How's Life in Canada? - OECD
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
How’s Life in Canada? How’s Life in Canada? Canada’s current well-being, 2018 or latest available year CIVIC INCOME AND ENGAGEMENT WEALTH Hav ing House- no say in hold House- Voter hold S80/S20 gov ernment* income turnout w ealth income SOCIAL Lack of CONNECTIONS social share ratio* HOUSING support* Housing Social affordability inter- actions Ov er- Gender crow ding WORK-LIFE rate* BALANCE gap in hours Employ - w orked* ment rate Time off Gender w age gap* Gender WORK AND gap in Long hours JOB QUALITY feeling safe in paid w ork* SAFETY Homicides* Life ex pectancy Negative affect Gap in life balance* ex pectancy SUBJECTIVE Life by education satisfaction Student HEALTH WELL-BEING (men)* Ex posure to Students skills in Access outdoor air w ith science to green pollution* low skills* space AVERAGE KNOWLEDGE INEQUALITY ENVIRONMENTAL AND SKILLS QUALITY Note: This chart shows Canada’s relative strengths and weaknesses in well-being compared to other OECD countries. Longer bars always indicate better outcomes (i.e. higher wellbeing), whereas shorter bars always indicate worse outcomes (lower well-being) – including for negative indicators, marked with an *, which have been reverse-scored. Inequalities (gaps between top and bottom, differences between groups, people falling under a deprivation threshold) are shaded with stripes, and missing data in white. Canada’s resources for future well-being, 2018 or latest available year Natural Capital Economic Capital Human Capital Social Capital Educational Greenhouse gas Produced fixed assets attainment of young Trust in others … emissions per capita adults … Financial net worth of Trust in Material footprint Premature mortality government government Red List Index of Labour Gender parity in Household debt threatened species underutilisation rate politics Note: ❶=top-performing OECD tier, ❷=middle-performing OECD tier, ❸=bottom-performing OECD tier. ➚ indicates consistent improvement; ↔ indicates no clear or consistent trend; ➘ indicates consistent deterioration, and “…” indicates insufficient time series to determine trends since 2010. For methodological details, see the Reader’s Guide of How’s Life? 2020. HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 2020
2 For more information Access the complete publication, including information about the methods used to determine trends at: https://doi.org/10.1787/9870c393-en. Find the data used in this country profile at: http://oecd.org/statistics/Better-Life-Initiative-2020-country- notes-data.xlsx. Deprivations in Canada Deprivations in selected indicators of current well-being, 2018 or latest available year CANADA 12% 33% of the population live in relative would be at risk of falling into poverty if they income poverty had to forgo 3 months of their income 20% 3% of poor households spend more than of the population report low 40% of their income on housing costs life satisfaction 7% say they have no friends or family There is no data available on to turn to in times of need satisfaction with time use Source: OECD (2020), How’s Life? 2020: Measuring Well-Being Note: Relative income poverty refers to the share of people with household disposable income below 50% of the national median; financial insecurity refers to the share of individuals who are not income poor, but whose liquid financial assets are insufficient to support them at the level of the national relative income poverty line for at least three months; housing cost overburden refers to the share of households in the bottom 40% of the income distribution spending more than 40% of their disposable income on housing costs; and low satisfaction with life and with time use refer to the share of the population rating their satisfaction as 4 or lower (on a 0-10 scale). HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 2020
3 Inequalities between men and women in Canada Gender ratios (distance from parity) for selected indicators of current well-being, 2018 or latest available year Feeling safe 0.79 Earnings 0.82 Employment rate 0.91 Adult skills (numeracy) 0.95 Perceived health 0.99 Time off 0.99 Hours worked (paid and unpaid) 0.99 Life satisfaction 1.00 Student skills (science) 1.01 Social support 1.01 Having a say in government 1.03 Life expectancy 1.05 Social interactions 1.06 Job strain 1.14 Long-term unemployment rate 1.30 Homicide victims // 2.57 Deaths from suicide, alcohol, drugs // 3.00 Long working hours (in paid work) // 4.41 Men doing better OECD average Women doing better Note: Grey bubbles denote no clear difference between men and women, defined as gender ratios within 0.03 points distance to parity. HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 2020
4 Inequalities between age groups in Canada Age ratios (distance from parity) for selected indicators of current well-being, 2018 or latest available year A. Younger and middle-aged people Earnings 0.66 Employment rate 0.68 Job strain 0.73 Feeling safe 0.93 Having a say in government 0.94 Adult skills (numeracy) 0.98 Life satisfaction 1.00 Social support 1.03 Time off 1.08 Satisfaction with time use 1.11 Long-term unemployment rate 1.21 Social interactions 1.23 Long working hours (in paid work) // 2.10 Middle-aged people doing better OECD average Younger people doing better B. Younger and older people Earnings 0.66 Job strain 0.77 Satisfaction with time use 0.87 Employment rate 0.89 Having a say in government 0.91 Life satisfaction 1.00 Time off 1.01 Feeling safe 1.01 Social support 1.03 Adult skills (numeracy) 1.05 Social interactions 1.23 Long-term unemployment rate // 2.09 Long working hours (in paid work) // 2.35 Older people doing better OECD average Younger people doing better Note: Age ranges differ according to each indicator and are only broadly comparable. They generally refer to 15-24/29 years for young people, 25/30 to 45/50 years for the middle-aged and 50 years and over for older people. See How’s Life? 2020 for further details. Grey bubbles denote no clear difference between age groups, defined as age ratios within 0.03 points distance to parity. HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 2020
5 Inequalities between people with different educational attainment in Canada Education ratios (distance from parity) for selected indicators of current well-being, 2018 or latest available year Job strain // 0.34 Long-term unemployment rate 0.70 Earnings 0.72 Having a say in government 0.77 Employment rate 0.90 Perceived health 0.93 Life expectancy (men) 0.95 Feeling safe 0.95 Long working hours (in paid work) 0.96 Life expectancy (women) 0.97 Life satisfaction 0.99 Social support 0.99 Satisfaction with time use 1.05 People with tertiary education doing better OECD average People with upper secondary education doing better Note: Grey bubbles denote no clear difference between groups with different educational attainment, defined as education ratios within 0.03 points distance to parity. HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 2020
6 Inequalities between top and bottom performers in Canada Vertical inequalities for selected indicators of current well-being, 2018 or latest available year Household income of the top 20% relative to the bottom 20% Share of wealth owned by the top 10%, percentage 12 90 80 10 70 8 60 51.7 50.3 50 6 5.4 5.1 40 4 30 20 2 10 0 0 Earnings of the top 10% relative to the bottom 10%, PISA score in science of the top 10% relative to the bottom 10% full-time employees 6 2 1.67 1.63 5 4 3.6 3.4 3 1 2 1 0 0 Life satisfaction scores of the top 20% relative to the bottom 20% Satisfaction with time use scores of the top 20% relative to the bottom 20% 4 4 3 3 2.78 2.1 2 1.7 2 1 1 0 0 Note: For all figures, countries are ranked from left (most unequal) to right (least unequal). HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 2020
7 Trends in current well-being since 2010 in Canada - I Household income (household net adjusted disposable income, Average OECD CAN USD at 2017 PPPs*, per capita) ~32 000 ~ 28 000 Income and Wealth Household wealth Average (median net wealth, USD at 2016 PPPs) CAN OECD ~193 000 ~162 000 S80/S20 income share ratio (the household income for the top 20%, Inequality divided by the household income for the OECD CAN bottom 20%) 5.4 5.1 Housing affordability (share of disposable income remaining after Average CAN OECD housing costs) 77.4 79.2 Housing Overcrowding rate (share of households living in overcrowded Inequality No data available for Canada. conditions) Employment rate (employed people aged 25-64, as a share of Average OECD CAN the population of the same age) 76.5 77.6 Work and Job Quality Gender wage gap (difference between male and female median Inequality wages expressed as a share of male wages) CAN OECD 18.2 12.9 Long hours in paid work (share of employees usually working 50+ Inequality hours per week) OECD CAN 7 3.6 Life expectancy Health (number of years a newborn can expect to Average live) OECD CAN 80.5 82 Note: The snapshot depicts data for 2018, or the latest available year, for each indicator. The colour of the circle indicates the direction of change, relative to 2010, or the closest available year: = consistent improvement, = consistent deterioration, = no clear trend, and white for insufficient time series to determine trends. The OECD average is marked in black. For methodological details, see the Reader’s Guide of How’s Life? 2020. * = Purchasing Power Parity. HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 2020
8 Trends in current well-being since 2010 in Canada - II Environmental Knowledge and Student skills in science Skills Average (PISA mean scores) OECD CAN 489 518 Quality Exposure to outdoor air pollution Inequality (share of population > WHO threshold) OECD CAN 62.8 0 Life satisfaction Subjective Well-being Average (mean value on a 0-10 scale) OECD CAN 7.4 8.1 Negative affect balance (share of population reporting more negative Inequality OECD CAN than positive feelings and states yesterday) 13 10 Homicides Average (per 100 000 population) OECD CAN 2.4 1.3 Safety Gender gap in feeling safe (percentage difference that women feel less Inequality safe than men when walking alone at night) CAN OECD -20.4 -16 Time off Work-life Balance (time allocated to leisure and personal care, Average hours per day) CAN OECD 14.6 15 Social interactions Average Social Connections (hours per week) OECD CAN 6 6.3 Lack of social support (share of people who report having no friends Inequality or relatives whom they can count on in times OECD CAN of trouble) 8.6 7.3 Engagement Voter turnout Civic Average OECD (share of registered voters who cast votes) CAN 68 69 Note: See note on page 7. HOW’S LIFE? 2020 © OECD 2020
You can also read