The Latest on A-F 2018 Accountability - Cheri Hendrick Accountability & Assessment Specialist (210)370 5451
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
The Latest on A-F
2018
Accountability
Cheri Hendrick
Accountability & Assessment Specialist (210)370‐5451 cheri.hendrick@esc20.net
TEA 2018 Accountability Development Website
The Implementation of House Bill 22 COLLABORATING TO BUILD A BETTER ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
A–F Accountability: Legislative Context
HB HB
2804 22
House Bill 22, 85th Texas Legislature
“The commissioner shall evaluate school district and campus
performance and assign each district and campus an overall
performance rating of”
A B C D or F
4
A–F Accountability: Gathering Stakeholder Input
Surveys Closed Thursday 11/30/17:
House Bill 22, 85th Texas Legislature • Survey for Student Achievement Domain
• Survey for School Progress Domain
“. . . the commissioner shall solicit input statewide from persons .
. ., including school district boards of trustees, administrators and
teachers employed by school districts, parents of students Survey Still Open:
enrolled in school districts, and other interested stakeholders.” Survey for Closing the Gaps Domain
• Feedback Link:
feedbackAF@tea.texas.gov
5
Three Domains: Combining to Calculate Overall Score
Best of Achievement or Progress Minimum 30% August 15, 2018
Districts receive an A, B, C, D or F
Campuses receive a “Met
Standard” or “Improvement
Required”
Student School Closing
Achievement Progress The Gaps
August 15, 2019
Districts receive an A, B, C, D or F
Campuses receive an A, B, C, D or F
66
Design Approach: Philosophical Commitments
“The commissioner shall ensure that the method used to
1 evaluate performance is implemented in a manner that No Forced
provides the mathematical possibility that all districts and Distribution
campuses receive an A rating.”
Law switched
We WANT stability in the model, we do not want the bar to
2 keep changing. We want to commit to something where from “annually”
the bar will remain static for 5 years, where the rules don’t to “periodically”
change.
7
A–F Accountability: New Labels/Grades
A = Exemplary Performance
B = Recognized Performance
C = Acceptable Performance
D = In Need of Improvement
F = Unacceptable Performance
8
Overall Change for the Inclusion of English Learners
ATAC Notes:
ELL Progress is discontinued
** New EL Performance
Measure for second year ELs
in development
Page 3‐4 of HB 22 Domain
Models
Will only be reported in
Accountability (data file)
Will not be on STAAR
Report Card
Inclusion of English Learners in 2018 Accountability 9
Student Achievement: Performance
School Closing
Progress The Gaps
Student
Approaches or Above
Achievement
Meets or Above
Masters
1
10
0Student Achievement: Calculating Score
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board
By 2030, at least 60 percent of Texans ages 25–34
will have a certificate or degree.
Student Achievement
Score
All
Students
A
Total Tests 3,212
# Approaches or Above 2,977 Average of 3
# Meets or Above 1,945
92.7 + 60.6 + 27.3 / 3 = 60.2
# Masters 878
% Approaches Grade Level or Above 92.7%
% Meets Grade Level or Above 60.6%
% Masters Grade Level 27.3%
1
11
1Student Achievement: Calculating Score
Elementary School
Middle School
•
• College, Career, Military Ready (CCM-R)
High School • Graduation Rates
12Student Achievement: CCM-R Indicators for HS
College Ready Career Ready
• Meet criteria on AP/IB exams • Earn industry certification
• Meet TSI criteria (SAT/ACT/TSIA) in • Be admitted to post-secondary industry
Reading and Mathematics certification program
• Complete college prep course offered
by a partnership between a district Military Ready
and higher education institution
• Complete dual credit • Enlist in the Armed Forces
• Complete OnRamps courses Computational Logic
• Earn an associate’s degree • Denominator is annual graduates.
• Meet standards on composite of • Student who accomplishes any one is in
indicators indicating college readiness numerator.
• All CCMR indicators lag by one year.
• CCMR data used in 2017–18 accountability
will be from the 2016–17 school year.
Not available for 2018 AccountabilityAdditional ATAC Notes:
STAAR Substitute assessment ‐
credit at approaches, meets and
masters levels
STAAR Alternate 2
Level II Satisfactory credit for
approaches and meets
Level III Advanced credit at
masters level
Conversation on CTE Coherent
sequence phase‐out
ATAC and APAC Concerns and Recommendations 14School Progress: Growth
Student Closing
Achievement The Gaps
School Progress
15School Progress: Two Aspects to Progress
Part A: Part B:
Student Growth Relative Performance
16STAAR Progress
Expected Growth
How is Growth Defined?
Scale Score
Meets Grade Level
Meets Grade Level
Previous Year Current YearSTAAR Progress
Proposed
New
Calculations
will simplify
the system
and these
two
columns are
no longer
needed
Meets Masters Masters only missed Just guessing
Grade Grade Grade three
Level Level Level questions
current current current
year year year
- - -
Meets Masters Meets
Grade Grade Grade
Level Level Level
previous previous previous
year year year 18Student Growth: Percent of Students Gaining
Current Year
Does Not
Approaches Meets Masters
Approach Grade Level Grade Level Grade Level
Grade Level
Does Not Met/Exceeded Met/Exceeded
Approach Growth Measure = 1 pt Growth Measure = 1 pt 1 pt 1 pt
Grade Level Did not meet = 0 pts Did not meet = .5 pts
Met/Exceeded Met/Exceeded
Previous Year
Approaches Growth Measure = 1 pt Growth Measure = 1 pt 1 pt 1 pt
Grade Level
Did not meet = 0 pts Did not meet = .5 pts
Meets 0 pts 0 pts 1 pt 1 pt
Grade Level
Masters 0 pts 0 pts 0 pts 1 pt
Grade Level
19Relative Performance: Measuring School Progress
Higher Levels
of Student
Achievement
A campus with fewer economically
Domain Score for All Students
disadvantaged students on average has
Student Achievement
higher levels of student achievement
A campus with more economically
disadvantaged students tends to have
lower levels of student achievement
Higher Rates of
Economically
% Economically Disadvantaged Students Disadvantaged
2
20
0Relative Performance: Measuring School Progress
Higher Levels
of Student Adjusted modeling
Achievement
data in HB 22
Domain Models
Domain Score for All Students
A
Student Achievement
B
C
D
F Higher Rates of
Economically
% Economically Disadvantaged Students Disadvantaged
2
21
1Additional ATAC Notes:
Adjusted modeling data page 17‐
18 of HB 22 Domain Models
A lot of conversation on Part B
Relative Performance
Now has four campus types:
Elementary (4,219)
Middle School (1,653)
K‐12 (334)
High School (1,271)
As well as District (1,203)
ATAC and APAC Concerns and Recommendations 22Closing the Gaps: Ensuring Educational Equity
Student School
Achievement Progress
Closing
The Gaps
23Closing the Gaps: Aligning Accountability Systems
Closing
The Gaps
TEA ESSA Website
Appendix A pages 80‐85
24Closing the Gaps: Ensuring Educational Equity
All Students
Continuously Enrolled English Economically
Race/Ethnicity Special Education and Mobile Learners (ELs) Disadvantaged
x x
25Closing the Gaps: Ensuring Educational Equity
Subgroups Indicators
• All Students • Academic Achievement in Reading,
• African American Mathematics, Writing, Science and Social
Studies
• Hispanic
• Growth in Reading and Mathematics
• White
(Elementary and Middle Schools)
• American Indian
• Graduation Rates
• Asian
• English Learner Language Proficiency
• Pacific Islander
• College, Career, and Military Readiness
• Two or More Races Performance
• Economically Disadvantaged • At or Above Meets Grade Level Performance
• Current and Former Special Education in Reading and Mathematics
• Current and Monitored English Language
Learners new adding M3 and M4
• Continuously Enrolled/Non-Continuously Enrolled
26Closing the Gaps: Student Groups
Continuously Enrolled and Non-Continuously Enrolled Feedback
• Not defined by HB 22 Opportunity
• Districts Should we use an
alternate definition? If
Grades 4–12: Enrolled at a district in the fall snapshot in the so, what?
current school year and each of the three previous years
Grade 3: Enrolled at a district in the fall snapshot in the
current school year and each of the previous two years
• Campuses
Grades 4–12: Enrolled at a campus in the fall snapshot in the
current school year and in the same district in each of the three
previous years
Grade 3: Enrolled at a campus in the fall snapshot in the current
school year and in the same district each of the previous two
years
27Additional ATAC Notes:
Minimum size:
All Students – 10
Student Groups – 25
TELPAS data source
2018 New TELPAS
Safe Harbor
Continuously Enrolled:
Model data District PEIMS
Snapshot Fall 2013, 2014,
2015 and 2016
2018 Accountability would be
District PEIMS Snapshot Fall
2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017
ATAC and APAC Concerns and Recommendations 2829
Overall A‐F Rating ATAC Meeting November 16–17, 2017 HB 22 Domain Models pages 29‐31
Local Accountability Plan:
Local Accountability
*Example *Example
Student School Closing Sa
Extra-
Local
Curricular
Achievement Progress The Gaps Assessments
Activities
31A–F Timeline: Domain Development
Expected Timeline Activity
Stakeholder feedback
ATAC and APAC monthly subcommittee meetings
Training Sessions with ESC: HB 22 Overview and Student Achievement Domain
Training Sessions with ESC: School Progress Domain
Aug.–December 2017
Training Sessions with ESC: Closing the Gaps Domain
September 18–19, ATAC meeting
October 11–12, APAC meeting
November, ATAC meeting (final recommendations for 2018 A–F)
December, APAC meeting (final recommendations for 2018 A–F)
Continued stakeholder feedback
January–April 2018
Commissioner final 2018 A–F decisions
2018 A–F accountability manual creation
May–June 2018 Public comment on A–F accountability manual
2018 A–F Manual adoption
3
32
2A–F Accountability: Gathering Stakeholder Input
Surveys Closed Thursday 11/30/17:
House Bill 22, 85th Texas Legislature • Survey for Student Achievement Domain
• Survey for School Progress Domain
“. . . the commissioner shall solicit input statewide from persons .
. ., including school district boards of trustees, administrators and
teachers employed by school districts, parents of students Survey Still Open:
enrolled in school districts, and other interested stakeholders.” Survey for Closing the Gaps Domain
• Feedback Link:
feedbackAF@tea.texas.gov
33You can also read
