You Can't Afford to be MIA with DIA: ANALYTICS TO ANSWERSEXECUTIVE SERIES Reducing Liability Loss with Data Integrity Audit Use

 
CONTINUE READING
A N A LY T I C S T O A N S W E R S E X E C U T I V E S E R I E S

                You Can’t Afford to be
                       MIA with DIA:
          Reducing Liability Loss with Data Integrity Audit Use

                                MARY CHMIELOWIEC, MBA
                                                Executive Vice President
                                                          PointRight Inc.
PointRight’s DIA
  saved $4.7 Million

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
    To say that professional liability is a great concern for long-term care providers is a vast

    understatement. If a provider isn’t aware of their residents’ areas of risk, healthcare plans can

    get off track and the facility can experience loss. In today’s world of healthcare reform and

    industry regulations, knowing what to do and when to do it is vital to staying compliant and

    avoiding losses. The best way any provider can circumvent losses is by using a Data Integrity

    Audit (DIA) with a unique database that comprises patient-level and facility-level data from

    private, commercial and government sources.

    This paper looks at the results of a recent study conducted by PointRight Inc. that focused on

    how DIA use improved the professional liability loss experience for a long-term care provider.
    Claims were considered in the year before and the year after each facility began using DIA.

    Both the best and worst DIA user facilities improved their loss experiences after implementing

    DIA. The average incurred loss per claim for the 31 months prior to DIA implementation was

    $158,705. After utilizing DIA for 2 years, the total incurred loss across all facilities was

    reduced by $4,700,000. Annual claims frequency also declined in the same time period after

    DIA was implemented.

                                                                                                        2
THE OUTCOME               Healthcare reform continues to impact all providers of long-term

        care. Providers must be prepared to demonstrate that the MDS data they submit to CMS is

        accurate in order to ensure that proper reimbursements are received.

        THE EXPLANATION                 The current and emerging healthcare reform environment is

        complex. Providers must act strategically to avoid claims that result in losses. An experienced

        data analytics partner can provide a successful process that helps providers achieve the

        desired outcomes they deserve.

        THE CONCLUSION                 Quality data leads to quality clinical outcomes, and helps

        prevent losses. A skilled data analytics partner can assist by expertly translating disparate

        data into usable information and insight. This is done by using data analytics and Web-based

        tools that measure risk, quality of care, compliance and reimbursement accuracy of the

        long-term care corporation, division or facility.

       100%
D ATA I N T E G R I T Y A U D I T D E F I N E D
        You may have heard the term DIA, but what is it, really? It is a patented Web-based tool that

        analyzes 100 percent of MDS assessments prior to CMS submission. DIA is a perfect tool for

        the reform environment because it screens data in a manner similar to that used by RAC

        auditors and surveyors to ensure that submitted records are accurate, and goes beyond

        checks performed by MDS software systems to ensure accurate MDS-based reimbursements.

        Instant feedback is provided to call out potential inconsistencies and documentation

        requirements. By incorporating feedback recommendations into the MDS assessment,

        facilities can ensure accurate reimbursement, maintain regulatory compliance, and reduce

        risk all while improving residents’ quality of care.

                                                                                                          3
WHAT YOU DON’T KNOW, CAN HURT YOU
Makes sense, right? But not everyone uses DIA and it can have devastating financial results.

The following charts illustrate the financial losses of 300+ facilities that did not use DIA in

2007. Each subsequent year after DIA implementation decreased liability loss.

   Year       Total number of          % of claims          Loss $ per           Loss reduced
              qualified claims          reduced            occupied bed             (Total)

   2007              153                   N/A                  1,019                  N/A

   2008              141                  7.8%                   864                 15.2%

   2009              141                  7.8%                   842                 17.3%

   2010*             109                   28%                (pending)            (pending)
*estimate

ACCURACY IS EVERYTHING
Accuracy and consistency of your data is a top priority for DIA. The extremely detailed

process applies 3,500 coding checks, 750 CMS consistency checks and more than 300 clini-

cal and statistical tests to every MDS assessment to ensure data integrity and assessment

validity. DIA checks for logical consistency, clinical and financial consistency, relationships

between symptoms and diseases, along with treatments and disabilities, and overall coding

of the MDS. DIA also provides multi-facility summaries, aggregate performance data and

reimbursement information including money at risk and potential money unrealized. With

confidence in your data, you’re ready to take the next step.

Don’t leave                                                               $$
  on the table.
                                                                                                  4
S U M M A R Y O F R E S U LT S
            The study was conducted on a group of more than 300 skilled nursing facilities that imple-

            mented DIA in 2007. Facilities were put into two groups: Best and Worst based upon their

            adoption of the DIA service. The following table outlines how using DIA improves the profes-

            sional liability loss experience for all facilities involved, regardless of their degree of utiliza-

                                           All Facilities       Best 50 Facilities         Worst 50 Facilities

   % of Facilities with PL Losses
                                               28%                      16%                        32%
   in the Year Before DIA

   % of Facilities with PL
                                               25%                      10%                        26%
   Losses in the Year After DIA

   Average # of Claims Per
                                               0.40                     0.16                       0.52
   Facility Before DIA

   Average # of Claims Per
                                               0.33                     0.12                       0.38
   Facility After DIA

            No provider can afford to be MIA when it comes to DIA. Don’t you deserve accurate RUG

            reimbursement, improved QMs/QIs, better care plans, fewer fines and deficiencies, huge

            savings on time and money and better compliance to regulations, policies and procedures?

            ABOUT POINTRIGHT
            PointRight is the industry leader in providing data-driven analytics and Web-based tools that

            measure risk, quality of care, rehospitalization, compliance and reimbursement accuracy in

            the healthcare industry. Using some of the largest and best databases in the industry, our

            nationally recognized clinical staff, researchers, and technologists expertly translate disparate

            data into usable information and insight. For more information, call 781.457.5900 or visit

            www.pointright.com.

            © PointRight Inc. January, 2014
                                                                                                                   5
You can also read