Developing the NLTP 2015-18- the FAR Review and One Network Road Classification - LGNZ
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Developing the NLTP 2015-18 – the FAR Review and One Network Road Classification Geoff Dangerfield, Chief Executive, NZ Transport Agency
NLTP Building Blocks
Government Policy Statement
Safer Journeys 2020 Strategy
Outcomes and
Network Resilience Priorities
Freight efficiency
NZTA Investment Signals Working together to do
the right things at the
right time for the right
price
RLTP One Network Road
Classification
Balancing the national &
Optimised AMPs Best Practice
local contribution Investment
programme Collaboration (REG)
FAR Review
Network Operating Plans
NLTF/Rates/Development
Journey Approach
Contributions
State Highway Plan
Business Case approachThe FAR Review – Key Elements
The provisional funding assistance rates framework has been confirmed
Overall Factors
One FAR
NLTF co- materially
Rate for
investment affecting
each AO
rate delivery
Only meet
Targeted
costs of fit
rates
for purpose
enhanced
standardsThe FAR Review – Board decisions in May
FARs will Transitional
NLTF co- No Council change no arrangements
will have a more than – over three
investment
FAR lower 1% pa for investment
rate of 53% periods
than 52% 2015-18
(9 years)
NLTP
Final FARs
Criteria for Emergency Special to be
additional works purpose determined
assistance funding roads Oct-Dec
2014The FAR Review – Special purpose roads
16 territorial
authorities have
SPRs Individual transition
plans for each
Council –role, level
of service,
upcoming work
SPRs will attract
Could transition a Council’s
separately from other
activities, but still normal FAR by
within 9-years 2023The FAR Review – Emergency works
National consistency and better resilience management
If cost to respond
10% short duration
will be funded natural events
at normal FAR
plus 20%The One Network Road Classification
Differentiating the road network and delivering the right level of service
1. Categorise the road • Developed jointly by local
network based on government/Transport Agency
function (Waitaki DC, Christchurch CC, Western BoP DC,
Auckland Transport in team)
2. Define customer • Will determine size of
levels of service for each Council’s programme
category
• Ensures consistent Customer
3. Determine gap Levels of Service between &
between current &‘fit for across individual Council
purpose’ levels of service
networks
• Is responsive to changes in
network useThe One Network Road Classification Integrated, nationally consistent classification • Recognises all roads are part of National Network • Categorises roads based on functions performed in national network • Helps local government & Transport Agency plan, invest, maintain and operate road network • Gives road users more consistency & certainty about what services to expect • Allows more strategic, consistent & affordable decision making
Implementing the ONRC Expectations for NLTP 2015/18 and beyond Completed by May 2014: • Self-audit on capability to implement ONRC For 2015 - 18 NLTP: • All RCAs apply ONRC to networks - identify differences in Customer Levels of Service, agree appropriate performance measures, understand financial implications • Alignment of network with ONRC agreed with Transport Agency
Implementing the ONRC Expectations for NLTP 2015/18 and beyond For 2015 - 18 NLTP (contd): • RCAs with good analysis & information supported, through funding, to close gaps in Customer Levels of Service during 2015-18 NLTP • Staged process for closing gaps – increases & decreases in customer levels of service expected. For 2018 -21 NLTP: • ONRC fully embedded in Asset Management Planning decision making & subsequent Regional Land Transport Programmes for 2018 NLTP process
State highway network and ONRC
Transport Agency has reclassified state highways using ONRC
Reclassified state
highway network
using ONRC –
adopted at February
meeting of the
Transport Agency
BoardApplying the ONRC on your network
Three steps in the process
1. REGIONAL category: Meet 2 criteria
1. Classifying roads into categories based (incl. at least 1 of Typical Daily Traffic, HCV
on their function in national network or Buses & 1 economic or social criteria)
2. Customer Levels of Service - define 2. MOBILITY level of service - The
what fit for purpose outcomes are for majority of road users experience
each category in terms of mobility, consistent travel times with some
safety, accessibility and amenity. exceptions in urban heavy peak,
3. Performance Measures - how holidays, during major events or
categories and customer levels of during severe weather events.
service translate into specific
maintenance, operational and 3. PERFORMANCE MEASURES
investment decisions. e.g.: A regionally strategic road will
have X metre wide lanes and
traffic services of Y and Z. The
alignment will be……A local example – Central Hawkes Bay DC
Porangahau Road: (Approx. 50km long, starts with high AADT in
Waipukurau and reduces significantly in rural area).
• Currently has one classification & will have two or three
classifications under ONRC over full length of the road.
• As classification changes, how will customer levels of
service change? (what will the driver experience)
• Do existing customer levels of service match proposed
customer levels of service?
• What agreements are needed to enable classification and
closing of customer levels of service gaps?Where FAR and ONRC meet
Ratepayer
share $
ONRC
Road user + size $ • FAR is central government
share $ contribution to the Council’s
FAR programme
• ONRC will determine the size
of the Council’s programme
• Combined they determine the
final dollar amount Council will
= NLTP receive from NLTFQuestions
You can also read
