Support for the Metric Only Update of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Support for the Metric Only Update of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act MARK HENSCHEL INSTRUCTOR-MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT MADISON COLLEGE MADISON, WISCONSIN MHENSCHEL@MADISONCOLLEGE.EDU
• The two main reasons the FPLA should be updated to legalize the use of metric-only package labeling in the USA are: • 1) Benefits to international trade and US business abroad • 2) Benefits to science and math education in the American educational system
ABOUT ME
• First introduced to the Metric System in 1960 while doing research on another topic • Over 40 years of teaching experience, including: • 7 years teaching shop classes in metric units only • 2 weeks teaching 7th grade girls to cook in the Metric System • Years of experience doing metric projects in various math classes in Chicago and Madison, Wisconsin
Teaching and learning in the Metric System • All measuring instruments in my plastic shop were made in the USA by Starrett and Stanley Tool Company • (Costs were already covered in the school budget for supplies.) • These are American companies making products in metric units • Measuring devices to cook were already dual dimensioned, I only needed to cover over the inch-pound designations to get students to cook using metric only measurements. • Oven temperature scale was changed using a tape overlay that was written in Celsius degrees. • Thus, the conversion cost was actually free!
BENEFITS OF METRICATION FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND US EXPORT BUSINESS
How Metrication will help US business • During WWII US business was the major exporting power in the world • Now foreign customers demand metric goods • The US could use the economy of scale to make metric only goods and export them to emerging markets, for example: • If we used A4 paper, we could make it for domestic use and also export to all other countries on the planet.
• Costs associated with metrication are miniscule or non existent • Every time companies have kept track of metrication costs, they have been much less than anticipated • GM discovered it cost more money to keep track of the costs of metrication than it did to go metric • When the metric helicopter was designed, the additional cost of metrication was only .24 percent, or less than one fourth of one percent • Thus it does not cost to go metric, it pays
BENEFITS OF METRICATION FOR SCIENCE AND MATH EDUCATION IN THE USA
US Science Education and Metrication • US students often not introduced to metric units until they reach science or nursing classes in high school or college • US suffers from a lack of scientifically trained professionals and has to import math and science teachers from overseas • Dual labeling leads to confusion as students do not have a “feel” for how big something is in metric units.
Consequences of conversion mistakes • Doctors and health professionals make mistakes in dosage, often resulting in incorrect doses as they have no “feel” for how much someone should weigh. • Mistakes in conversions for fuel required for aircraft resulted in near crash of passenger jet in Canada • Mistakes in conversions resulted in loss of Mars Orbiter and millions of dollars in taxpayer money.
Benefits of Metric Only Package Labeling • Customers will get familiar with sizes of metric units, resulting of acceptance of metric units in news and weather reports • US companies will be able to export products to metric only markets • Students at all grade levels will become familiar with metric sizes used in everyday life • No conversion means health professionals are less likely to make mistakes in dosages
REQUEST FOR THE US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Support the metric only update of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act • Update would allow, but not require the use of metric only package labels in the USA • No change in package sizes would be required by the legislation • US companies would be allowed to use any package sizes that help them compete in international markets • Companies may find one package label design that may meet the import requirements of many countries, especially if the (–re) English language spelling is allowed on US package labels • This leads to the economy of scale and the decrease in production costs
• Ask the Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Trade Commission to support the use of NIST standard 130 • Only about 20 words of change in the FPLA would be needed to make metric only package labeling legal in the USA • Allowing retail outlets to calculate prices by grams or milliliters makes comparison of product prices easier for the consumer
• I appreciate the opportunity to offer my input to the US Chamber of Commerce • A recent online Whitehouse petition obtained 37,000 signatures from US citizens who want the USA to go metric. • These were obtained in only 30 days • If we had time to do a proper survey (similar to the one done by Maurice Stans in the Nixon Administration), the numbers of US citizens who support US metrication would number in the millions.
Citizens are often ahead of politicians • Allowing the use of more metric units in the everyday lives of US citizens is the right thing to do. • Our employment numbers would increase as we produce more metric products we can export • Our children will do better in science and math classes that already use metric units • Change is a normal process, and our citizens will get used to using the new units in their everyday lives as we have already accepted computers, cell phones and digital television.
Small piece of legislation, big effects • This metric only update of the FPLA would be a tiny change in legislation. • Yet this legislation, coupled with increased metric instruction in our schools could help our country for generations to come. • I respectfully ask the US Department of Commerce to support the metric only labeling update of the FPLA. • Thank you very much
You can also read