How's Life in Israel? - OECD
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
How’s Life in Israel?
How’s Life in Israel?
Israel’s current well-being, 2018 or latest available year
CIVIC
INCOME AND
ENGAGEMENT
WEALTH
Hav ing House-
House-
hold
Voter no say in income hold
turnout gov ernment* w ealth S80/S20
SOCIAL Lack of income
CONNECTIONS social share ratio*
Housing HOUSING
support*
affordability
Social
inter-
actions Ov er-
crow ding
WORK-LIFE Gender rate*
BALANCE gap in
hours Employ -
w orked* ment rate
Time off Gender WORK AND
w age gap* JOB QUALITY
Gender
gap in
feeling Long hours
in paid
SAFETY safe
w ork*
Homicides* Life
ex pectancy
Negativ e
Gap in life
affect
ex pectancy by
balance* Life
SUBJECTIVE education HEALTH
satisfaction Student
WELL-BEING Ex posure to (men)*
Access Students skills in
outdoor air w ith science
to green
pollution*
space low skills*
AVERAGE
KNOWLEDGE
INEQUALITY ENVIRONMENTAL AND SKILLS
QUALITY
Note: This chart shows Israel’s relative strengths and weaknesses in well-being compared to other OECD countries. Longer bars always indicate
better outcomes (i.e. higher wellbeing), whereas shorter bars always indicate worse outcomes (lower well-being) – including for negative
indicators, marked with an *, which have been reverse-scored. Inequalities (gaps between top and bottom, differences between groups, people
falling under a deprivation threshold) are shaded with stripes, and missing data in white.
Israel’s resources for future well-being, 2018 or latest available year
Natural Capital Economic Capital Human Capital Social Capital
Educational
Greenhouse gas
Produced fixed assets attainment of Trust in others
…
emissions per capita
young adults …
Financial net worth of Trust in
Material footprint Premature mortality
government government
Red List Index of
Household debt
… Labour … Gender parity in
threatened species underutilisation rate politics
… …
Note: ❶=top-performing OECD tier, ❷=middle-performing OECD tier, ❸=bottom-performing OECD tier. ➚ indicates consistent
improvement; ↔ indicates no clear or consistent trend; ➘ indicates consistent deterioration, and “…” indicates insufficient time series to
determine trends since 2010. For methodological details, see the Reader’s Guide of How’s Life? 2020.
HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 20202
For more information
Access the complete publication, including information about the methods used to determine trends at:
https://doi.org/10.1787/9870c393-en.
Find the data used in this country profile at: http://oecd.org/statistics/Better-Life-Initiative-2020-country-
notes-data.xlsx.
Deprivations in Israel
Deprivations in selected indicators of current well-being, 2018 or latest available year
ISRAEL
18%
of the population live in relative There is no data available on
income poverty financial insecurity
There is no data available on There is no data available on life
housing cost overburden satisfaction
9%
say they have no friends or family There is no data available on satisfaction
to turn to in times of need with time use
Source: OECD (2020), How’s Life? 2020: Measuring Well-Being
Note: Relative income poverty refers to the share of people with household disposable income below 50% of the national median; financial
insecurity refers to the share of individuals who are not income poor, but whose liquid financial assets are insufficient to support them at the
level of the national relative income poverty line for at least three months; housing cost overburden refers to the share of households in the
bottom 40% of the income distribution spending more than 40% of their disposable income on housing costs; and low satisfaction with life and
with time use refer to the share of the population rating their satisfaction as 4 or lower (on a 0-10 scale).
HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 20203
Inequalities between men and women in Israel
Gender ratios (distance from parity) for selected indicators of current well-being, 2018 or latest available year
Earnings 0.78
Feeling safe 0.84
Employment rate 0.90
Adult skills (numeracy) 0.95
Perceived health 0.96
Having a say in
government
0.97
Social support 1.01
Student skills (science) 1.04
Life expectancy 1.05
Long-term
unemployment rate
1.09
Job strain 1.31
Homicide victims // 3.14
Long working hours
(in paid work)
// 3.20
Deaths from suicide,
alcohol, drugs
// 5.53
Men doing better OECD average Women doing better
Note: Grey bubbles denote no clear difference between men and women, defined as gender ratios within 0.03 points distance to parity.
HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 20204
Inequalities between age groups in Israel
Age ratios (distance from parity) for selected indicators of current well-being, 2018 or latest available year
A. Younger and middle-aged people
Employment rate // 0.55
Long-term
unemployment rate
0.74
Job strain 0.76
Having a say in
government
0.92
Adult skills (numeracy) 0.96
Feeling safe 1.01
Social support 1.04
Long working hours
(in paid work)
// 2.63
Middle-aged people doing better OECD average Younger people doing better
B. Younger and older people
Employment rate 0.65
Job strain 0.75
Feeling safe 1.00
Having a say in
government
1.01
Social support 1.05
Adult skills (numeracy) 1.06
Long-term
unemployment rate
1.30
Long working hours
(in paid work)
// 2.61
Older people doing better OECD average Younger people doing better
Note: Age ranges differ according to each indicator and are only broadly comparable. They generally refer to 15-24/29 years for young people,
25/30 to 45/50 years for the middle-aged and 50 years and over for older people. See How’s Life? 2020 for further details. Grey bubbles denote
no clear difference between age groups, defined as age ratios within 0.03 points distance to parity.
HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 20205
Inequalities between people with different educational attainment in Israel
Education ratios (distance from parity) for selected indicators of current well-being, 2018 or latest available year
Job strain // 0.29
Having a say in
government
0.68
Long-term
unemployment rate
0.75
Employment rate 0.84
Feeling safe 0.93
Social support 0.98
Perceived health 0.99
People with tertiary education doing better OECD average People with upper secondary education doing better
Note: Grey bubbles denote no clear difference between groups with different educational attainment, defined as education ratios within
0.03 points distance to parity.
HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 20206
Inequalities between top and bottom performers in Israel
Vertical inequalities for selected indicators of current well-being, 2018 or latest available year
Household income of the top 20% relative to the bottom 20% Share of wealth owned by the top 10%, percentage
12 90
80
10
70
8 60
51.7
6.5
50
6 5.4
40
4 30
20
2
10
0 0
Earnings of the top 10% relative to the bottom 10%, PISA score in science of the top 10% relative to the bottom 10%
full-time employees 1.93
6 2
1.67
4.9
5
4
3.4
3 1
2
1
0 0
Life satisfaction scores of the top 20% relative to the bottom 20% Satisfaction with time use scores of the top 20%
relative to the bottom 20%
4 4
3 3 2.78
2.1
2 2
1 1
0 0
Note: For all figures, countries are ranked from left (most unequal) to right (least unequal).
HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 20207
Trends in current well-being since 2010 in Israel - I
Household income
(household net adjusted disposable income, Average No data available for Israel.
USD at 2017 PPPs*, per capita)
Income and Wealth
Household wealth
Average No data available for Israel.
(median net wealth, USD at 2016 PPPs)
S80/S20 income share ratio
(the household income for the top 20%,
Inequality
divided by the household income for the
ISR OECD
bottom 20%) 6.5 5.4
Housing affordability
(share of disposable income remaining after Average No data available for Israel.
housing costs)
Housing
Overcrowding rate
(share of households living in overcrowded Inequality No data available for Israel.
conditions)
Employment rate
(employed people aged 25-64, as a share of Average
OECD ISR
the population of the same age)
76.5 77.5
Work and Job Quality
Gender wage gap
(difference between male and female median Inequality
ISR OECD
wages expressed as a share of male wages)
21.8 12.9
Long hours in paid work
(share of employees usually working 50+ Inequality
hours per week) ISR OECD
16.3 7
Life expectancy
Health
(number of years a newborn can expect to Average
live) OECD ISR
80.5 82.6
Note: The snapshot depicts data for 2018, or the latest available year, for each indicator. The colour of the circle indicates the direction of
change, relative to 2010, or the closest available year: = consistent improvement, = consistent deterioration, = no clear trend,
and white for insufficient time series to determine trends. The OECD average is marked in black. For methodological details, see the Reader’s
Guide of How’s Life? 2020. * = Purchasing Power Parity.
HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 20208
Trends in current well-being since 2010 in Israel - II
Environmental Knowledge and
Student skills in science
Skills
Average
(PISA mean scores)
ISR OECD
462 489
Quality
Exposure to outdoor air pollution
Inequality
(share of population > WHO threshold)
ISR OECD
100 62.8
Life satisfaction
Subjective Well-being
Average No data available for Israel.
(mean value on a 0-10 scale)
Negative affect balance
(share of population reporting more negative Inequality
than positive feelings and states yesterday) ISR OECD
18 13
Homicides
Average
(per 100 000 population)
OECD ISR
Safety
2.4 1.5
Gender gap in feeling safe
(percentage difference that women feel less Inequality
safe than men when walking alone at night) OECD ISR
-16 -13.3
Time off
Work-life
Balance
(time allocated to leisure and personal care, Average No data available for Israel.
hours per day)
Social interactions
Average No data available for Israel.
Social Connections
(hours per week)
Lack of social support
(share of people who report having no friends
Inequality
or relatives whom they can count on in times ISR OECD
of trouble) 9.3 8.6
Engagement
Voter turnout
Civic
Average
(share of registered voters who cast votes) ISR OECD
67 69
Note: See note on page 7.
HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 2020You can also read
