The Sage Gateshead. Economic Contribution: 10 Year Anniversary
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Table of Contents Introduction and Methodology ..................................................................................... 2 Economic Contribution ................................................................................................. 4 Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 12 The Sage Gateshead – EIA Comparison Report 11
INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY In November 2009, ERS was commissioned by the Sage Gateshead (‘the Sage’) to undertake research outlining the economic impacts generated by the Sage since its opening in December 2004. The output of this work was a report capturing the first five years of the Sage’s operations (‘the five year report’). This report represents an update of this earlier analysis, highlighting the total economic contribution of the Sage over its ten year existence. In order to ensure comparable figures with the five year report, the methodology used in this report aims to be as consistent as possible with the five year figures. However, it should be noted that there are a number of differences between the two reports. Therefore, to facilitate comparison of the figures, this report includes a reworking of the five year figures as well as the ten year cumulative figure, allowing for comparisons of how the economic contribution has developed over time. Note that when figures from the first and second time year period, changes in the data provided by the client (see below for more information) as well and the evolving nature of official statistics methodologies, mean there are some differences in the approach taken to calculating figures the different contributions. This means that some of the figures presented in this report may not be perfectly comparable. Throughout this report we detail areas of methodological difficulty and the approach taken when addressing these challenges. Data: There are two broad sets of data that these figures are based on: 5 year dataset: This data was provided by the client at the time of the original report. Updated data: The activities of the Sage following the 5 year report have been captured by a series of data collected for a different (but similar) economic contribution project. While these two datasets capture broadly the same topics, they are not identical. In addition, the methodologies used by the two impact assessments are also different. The Sage Gateshead – 10 Year economic contribution 2
Given these differences, the data was interpreted slightly differently, this is highlighted throughout the report. Time Series: The analysis presented in this report is largely based on financial year data (1 April – 31 March). This presents some difficulties given that the anniversary of the Sage’s opening falls in December. To address this issue, unless otherwise stated, figures referring to 2004/05 and 2014/15 are based on a pro-rata sum (i.e. 4 month period for 2004/05, a 8 month period for 2014/15), calculated using the average of surrounding years. This approach ensures a full 120 months of data is included in the analysis. The Sage Gateshead – 10 Year economic contribution 3
ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION Direct Employment Table 1 below outlines the number of individuals employed at Sage Gateshead on a full and part time basis, for each of the 10 years of the Sage’s operations. Table 1: Employment Figures – The Sage Gateshead Year Full Time Part Time Total FTE 2004/05 168 205 373 271 2005/06 171 235 406 289 2006/07 182 242 424 303 2007/08 182 282 464 323 2008/09 195 198 393 294 2009/10 195 289 484 340 2010/11 148 283 431 290 2011/12 172 287 459 316 2012/13 179 274 453 316 2013/14 165 298 463 314 Source: The Sage Gateshead Table 2 below breaks down this employment by geographic area. As can be seen, the vast majority of this employment is in the North East. Table 2: Geographical Breakdown of Employment Newcastle/Gateshead North East Region Elsewhere Year FTE % FTE % FTE % 2004/05 157 58 98 36 16 6 2005/06 168 58 106 37 15 5 2006/07 177 58 110 36 16 5 2007/08 165 56 111 38 18 6 2008/09 202 63 110 34 11 3 2009/10 208 61 118 35 14 4 2010/11 179 57 129 41 8 3 2011/12 197 62 113 36 6 2 2012/13 192 61 118 37 6 2 2013/14 186 59 120 38 9 3 Source: The Sage Gateshead Expenditure on wages since opening the Sage equals £59.9m1, with £57.4m in the north east region. In the last full financial year (2013/14) the spend was to £5.75m in total, £5.6m in the region). 1 Note that no figures were available between April and November 2014. To fill this gap a pro-rata amount based on the average between 2010-11 and 2013-14 was applied. Also, note that the salary expenditure The Sage Gateshead – 10 Year economic contribution 4
Associated Audience Expenditure – Leisure Visitors Visitors to the Sage bring additional impact to the local economy in recognition that their visit to venue may well include a meal out, a night (or several nights) stay in the region and spend on other activities within the area. In assessing the associated impact of visitors to The Sage Gateshead it is considered that those visitors residing locally and within the region are unlikely to have a significant additional impact in the local area (for example, they may go for a meal as part of a night out but are unlikely to stay over). Those that reside outside of the region are more likely to stay over as part of their visit and in doing so, are likely to generate greater levels of spend within the local economy and regional economy. The impact of leisure visitors is calculated by multiplying the number of visitors from outside the region with the spend they bring to the area. In order to produce a combined 10 year impact, it is necessary to combine two different data sets. Specifically: Tickets sold to those residing out of the region: Data for 2005/6 - 2008/09 is based on a postcode analysis of tickets sold. This data was produced for the five year economic contribution report. ‘Visitors, participants and attendees’ from out of the region: Data for 2009/10- 2013/14 is based on the numbers and origins of ‘visitors, participants and attendees’. This data was produced for a series of multi-organisational economic impact reports. While both datasets have been provided by the Sage, they have been collected for slightly different projects. Therefore, given that the data measures slightly different indicators it is important their numbers are interpreted appropriately in produce to collect broadly comparable analysis. As can be seen in the table below, the difference in methodologies results produces notably different visitor numbers. Specifically, when captured via an analysis of ticket relating to 2004-05 appears to relate to the entire financial year (i.e. including a period before opening in Dec 2004. As this was included in the 5 year report it is included here too. The Sage Gateshead – 10 Year economic contribution 5
sales, the number of visitors is relatively stable. When analysis changes to the second data set the number of visitors varies dramatically. However, it should be noted that, in the analysis for which “visitors, participants and attendees” figures are specifically collected, only 25% of the numbers are considered in economic impact calculations. This is based on the assumption that only 25% of those from outside the region would purposefully dedicate their day visits to the Sage. The five year report meanwhile, includes all those from outside the region who buy tickets. Therefore, this analysis applies a 25% weighting to “visitors, participants and attendees” but not to the analysis of tickets sold (which as this indicator collects different information can be interpreted differently). Multiplying the numbers of visitors from outside the region by the average overnight stay produces the total spend in the regional economy generated by leisure visitors. Average overnight stay is taken from statistics published by VisitEngland2. The resulting spending figures are shown in the table below. As can be seen, in the ten years the Sage has been in operation £18.4m has been generated through additional visitor spend within the region. 2 Expenditure statistics published by VisitEngland have changed methodology over the period in question. Figures up to and including 2009 are taken from the UK Tourism Survey. Figures from after this point use the Great Britain Tourism Survey (2012) instead. Figures used in calculating the previous report multiplied UK and International visitors by a visitor spend per night based exclusively on domestic visitors spending statistics. This spending statistic was calculated using “all tourism” figures (i.e. as opposed to leisure or business tourism). In order to ensure methodological consistency between the figures, the same approach has been adopted for this update. Given that annual figures are not available for 2014, 2013 figures were applied using a 2.5% inflation rate. The Sage Gateshead – 10 Year economic contribution 6
Table 3: Visitor Spending Impact Total Tickets Sold /Visitors With (elsewhere UK and Int.) Weighting Calculated Spend 2004/05 77,003 9,704 9,704 £653,057 2005/06 227,948 29,669 29,669 £1,692,937 2006/07 233,654 29,773 29,773 £1,698,555 2007/08 231,383 28,703 28,703 £1,512,946 2008/09 231,046 28,300 28,300 £1,616,779 2009/10 724,618 425,658 106,415 £5,468,641 2010/11 695,139 123,909 30,977 £1,764,774 2011/12 232,010 125,587 31,397 £1,768,265 2012/13 221,986 11,760 2,940 £190,688 2013/14 273,851 33,545 8,386 £573,116 2014/15 1,431,736 96,061 24,015 £1,682,238 Total 4,580,374 942,669 204,130 £18,621,997 Associated Audience Expenditure – Business / Conference Visitors: The Sage also provides a significant economic impact through hosting conferences which attract business visitors to the region. Again, differences in available data means slightly different approaches were taken when capturing these impacts. Essentially, both data sources capture the number of visitors from outside the region. These number of visitors from outside the region (i.e. rest of UK and international) are then multiplied with VisitEngland statistics showing the average nightly spend per domestic tourist making a trip to attend a conference3. It was assumed that the length of overnight stay was commensurate with the length in number of days for each conference. 3 As with leisure tourism, these figures were taken from the GBTS and UKTS The Sage Gateshead – 10 Year economic contribution 7
Table 4: Business Conference Impact Year Attendance Spend 2004-05 £1,235,752 2005-06 £1,218,224 2006-07 £1,862,782 2007-08 £1,387,162 2008-09 £1,154,363 2009-10 £1,080,552 2010-11 £1,543,648 2011-12 £4,682,611 2012-13 £1,191,362 2013-14 £3,321,080 2014/15 £1,489,098 Total £20,166,634 Indirect and Induced Impacts Direct expenditure drawn from The Sage Gateshead supports further jobs and additional expenditure through indirect and induced effects (essentially the local spend from the income received by those employees within the organisations). The report upon which this analysis is based, used multipliers of 1.9 for local effects and 1.38 for regional effects. These multipliers were based on a review of existing research and government guidance. When calculating these impacts the analysis also accounted for additionality factors such as: Displacement (public sector investment that detracts from existing private sector operations) – very low due to the lack of competitors within the region; Leakage (benefits from the investment that accrue to non-Newcastle/Gateshead residents and businesses and therefore leak out of the local economy) – accounted for through the geographical mapping of spend and the residential location of employment; In order to maximise methodological compatibility, it is assumed that the multipliers and additionality factors are the same as that used when calculating figures from the 5 year report. The Sage Gateshead – 10 Year economic contribution 8
Table 5 below details patterns of direct, indirect and induced impact for employment (FTE) both locally and in the region. Table 5: Patterns of Employment – Direct, Indirect and Induced Gross FTE Direct Direct, Indirect Gross FTE Direct Direct, Indirect & Year regional & Induced (FTE) Local Induced (FTE) local (including local) regional 2005/06 168 274 215 468 2006/07 177 287 227 490 2007/08 165 276 212 472 2008/09 202 312 259 533 2009/10 208 325 266 557 2010/11 179 308 230 527 2011/12 197 310 253 530 2012/13 192 310 246 530 2013/14 186 306 239 523 The employment figures can be calculated as Gross Value Added (GVA) to aid the financial assessment of economic impact. The activities of the Sage (as with the creative industries sector as a whole) is difficult to define using government standard industrial classification (SIC) systems. The five year update notes that employment predominantly sits within the Hotels and Restaurants sector and the Other Community, Personal and Social Activities sector. A GVA per employee figure from the combination of the two sectors was therefore used as a best estimate of GVA per employee, factoring inflation and employment change to account for variances in GVA over the years analysed. 4 Since the five year economic contributions were calculated, there has been a change in SIC classification, meaning it is difficult to use more up to date government statistics to provide a directly comparable GVA per head figure. Therefore, in order to promote consistency between years, the same GVA per employee figure as the five year report is used (again with a 2.5% inflation rate applied). The local and regional GVA impact is shown in the table below. 4 Headline GVA per employee for the Hotels sector equates to £15,687 per employee in 2006 and for the community service sector equates to £29,912 for the same year. The combined figure for that year equates to £21,711 GVA per employee. Subsequent years have been calculated on the basis of 2.5% annual inflation. Indirect and induced employment has been assessed against cross-sector GVA per employee in recognition that this investment is unlikely to be sector specific. The Sage Gateshead – 10 Year economic contribution 9
Table 6: GVA Impacts - Net Direct, Indirect and Induced Local Regional 2004-05 2,918,993 6,961,236 2005-06 7,233,648 10,668,126 2006-07 8,230,116 12,066,719 2007-08 7,547,883 11,381,384 2008-09 10,152,073 14,163,500 2009-10 10,621,169 15,036,072 2010-11 9,721,261 14,847,311 2011-12 10,742,950 15,354,678 2012-13 10,673,068 15,529,163 2013-14 10,981,308 16,167,778 2014-15 7,019,765 17,015,558 Total 95,842,235 230,488,680 Indirect Visitor Spend Visitor spend (both leisure and business) attracted to the region by The Sage Gateshead equated to £38.8m (leisure = £18.6m and business = £20.2m). As with the employment listed above, there is a supply-side multiplier associated with this expenditure in recognition of the fact that one person’s expenditure is another person’s income resulting in further reinvestment in the region. Figures for the five year report use a multiplier of 1.37. This was based on research undertaken regionally5. Again, in order to ensure compatibility between figures, the same multiplier was selected for this update. Applying this multiplier to the expenditure figure results in a direct and indirect expenditure relating to tourism (both business and leisure) of £53.1m in the regional economy over a ten year period. The five year report used Annual Business Inquiry (2007) information (namely, turnover per head in the Hotels and Restaurants sector) to convert direct and indirect spend into jobs supported in the region. This report does the same albeit with a slightly different 5 Modelling the North East Economy: The impact of tourism on economic activity in the North East of England, Durham University (2007) The Sage Gateshead – 10 Year economic contribution 10
mtethodology6. The results of this analysis find that in 2008/09 (the last full financial year of the five year report), a spend of £3.8million equated to an estimated 78.0 FTE jobs, in 2013/14 (the last full financial year of the ten year report), a spend of £5.3million equated to an estimated 107.9 FTE jobs. 6 Given the difficulties in accessing this archive information, a new turnover per head for the ‘Accommodation and Food Services’ sector is used. This was obtained using ONS BRES and ABS data for 2008 and 2012. The Sage Gateshead – 10 Year economic contribution 11
CONCLUSIONS The analysis presented within the earlier sections provides details on direct, indirect and induced impacts associated with organisational employment and direct and indirect visitor spend within the region. These impacts are summarised below at a North East Regional level. Total Economic Contribution: The total (direct, indirect and induced) economic contribution of The Sage Gateshead to the North East Region equates to around £283.6m7since opening with 632 FTE jobs supported in the region during the most recent complete financial year. The table below presents these figures in more depth as well as comparing how impacts have changed between the first five years of operation and the second five years of operation. Table 7. Summary of Economic Contribution8 Comparing economic contributions Indicator Cumulative % 2004-09 2009-14 increase Total Economic Contribution £283.6m £128.3m £155.3m 21.0% Jobs supported (FTE) N/A 635 632 -0.5% Employment Direct, Indirect, Induced FTE equivalent employment (Local) N/A 267 239 -10.4% Direct, Indirect, Induced FTE employment (Regional) N/A 557 523 -6.1% Direct, Indirect and Induced GVA (Local) £95.9m £43.2m £52.7m 22% Direct, Indirect and Induced GVA (Regional) £230.5m £103.1m £127.4m 23.6% Visitor Spend (all figures regional) Leisure Spend £18.6m £10.8m £7.8m -27.9% Business Spend £20.2m £7.6m £12.6m 66.1% Total Leisure and Business spend £38.8m £18.4m £20.4m 10.8% Direct and Indirect spending £53.1m £25.2m £27.9m 10.8% Jobs Supported by spending (FTE) N/A 78 108 38.4% 7 Made up of direct, indirect and induced GVA associated with employment and direct and indirect visitor spend 8 Note all employee data shown is for financial years 2008/09 and 2013/14 The Sage Gateshead – 10 Year economic contribution 12
You can also read