of Planetary
                        Microphones (1/3)
n    The short history of the planetary
     microphones began probably with Grozo
     2 instrument during the Venera 13 and 14
     mission

    (http://mentallandscape.com/V_Venera11.htm)

n    First Planetary microphone on Huygens
       n   Successfully retrieved the descent sounds
n

2                                                      June 2011 - 2
The Mars Microphone onboard Supercam for the Mars 2020 rover
A Short History of Planetary
                  Microphones (2/3)
n   Second opportunity on Mars Polar
    Lander
    n   Mars Microphone Development up to FM
        by Greg Delory (UC Berkeley)
    n   Support by the Planetary Society
    n   Failed landing of MPL

n   Third opportunity with Phoenix : sound
    coupled with Mardi imager (Not used)

3                                              June 2011 - 3
The Mars Microphone onboard Supercam for the Mars 2020 rover
A Short
Taking into account   both the History
                                sensor and of
                                           the Planetary
                                               lander requirements, two possible a
are studied and shown inMicrophones            (3/3)20. For exact dimensions, det
                           the Figure 19 and Figure
additional views, please refer to Annex #4. Schiaparelli, w/o heat shield & back cove
                              MicroAres
                                              MarsWind
                        MarsTem
                                                                        Camera FoV
                                                                        55°x83°
                          Camera
                          System                         MicroMED

                              MEtBaro

                                          The    Mars Microphone sensor was
                                          Microphone
                               CEU        Sensor Elect.
                                          considered a low-risk development, but was
                                          judged by the Science panel to lack
            Lande r                       sufficient scientific justification
            Battery

                                           MicroMIMA

       Camera
       Cal.           VISTA
       Traget
                                          MicroMETSIS
                Microphone
                Sensor

 Figure 19: DREAMS accommodation #1, CEU and Battery in place of CTPU position.

                  MarsTem
                                        MarsWind                    4
The Mars Microphone onboard Supercam for the Mars 2020 rover
Acoustics on Mars is complicated

                                                                        Very strong absorption
                                                                           Williams (2001)

                                                    Sound amplitude as a function of the distance for noise source = 60 dB
                                             60
                                                                                                                                   4m
                                                                                                                                   7m
                                                                                                                                   10 m

                                             50

                                             40
                      Sound intensity (dB)

                                                  Increasing distance
Sound amplitude vs.                          30

 distance on Mars
                                             20

                                             10

                                              0
                                                        102                    103                    104                    105
                                                                                Frequency (Hz)

                                                   5
The Mars Microphone onboard Supercam for the Mars 2020 rover
Microphone science goals have
to be crystal clear

                        6
The Mars Microphone onboard Supercam for the Mars 2020 rover
SuperCam on Mars 2020

Dr. Steven J. Rehse / W hat is LIBS?

                                                                         Spectrum
                                                       + sound

                                           SuperCam is used to study Rocks at
                                                       distance
                                       7
The Mars Microphone onboard Supercam for the Mars 2020 rover
SuperCam on Mars 2020

Dr. Steven J. Rehse / W hat is LIBS?

                                                                         Spectrum
                                                       + sound

                                           SuperCam is used to study Rocks at
                                                       distance
                                       8
The Mars Microphone onboard Supercam for the Mars 2020 rover
Microphone science goals                                                  1 atm, Air

                                                        Pa/√ Hz
                                   4 m

                                                                              7.5 mbars, CO 2

                                                                  10 2        Freq (Hz)     10 4

         Rovers Sounds
                         Microphone will record LIBS impacts up to 4 meters

The science objectives of the Mars Microphone are:
    1)   To support the LIBS investigation to obtain unique properties of Mars
         rocks and soils through their coupling with the LIBS laser.
    2)   To contribute to basic atmospheric science: wind, convective vortices, dust
         devils studies at close distance or when interacting with the rover.
    3)   To monitor various artificial sounds.

                                                9
The Mars Microphone onboard Supercam for the Mars 2020 rover
Microphone accommodation
                   RWEB (External view)

                                            MTB3-B

                                                                                   MIC + PT1000
                                                               MIC-FEE

                                     FEE + Cover

    RWEB (External view)                  Mast unit (Interior view)

                                                                         Post + Microphone

                              10
SuperCam EQM Model

              11
287   level of compaction of 6 tonnes. For the higher levels, the amplitude remains

                                                           behaviour follows the variation of the Vickers Hardness indicating that the Vick
               What can we learn froma critical
                                        LIBS         acoustics?
                                                     288

                                                parameter influencing the acoustic signal.
                                                     289

                                                                                                               (Murdoch et al, 2018, submitted)
                 ablated mass
                                                  distance
                                                                                          0.015

                                                                                           0.01
                                                                                                       2t

                                                                          Pressure (Pa)
                                                                                                       3t
                                                                                          0.005        4t
                                                                                                       6t
                                                                                                       8t
                                                                                              0
                                       velocity of                                                     10 t
   peak-to-peak                      acoustic wave
                                                                                                       15 t
                                                                                          -0.005
amplitude of acoustic                     front
 waveform (pressure
                                                                                           -0.01
        gap)
                                                                                                   0     0.2   0.4    0.6     0.8        1        1.2
                                                                                                                     Time (ms)
The intensity of the acoustic signal acquired as the
peak-to-peak    amplitude    of  acoustic  waveform                         Waveforms of JSC1 targets at different levels of
                                                           Figure 15: Waveforms of JSC1 targets at di↵erent levels of compaction as measured by the microph
isproportional to the ablated masses (Chaléard et al.,     the targets. Eachcompaction
                                                                            line represents theas  measured
                                                                                                average signal overby   the around
                                                                                                                    10 shots microphone        atof1.5
                                                                                                                                   the 300th shot        m
                                                                                                                                                    the acquisi
1997; Grad and M ozina 1993)                                                from the targets.
The mass ablated is obtained from the acoustic signal
                                                                   The sound peak amplitude increases with the hardness
amplitude .                                        290 5.3. Analysis of the target craters
                                                                   of the material
                                                     291       The resulting JSC-1 impact craters were analyzed with a microscope (Olympu

  The LIBS acoustic signal constraints             the material hardness
                             nification factor x100) and the pictures are represented in Fig. 16. The averag
                                                     292

                                                     293   the crater in the direction of the laser beam is 828 ± 23 µm. There is no signifi

                                                     294   resulting crater diameter with the target compaction (< 3 %). Unfortunately, the 4
                                                               12                                                     18
Bandwidth of acoustic signals on Mars

n   Frequency ranges of the different signals to be calibrated

                                                                     MICROPHONE BANDWIDTH (100 Hz – 10 kHz)

                                                                                        LIBS acoustics
                                                                                         (0.5-5 kHz)

                             N elke an d V ary, 2 0 1 4                                     Rover activities (1-10 kHz)

                                 Vortices (10 Hz to 1 kHz) for vortex diameters 1 – 30 m

       Aeroacoustics (1 Hz to 500 Hz) for wind speeds < 20 m/s, object sizes > 1 cm                               Saltation
                                                                                                                  (5-10 kHz)
                      Dynamic pressure (all frequencies) but drops off rapidly with increasing frequency

     10 0                       10 1                        10 2                           10 3                       10 4

                                                          FREQUENCY (Hz)
Microphone Radiation issues

n   Microphone gain had decreased sharply after X-ray inspections
     n   All other operations (Shocks, Serialization, retinning) have no impact on
         performance
     n   All flight/qualification microphones have been exposed to X-ray
           n Need of another lot

                                                 Blue curves (light and dark): no X-ray inspection
                                                 Other curves: X-ray inspection

                                            14
Calibration: End to end
Objectives:
n Verify the gains of the instrument in the windy
  Martian environment
n Ensure microphone is not saturated by Aeolian
  noise

                                                    Test details:
                                                         n  Use of AWTSII 2010 Martian
                                                            wind tunnel foreseen (2m x
                                                            2m x 0.9m) in Denmark
                                                        n   LIBS-like sound + MIC
                                                            operation + Martian
                                                            atmosphere over a sufficient
                                                            distance, with wind.
             Arhus wind tunnel, Denmark
                                                        n   Target: Spring 2017

                                          15
Aarhus end-to-end validation tests

                     16
To summarize
n   There will be a microphone on Mars 2020 (FM delivered in
    february 2018, Supercam FM this fall)
n   You can hear sounds on Mars (even if it’s tough)
n   You can do science with it !

                                                              Arm

      MOXIE

                                                     Wheels

       + other engineering noise   Helicopter

                                                17
Thanks to :
CNES
ISAE-SUPAERO
IRAP
LANL
JPL
      18
You can also read