Prepared By: Kate Brennan - In The News: An Analysis of the Toronto Star's Marineland Investigation
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
IN THE NEWS-‐ MARINELAND INVESTIGATION CRISIS On August 15, 2012 The Toronto Star began publishing articles as part of their major investigative series titled “Inside Marineland”, which focused on the conditions and treatment of animals at Marineland. The investigation, which lasted over a year, was centered on interviews with former employees who stated that Marineland badly mistreated their animals. Throughout the series employees blamed poor water quality and staffing shortages for the ill health and death of animals at Marineland. BACKGROUND Marineland is a themed amusement and animal exhibition park located in Niagara Falls, Ontario and is one of Niagara Fall’s main tourist attractions. Marineland first opened in 1961 and is owned by John Holer. Marineland houses a variety of animals including beluga wales, sea lions, walruses, bottlenose dolphins, and the only orca currently living in captivity in Ontario. Throughout the park’s history, Marineland has been involved in numerous controversies over the ill treatment of its animals at the park, but has always denied these types of allegations. Star reporter Linda Diebel started the investigation into Marineland with the expectation that it would last a few weeks, however, the story kept growing into other stories and her investigation lasted for over a year. Marineland has continued to be in the spotlight today with the recent announcement that the government will be banning the captivity of killer whales in Ontario. MEDIA COVERGE August 2012-‐ Crisis Begins On August 15, 2012 The Toronto Star broke the first story of alleged animal abuse at Marineland. This was the start of the Star’s major investigative series “Inside Marineland” led by reporter Linda Diebel. The Star posted an article, which was based on reports from former employees that went into specific details about the conditions and the damage that had been done to the animals at Marineland. The article mentions a number of examples demonstrating the mistreatment of animals. For example, the article talks about Larry the harbour seal who, after living at Marineland for eight years, went blind from the poor water conditions. The article mentions Skoot the baby beluga who was killed by two adult belugas, which trainers believe was the result of under staffing. The article also states that Holer, the owner of Marineland, denied all allegations stating, “We take care of our animals-‐ better than I would take care of myself.” The Star’s first publication on August 15 also included a video of interviews with former employees. In the video a former employee stated, ““I was witness to things that people would never imagine a place like Marineland to be capable of.” A former trainer stated, “I saw things that resulted in death.” A day after the first story was published; the Star reported on the reaction from the public. They stated that that an animal advocacy group was expecting a surge of new protesters at an upcoming demonstration outside Marineland. “RSVPs on our
IN THE NEWS-‐ MARINELAND INVESTIGATION website went from 20 to 200 in less than 24 hours”, said Dylan Powell, a protest organizer from Marineland Animal Defense. Powell stated that new protesters were joining after reading the Star’s report and watching the video. On August 17, 2012 The Globe and Mail reported that a veterinarian at Marineland and the organization in charge of monitoring animal welfare were denying the allegations of animal neglect made in the Star’s articles. The Globe and Mail also stated that Toronto city Councilor Michelle Berardinetti had called for the provincial government to investigate the allegations. October 2012 On October 2, 2012 the Globe and Mail reported on a Marineland protest where about 150 people rushed the gates of Marineland while about 800 people gathered outside. These protesters wanted to end animal captivity and their goal was to shut down the park. October 10, 2012 the Globe and Mail reported that after mounting pressure from welfare activists, including former Marineland employees, the Ontario government was going to strengthen regulations to protect animals kept in zoos and aquariums including Marineland. This article also stated that a petition with 77,000 signatures was delivered to the Ontario legislature, demanding that parks like Marineland be better regulated. December 2012-‐ Mass Animal Graves On December 20, 2012 the Toronto Star reported that the Ontario Ministry of the Environment announced an investigation into several mass animal graves at the park. For decades, according to former employees, Marineland had been digging pits to dispose of its animals, and using heavy machinery to cover them up. Former employees stated that there were four mass graves on site. Marineland does not have permits for such practices. A year later, on January 14, 2013 following a ministry probe, The Toronto Sun reported that Marineland had been ordered to stop burying dead animals on site. They also reported that according to Ontario’s Ministry of Environment the parks practice of burying its dead animals on site had not impacted the water quality in the nearby Welland River, which has been a concern. August 2013-‐A Year After On August 6, 2013 The Star published a follow up video on their website about what has happened since the first story about Marineland’s mistreatment of animals was published. In the video, reporter Linda Diebel states that since the first video, the OSPCA issued a number of orders against Marineland and Marineland complied with all orders. Diebel also reports that the government reacted to the investigation by creating new programs with the hope to license zoos and aquariums in Ontario, to bring in special standards of care for marine mammals and for the Ontario SPCA to have greater powers, responsibility and more transparency. In the video it is also
IN THE NEWS-‐ MARINELAND INVESTIGATION disclosed that the Star was working with 15 whistleblowers who were former employees and since then 3 have been sued by the owner of Marineland. January 2015-‐ Ban of Killer Whales in Ontario On January 27, 2015 the Star reported on the Ontario government’s announcement to ban the captivity of killer whales in Ontario and the massive upcoming overhaul of conditions for captive marine mammals. These government decisions were based on a 125-‐page report, which was written by a team of scientists. The Star summarized their findings by using a quote from the report: “It is our opinion that the present standards of care that apply to marine mammals in public display facilities are insufficient.” This article also links back to and discusses the Star investigation of Marineland in 2012. COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT OF THE ISSUE This crisis commenced on August 15, 2012 when the Star published the first article and video accusing Marineland of mistreating their animals. Holer, the owner of Marineland, denied all accusations made in this article. Before the article was published Holer had two phone interviews with the Star in which he denied that animals suffer at Marineland or that they were under staffed. Holer also stated that he was responsible for the water and for determining how healthy the water is, which had been identified as a major concern by former employees. Holer acknowledged that some animals have eye problems but blamed these problems on aging. These statements were included in the Star’s initial report. On the same day the Star’s article was published, Marineland published a media statement on their website that said, “For over 50 years, Marineland has proven that it is one of the world's best facilities for animal and marine mammal care.” The statement also invited members of the media and the public to visit Marineland to see for themselves, however, it did not address the Star’s article. In response to protests made against Marineland in 2012, Marineland issued a statement saying that it is, “very difficult and personally upsetting” for many Marineland staff to see these issues raised through the media and that they only want to provide a safe and healthy environment for the animals in their care. In response to the gravesite accusations, Marineland spokesperson Ann Marie Rondinelli stated, “Here at Marineland we have the greatest respect for the beautiful animals in our care in both life and death. Their remains are dealt with respectfully and in methods as prescribed by the law.” In response to the Ontario Government’s promise to ban the captivity of killer whales in Ontario, Marineland issued a statement the next day stating that the health and welfare of it's animals are its greatest priority and, therefore, Marineland welcomes and supports the decision. Marineland also stated that it “intends to work co-‐operatively with the (ministry) to continue to ensure that it complies fully with all environmental laws and regulations." Throughout the investigation Marineland
IN THE NEWS-‐ MARINELAND INVESTIGATION stated that they were always in compliance with the Ontario Ministry of Environment, and the OSPCA’s requirements and laws. ANALYSIS John Holer’s decision to deny all accusations against Marineland and their treatment of animals may have caused more harm to Marineland’s reputation than if he had accepted responsibility for Marineland’s shortcomings. By denying all accusations, even with 15 different former employees claiming the same things, Marineland appeared untrustworthy and guilty of the accusations. Marineland should have addressed the Star’s first article immediately in a media release. By addressing and fixing the issues immediately, Marineland could have possibly avoided having such a lengthy Star investigation, and the ongoing reputation damaging publicity that went along with it. Marineland should have issued a statement informing the public that although they feel their standards have always met the legal requirements, they are prepared to address any shortcomings and will implement changes in order to further enhance their services and the wellbeing of their animals. Marineland is constantly stating that the health and wellbeing of their animals is the most important thing to them. In order to prove this to the public, Marineland should have immediately taken steps to demonstrate their commitment to making improvements, such has hiring more staff or shutting down the facility until the water quality was improved. By taking these actions and making changes to improve the quality of life for their animals, Marineland would have had the opportunity to gain back the trust and support of the public. In the future, Marineland should be more transparent with the public about what goes on behind the scenes. In order to improve their reputation, the public needs to feel confident that Marineland’s animals are treated with care when the park is open and closed. By allowing the public to see what happens and how the animals are cared for when the gates to the park are closed, Marineland will be able to gain back some support. Throughout the investigation, Marineland’s only defense was to advise the public that it had always been in compliance with the Ontario Ministry of Environment, and the OSPCA’s requirements and laws. By making it publicly known that Marineland supported and aligned themselves with these groups, and abided by their laws, they attempted to maintain their credibility with the public and divert attention away from the reported mistreatment of the animals in their care.
You can also read