Influence of anthropogenic activities and seasonal variation on groundwater quality of Kathmandu Valley using multivariate statistical analysis
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Water Quality: Current Trends and Expected Climate Change Impacts (Proceedings of symposium H04 67 held during IUGG2011 in Melbourne, Australia, July 2011) (IAHS Publ. 348, 2011). Influence of anthropogenic activities and seasonal variation on groundwater quality of Kathmandu Valley using multivariate statistical analysis DHUNDI RAJ PATHAK1,2, AKIRA HIRATSUKA3 & YOSUKE YAMASHIKI4 1 Solid Waste Management & Resource Mobilization Centre, Ministry of Local Development, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal drpathak@ymail.com 2 Engineering & Geotechnical (E. & G.) Consult (P) Ltd, Kathmandu, Nepal 3 Department of Civil Engineering, Osaka Sangyo University, 3-1-1 Nakagaito, Daito, Osaka 5748530, Japan 4 Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan Abstract Increasing anthropogenic activities in Kathmandu, the main urban centre of Nepal, have mounted heavy stresses on groundwater quantity and quality. Changing climate reflected by significant annual variations in temperature and precipitation may further exacerbate the situation, which will have a direct impact on groundwater levels, reserves and quality. In this study, several water quality parameters were used as possible indicators to trace the impact of anthropogenic activities on the groundwater quality of Kathmandu using multivariate statistical analysis. Impact of climatic and seasonal variations on groundwater quality was also discussed. Compared to the dry season, groundwater sources sampled during the wet season were more contaminated. The reasons for higher contamination levels during the wet season were probably due to the high recharge resulting in a shallow water table, and supplemented by leakages from septic tanks, haphazard disposal of solid waste and sewage. Key words multivariate statistical analysis; groundwater quality; anthropogenic activities; climate change; seasonal variation; Kathmandu, Nepal INTRODUCTION In Kathmandu, the main urban centre of Nepal, people largely depend upon groundwater to meet day-to-day water needs because of the inadequate and unreliable piped water supply. Rapid urbanization and the increasing population demand more agricultural, industrial and domestic supplies. People use a variety of groundwater sources comprising of dug wells, tube wells, stone spouts and deep tube wells (Khadka, 1993). Most people use either tube wells or dug wells to tap shallow groundwater for logistic and economic reasons. In addition, stone spouts are one of the traditional and trusted alternatives to municipal piped water supply in Kathmandu. These spouts are excavated brick-lined structures that tap the shallow groundwater, which can also be a part of a series of spouts. They are distributed throughout the valley, both in dense urban and village settings. Generally, shallow groundwater is susceptible to fluctuation of water quality within relatively short time scales and therefore can be used as an indicator of anthropogenic activities at and/or near the ground surface such as disposal of solid waste, leaching of septic materials and infiltration of sewage and wastewater from poorly managed sewerage systems. Similarly, all the rivers in the valley have been polluted due to improper disposal of solid waste on the riverbanks, and direct discharge of untreated sewage and wastewater into the rivers. The highly permeable alluvial river deposits facilitate mass transportation phenomena resulting in further deterioration in groundwater quality. Thus, the interaction between groundwater and the surface plays a distinctive and significant role in the present hydrogeological situation. Changing climate, represented by annual variations in temperature and precipitation, may have adverse impact on changes in groundwater quantity and quality. Several researchers have studied the groundwater quality of Kathmandu (Khadka, 1993; Chettri & Smith, 1995; Jha et al., 1997; ENPHO, 1999; Khatiwada et al., 2002; GWRDB, 2000, 2001; JICA & ENPHO, 2005; Warner et al., 2008; Pathak et al., 2009, Panta, 2010). As discussed in several previous studies, anthropogenic activities influence the shallow groundwater regime warranting regular monitoring. However, systematic investigations on the current status and trends of groundwater quality and its relation to various anthropogenic activities, climate change and Copyright © 2011 IAHS Press
68 Dhundi Raj Pathak et al. seasonal variations have not been carried out in the region. Therefore, it has become imperative to elucidate and investigate the factors effecting groundwater quality and quantity. This will facilitate the design and development strategies that can protect the environment and prevent further deterioration of the affected systems. In this study, various water quality parameters were used as possible indicators to trace the impact of anthropogenic activities on the groundwater quality of Kathmandu using multivariate statistical analysis. In addition, impacts of climatic and seasonal variations on groundwater quality are discussed. METHODS Description of study area Water quality data were sampled from the groundwater aquifers, including samples from dug wells, shallow tube wells and deep tube wells, in Kathmandu Valley, the main urban centre of Nepal (Fig. 1). Kathmandu Valley includes five of the 58 municipalities of the country, including three major cities; Kathmandu, Lalitpur and Bhaktapur. Fig. 1 Study area. The current population of Kathmandu Valley is estimated to be about 3 million people, which is about 30% of the total urban population. Kathmandu-centric development has resulted in rapid urbanization in the valley. The rapid urbanization in Kathmandu is stretching municipal boundaries, converting open spaces and agricultural fields into concrete jungles. Between 1984 and 2000, agricultural land in the valley has decreased from 62% to 42%. If this trend continues, by 2025 there will be no agricultural fields left in this once fertile valley (ICIMOD, 2007). The unplanned and haphazard urbanization in the valley have led to poor drainage and sanitation. The solid wastes are disposed along the riverbanks and the untreated sewage and wastewaters from domestic and industrial areas are directly discharged into the rivers (Fig. 2) rendering them as open sewers. The Kathmandu Valley can be considered to be a closed groundwater basin with several independent or interconnected aquifers. In general, the aquifers in the Kathmandu Valley can be divided into shallow and deep systems that provide residents with drinking water. The upper unconfined aquifers are composed of unconsolidated coarse sediments, but become confined at a greater depth due to the presence of extensive clay layers. The shallow unconfined aquifers occur
Anthropogenic activities and seasonal variation on groundwater quality in Kathmandu Valley 69 at depths below 10 m, while the deep confined aquifers occur at around 310–370 m (Khadka, 1993). In addition, isolated confined aquifers are located at significantly deeper levels (Gautam & Rao, 1991). The objective of this study is to investigate the influence of anthropogenic activities and seasonal variation on groundwater quality in the unconfined shallow aquifers, which are exploited by many dug wells, tube wells and traditional stone spouts. The shallow aquifers are recharged mostly along the basin margins, directly from precipitation and by supply from several small rivers. Average annual precipitation in the Kathmandu Valley is around 1400 mm of which 80% occurs during the monsoon from June to September. The shallow aquifers of the valley are characterized by a high recharge rate. Discharge of untreated wastewater Improper dumping of solid waste on the bank of rivers Fig. 2 Solid waste disposal on the river banks and the direct discharge of untreated sewage and wastewater into the rivers. Groundwater quality parameters The data sets on quality parameters of water samples collected from shallow groundwater systems of Kathmandu, including stone spouts, dug wells and shallow tube wells, in different time windows from 1999 to 2008 were analysed to trace the impact of anthropogenic activities, climatic and seasonal variations on groundwater quality. The data sets of 120 water quality sampling sites comprising 16 quality parameters obtained from ENPHO (ENPHO, 1999) and 253 water quality sampling sites comprising 8 water quality parameters obtained from ENPHO & JICA (ENPHO & JICA, 2005), were used to study the influence of anthropogenic activities. In addition, nitrate-N values from shallow groundwater aquifers sampled by the authors in September and October of 2008 were also utilized in this study. Further selected water quality characteristics of shallow groundwater sources, including dug wells and shallow tube wells sampled during the wet (monsoon) and dry (winter) seasons by the Ground Water Resources Development Board (GWRDB) of Nepal (GWRDB, 2000, 2001), were used to trace the impact of climatic and seasonal variations on the groundwater quality of Kathmandu Valley. Multivariate statistical analysis Groundwater water quality parameters were subjected to basic descriptive statistical parameters and multivariate analyses, such as principal component analysis (PCA) and factor analysis (FA), for interpretation of groundwater quality. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to calculate the correlation between the variables. All mathematical and statistical computations were made using Microsoft Office Excel 2003 and SPSS 17. PCA expresses the association between variables with reducing dimensionality of data structure. It involves the transformation of the original variables into new uncorrelated ones called principle components (PCs), which is accomplished on the diagonals of the correlation matrix (Vega et al., 1998; Helena et al., 2000). The principal component (PC) can be expressed as: z ij = a i1 x1 j + a i 2 x 2 j + a i 3 x3 j + ..... + a im x mj (1)
70 Dhundi Raj Pathak et al. where z = the component score, a = the component loading, x = the measured value of variable, i = the component number, j = the sample number and m = total number of variables. FA followed by PCA reduces the contribution of less significant variables to simplify even more of the data structure coming from PCA. This purpose can be achieved by rotating the axis defined by PCA according to well-established rules and constructing new groups of variables, which are also called varifactors (Vega et al., 1998; Helena et al., 2000; Chapagain et al., 2009). The FA can be expressed as: z ji = a f 1 f1i + a f 2 f 2i + a f 3 f 3i + ..... + a fm f mi + e fi (2) where z = the measured variable, a = the factor loading, f = the factor score, e = residual term accounting for errors or other source of variation, i = sample number and m = the total number of factors. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Results of multivariate statistical analysis PCA was used as an extraction technique to investigate the chemical characteristics of ground- water and to distinguish the anthropogenic processes affecting groundwater quality in the system after which the factor loadings matrix was rotated to an orthogonal simple structure according to the varimax rotation technique. From the 1999 and 2005 groundwater quality data sets, PCs were extracted on the symmetrical correlation matrix computed with the 16 and 8 variables, respectively. The first five components and three components extracted have eigen values greater than 1, and account for 78% and 60% of the total variance in the 1999 and 2005 data, respectively. To maximize the variance of the extracted principal axes, the varimax normalized rotation was applied (Cloutier et al., 2008). In the 1999 data set, PC1 represents the hardness loading, which explains the greatest amount of variance (22%). This component is characterized by highly positive loadings in total hardness (0.97), calcium (0.89), magnesium (0.86) and conductivity (0.72). The high loading factor of conductivity is likely due to the contribution of high concentrations of dissolved ions in the groundwater. PC2, which accounts for 17% of the total variance, contains high loadings of temperature (0.67), turbidity (0.58), phosphate (0.82) and ammonia (0.8). The variables nitrate-N (0.83), chloride (0.82) and total coliform (0.75) contribute most strongly to the third component (PC3), which explains 17% of the total variance associated with anthropogenic activities influencing the shallow aquifers, such as septic tank leachate, domestic sewage, industrial effluent, and solid waste disposal. The significant correlation of nitrate-N with chloride, nitrate-N with total coliform and chloride with total coliform also support this interpretation. PC4 explains 14% of the variance, which is mainly related to ferrous iron (0.7), manganese (0.69), turbidity (0.63) and E. coli bacteria (0.69), assumed to be indicative of industrial pollution. PC5 projects 7.6% variance relating to high loadings of pH. Similarly, in the data set of 2005, PC1, which accounts for 23% of total variance, contains high loading for ferrous iron (0.84), manganese (0.74) and ammonia (0.66), which is attributed to the influence of domestic and industrial wastes. PC2 explains 21% of variance and is associated with high negative loading of pH (–0.83) and positive loading of depth (0.60) and conductivity (0.71). PC3 accounts for 15% of total variance and is associated with high loadings for nitrate and age of the groundwater sources. This indicates that long-term urban anthropogenic activities, e.g. poorly designed septic systems and inadequate containment and treatment of sewage, may be directly related to nitrate contamination in the traditional water sources, such as stone spouts and some dug wells installed at old urban centres that have been used as “safe” drinking water sources for hundreds of years in Kathmandu. Seasonal and climatic water quality variations Of contaminants originated at or near ground surface due to different anthropogenic processes, nitrate, BOD, total coliform, faecal coliform, sulphate, phosphate, ammonia and manganese
Anthropogenic activities and seasonal variation on groundwater quality in Kathmandu Valley 71 Concentration (mg/L, CFU/100); 10 x coliform bacteria & 10 x sulphate 8 Monsoon Winter 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Manganese Nitrate Ammonia Sulphate Phosphate BOD Coliform Coliform Fecal Total Water quality parameters Fig. 3 Concentration of selected contaminants in the monsoon (wet season) and winter (dry season). concentrations tend to be highest during the monsoon (wet season) period corresponding to high rainfall intensity and groundwater recharge, compared to the drier winter season (Fig. 3). Considering that precipitation and corresponding recharge are typically highest from June to September, it follows that contaminant concentrations tend to be higher during these months. Climate change would further increase this seasonal imbalance due to the occurrence of higher rainfall during the rainy season and less rainfall during the dry season. An analysis of 30 years of rainfall data at Kathmandu indicates that rainfall (1125.6 mm) during the monsoon (June– September) is about 80% of total average annual precipitation. Climate change also could affect groundwater quality by changing the vulnerability of shallow aquifers to diffuse pollution. The case study presented for shallow aquifers in Kathmandu employs vulnerability indices for the susceptibility of aquifer to pollution (Pathak & Hiratsuka, 2010). The indices were derived from GIS-based methods such as DRASTIC (Depth to water, net Recharge, Aquifer media, Soil media, Topography, Impact of the vadose zone and hydraulic Conductivity) and a fuzzy pattern recognition model based on the DRASTIC system. The analysis suggests that depth to the water table and recharge are the most important parameters in determining aquifer vulnerability. During the wet season, the rising water tables due to the higher amount of recharge through porous sandy soils is accompanied by an increase in the transport of contaminants, i.e. from leaching of septic tanks, the poorly managed sewerage system and solid waste disposal. In addition, improper solid waste disposal and leachates from septic systems cause the germination of harmful vectors, viruses and bacteria, especially during the monsoon (wet season). Climate change is expected to change the frequency and magnitude of extreme weather events, which will further contribute to changing patterns of morbidity and mortality associated with vector-borne and water-borne diseases (Marashini, 2010). Current status of nitrate in groundwater: possible indicator of anthropogenic activities The quality of water extracted from groundwater sources of Kathmandu Valley, especially from the shallow aquifers is under threat of degradation by nitrate, coliform bacteria and other contaminants because of different anthropogenic activities, resulting from rapid, unplanned and haphazard urbanization of the entire valley. Nitrate-N is commonly used as an environmental indicator to trace the impact of anthropogenic activities on groundwater. Nitrate-N ranged from 0.0 to 26 mg L-1 in shallow groundwater systems of Kathmandu, where 16% of the sampled wells exceeded US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) guidelines of 10 mg L-1 as nitrate-N (USEPA, 2009). However, another 33% of the wells have high nitrate-N concentrations ranging from 2 to 10 mg L-1 (Pathak et al., 2009). Extremely high nitrate-N concentrations (>10 mg L-1) have been observed, particularly in the northern areas of the valley. This area is dominated by
72 Dhundi Raj Pathak et al. sandy formations and contains an old city where many households use septic tanks. Therefore, nitrate contamination for the shallow aquifers in Kathmandu Valley is mostly due to septic tanks, poorly managed sewer pipes and disposal of solid wastes. In addition, groundwater in areas of intensive washing activity has severe contamination problems. An investigation using nitrate nitrogen and oxygen isotope concentrations to trace sources (Nakamura et al., 2010) also reported that human waste is the major source of nitrate contamination in the shallow groundwater of Kathmandu. This study also revealed that significant differences existed in contamination levels based on the type of groundwater source (dug wells, stone spouts and tube wells), which was also reported in other work. Dug wells and stone spouts were the most contaminated with bacteria and nitrate due to anthropogenic activities. Acknowledgements Thanks are given to the editor(s) and reviewer(s) whose comments and suggestions have significantly contributed to the improvement of this manuscript. The first author is very grateful to Dr Jake Peters for his editorial review and comments on the manuscript. REFERENCES Chapagain, S. K., Pandey, V. P., Shrestha, S., Nakamura, T. & Kazama, F. (2009) Assessment of deep groundwater quality in Kathmandu Valley using multivariate statistical techniques. Water Air Soil Pollut. 210(1–4), 277–288. Chettri, M. & Smith, G. D. (1995) Nitrate pollution in groundwater in selected districts of Nepal. Hydrogeol. J. 3(1), 71–76. Cloutier, V., Lefebvre, R., Therrien, R. & Savard, M. M. (2008) Multivariate statistical analysis of geochemical data as indicative of the hydro geochemical evolution of groundwater in a sedimentary rock aquifer system. J. Hydrol. 353, 294–313. Environment and Public Health Organization (ENPHO) & Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (2005) Groundwater quality surveillance in Kathmandu and Lalitpur municipality areas. Report on Joint JICA Expert Office at MPPW, Kathmandu, Nepal and ENPHO, 1–45. Gautam, R. & Rao, G. K. (1991) Groundwater resources evaluation of the Kathmandu Valley. J. Nepal Geol. Society 7, 39–48. Groundwater Resources Development Board (GWRDB) (2000, 2001) Groundwater quality monitoring data of Kathmandu Valley. Annual status report 2000, 2001 & 2003 (unpublished), GWRDB, Kathmandu, Nepal. Helena, B., Pardo, R., Vega, M., Barrado, E., Fernandez, J. M. & Fernandez, L. (2000) Temporal evolution of groundwater composition in an alluvial aquifer (Pisuerga River, Spain) by principal component analysis. Water Res. 34, 807–816. ICIMOD (2007) Kathmandu Valley Environmental Outlook. Report on joint International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Ministry of Environment, Science and Technology (MoEST) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal. Jha, M. G., Khadka, M. S., Shrestha, M. P., Regmi, S., Bauld, J., & Jacobson, G. (1997) The assessment of groundwater pollution in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Report on Joint Nepal-Australia Project 1995-96. Australian Geological Survey Organization, Canberra, 1–64. Khadka, M. S. (1993) Groundwater quality situation in alluvial aquifers of the Kathmandu Valley. J. Austr. Geol. Geophys. 14, 207–211. Khatiwada N. R, Takizawa S, Tran, T. V. N, & Inoue, M. (2002) Groundwater contamination assessment for sustainable water supply in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Water Sci. Tech. 46(9), 147–154. Marasini, B. R. (2010) Effects of climate change on urban health in the Kathmandu Valley. Special Issue: World Health Day 2010, Urbanization and Health, Regional Health Forum 14(1), 15–18. Nakamura, T., Osaka, K., Chapagain, S. K., Nishida, K. & Kazama, F. (2010) Identification of nitrate sources in shallow groundwater of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal using nitrate nitrogen and oxygen isotope. Paper presented on Japan Geosciences Union Meeting 2010, May 2010, Chiba, Japan. Pant, B. R. (2010) Ground water quality in the Kathmandu valley of Nepal. Environ. Monit. Assess. doi 10.1007/s10661-010- 1706-y. Pathak, D. R. & Hiratsuka, A. (2011) An integrated GIS based fuzzy pattern recognition model to compute groundwater vulnerability index for decision making. J. Hydro-environ. Res. 5 (2011), 63–77. Pathak, D. R., Hiratsuka A. & Awata, I. (2009) Assessment of nitrate contamination in groundwater of shallow aquifer in Kathmandu. In: Trends and Sustainability of Groundwater in Highly Stressed Aquifers (ed. by M. Taniguchi, A. Daussman, K. Howard, M. Polemio & E. Lakshmanan), 178–183, IAHS Publ. 329, IAHS Press, Wallingford, UK. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2009) 2009 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories, EPA 822-R-09-011, Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, pp 18. Vega, M., Pardo, R., Barrado, E. & Deban, L. (1998) Assessment of seasonal and polluting effects on the quality of river water by exploratory data analysis. Water Res. 32, 3581–3592. Warner, N. R., Levy, J., Harpp, K. & Farruggia, F. (2008) Drinking water quality in Nepal’s Kathmandu Valley: a survey and assessment of selected controlling site characteristics. Hydrogeol. J. 16(2), 321–334, doi: 10.1007/s10040-007-0238-1.
You can also read