Effects of concentration on in vivo absorption of a peptide containing protein hydrolysate - Gut

Page created by Bobby Rose
 
CONTINUE READING
Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.23.4.304 on 1 April 1982. Downloaded from http://gut.bmj.com/ on November 1, 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright.
Gut, 1982, 23, 304-309

Effects of concentration on in vivo absorption of a
peptide containing protein hydrolysate
J E HEGARTY, P D FAIRCLOUGH, K J MORIARTY, M J KELLY, AND M L CLARK
From the Department of Gastroenterology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London

SUMMARY Amino acid absorption from a peptide-containing protein hydrolysate and an equiva-
lent amino acid mixture over a range of concentrations of the two-such as is thought to be found in
the normal intestine after a meal'-has been studied using a jejunal perfusion technique in man.
The relative rates of amino acid absorption from the protein hydrolysate and amino acid mixture
varied markedly with concentration, demonstrating that the global hypothesis that peptides confer
an advantage in amino acid absorption in vivo is too simple. There is a highly significant correlation
between amino acid absorption and the concentrations of amino acid in the perfusate, whether this
contained amino acid or protein hydrolysate, suggesting that, under these experimental conditions
at least, the presence of distinct amino acid and peptide transport systems is relatively unimpor-
tant. Doubt is thus cast upon suggestions derived from previous intestinal perfusion experiments
that intact peptide transport may be nutritionally significant in man.

The existence and independence of intestinal trans-       as follows. Crude lactalbumin obtained from whey
port systems for amino acids and small peptides in        during the commercial processing of milk was hydro-
animals and man has now been demonstrated.2 Intes-        lysed with pancreatin. The resulting digest was separ-
tinal perfusion studies in man demonstrating greater      ated into peptide fractions by ultrafiltration and the
and more rapid amino acid absorption from four            approximate size of the peptides obtained was esti-
different protein hydrolysates containing small pep-      mated by gel filtration on columns of Sephadex G10.
tides than from equivalent free amino acid mixtures       As estimated by this technique, the preparation con-
have been interpreted as suggesting that the peptide      tained 20% free amino acids, 30-35% di-, tri-, and
transport systems might be of nutritional impor-          tetrapeptides, 20-30% larger oligopeptides up to
tance.3 4 5 However, each hydrolysate was studied         MW 1500D and 10-20% peptides above MW 1500D.
only at a single concentration. As the relative rates     It should be borne in mind that, because of the varia-
of absorption of amino acids from single pep-             tion in the molecular weight of individual amino
tides and equivalent free amino acids are known to be     acids, this distribution is an approximation. An ami-
critically dependent on concentration,6 7 8 the present   no acid mixture simulating the amino acid composi-
study was designed to examine in vivo in man the          tion of the hydrolysate was also prepared. Individual
effect of concentration on the relative rates of amino    amino acid concentrations in solutions of protein
acid absorption from a protein hydrolysate contain-       hydrolysate (both free and peptide bound) and ami-
ing a complex mixture of peptides of varying size and     no acid are compared in Table 1. The amino acid
an equivalent free amino acid mixture.                    composition of the preparations was derived from ion
                                                          exchange chromatography of solutions of the hy-
Methods                                                   drolysate and amino acid mixture as described below.
LACTALBUMIN HYDROLYSATE AND EQUIVALENT                    PERFUSION TECHNIQUE
FREE AMINO ACID MIXTURE                               Jejunal absorption of amino acids from protein hy-
The hydrolysate of lactalbumin was prepared by drolysate and amino acids was studied in 18 normal
Nestle Technical Assistance (Lausanne, Switzerland) healthy adult volunteers using the intestinal perfu-
                                                       sion technique previously described.8 The study was
                                                       approved by the Ethical Committee of St. Bar-
                                                      tholomew's Hospital and informed consent was
Received for publication 17 August 1981                obtained from all subjects. Solutions containing pro-
                                                   304
Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.23.4.304 on 1 April 1982. Downloaded from http://gut.bmj.com/ on November 1, 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright.
Absorption ofprotein hydrolysate                                                                                         305
Table 1 Individual amino acid concentration (mmolll) of a         to 290-300 MOsm/kg by addition of NaCl and the
solution of lactalbumin hydrolysate and its equivalentfree        pH to 7 by addition of 1M NaOH. The sodium con-
amino acid mixture containing 100 mmol (1 32 g) total amino       tent of perfusion solutions was measured by flame
acidsll                                                           photometry.
Amino                  Lactalbumin                 Amino acid
acid                   hydrolysate                 mixture        ANALYTICAL METHODS AND CALCULATION OF
                                                                  RESULTS
Asparagine             11-3                        11-9
Threonine               8-8                         8-4           Aliquots of the perfusion solutions containing amino
Serine                  7-1                         7-2           acid or protein hydrolysate and their respective intes-
Glutamine              16-5                        16-1           tinal aspirates were hydrolysed under reflux condi-
Proline                 7-9                         7-2
Glycine                 3-4                         3-7           tions at 110°C for 24 hours with 6 M HCl in the
Alanine                 7.5                         7-4           presence of norleucine as internal standard to com-
Valine                  7.5                         7-3
Methionine              1-8                         1-8           pensate for hydrolysis losses. After cooling, the ami-
Isoleucine              6-9                         6.3           no acid content of the hydrolysed sample was esti-
Leucine                 9-6                         9-4
Tyrosine                1-9                         1-9           mated by ion exchange chromatography using a
Phenylalanine           2-5                         2-9           Locarte automatic loading amino acid analyser
Lysine                  7-1                         6-5           (Locarte Company, London, UK). The 14C PEG
Histidine               1-5                         1-5
Arginine                1-9                         1-9           content of the test solutions and intestinal aspirates
Individual amino acid concentration:
                                                                  was measured by liquid scintillation counting.9 Ami-
                                                                  no acid absorption was calculated using previously
       mg/100 ml= Conc (mmol/l) x mol wt amino acid               described formulae. 10 Luminal disappearance of ami-
                                     10
                                                                  no acid residues was taken to be equivalent to absorp-
tein hydrolysate and amino acids were infused at 20               tion. The significance of differences was assessed by
mi/min. After an equilibration time of 30 minutes,                the paired t test."
three 10 minute samples were collected from the
distal collecting orifice by simple siphonage into a              Results
vessel at 4°C. Samples were stored at -20°C until
required for analysis.                                            Whereas five amino acids (isoleucine, leucine,
   Three concentrations of protein hydrolysate and                methionine, proline, and arginine) were absorbed to
amino acid mixture containing 40, 70, and 100 mmol/l              a greater extent (p
Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.23.4.304 on 1 April 1982. Downloaded from http://gut.bmj.com/ on November 1, 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright.
306                                                                       Hegarty, Fairclough, Moriarty, Kelly, and Cli'ark
               so

                                                                                  a AMINO ACID MIXTURE
               S0                                                                 = HYDROLYSATE

               70

               60

AMINO          W0
ACID
ADSORPTION
1% of purfud
  B   )40

               30

               20

                              10f

               0
                        MET   LEU   ILEU   PRO   ARG   VAL    PHE      ALA    TYR     LYS     GLY    SER     HIS     THR      GLU    At5P
                    p    NS   NS     NS     NS   NS     NS
Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.23.4.304 on 1 April 1982. Downloaded from http://gut.bmj.com/ on November 1, 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright.
Absorption ofprotein hydrolysate                                                                                            307
                  8

                  7
                                                                M AMINO ACID MIXTURE
                                                               6- HYDROLYSATE

                      6~~
AMINO             5
ACID
ADSORPTION
(mMoilsbr/30cm)
                  4

                  3

                  2

                          MET   LEU   ILEU   PRO   ARG   VAL    PHE    ALA   TYR    LYS   GLY   SER     HIS    THR   GLU    ASP
                      p    NS    NS    NS    NS    NS     NS
Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.23.4.304 on 1 April 1982. Downloaded from http://gut.bmj.com/ on November 1, 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright.
308                                                                             Hegarty, Fairclough, Moriarty, Kelly, and Clark
of protein hydrolysates as the concentration of pep-                    sumably the more important for protein synthesis. In
tides increases and saturation of the free amino acid                   Fig. 1 amino acid absorption is expressed, firstly, as a
transport system by amino acids released at the brush                   percentage of the perfused load and in Fig. 2 as actual
border occurs. This explanation must of necessity be                    amounts of amino acid absorbed. Quite clearly the
tentative as confirmation would require considerably                    'pattern' of presentation of amino acids to the tissue
more detailed analysis of amino acid and peptide                        bears no relationship to the pattern of absorption
transport kinetics than is allowed by the results of the                obtained when the results are expressed as a percen-
present studies.                                                        tage of the perfused load, but is, in fact, related to the
   The importance of the pattern of amino acid                          composition of the solution perfused (Fig. 3), as pre-
absorption from amino acid mixtures and protein                         viously demonstrated in vitro by Gardner,16 17 and in
hydrolysates has previously been emphasised.45 Dur-                     vivo in man by Marrs et al. 18 A similar result was also
ing jejunal perfusion of a number of different protein                  obtained at 40 and 70 mmol/l total amino acid (results
hydrolysates and their equivalent amino acid                            not shown). Previous studies quoted in support of the
mixtures3 45 it has been observed that the variation in                 suggestion that protein hydrolysates may be superior
percentage amino acid absorption from the protein                       to amino acid mixtures in terms of protein synthesis
hydrolysates was considerably less than that seen                       emphasised the importance of simultaneity of pre-
with the equivalent amino acid mixtures. It was sug-                    sentation of amino acids to the tissues for protein
gested that this observation might be of nutritional                    synhesis'9 rather than that the actual amounts of
importance because of more 'even' presentation of                       amino acids were importnt in this respect. It is pos-
the amino acids to the tissues for protein synthesis.                   sible, but unproved, that rapid absorption of some
While expression of the absorption rates of individual                  amino acids from protein hydrolysates compared
amino acids as a percentage of perfused load is valid                   with equivalent amino acid mixtures shown in perfu-
and useful for comparing amino acid absorption from                     sion experiments will confer an advantage in protein
different nitrogen sources, the 'pattern' of absorption                 synthesis in normal man fed orally with a hy-
so obtained is quite different from the pattern one                     drolysate. This possibility is the subject of further
sees when absolute amounts of amino acid absorbed                       investigation.
are considered, because percentage absorption takes                        Our results illustrate the fundamental importance
no account of the wide variation in concentration of                    of studying kinetic phenomena over a range of con-
the amino acids in the perfusate-for example, com-                      centration since results at a single concentration are
pare histidine and glutamine (Table 1). The pattern                     frequently misleading.20 Although we have shown no
of absolute amounts of amino acid absorbed is pre-                      significant absorptive advantage due to either prepa-

                                                                           8-
       E
      U
      0
      m
                                                   LEU                                                           *LEU
                                         PRO*
                                            E
            6-                                                             6-
      0
      E                                                r=081
      E                         I LEU@                 p
Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.23.4.304 on 1 April 1982. Downloaded from http://gut.bmj.com/ on November 1, 2021 by guest. Protected by copyright.
Absorption ofprotein hydrolysate                                                                                       309

ration the recommendation that chemically defined                 electrolytes in the normal human jejunum. Clin Sci Mol
enteral diets should include protein hydrolysates con-            Med 1975; 49:401-8.
taining small peptides rather than free amino acids as          8 Sladen GE, Dawson AM. Further studies on the perfu-
the nitrogen source is probably reasonable on the                 sion method for measuring intestinal absorption in man.
                                                                  The effects of proximal occlusive balloon and a mixing
grounds of palatability, lower osmostic pressure, and             segment. Gut 1970; 11:947-54.
lower cost. Further studies of absorption of amino              9 Wingate DL, Sandberg RJ, Phillips SF. A comparison of
acids, peptides, and whole protein nitrogen sources               stable and 14C labelled polyethylene glycol as volume
after meals and estimation of their effects on protein            marcators in the human jejunum. Gut 1977; 13:812-5.
synthesis, however, are required to establish a nutri-         10 Sladen GE, Dawson AM. Interrelationships between
tional case for or against the use of peptides in enteral         the absorption of glucose, sodium and water by the
diets.                                                            normal human jejunum. Clin Sci 1969; 36:119-32.
                                                               11 Snedecor GW, Cochrane WG. Statistical methods 6th
The support of the Nestle Co., The Wellcome Foun-                 ed. Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1937.
dation and the Joint Research Board of St. Bar-                12 Matthews DM, Lis MT, Chang B, Crampton RF.
tholomew's Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.                   Observations on the intestinal absorption of some oli-
                                                                  gopeptides of methionine and glycine in the rat. Clin Sci
References                                                        1969; 37:751-64.
                                                               13 Matthews DM, Craft IL, Geddes D, Wise IJ, Hyde CW.
 1 Adibi SA, Mercer DW. Protein digestion in human                Absorption of glycine and glycine peptides from the
   intestine as reflected in luminal mucosal and plasma           small intestine of the rat. Clin Sci 1968; 35:415-24.
   amino acid concentration after meals. J Clin Invest 1973;   14 Adibi SA. Leucine absorption rate and net movements
   52:1586-94.                                                    of sodium and water in human jejunum. J Appl Physiol
 2 Matthews DM. Intestinal absorption of peptides. Phy-            1970; 28:753-7.
    siol Rev 1975; 55:537-608.                                 15 Olsen WA, Ingelfinger FJ. The role of sodium in intes-
 3 Silk DB, Marrs TC, Addison JM, Burston D, Clark ML,            tinal glucose absorption in man. J Clin Invest 1968;
    Matthews DM. Absorption of amino acids from an ami-           47:1133-42.
    no acid mixture simulating casein and a tryptic hydroly-   16 Gardner MLG. Absorption of amino acids and peptides
    sate of casein in man. Clin Sci 1973; 45:715-9.               from a complex mixture in the isolated small intestine of
 4 Silk DB, Marrs TC, Clegg KM, Addison JM, Burston               the rat. J Physiol 1975; 253:233-56.
    D, Clark ML, Matthews DM. Absorption of an amino           17 Gardner MLG. Absorption from a mixture of 17 free
    acid mixture simulating casein and an enzyme hy-              amino acids by the isolated small intestine of the rat. J
    drolysate of casein prepared for oral administration to        Physiol 1976; 225:563-74.
    patients. Br J Nutr 1975; 33:95-100.                       18 Marrs TC, Addison JM, Burston D, Matthews DM.
 5 Fairclough PD, Hegarty JE, Silk DB, Clark ML. A                 Changes in plasma amino acid concentration in man
    comparison of the absorption of two protein hydroly-           after ingestion of an amino acid mixture simulating ca-
    sates and their effects on water and electrolyte move-         sein and a tryptic hydrolysate of casein. Br J Nutr 1975;
     ments in the human jejunum. Gut 1980; 21:829-34.              34:259-65.
 6 Burston D, Taylor E, Matthews DM. Kinetics of uptake        19 Cannon PR, Steffee CH, Frazier LJ, Rowley DA, Step-
     of lysine and lysyl-lysine by hamster jejunum in vitro.       toe RC. The influence of time of ingestion of essential
     Clin Sci 1980; 59:285-7.                                      amino acids upon utilisation and tissue synthesis. Fed
  7 Silk DB, Fairclough PD, Park NJ, Lane A, Webb JPW,             Proc 1947; 6:390.
     Clark ML, Dawson AM. A study of relations between         20 Dixon M, Webb EC. Enzyme kinetics. In: Enzymes.
     the absorption of amino acids, dipeptides, water and          London: Longman, 1979: 55-138.
You can also read