Downstream Landscape in SADC Opportunities for Namibia / Walvis Bay - Namibia Oil and Gas Conference 2019
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Downstream Landscape in SADC Opportunities for Namibia / Walvis Bay Swakopmund, Namibia Oil & Gas Conference, April 2019 Stanislas Drochon, Director, Africa Oil & Gas Mobile: +33 6 45 45 53 00 – stanislas.drochon@ihsmarkit.com Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
IHS Markit activities in the Oil Markets, Midstream, Downstream group Oil Markets, BESPOKE CONSULTING • Midstream, 4 • Strategy development and investment options assessment Market studies to support portfolio optimization and business development • Competitive benchmarking Downstream • Refinery economics and crude valuations & Chemical • Transaction support, due diligence and asset valuations SUBSCRIPTIONS 3 • Crude Oil Markets • Midstream Oil & Natural Gas Liquids INSIGHT • Refining & Marketing • Global Lubricants Service • Company Strategies & Performance 2 ANALYTICAL MODELS • Energy Demand Model ANALYTICS • Product Supply/Demand Model • Crude Flow Model • Custom model and functionality development 1 MIDSTREAM CONTENT & ASSETS • Midstream Essentials CONTENT 2 Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved. 2
Consulting in Africa – Samples • Logistics • Strategy > Alternative supply routes for Botswana > NOC in Southern Africa > Market Study for Storage Development: > Major in Africa Mozambique, Tanzania, Djibouti, Ghana etc • Market Study for Refinery Project > Mozambique-Zimbabwe pipeline > South Africa, South Sudan, Liberia, Nigeria etc • Due Diligence – Buyer’s side • Portfolio Review > Major’s integrated assets in South Africa > Regional oil company > Major’s assets in North Africa > Major’s retail assets in Kenya • Review of Affiliate Performance > Kenya, Tanzania, Malawi, Uganda etc • Presentation and support to the Board > NOC, regional oil companies • Market Entry Strategy Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved. > Zimbabwe, Zambia, Mozambique, Liberia etc
Regional Trends – SADC Confidential. © 2017 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
SADC: South Africa the largest market by far Strongest growths mostly beyond SACU/Islands White Whiteoiloilproducts demand products in SADC demand in SADC SADC - White oil product demand by country 2018 and 2001-2018 CAGR CAGR: +3%/y CAGR: +2.6%/y 1,000 1,000 900 900 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 800 800 3% 3% 3% 2.4%/y 2%/y 700 3% 2.4%/y 4% 700 8% 2.3%/y 0.6%/y 2.8%/y 2.8%/y thousand b/d 9% 7.8%/y 3.5%/y 600 600 7.2%/y 8.8%/y 59% 9.2%/y 500 500 1.9%/y 6.2%/y 400 400 300 Namibia: 300 200 small size, limited growth 200 100 100 0 0 2001 2005 2010 2015 2018 2020 2025 Other White Products (Jet Fuel, Kerosene, LPG) Gasoline Gasoil© 2019 IHS Markit Source: IHS Markit Source: IHS Markit © 2019 IHS Markit Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
Refining production on slight decline, heavily concentrated in South Africa White Whiteoiloilproducts demand products in SADC supply in SADC SADC - White oil product supply by country - 2018 1,000 1,000 900 900 800 800 700 700 thousand b/d 600 600 500 500 2% 94% 4% 400 400 300 300 200 200 100 100 0 0 SouthAfrica Angola Zambia 2001 2005 2010 2015 2018 2020 2025 Other White Products (Jet Fuel, Kerosene, LPG) Gasoline Gasoil© 2019 IHS Markit Source: IHS Markit Source: IHS Markit © 2019 IHS Markit Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
Fast growing imports explain the growing appetite from traders for the region South Africa turned into a large net importer since 2005 – and will remain so White Whiteoiloilproducts SD balance products in SADC SD balance in SADC South Africa - White oil product SD Balance 0 100 Moving from exporter toward large importer -100 50 Opens opportunities to develop alternative supply routes to hinterland -200 thousand b/d 0 -300 -50 -400 -500 -100 -600 2001 2005 2010 2015 2018 2020 2025 -150 Source: IHS Markit Other White Products (Jet Fuel, Kerosene, LPG) Gasoline Gasoil 2001 2005 2009 2013 2017 2021 2025 © 2019 IHS Markit Source: IHS Markit © 2019 IHS Markit Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
98% of fuel imported in Walvis Bay is for the local market – ie we are not a hub or even a corridor (yet?) 2018 White products imports by port and destination 100 80% Transit flows to SADC Matadi/ 90 Local flows 70% Muanda Dar es Salaam 80 Share of SADC transit in 60% total imports (right axis) 70 Luanda 50% Thousand b/d 60 Lusaka Nacala Lobito 50 40% 40 30% Grootfontein/ Tsumeb 30 Beira 20% 20 Walvis Bay 10% Maputo 10 0 0% Durban Transit country Dar es Durban Luanda Beira Walvis Maputo Matadi Cape Nacala Salaam Bay Town Source: IHS Markit © 2019 IHS Markit Landlocked country Cape Town /region Existing flows Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved. Key port for import Potential flows
Namibia – What next? How to import cheaply and reliably? Is there a future for Walvis Bay as a hub / corridor? Confidential. © 2017 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
If the objective is to import at the cheapest price… • … then implementing a transparent BPS (Bulk Tanzania - BPS results - Average premium of the BPS winner Procurement System) for 100% of volumes, managed 60 by an independent body, seems like a fair potential solution 50 • Key stakeholders could include (non exhaustive list): > MME, MoF, MoTI, BoN 40 > Namport, TransNamib US$/ton 30 > NAMCOR and private OMCs • Examples: Kenya, Tanzania or Mozambique 20 • Additional questions: 10 > Why “50%” for NAMCOR’s mandate? 0 – Economies of scale would be better with 100%... 2012 2017 Source: IHS Markit © 2019 IHS Markit > What’s different from last decade's context? Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
What makes a key fuel hub? Is Walvis Bay a hub? What makes a key liquid storage hub? How does that apply to Walvis Bay? 1 2 Political stability/ 3 4 Strategic location Significant storage capacity Refining center open environment • Small local market size, limited • Namibia a relatively stable, • Limited storage capacities and • No refinery currently (or in upside open country competition vs other ports in the future) • Far from hinterland markets – • Strong support for port region only accessible by road development from port/local authorities • No petrochemical, refining or sizeable bunker activity • A number of questions remain unanswered – uncertainties 5 Significant 6 Port infrastructure and 7 Pricing center oil flows competitive costs • At the end of fuel flows from • Port costs competitive with rivals • No crude and product price NWE or Middle East assessments based on WB • Investment in new jetty • Not along fuel trading routes • But transport cost not competitive at all beyond port Source: IHS Markit © 2019 IHS Markit Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
Walvis Bay as a corridor – What it would take to increase transit volumes? Operational aspects seem positive – but transport to markets is prohibitive and/or unreliable 1 Vessel Arrives at Port 2 Product Landed 3 Product Storage at Port 5 Product Exits Port Import End Location Market ? • New petroleum jetty coming • Next markets beyond Namibia (Angola, onstream soon • Free imports for now • Reasonable storage fees Botswana, Copperbelt) are very far from (handled by two OMCs) WB – and would be supplied on non- • Deep sea port (2x60DWT • Excess storage capacities competitive road/rail transport from WB only though, vs same in Beira • Impact of NAMCOR’s coming with MME/NAMCOR’s Walvis and 150,000 DWT in Dar es potential mandate? depot coming onstream (ie • Only cheap rail could make it competitive Salaam) will have less than 5 for WB, but 1) cost? 2) reliability? Bay • Economies of scale are turnaround per year, or 80 • Lower cost? • Operations smooth at the port critical: days of reserves) • Enhance Transnamib capacities • Limited demurrage • 100% “mandate”? with potential secondary storage in • BPS? • Port cost competitive (esp vs Might reduce storage costs Grootfontein/Tsumeb? • Include neighbors? Mozambique) • Expand rail network to Caprivi? Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
Walvis Bay is far from its key export markets – and transportation costs per unit are among the highest… The case of Lusaka Distance to Lusaka - km Average cost per km per cu.m - To Lusaka 2,500 NB: Rail cost per unit is 30% more expensive in Namibia (WB-GF) than in 2,000 Angola (Lobito-Luau) Gap 1,500 x2 Road Road Road Rail Road 1,000 Road Road Rail 500 Rail Pipe 0 Dar es Lobito-Luau- Beira-Lusaka Walvis Bay- Walvis Bay- Beira-Harare- Beira Beira Dar es Walvis Bay Walvis Bay Durban Lobito Salaam- Lusaka (rail- (road) Grootfontein- Lusaka (road) Lusaka Salaam Lusaka (road) road) Lusaka (pipeline- Source: IHS Markit © 2019 IHS Markit Source: IHS Markit © 2019 IHS Markit (rail+road) road) NB: Zambia is the main destination for Namport’s transit (all goods) Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
As a consequence, Walvis Bay is not competitive to supply the hinterland at current transportation fees Transport costs to Lusaka Road Pipeline + secondary storage Rail + secondary storage Rail doesn’t create competitive advantage on price from WB Gap x2 Road Road Road Road Road Road Pipeline + Rail + Rail + secondary secondary secondary storage storage storage Beira-Lusaka (road) Beira-Harare-Lusaka (pipeline- Dar es Salaam-Lusaka (road) Lobito-Luau-Lusaka (rail-road) Walvis Bay-Grootfontein- Walvis Bay-Lusaka (road) Source: IHS Markit road) Lusaka (rail+road) © 2019 IHS Markit Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
15 And even within Namibia, rail appears less competitive than road…. Cost to Supply Grootfontein from Walvis Bay Secondary storage Rail Road Rail Road Source: IHS Markit © 2019 IHS Markit Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
Turning Walvis Bay as a regional corridor : Proposed approach for a strategy definition Objective: Approach: 1. Map the regional fuel supply chains from various ports to the hinterland markets Establish Walvis 2. Understand the competitiveness of Walvis Bay against these Bay as the most competing ports from both a tangible (direct and indirect cost) and competitive port intangible (reliability, trustworthiness, safety) perspective in the region with 3. Identify and assess changes that could improve the competitiveness regards to fuel of Walvis Bay – clear, transparent cost benefit analysis supply for the hinterland 4. Select strategic and operational actions 5. Make strategic and operational recommendations and identify how implementation could be financed Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
Conclusion A few questions ahead… Confidential. © 2017 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
A few questions ahead… How to establish the Port of How to ensure MME’ storage What import scheme for Walvis Bay as the preferred use optimization, ie avoid which ultimate objectives? entry point for the white elephant syndrome? hinterland? • Commercial vs strategic • Ensure lowest prices and • Develop an Integrated stocks balance? How to most reliable supply for Strategy that would optimize throughput? consumers – critical establish the Port of Walvis • Decapitalize, bring in other objectives (?) Bay as the preferred entry partners? • Transparency critical point for traders and oil • Who will operate the • Fuel represents 1st item of companies supplying the storage with NAMCOR? Namibia’s overall imports hinterland • How will the 50% mandate • Seems like a number of actions have to be taken • Subsidiary question – when be organized, if confirmed? is the last time we had a • How to avoid the “G. shortage? experience” to happen again? • How to create trust among stakeholders? Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
Thank you – Q&A Confidential. © 2019 IHS MarkitTM. All Rights Reserved.
20 IHS Markit Customer Care CustomerCare@ihsmarkit.com Americas: +1 800 IHS CARE (+1 800 447 2273) Europe, Middle East, and Africa: +44 (0) 1344 328 300 Asia and the Pacific Rim: +604 291 3600 Disclaimer The information contained in this presentation is confidential. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination, in full or in part, in any media or by any means, without the prior written permission of IHS Markit Ltd. or any of its affiliates ("IHS Markit") is strictly prohibited. IHS Markit owns all IHS Markit logos and trade names contained in this presentation that are subject to license. Opinions, statements, estimates, and projections in this presentation (including other media) are solely those of the individual author(s) at the time of writing and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of IHS Markit. Neither IHS Markit nor the author(s) has any obligation to update this presentation in the event that any content, opinion, statement, estimate, or projection (collectively, "information") changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate. IHS Markit makes no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any information in this presentation, and shall not in any way be liable to any recipient for any inaccuracies or omissions. Without limiting the foregoing, IHS Markit shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with any information provided, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on any information provided. The inclusion of a link to an external website by IHS Markit should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the site's owners (or their products/services). IHS Markit is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites. Copyright © 2017, IHS MarkitTM. All rights reserved and all intellectual property rights are retained by IHS Markit.
You can also read