ORD's Tiered Toxicity Testing Strategy for - PFAS
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
ORD’s Tiered Toxicity Testing Strategy for PFAS EPA Executive BOSC Meeting September 29, 2021 Rusty Thomas Director, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure Office of Research and Development The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. EPA
Quick Review of the State of the Science • There continues to be an evolving definition of what constitutes a PFAS. • The EPA needs to evaluate a large number of PFAS for potential human and ecological effects. • Most PFAS have limited or no toxicity data. • There is emerging consensus on the need to use category/grouping-based approaches to evaluate PFAS for a range of decision contexts. • In a category/grouping approach, one or more data rich analogs is used to read- across toxicity values for the remaining data poor substances within the group. • Historically, for human health assessment within EPA, PFAS analogs and/or groups were based on a combination of chain-length and functional groups. 1 Office of Research and Development
It Starts With Chemistry… Curating Names, Structures, and Identifiers DTXSID Substance_Name Substance Source_Name (incorrect or Source_CASRN Source_Acronym Unique_Acronym _CASRN ambiguous) (incorrect or (incorrect or invalid) ambiguous) DTXSID20874028 2H,2H,3H,3H-Perfl uorooctanoi c a ci d 914637-49-3 5:3 Pol yfl uori na ted a ci d 914637-49-3 5:3 a ci d 5:3 PFOA DTXSID7027831 N-Methyl -N-(2- 24448-09-7N-Methyl NMeFOSE, MeFOSE NMeFOSE hydroxyethyl )perfl uorooctanes ul fona mi de perfl uorooctanes ul fona mi deoetha nol DTXSID10892352 Perfl uoro-2-{[perfl uoro-3-(perfl uoroethoxy)- 749836-20-2 Etha nes ul foni c a ci d, 2-[1-[di fl uoro(1,2,2,2- 749836-20-2 PFESA Byproduct 2 PFESA Byproduct 2 2-propa nyl ]oxy}etha nes ul foni c a ci d tetra fl uroroethoxy)methyl ]-1,2,2,2- tetra fl uoroethoxy]-1,1,2,2-tetra fl uoro DTXSID70892479 DTXSID8071354 Lists from EPA Regulatory Offices and Perfl uoropentanes ul fona te Ammoni um perfl uoropentanes ul fona te 175905-36-9 Perfl uoropenta ns ul fona te 68259-09-6 Ammoni um perfl uoropenta ns ul fona te 2706-91-4 68259-09-6 PFPeS PFPeS_i on APFPeS DTXSID40881350 4,8-Di oxa -3H-perfl uoronona noi c a ci d 919005-14-4 2,2,3-Tri fl uoro-3-(1,1,2,2,3,3-hexa fl uoro-3- 919005-14-4 ADONA ADONA pa rent a ci d DTXSID00874026 Regions Ammoni um 4,8-di oxa -3H- perfl uoronona noa te (tri fl uoromethoxy)propoxy)propa noi c a ci d 958445-44-8 Ammoni um 4,8-di oxa -3H- perfl uoronona noa te 958445-44-8 ADONA ADONA DTXSID3037707 Potas s i um perfl uorobutanes ul fona te 29420-49-3 Potas s i um perfl uoro-1-butanes ul fona te PFBS PFBS-K DTXSID5030030 Perfl uorobutanes ul foni c a ci d 375-73-5 Perfl uorobutanes ul foni c a ci d 375-73-5 PFBS PFBS DTXSID60873015 Perfl uorobutanes ul fona te 45187-15-3 Perfl uorobutanes ul fona te 375-73-5 PFBS PFBS_i on DTXSID3040148 Perfl uorodeca nes ul foni c a ci d 335-77-3 Perfl uorodeca nes ul foni c a ci d PFDS PFDS DTXSID00873014 Perfl uorodeca nes ul fona te 126105-34-8 Perfl uorodeca nes ul fona te 335-77-3 PFDS PFDS_i on DTXSID60892443 Sodi um perfl uorodeca nes ul fona te 2806-15-7 Sodi um perfl uoro-1-deca nes ul fona te PFDS PFDS-Na 2 Office of Research Antony Williams, Ann Richard, and Chemical Curation Team and Development
It Starts With Chemistry… Curating Names, Structures, and Identifiers Currently >10,000 PFAS and >30 lists DTXSID Substance_Name Substance Source_Name (incorrect or Source_CASRN Source_Acronym Unique_Acronym _CASRN ambiguous) (incorrect or (incorrect or invalid) ambiguous) DTXSID20874028 2H,2H,3H,3H-Perfl uorooctanoi c a ci d 914637-49-3 5:3 Pol yfl uori na ted a ci d 914637-49-3 5:3 a ci d 5:3 PFOA DTXSID7027831 N-Methyl -N-(2- 24448-09-7N-Methyl NMeFOSE, MeFOSE NMeFOSE hydroxyethyl )perfl uorooctanes ul fona mi de perfl uorooctanes ul fona mi deoetha nol DTXSID10892352 Perfl uoro-2-{[perfl uoro-3-(perfl uoroethoxy)- 749836-20-2 Etha nes ul foni c a ci d, 2-[1-[di fl uoro(1,2,2,2- 749836-20-2 PFESA Byproduct 2 PFESA Byproduct 2 2-propa nyl ]oxy}etha nes ul foni c a ci d tetra fl uroroethoxy)methyl ]-1,2,2,2- tetra fl uoroethoxy]-1,1,2,2-tetra fl uoro DTXSID70892479 DTXSID8071354 Lists from EPA Regulatory Offices and Perfl uoropentanes ul fona te Ammoni um perfl uoropentanes ul fona te 175905-36-9 Perfl uoropenta ns ul fona te 68259-09-6 Ammoni um perfl uoropenta ns ul fona te 2706-91-4 68259-09-6 PFPeS PFPeS_i on APFPeS DTXSID40881350 4,8-Di oxa -3H-perfl uoronona noi c a ci d 919005-14-4 2,2,3-Tri fl uoro-3-(1,1,2,2,3,3-hexa fl uoro-3- 919005-14-4 ADONA ADONA pa rent a ci d DTXSID00874026 Regions Ammoni um 4,8-di oxa -3H- perfl uoronona noa te (tri fl uoromethoxy)propoxy)propa noi c a ci d 958445-44-8 Ammoni um 4,8-di oxa -3H- perfl uoronona noa te 958445-44-8 ADONA ADONA DTXSID3037707 Potas s i um perfl uorobutanes ul fona te 29420-49-3 Potas s i um perfl uoro-1-butanes ul fona te PFBS PFBS-K DTXSID5030030 Perfl uorobutanes ul foni c a ci d 375-73-5 Perfl uorobutanes ul foni c a ci d 375-73-5 PFBS PFBS DTXSID60873015 Perfl uorobutanes ul fona te 45187-15-3 Perfl uorobutanes ul fona te 375-73-5 PFBS PFBS_i on DTXSID3040148 Perfl uorodeca nes ul foni c a ci d 335-77-3 Perfl uorodeca nes ul foni c a ci d PFDS PFDS DTXSID00873014 Perfl uorodeca nes ul fona te 126105-34-8 Perfl uorodeca nes ul fona te 335-77-3 PFDS PFDS_i on 3 DTXSID60892443 Sodi um perfl uorodeca nes ul fona te 2806-15-7 https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard Sodi um perfl uoro-1-deca nes ul fona te PFDS PFDS-Na Office of Research Antony Williams, Ann Richard, and Chemical Curation Team and Development
It Starts With Chemistry… Curating Names, Structures, and Identifiers • Attempted to procure ~3,000 based on chemical diversity, Agency priorities, and other considerations • Obtained 480 unique chemicals • 430/480 soluble in DMSO (90%) • Initially selected 150 PFAS in two phases for testing • Currently, over 100 have passed QC and are undergoing Tier 1 testing and available for Tier 2 and other testing 4 Office of Research Kathy Coutros, Ann Richard, Barbara Wetmore, and Analytical Chemistry Team and Development
Selecting a Subset of PFAS for Tiered Toxicity and Toxicokinetic Testing • Developed initial structural categories based on Buck et al., 2011 • Selected 150 substances to support refinement of categories and read-across evaluation. • Testing substances in a range of assays to characterize mechanistic and toxicokinetic properties. 5 Office of Research and Development
Tier 1 In Vitro Toxicity and Toxicokinetic Testing Summary of Tier 1 toxicity and toxicokinetic testing will be provided by Richard and Barbara in Breakout Meetings… 6 Office of Research and Development
Legacy In Vivo Toxicity Study Data Curation Summary of in vivo toxicity study data curation activities will be provided by Richard and Kris in Breakout Meetings… 7 Office of Research and Development
Develop and Refine PFAS Categories for Hazard Assessment in Collaboration with OCSPP Develop Initial PFAS Categories Chemistry Curation (Structure-Based) Activities In Vivo Studies to Fill Gaps In Vivo Toxicity Study Identify PFAS Categories with • ORD studies Curation Activities Data Gaps • TSCA Test Orders Refine PFAS Categories Using In Vitro Toxicity and Mechanistic, Toxicokinetic, and In Vivo Toxicokinetic Testing Testing Data Activities 8 Office of Research Antony Williams, Grace Patlewicz, Richard Judson, and OPPT Collaborators and Development
Develop Initial PFAS Structural Categories for Hazard Assessment in Collaboration with OCSPP Tertiary categorization performed only on Secondary Categories with structural diversity greater than the threshold Primary Secondary Tertiary DSSTox Structural Structural Structural Structural Database Filters Categories* Categories Categories ~906K substances 1. Contains -CF2 1. PFAS derivatives 1. Greater than or equal to 8 2. Apply ‘OPPT working 2. PFAAs carbons definition’ 3. Perfluoro PFAA 2. Less than 8 carbons 3. Remove radicals, charge precursors 3. Volatile (>100 mmHg imbalanced 4. Non-PFAA Perfluoroalkyls Vapor Pressure) 4. Remove specific types of 5 5. FASA-based PFAA and 6 membered rings Precursors (aromatic, containing 6. Fluorotelomer PFAA double bonds, precursors heterocycles) 7. Silicon PFAS 8. Side-chain fluorinated aromatic PFAS *Based 9 on Su and Rajan, 2021 9. Other aliphatic PFAS Office of Research Antony Williams, Grace Patlewicz, Richard Judson, and OPPT Collaborators and Development
Structural Diversity ‘Within’ and ‘Between’ Secondary Categories Used to Set Diversity Threshold Secondary Category C Secondary Category A ‘Between’ and ‘Within’ Category Pairwise Distance Distributions Diversity Characteristic #2 ‘Within’ Category Distances Density ‘Between’ Category Distances Secondary Category B Median Pairwise Distances 10 Diversity Characteristic #1 Office of Research Antony Williams, Grace Patlewicz, Richard Judson, and OPPT Collaborators and Development
Centroids Calculated for Each Terminal Category to Help Select Most Representative PFAS for Testing Terminal Category A Diversity Characteristic #2 Centroid ‘Centroids’ used to Mean of the chemical identify the most Terminal Category B fingerprint matrix representative used to identify the substance for the ‘centroid’. group Centroid 11 Diversity Characteristic #1 Office of Research Antony Williams, Grace Patlewicz, Richard Judson, and OPPT Collaborators and Development
Develop and Refine PFAS Categories for Hazard Assessment in Collaboration with OCSPP Develop Initial PFAS Categories Chemistry Curation (Structure-Based) Activities In Vivo Studies to Fill Gaps In Vivo Toxicity Study Identify PFAS Categories with • ORD studies Curation Activities Data Gaps • TSCA Test Orders Refine PFAS Categories Using In Vitro Toxicity and Mechanistic, Toxicokinetic, and In Vivo Toxicokinetic Testing Testing Data Activities 12 Office of Research Antony Williams, Grace Patlewicz, Richard Judson, and OPPT Collaborators and Development
Take Home Messages • ORD undertaking a multi-pronged strategy to characterize the chemistry, toxicity, and toxicokinetic properties of the broader class of PFAS. • A category-based strategy is being used to identify candidate PFAS for further in vivo testing and provide toxicity values for the constituent substances. • Initial structural categories will be refined using the mechanistic and toxicokinetic data. • ORD is working closely with OCSPP to develop the strategy for regulatory application. 13 Office of Research and Development
Questions? 14 Office of Research and Development
You can also read