PATPARGANJ Slum Redevelopment Scheme, Ward Number 220 - CITY LEVEL PROJECTS - Delhi Urban Art Commission
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
(An ISO 9001 : 2008 Certiied Organisation) Delhi Urban Art Commission Prof. Dr. P.S.N. Rao Chairman Sonali Bhagwati Member Samir Mathur Member Sonali Rastogi Member Durga Shanker Mishra Member & Addl. Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development Vinod Kumar Secretary DUAC Staf Rajeev Kumar Gaur, Raghvendra Singh, Amit Mukherji, V. K.Tyagi, Uma Bhati, Nishi Sachdeva, Manju Anjali, Siddharth Sagar, Indu Rawat, Nihal Chand Senior Consultant Dr. Aruna Ramani Grover Satish Khanna Consultants Sulabh Goel Nikhil Pandey (3D Visulizer)
Preface DELHI URBAN ART COMMISSION with gratitude duly acknowledges the valuable contributions of the following in making this report: Raj Rewal Former Chairman, DUAC The city of Delhi, capital of this vast land of diversities, is a city laden with layers of history, Satish Khanna Former Member, DUAC Eric P. Mall Former Member, DUAC a place where civilizations have lived, prospered and perished over centuries. The modern D. Diptivilasa Former Member DUAC & Addl. Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development city today, built over and around a rich tapestry of heritage, presents an opportunity at every turn, to allow for co-existence of the past, present and the future. In order to understand this multidimensional urban spectrum and attempt to plan the future, various Organisations/Others city level studies have been initiated by the DUAC. I hope that these studies will help Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India the planners of modern day Delhi to carefully articulate urban space, structure, form and Delhi Development Authority environment and sensitively address future requirements. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi I convey my thanks to all the Consultants and Members of the Commission who have North Delhi Municipal Corporation tirelessly worked on this research project to bring out this document. I also take this East Delhi Municipal Corporation opportunity to place on record my sincere appreciation of the efforts of Secretary and South Delhi Municipal Corporation other staff of DUAC for providing the necessary administrative support to make this New Delhi Municipal Council happen. Geospatial Delhi Limited I fondly hope that the authorities of the local, state and national government take these Delhi Metro Rail Corporation studies seriously and implement, in right earnest, the suggestions given herein. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board BSES Rajdhani Power Limited March, 2015 Sd/- BSES Yamuna Power Limited Prof. Dr. P.S.N. Rao RWA Chairman, DUAC
Contents Summary 1 Slum Context 6 As per the Shelter Policy of MPD 2021, 50-55% of the 24 lakh additional dwelling units to be provided in the plan period would be for the Urban Poor and economically weaker 1.1 Location, Connectivity and Land Use 7 1.2 MPD 2021 Requirements 8 sections in the form of houses of two rooms or less. In the existing slum settlements, the threefold strategy of relocation from areas required for public purpose, in-situ up-gradation 1.3 Patparganj Slum 9 and the interim measure of upgradation to minimum standards is to be followed. 1.4 Existing Condition/Situations 10 2 Design Proposals 12 Objective In keeping with the above framework the Delhi Urban Art Commission 2.1 Site Restructuring 12 has undertaken alternative site speciic housing design options for slums in 2.2 Development Details 13 Patparganj which falls under the Municipal Ward No. 220. 2.3 Design Intent Option 1 14 2.3.1 Layout Concept 14 2.3.2 Cluster Concept 14 Design Intent The intent was to explore options which accommodate the owners as 2.3.3 Residential Unit Concept 14 well as rented population within the limits of the site geometry and size. 2.4 Design 15 2.4.1 Details for Pocket A 15 2.4.2 Design Proposal Pocket A 16 2.4.3 Design Calculation-Pocket A 16 Outcome Explorations have resulted in alternative design options for in-situ 2.4.4 Cluster Design 17 rehabilitation of the slum population in Patparganj. 2.4.5 Details 18 2.5 Design Intent Option 2 19 It has also resulted in establishing some insight into the inter-relationships 2.5.1 Layout Concept 19 of governing norms of FAR, density, ground coverage and setback norms. 2.5.2 Cluster Concept 19 2.5.3 Residential Unit Concept 19 2.6 Design 20 2.6.1 Details for Pocket D 20 2.6.2 Design Proposal Pocket D 21 2.6.3 Design Calculation-Pocket D 21 2.6.4 Cluster Design 22 2.6.5 Details 23 2.7 Comparision 24 3 Future Direction and Recommendations 24 3.1 On Design Intent 24 3.2 Outcome 24 3.3 Recommendations 24
SLUM CONTEXT SLUM CONTEXT For Economically Weaker Section Housing, the Master Plan 1.1 Location, Connectivity and Land Use of Delhi 2021 and the National Building Code of India 2005 recommend a small unit size. This size is in keeping with Patparganj slums are located in r ha pass GT R Vi tion Vinod Nagar West y affordability of the beneiciary in the irst instance and their Municipal Ward Boundary Number d an Sta ur B Hap oad inancial capacity to retain it subsequently. 220 and is surrounded by DDA lats An ay 24 East o T ai w R l NH With this income group it is the failure of the latter which Delhi of Mayur Vihar Phase II to the east, pushes the head of the family to sell the house as a commodity the Yamuna riverfront to the west Akshardham in the market at every potential inancial crunch. Lack of and Vinod Nagar in the north. Metro Station Mayur Phase II inancial security forces a family of 5–6 to live in a small shelter rg The area is connected to the rest Ma as Sanjay Lake unit with a carpet area of 25 sq m. Vik 2 4 of the city through NH 24 and Noida NH This miniscule unit with four or ive independent, internal Link Road. The other form of mass Slums ad spaces, i.e. 1–2 rooms, kitchen, bathroom and balcony providing rapid transit system connecting the Ro direct light and ventilation, implies a rather intricate spatial Outer Ring area is Delhi Metro, which is at a Patparganj ng Road Ya No Me m Ri Ward no To M un organization which has many interstitial open to sky spaces. walkable distance. Landmarks in the a To ida ine tro 220 athur Simmilarly when a family of 5-6, sometimes across 3 vicinity are Commonwealth Village Lin L r a pu Jai in kR generations, is forced to live in 25 sq m of indoor area, the and Akshardham Temple. ra To oa D space immediately outside the unit becomes very valuable, The land use is predominantly d t ur Cu Mayur Vihar I ip reinforced by the requirements of the social family structure. residential. The site is surrounded az on Metro Station Gh This calls for careful crafting of the built and the open along by an unauthorized area, planned nd Hi with apportioning of common spaces around the unit. Delhi Key Map housing and an urban village. Schools, healthcare facilities and Local Transport and Road Network the largest recreational facility of East Legend ass Byp Area of Intervention Major Roads City Drains/ apur Delhi, ‘Sanjay Lake’, are at a walkable Water Bodies 24 H distance. NH Metro Northern Railway Legend Schools Dispensary Parks and Playgrounds Post Ofice Mother Dairy Mayur Vihar Phase II Key Map Sanjay Lake Akshardham Ward no 219 Pandav Metro Station Nagar R oad Sanjay Lake Sanjay Lake Slum Patparganj Sanjay Lake Ward no 220 View Study Area Slum 6.6 ha Apartments in ra rD Dellopura II ipu Ward no 211 t Cu az Gh on nd Hi Patparganj Urban Village Patp New Ashok Nagar Ward no 212 arga nj R oad Legend Area of Study Other Wards Boundary Area of Study and Ward Boundaries Landmarks and land use in the vicinity 6 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 7
SLUM CONTEXT SLUM CONTEXT 1.2 MPD 2021 Requirements 1.3 Patparganj Slum Pandav N Pandav N With the Master Plan of Delhi 2021 agar Roa d agar Roa d Patparganj slum is a cluster of ive specifying a density of 900 dwelling School 21% School 21.7% camps. 31. 8% 2.5% 18.2% units per hectare for this income 55% 20.3% 8% In 1988 the two camps of Shastri group in keeping with the high costs 18% and Jawahar Mohalla were established of urban land in the city, the human 3.5% Percentage on-site on this site. Over the decades they footprint is enhanced manifold in an 4 3 have widened the lanes and built a Existing Land EWS housing area. Use Distribution larger number of pucca houses In 1990 the other camps came Sanjay Lake View Sanjay Lake into existence when people were Apartments View Apartment Existing Demographics evacuated from the site of the Ownership = DDA 1 Mother Dairy plant at Patparganj. Patparganj Patparganj Status = Slum Village Village The population comprises many Total Site Area = 6.6 ha generations of migrants from Uttar Open Area = 1.18 ha Pradesh and Bihar. Total Slum Area = 5.34 ha 2 Ground Coverage = 46.3% 5 Existing FAR = 1.13 Legend Owner Population = 10505 Commercial Rented Population = 10000 Residential 1. Mahatma Gandhi Camp Open Spaces 2. Khoka Patri Camp Gross Population = 20505 3. Ram Prasad Bismil Camp Existing DUs = 4556 Social Infrastructure 4. Shastri Mohalla Shashi Garden Circulation (16%) 5. Jawahar Mohalla Popu. Density/ha = 683 PPL/DUs =5 Avg. Unit Size = 9-12 sq m Land use map for Patparganj Slum Patparganj Slum Boundaries Jawahar Mohalla Pandav Pandav Nagar Nagar Ro Sanjay Lake Road ad School School Sanjay Lake View Apts Patparganj Urban Village Mahatma Gandhi Camp Khoka Patri Camp Ram Prasad Bismil Camp Existing Housing Typology Key Map • The average size of dwelling • Single Men – In Dormitories Existing Figure Ground Map Socio-economic units is 9–20 sq m. • Small Family (3-4) – In one-room units Characteristics • The rented population mostly • Extended Family (5-6) – In two- a. The men living in the slums are lives on upper level. room unit labourers, drivers, rickshaw-pullers, ofice peons, petty shopkeepers, Plot Sizes (sq m) No. of Units (%) and rehriwalas. Extended b. Many women are working as maids Less than 7 20 and labourers. 7-15 35 Dormitories (Single Men) c. The average household income is 20% Small Family (3-4) 35% 15-25 26 Rs. 8000–10,000/- in one-room unit 45% d. There are primary, secondary and 25-35 14 Extended Family senior secondary schools run by (5-6) in two-room unit
SLUM CONTEXT SLUM CONTEXT 1.4 Existing Condition/Situations Structure Built Conditions Rooing Mixed varieties of built conditions A maximum of G+2 structures with Aluminium/asbestos sheets for Pandav Services were observed as per site conditions several issues which need to be taken single-storeys and G. I. sections with Nagar R The camp has inadequate basic depending upon the needs. Though care of. The average street widths local red sandstone slabs for G+1 School oad amenities like toilets, proper the construction has been restricted vary from 0.75 m to 1 m. structures respectively, were the types 4 sewerage and other facilities. within a boundary wall by local of rooing conditions which were Moreover, lack of proper bodies, a temporary extension could spotted in the residential dwelling maintenance is a major concern. be seen on all the sides of the site. units. Use of RCC slabs were also 6 1 Ladders are used to climb to the seen for some newly constructed 3 1 upper loors due to lack of space buildings (temple shelters). for constructing a common staircase, 2 Sanjay Lake View which could have been shared by a Apartments group of dwelling units. 5 7 Inadequate services Patparganj Urban Village 2 Shashi Garden Poorly maintained parks and playgrounds Existing Area Layout for Patparganj Slums Open Spaces There are 8 open spaces of varying sizes in the settlement with a gross area Dwelling Unit (DUs) Parking & Accessibility of 1.18 ha. To prevent encroachment Typology On-road parking for scooters and the Delhi Development Authority has DU typologies were found, with cycle-rickshaws encroach upon the enclosed these spaces by 1.5 m high several loors relecting the changing pedestrian walking areas and ROWs. boundary walls. Depending upon size family needs of increasing numbers. Connectivity by public transport also and location, these open spaces are In some cases, additional loors have is an issue with people walking to the used as playgrounds, spaces for civil and been added to be rented out to main road for travelling. religious events, parking and dumping enhance the family income. yards. Pandav Nagar Road 3 4 Different DU typology existing is the area Approach road to the site 5 6 Area Map Showing Open Spaces 7 DU typology according to needs Encroached ROWs Open Spaces are used as dumping grounds 10 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 11
DESIGN PROPOSALS DESIGN PROPOSALS 2.1 Site Restructuring 2.2 Development Details Site Statistics Shelter Unit Pa nd The Shelter Policy of Master Plan of Delhi 2021 stipulates the need to carefully calibrate the equation between Floor av 1 Site Area 6.6 ha Na Area Ratio (FAR) and density for optimum land utilization. It has been observed that in the irst two Master Plan g ar Petrol Ro periods, housing areas have not fully delivered the envisaged FAR, leading to underutilization of infrastructure. In general 2 Parks & Playgrounds 0.44 ha a Pump d the stipulated FAR for housing is 200, but MPD 2021 also recommends enhancement of FAR by 50% in sites located Pocket A in the vicinity of Metro corridors and signiicant road corridors. Due to the small unit size in the case of EWS housing, 3 Gross Area Available 5.08 ha 11791.6 sq m meeting the target FAR is usually a challenge albeit the higher permissible ground coverage. This is in keeping with the felt need that EWS housing must be low-rise, i.e. 2 to 3 loors, as the connection with the ground is crucial due to the Total number of Remunerative Area 4 2101 7911.6 sq m small-unit size. This leads to the question of how to have higher FAR which ensures optimization of the value of urban DUs land and creates habitable high-rise living for the EWS community. 5 Population to be 10505 accommodated Social Pocket B Infrastructure Bazaar 3683.1 3798.7 sq m Community Park 747.5 sq m Plot Details sq m 2570.6 sq m 900 dwelling units per hectare; with plot sizes of 5.34 hectares this converts to 4806 1 Permissible Density dwelling units at Patparganj Slums 843.6 sq m Maximum of 400 wherever necessary although the norm of 200 as per residential group 2 Permissible FAR housing shall prevail 1857.5 s Playgrou m 3 Shelter size 25 – 30 sq m Legend 4 Ground Coverage Is subject to local conditions with the stipulation that setback shall be maintained. q Commercial (1.1%) nd 5 Parking Norm 0.25 ECS per 100 sq m of total built-up area. Residential (56.8%) Open Spaces (6.8%) Pocket D Pocket C Social Infrastructure (7%) 11603.4 sq m 10429.3 sq m Remunerative Area (12%) Proposed Circulation (16.3%) Existing Road Shelter Details 1 Heights Structure Plan Maximum of 15 m for low-rise development with staircase; lifts to be provided for 1.1 Building height buildings beyond 15 m 1.2 Habitable room Minimum of 2.6 m As per MPD 2021 1.3 Kitchen Minimum of 2.6 m Redevelopment Schemes for Slum/EWS/JJ Clusters/In-Situ Development should follow certain guidelines as stated below: 1.4 Bath/WC or combined Minimum of 2.1 m Minimum plot size 2000 sq m (facing 9 m Road) 1.5 Corridor Minimum of 2.1 m Density Norm Slum/EWS = 900 DUs/ha+15% variation 1.6 Staircase Minimum of 2.1 m DU Size = 25- 30 sq m 2 Room Size Maximum FAR = 400 Mixed Use = 10% of FAR 2.1 Habitable room A minimum of 12.5 sq m in a one-room shelter unit Where there are 2 rooms, the irst room shall be a minimum of 9.5 sq m (minimum side Land use distribution of site 2.5 m) and the second a minimum of 6.5 sq m (minimum side 2.1 m) By retaining the existing community spaces and recognizing the surrounding road network, the proposed land 2.2 Kitchen Minimum area of 3.3 sq m with minimum side of 1.5 m use distribution has taken into account the meaningful relationship of order of internal spaces and site periphery. 2.3 Water closet Minimum area of 0.9 sq m with minimum side of 0.9 m Remunerative area and social infrastructure has been located along the main road on a prime piece of land in order to make the scheme feasable. The greens have been strategically located centrally, keeping in mind the accessibility issues 2.4 Bath Minimum area of 1.2 sq m with minimum side of 1.0 m for people coming in from nearby areas for weekly markets along with a large common green which can be used by 2.5 Combined bath and WC Minimum area of 1.8 sq m with minimum side of 1.0 m neighbouring areas 2.6 Balcony Minimum of 0.9 m width to a maximum of 1.2 m width and not to overhang above roads A. Social Infrastructure (7%): already includes a mosque and a temple. Proposal includes two Primary Schools, 3.0 Staircase two dispensaries and a banquet hall B. Parks and Playgrounds (6.8%): includes common playground and space for Rehri Bazaar. 3.1 Flight Width Minimum of 0.9 m for 3 storeys and above C. EWS Housing (56.8%): includes all typologies of EWS housing with tot lots and community service areas with 3.2 Riser Maximum of 200 mm parking spaces 3.3 Tread Minimum of 250 mm D. Remunerative Area (12%): which can be given to builder as incentive for construction of EWS and site development. 12 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 13
DESIGN PROPOSALS DESIGN PROPOSALS 2.3 Design Intent Option 1 2.4 Design 2.3.1 Layout Concept The plan has been worked out on a module which has large central greens, commercial use along main roads and the The layout concept takes into vehicles at the periphery. Population to be accommodated-10500. account the existing social fabric Pa nd Pocket D Pocket A and connections that residents have av N Site Area: 1.16 ha Site Area: 1.17 ha created over decades of living. ag Community green DUs: 675 (G+4) ar DUs: 675 (G+4) located strategically Ro Density: 581 DU/ha Density: 577 DU/ha It generates a hierarchy of areas ad between three pockets to Sr. Secondary comprising public, semi-public, semi- Pocket A encourage use School private and private spaces within Remunerative Area the site layouts and residential units, creating secure spaces and a feeling Co rk a) of ownership. mm Pa 3 h Pandav Nagar Road (0 Spaces have been designed so as un .5 Petrol Pump it y Social to encourage outdoor activities like Infrastructure ar walking, cycling, and social activities Pocket B Baza Bazaar Remunerative among all age groups. Type A Area (0.79 ha) Community Commercial and institutional Park a) 8h buildings will be located at road ( 0.1 ro und edges and junctions to create quiet yG Pla al and safe residential pockets, with Soci tructure s Inf a r Entry access to parking. Main Playgrou Pocket C Type B nd Intermediate greens Pocket B make places more active and Pocket C allow for social interaction Site Area: 1.04 ha Site Area: 0.37 ha DUs: 215 (G+4) among the residents. Pocket D DUs: 605 (G+4) Segregated children’s play Density: 581DU/ha Density: 581DU/ha area to accommodate their 2.3.2 Cluster Concept needs. Residential units are organized Type C around a courtyard which provides Site Layout Site Area: 6.6 hectares Total no of DUs proposed: 2170 natural light, ventilation and safety. Residential area: 3.74 ha This produces a healthy internal Area under social infrastructure: 0.46 ha environment. Distribution of Dwelling Units Incentive to builder: 0.79 ha The EWS units designed are 2.4.1 Details for Pocket A modular and can be adapted according to site variations, with 2.3.3 Residential Unit Concept Pandav building heights of G+4. As vehicular There are openings provided in all rooms to facilitate maximum amount of School N agar Ro ad movement will be restricted to the natural light and ventilation. The door has been positioned to maximize the Total Site Area 1.17 ha periphery, with access only during full potential of the 27.5-29 sq m carpet area provided by the scheme as the emergencies, the distances between placement of doors and windows is crucial when designing small spaces. Ground Coverage 41.5% buildings inside the cluster will vary Sanjay Lake FAR 2.07 between 5-7 m. View Apartments Density 577 DUs Type of Units G+4 Patparganj Urban No of DUs on Village Ground Floor 135 Total no. of DUs 675 Legend 8 ECS + Proposed Site Parking 70 two- Pocket A wheelers Unit -A Unit -B Unit -C Key Plan 14 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 15
DESIGN PROPOSALS DESIGN PROPOSALS 2.4.2 Design Proposal Pocket A 2.4.4 Cluster Design Banquet Hall Provision for parking along the pocket periphery Unit A Interconnected EWS units blocks B Inclusive design for residential and green spaces interwoven in the layout A C A Vehicular movement along the main 7.5 ROW road Plan of Type A Plan of Type B View A Road 7.5 m Unit A - 36 sq m Unit A,B,C - 35 sq m Ground + Four Floors Located in ive storey block Rooms - 2, Kitchen, Toilet Rooms: 2 - Kitchen, Toilet, Balcony Bigger open greens provided to control Gross area - 36 sq m Gross area - 35 sq m spillover of activities Carpet area - 27.5 sq m Carpet area - 27.5/27/27 sq m G+4 Parking Unit C Road 7.5 m Informal bazaar to cater to daily needs of the residents Provision for social infrastructure encouraging social interaction Ground Floor Layout for Pocket A 2.4.3 Design Calculation-Pocket A Pandav School Nagar R oad Total Site Area 1.17 ha Module Unit Type A Sanjay Lake View A View Ground Coverage 41.5% Apartments View A Proposed Built-up on Covered Area DUs Floors (ha) Ground Floor Vehicular movement Encouraging Segregate area 0.415 135 on the periphery G+4 Structure pedestrianization of play First Floor 0.415 135 A’ Second Floor 0.415 135 Patparganj Urban A Village Third Floor 0.415 135 Total Built-up area 2.07 Legend Pocket A FAR 2.07 Key Plan Section AA’: Showing skyline and road space utilization 16 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 17
DESIGN PROPOSALS DESIGN PROPOSALS 2.4.5 Details 2.5 Design Intent Option 2 G+4 Encouraging Central Open Space Structure Pedestrianization 2.5.1 Layout Concept In an attempt to accommodate rented and owner population, a mix Pa nd of low to high-rise blocks are being av N ag proposed. ar Roa Apart from retaining the existing d social infrastructure, the layout Pocket A Remunerative Area accommodates functions like an Section AA’: Showing Skyline informal bazaar to cater to local needs. It also generates a hierarchy of areas comprising public, semi-public, semi-private and private spaces Pocket B Social within the site layouts and residential Infrastructure Bazaar units, creating a secured space and a Community feeling of ownership. Park Spaces have been designed so as to encourage outdoor activities, like walking, cycling, and social activities Type A among all age groups. Pocket C Commercial and institutional Playgrou buildings will be located at road edges and junctions to create quiet nd and safe residential pockets, with access to parking for residential Type B pockets. Pocket D Type C View B 2.5.2 Cluster Concept The EWS units designed are modular Salient Features: and can be adapted according to Distribution of Dwelling Units School Pandav Nagar R a. Provision of basic amenities in the form of dedicated site variations, with building heights oad spaces for community use and playgrounds. of G+4, S+9 and S+11. As vehicular A’ b. Accommodation of all the inhabitants within the trafic will be restricted to the area. periphery, with access only during c. Providing better living conditions and an aesthetic emergencies, the distance inside the 2.5.3 Residential Unit Concept Sanjay Lake quality for the redeveloped EWS housing. cluster will vary between 8-11 m. With the intent of accommodating the owner and rental population, the units View Apartments The roof space will be utilized to are classiied as two-room and single units respectively. To facilitate maximum allow homemakers/house-owners amount of natural light and ventilation, openings are provided in all rooms. The to engage in activities that can be a unit size varies from 27.5–29 sq m carpet area. View B source of income. A Patparganj Urban Village Legend Pocket A Key Plan Unit -A Unit -B Unit -C 18 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 19
DESIGN PROPOSALS DESIGN PROPOSALS 2.6 Design 2.6.2 Design Proposal Pocket D The plan has been worked out on a module that is self-suficient, self-contained, and provides for the daily needs of the residents. Population to be accommodated–16855. Bazzar Pocket A Provision of parking along the main Community green located Site Area: 1.17 ha road for NMV’s and few cars Pocket D Site Area: 1.16 ha strategically, to segregate DUs: 1019 activities of all age groups (G+4,S+9/11) Community Informal bazaar to cater to daily needs DUs: 1024 (G+4,S+9/11) Sr. Secondary Density: 882 DU/ha and avoid conlict Density: 871DU/ha Park of the residents School Intermediate greens make places more active and Provision for social infrastructure to allow for social interaction encourage social interaction G+4 Pandav N among the residents. Co Pa mm Petrol Pump rk un agar Roa ity Remunerative G+9 Inclusive design for residential and green spaces interwoven in the layout d ar Baza Area (0.79 ha) Playgrou Pocket D Vehicular movement along the main 7.5 ROW road nd S+11 Unit B Road 7.5 m re Segregated playground for children d ial ctu ou n Soc astru ntry Gr Infr Main E y Pla G+4 Unit A Parking Site layout Pocket B Site Area: 0.37 ha Stilt DUs: 334 (S+9, S+11) Density: 902 DU/ha m Road 7.5 Pocket C Site Area: 1.04 ha Ground Floor Layout for Pocket D DUs: 934 (G+4, S+9/11) Site Area: 6.6 hectares Density: 898 DU/ha Total no of DUs proposed: 3311 Residential area: 3.74 ha Area under social infrastructure: 0.46 ha 2.6.3 Design Calculation-Pocket D Incentive to builder: 0.79 ha Pandav School Nagar Ro ad Total Site Area 1.16 ha 2.6.1 Details for Pocket D Ground Coverage 33.7% Pandav Proposed Built-up on Covered Area DUs School Nagar R Floors (ha) o ad Sanjay Lake Ground Floor 0.39 118 Total Site Area 1.16 ha View Apartments First Floor 0.46 150 Ground Coverage 33.7% Second Floor 0.46 150 Sanjay Lake Third Floor 0.46 150 View FAR 3.1 Apartments Fourth Floor 0.46 150 Density 850 DUs Fifth Floor 0.24 54 Sixth Floor 0.24 54 Type of Units G+4/S+9/S+11 Seventh Floor 0.24 54 Patparganj Urban Village No. of DUs on Ground Patparganj Urban Eight Floor 0.24 54 118 Village Floor Ninth Floor 0.24 54 Total no. of DUs 1024 Tenth/Eleventh Floor 0.09 18 Legend Proposed Site Legend Total Built-up area 3.6 2 ECS + 60 two- Pocket D Parking wheelers Pocket D FAR 3.1 Key Plan Key Plan 20 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 21
DESIGN PROPOSALS DESIGN PROPOSALS 2.6.4 Cluster Design 2.6.5 Details Central Open Space Stilt for Parking Encouraging Pedestrianization B Section BB’: Showing Skyline C A A Plan of Type A Plan of Type B Unit A: 25 sq m Unit A,B,C: 38 sq m Ground + Four Floors Located: S+9/12 storey block Rooms: 1, Kitchen, Toilet Rooms: 2, Kitchen, Toilet, Balcony Gross area: 25 sq m Gross area: 38 sq m Carpet area: 21.5 sq m Carpet area: 27.5/27/27 sq m View B Pandav N Salient Features: agar Ro a d a. Provision of basic amenities in the form of dedicated Module Unit Type A View A: Showing surrounding urbanscape School spaces for community use and playgrounds. B’ b. Introduction of activity rooms which caters to housewives who want to work, as well as for other Vehicular movement on the periphery Activity Area Encouraging Pedestrianization Segregate area of play Sanjay Lake social activities. View B c. Providing better living conditions and aesthetic Apartments quality for the redeveloped EWS housing. View C B S+11 Structure S+9 Structure A’ A Patparganj Urban A A Village G+4 Structure S+11 Structure View C: Showing the varying skyline and space Section AA’: Showing skyline and road space utilization Key Plan distribution 22 CITY LEVEL PROJECT PATPARGANJ SLUMS 23
DESIGN PROPOSALS 2.7 Comparision S. No. Parameters Existing Option 1 Option II 21% Residential Mass G+2 23% S+11 1 Distribution 9% 100% 35% G+1 G+4 S+9 70% G 40% G+4 2 Density 690 DUs/ha 580 DUs/ha 885 DUs/ha 3 Ground Coverage 61% 41% 37% 4 FAR 1.13 200 300 1.1% Legend Legend Legend Commercial 1.1% Commercial Commercial 16.3% (An ISO 9001 : 2008 Certiied Organisation) 21% Residential 16.3% Residential Residential 2.5% 12% Open Spaces Open Spaces 56.8% Open Spaces 5. Land use Distribution 55% 12% 56.8% 7% 18% Social Infrastructure 7% Social Infrastructure Social Infrastructure 6.8% 6.8% Circulation Circulation Circulation 3.5% Remunerative Area Remunerative Area Delhi Urban Art Commission The Delhi Urban Art Commission was set up by an Act of Parliament in 1973 3.1 On Design Intent to “advise the Government of India in the matter of preserving, developing Since the size of the site is reasonably large, it made it easier to explore the possibility of apportionment of land for remunerative purpose. Taking into account the social and commercial requirements of the existing population, it was and maintaining the aesthetic quality of urban and environmental design within possible to allocate 0.8 ha of land for it. From the onset, it was recognized that to achieve the maximum permissible FAR of 400 with units of 25 to 30 sq m was not a mathematical possibility. However, the high rental population on Delhi and to provide advice and guidance to any local body in respect of any the site opened the possibility of two alternatives explorations: a. To house the owner population in only two-room units. project of building operations or engineering operations or any development b. To house the owner population in two-room units and the rental population in single-room units. proposal which affects or is like to affect the skyline or the aesthetic quality of 3.2 Outcome the surroundings or any public amenity provided therein”. This led to two satisfactory design solutions. In the irst option, a total FAR of 200 was achieved by accommodating an average of 2901 PPHA. The density being reasonable and the unit design being compact, the resultant scheme has ive- storey walk-up apartments. A low-rise layout with satisfactory open spaces and social infrastructure emerged. In the second option, the attempt was made to accommodate all rental as well as owner population. In this option the average density of 4426 PPHA was achieved with a FAR of 300. However, with a careful mix of low-rise (5 storey), medium-rise (stilt + 9 storey) and high-rise (stilt + 11 storey) blocks it was still possible to create satisfactory open spaces for community use. 3.3 Recommendations • As the relationship between 400 FAR and 900 dwelling units per hectare with a unit size of 25 to 30 sq m is a mathematical paradox, there is a need to cut back on the FAR. Alternately this FAR, if sustainable from the point of view of available physical infrastructure in the precinct and neighbourhood, could be transferred to the remunerative component. • The setback provision on small plots needs to be re-examined as it precludes the creation of satisfactory community open spaces by scattering precious open land as peripheral ribbons. This is particularly important since the lack of restriction on ground coverage allows for multiple explorations in the realm of low and medium-rise development. 24 CITY LEVEL PROJECT
(An ISO 9001 : 2008 Certiied Organisation) fnYyh uxj dyk vk;ksx Delhi Urban Art Commission Tel: 24619593, 24618607, 24690821, 24636191, Fax: 24648970 Email: duac74@gmail.com Website: www.duac.org
You can also read