The négaWatt Scenario for France 2017-2050 - Energy transition through sufficiency, efficiency and renewables
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
The négaWatt Scenario for France 2017-2050 Energy transition through sufficiency, efficiency and renewables Christian COUTURIER Association négaWatt 27/06/2017 – AgroParisTech – Paris With support of Fondation Charles Léopold Mayer pour le progrès de l’Homme
Who are we? A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt Created in 2001 by a bunch of experts and field-practitioners of energy Goals : • Sustainable energy scenarios • Elaboration of sustainable strategies • Lobbying at national level • Proposals for energy policies A core of around 25 “companions” + 25 “ambassadors” Over 1000 members Created in 2009 Subsidiary and operational branch of the association 2
A change of paradigm A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt 3. Subs=tu=on 2. Efficiency 1. Sufficiency Develop flow-based Reduce the losses, Priori&ze energy renewables to i.e. the need of end-uses in terms of replace stock-based primary ressources individual/collec&ve fissile and fossils to serve end-uses energy services Transport and Production distribution Consumption losses losses losses Primary Energy Energy Final Energy Carriers Energy Services Primary Energy SUPPLY DEMAND 4
The negaWatt approach A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt Prioritize the needs Energy demand for energy services Reduce the amount of energy consumed to satisfy a given need of services Production Substitute renewables to fossil fuels and nuclear 5
Careful introduction of innovation A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt A trajectory that is robust without the need of hypothetical technological ruptures … but open to innovations, based on their current level of maturity / readiness Readiness of new technologies Environnemental Technological (TRL) Industrial (MRL) and social (ESRL) 7 Prototype in operational Modelisation of generic System demonstration conditions impacts Development and 8 Validation by tests and Impact assessment based demonstration of complete demonstrations on real data of a prototype real scale system 9 Proven real system through Implementation and Systemic and multi-scale successful operations manufacturing of system assessment Impacts measured through 10 Optimized system Full scale production real operation Social and environmental 11 Massive deployment, acceptability, indirect effects integration to the system measured 6
Energy demand Buildings: residential and tertiary Transports Industry and raw materials Agriculture and food
France: a constantly revised trend (“tendanciel”) A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt Final energy consumption in France (past / trend and nW scenario) 3 000 2003 Tendanciel 2 500 Tendanciel 2003 2 000 1 500 nW 2003 1 000 Scénario nW 500 Réel 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 8
France: a constantly revised trend (“tendanciel”) A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt Final energy consumption in France (past / trend and nW scenario) 3 000 2006 Tendanciel Tendanciel 2003 2 500 2 000 Tendanciel 2006 1 500 nW 2003 1 000 Scénario nW nW 2006 500 Réel 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 9
France: a constantly revised trend (“tendanciel”) A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt Final energy consumption in France (past / trend and nW scenario) 3 000 2011 Tendanciel 2003 2 500 Tendanciel Tendanciel 2006 2 000 Tendanciel 2011 1 500 nW 2003 1 000 nW 2006 Scénario nW nW 2011 500 Réel 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 10
France: a constantly revised trend (“tendanciel”) A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt Final energy consumption in France (past / trend and nW scenario) 3 000 2017 2 500 Tendanciel 2003 Tendanciel 2006 2 000 Tendanciel 2011 Tendanciel Tendanciel 2016 1 500 nW 2003 1 000 nW 2006 Scénario nW nW 2011 500 nW 2016 Réel 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 11
Results – Final energy consumption by sector A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt TWh 2000 Sufficiency Sobriété 1800 Efficiency Efficacité (demand) 1600 596 TWh (demande) -512 TWh Transports Transports 1400 1200 Résidentiel- Buildings -338 TWh tertiaire 1000 Agriculture Agriculture 800 781 TWh 225 TWh Industry Industrie 600 400 66 TWh 341 TWh Trend Tendanciel 200 57 TWh négaWattnW 387 TWh Scénario 183 TWh 0 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 12
Energy supply Bioenergy Electric renewables Nuclear power and fossil fuels Energy carriers and grids
Results – Primary energy A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt Reducing consumption is key to allow for developing renewables to come in substitution, rather than in addition Sufficiency Efficiency (demand) Efficiency (supply) Other renewables Biomass -66% Electric renewables Nuclear Oil Fossil gas Coal >99% négaWatt Trend 14
Competition or synergies: the « hexalemma » of land and biomass use A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt A new balance between the main uses of land and biomass * * Foresta (VII° Siècle) : « territoire soustrait à l'usage général » ; « terrain sur lequel on a prononcé un ban, une proscription de culture, d'habitation » 15
Afterres2050 A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt Comprehensive report available onhttp://afterres2050.solagro.org 16
Energy fluxes from agriculture (final use) A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt Total = primary energy content of all agricultural biomass Human food humaine Alimenta&on Exports Exporta&ons ANerres Energy et Energie and materials matériaux Lossesélevage Pertes by animals metabolism (métabolisme animaux) Actuel Organic maWer on the soils Apports aux sols C stable (stable C) Apports Organicaux solson maWer C labile the soils 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 PJ (labile C) Destination finale des flux d’énergie primaire (via la photosynthèse) en PJ / an – France métropolitaine 17
2 à 5 less impacts A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt 2015 2050 Methane and N20 -56% Energy consumption -4O% Synthetic nitrogen consumption -6O% Phytosanitary consumption -7O% Irrigation in summer -8O% Ammonia emissions -7O% Land artificialisation -5O% 18
Agricultural resilients systems and producers of biodiversity A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt 19
420 TWh of bioenergy A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt Algues No dedicated cultures for bioenergy Cultures annuelles No competition with other uses Herbes et cultures fourragères TWh PCs Cultures intermédiaires 450 Biodéchets annuelles 400 DéjecAons d'élevage t cultures fourragères 350 Résidus de culture intermédiaires 300 ets Dérivés du bois 250 Produits connexes ns d'élevage 200 Bois hors forêt de culture Bois forêt 150 du bois 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 100 20 connexes s forêt 50 t 0 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 20
420 TWh of bioenergy A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt TWh 450 400 350 300 Biogas Biogaz 250 Liquid biomass Biomasse liquide 200 Biomasse solide Solid biomass 150 100 50 0 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 21
Gas carrier in 2050 A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt Fossil gas Stationnary fuel Gas carrier 0 TWh 80 TWh 260 TWh Methanation Vehicle fuel 90 TWh 180 TWh Power Solide biomass sector 250 -> 70 TWh Biogas 130 -> 100 TWh 22
Impacts and benefits GreenHouse Gases Air quality Energy poverty Costs and employment
Greenhouse gas emissions in négaWatt scenario A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt MteqCO2 500 450 Others Autres gaz 400 NN2O 2O CH CH4 4 350 CO CO22 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 24
Carbon neutrality by 2050 A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt MteqCO2 500 Raw GHG tous Emission emissions GES 400 Carbon capture Stockage forêts by lands et prairies 300 Net GHG emissions Emissions nettes 200 100 0 -100 -200 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075 2085 2095 Evolution of raw and net GHG emissions by 2100 25
Energy transition saves costs on the long term A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt Billion € 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 -50 2 020 2 025 2 030 2 035 2 040 2 045 2 050 négaWattnégaWatt Scénario scenario Trend scenario Scénario tendanciel Net savingsnettes Economies Total energy related expenses 26
A clear positive impact on jobs A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt 700 000 emploi net total 600 000 emploi brut bâ&ment Jobs (full =me equivalent) 500 000 emploi brut renouvelables 400 000 emploi brut répara&on 300 000 200 000 effet induit 100 000 emploi brut informa&on 0 emploi brut efficacité appareils -100 000 -200 000 emploi brut énergie non renouvelable & réseaux -300 000 emploi brut transports 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 + 100 000 jobs in 2020, 400 000 in 2030, 600 000 in 2050 compared to the trend scenario 27
07. Conclusion
Energy transition, a project of society A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt Energy transition is a response to the unsustainability of the energy system Energy sufficiency and efficiency can cut half of our final energy consumption by 2050 This is enough for allowing a realistic development of mixed renewable energies to meet 100% of our needs This could make France carbon neutral by 2050, in compliance with its shared responsibility as party to the Paris Agreement It brings a lot of additional environmental, social and economic benefits 29
Questions for the science A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt What are the priority research needs for the next 10 years ? Level 10 of TRL : process optimization Level 11 of MRL : massive deployment, system integration Which tools for research and development are lacking today? ESRL scale More systemic approach Which types of partnerships are necessary for the development of bioeconomy? Which new stakeholders ? Governance of soils / biomass / landscape as commons Find new ways on how to manage the stakeholders community 30
What are the priority research needs for the next 10 years ? • Level 10 of TRL : process optimization • Level 11 of MRL : massive deployment, system integration Which tools for research and development are lacking today? • ESRL scale • More systemic approach Which types of partnerships are necessary for the development of bioeconomy? Which new stakeholders ? • Governance of soils / biomass / landscape as commons • Find new ways on how to manage the stakeholders community 031
Pour aller plus loin A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt Rapport de synthèse du scénario Deux ouvrages Graphiques dynamiques Vidéos Revue de presse Recevoir nos actualités www.negawatt.org Les réponses aux idées reçues sur la transition énergétique www.decrypterlenergie.org 32
Thank you for your attention! A S S O C I AT I O N négaWatt Rendre possible ce qui est souhaitable … www.negawatt.org www.decrypterlenergie.org 33
You can also read