How to take a further step toward net zero carbon at your WWTP? - Speakers Nina Reppich
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
How to take a further step toward net zero carbon at your WWTP? 29.07.2021 Speakers Nina Reppich Maria Dittmann Ulrich Knörle
ABOUT US ELIQUO is a portfolio company of SKion Water GmbH Experts in plant engineering and innovative water and wastewater technologies and solutions for municipalities Our goal: to protect water as valuable resource and thus make an important contribution to protect nature
Clean water has a price, also for the environment Survey: Which factors at WWTPs are essential for reducing the carbon footprint? Electric Power Heat Transports Operating Media/Chemicals Direct greenhouse gas emissions 3
Direct emissions – major share on WWTP‘s carbon footprint 47 kg Total amount of 77.7 kg CO77.7 kg CO2e Direct Emissions Total amount of emissions from 2e pro EW undper PE per year Jahr 13.5 kg a WWTP 4.3 kg Indirect Emissions 6.9 kg Power 1.5 kg Operating Materials Further Indirect Emissions 4 kg Sewage Sludge (Disposal) 0.5 kg Sewage Sludge (Transport) Sankey diagram created by Iris Beuter, Master thesis student at Umwelttechnik BW based on the following studies: • Daelman, M. R. J (2013) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from municipal wastewater treatment - results from a long-term study (DOI: 10.2166/wst.2013.109) • Law, Y. (2013) Fossil organic carbon and its fate in treatment plants (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.06.002) • Kosse, P. (2016) Climate change and greenhouse gas emissions within the context of urban waste water management 4
Methane emissions play a significant role 16 kg CO2e per PE and Year 14 47 kg 12 Total amount of 10 Total amount of Direct Emissions emissions 77.7 kg CO2e 13.5 kg CO2e per PE per yearfrom 8 per PE per year 13.5 kg from direct methane emissions a WWTP 6 4.3 kg 4 Indirect Emissions 2 6.9 kg Power 12.9 kg CO 0 1.5 kg Further Indirect 2e per PE per year Emissions Operating Materials from total indirect emissions 4 kg Sewage Sludge (Disposal) 0.5 kg Sewage Sludge (Transport) The share of methane emissions is higher than the total indirect emissions of a wastewater treatment plant. 5
75% of the GHG emissions originate from CH4 in sludge treatment results from a study conducted at 10 different WWTPS Both studies show comparable results concerning methane emissions Methan: 9.3 kg CO2e Consistent on all studies: per PE and year direct methane emissions play a major role and are easy to avoid 6
Theory vs. Practice WWTP Lingen – Specific gas volume captured by degassing 0,40 Specific Gas volume [m³N gas/m³ sludge] 0,35 0,30 y = -0,0013x + 0,6281 The gas volume captured R² = 0,9805 by degassing is twice as 0,25 340 LN biogas/m³ sludge high as expected in theory! 49% CH4 0,20 0.15 m³N CH4/m³ sludge 0,15 0,10 0,05 0,00 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 Absolute pressure in degassing tank [hPa] Total (dissolved gas + gas bubbles) _ Dissolved gas (calc. acc. Henry's law) 8
What is EloVac®-P Compact Plug & Play-Unit System for vacuum degassing of digested sludge Energy-positive Reduces greenhouse gas emissions Optional: integrated controlled phosphate precipitation Improves dewaterability of digested sludge Patent pending EloVac®: vacuum degassing 10 EloVac®-P: vacuum degassing with integrated phosphate precipitation
How does EloVac®-P work? Implementation Biogas to utilisation Raw sludge Optional: EloVac®-P Centrate back to headworks EloVac®-P 11
Why Phosphate Precipitation? Benefits in addition to the improvement of the carbon footprint by vacuum benefits with phosphate precipitation: P↓ Reduction of Phosphate return load by up to 95% Improvement of dewaterability by up to 5%-points Lower polymer consumption Avoid struvite scaling issues ROI of < 3 years depending on disposal and polymer costs 12
Why Phosphate Precipitation? TR(A) measurements* for the evaluation of the EloVac®-P plant in Lingen, GER For example, we offer laboratory tests to investigate the effect of EloVac®-P on a specific sludge. 13 *) = TR(A) - www.KBKopp.de
Demo plant for Europe Capacity 15 m³/h digested sludge (full scale treatment for midsized WWTPs) Available since 10/2020 So far experiences at 4 different WWTPs and 3 further employments by end of 2021 14
EloVac®-P in Hannover Results of full scale demo test Background of the project Pigs (see picture on the right) are regularly used to clean the connecting pipeline (14 km length) between sewage treatment plants. Deposits in the pressure line cause the pig to move unevenly (by sticking and loosening) and cause abrasion on the surface of the pigs. Goal: mitigate scaling reduce abrasion on pigs 15
EloVac®-P in Hannover 4 months of continuous operation Improved volume, difference of the pig before and after use improvements as shown in the picture Source: KBKopp 16
EloVac® – successful technology HIAS, Ottestad, Norway Provo, USA Capacity max. 290 m³/d Capacity max. 500 m³/d digested sludge commissioning 2020 commissioning 2021 Lingen, Germany Saves 150 t CO2e per year Further Projects 160 m³/d digested sludge Summer 2021:Northern Germany 2016: EloVac® 2019: EloVac®-P Autumn 2021: South Korea End of 2021: Denmark and USA 17 2022: South Germany
Text hinzufügen
Your Questions?! 19
Interested to learn more? Examples for further online seminars Avoidance of greenhouse Compact solution for the gas emissions through 4th purification stage vacuum degassing of with ozone sewage sludge EloVac®-P ELOZONIQ PYREG® ElIQUOs own ANAMMOX® Technology EloDry® ELIQUOs Partner LysoTherm® Technologien Pearl® Thermal pressure hydrolysis Decentralized disposal Solutions for reject water to increase the efficiency of concept through treatment sludge digestion sludge drying 20
Contact Nina Reppich Sr. Marketing & Communications Manager +49 151 12 55 76 89 nina.reppich@eliquowater.com Maria Dittmann Product Manager +49 151 58954415 Maria.Dittmann@eliquo-tech.com Ulrich Knörle Managing Director +49 171 7480154 Ulrich.Knoerle@eliquo-tech.com www.eliquo-tech.com 21
You can also read