THE EFFECT OF INDEPENDENCE ON SCOTLAND'S INTERNATIONAL STATUS, LAWS, PEOPLE AND COMPANIES
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
THE EFFECT OF INDEPENDENCE ON SCOTLAND'S INTERNATIONAL STATUS, LAWS, PEOPLE AND COMPANIES If Scotland were to vote for independence from the rest of the United Kingdom, Scotland would be a new state, though its laws and legal system would continue. Independence would, however, have a profound effect on people and companies on both sides of the border. Can companies migrate from north of the border to south, or vice versa? Will people be able to travel and work freely in both countries? In the first of this series of briefings we state that existed before the union with looked at how and when Scotland might England in 1707. As such, Scotland must secure a second independence make its entrance on the referendum and then move to international stage. independence itself. For a valid For many purposes, this debut will be referendum, Scotland is likely to need straightforward. Numerous Westminster legislation. The SNP would uncontroversial international like a referendum by the end of 2023, arrangements (postal services, flights and with independence to follow before the so on) will require Scotland to do little next Scottish Parliamentary elections, in more than to announce that it will treat May 2026. itself as bound in the same way as the Assuming independence, we now turn to UK by the previous arrangements or the status of the two countries, Scotland simply to sign up in its own name. But in and the rest of the United Kingdom (rUK), some cases, accession to existing what they might have to do to their laws treaties could prove more difficult. as a result of independence and, critically, Scotland will have to apply to join some the effect of independence on individuals multilateral organisations, such as the UN, and companies on both sides of the NATO and the IMF. (new) border. Scotland could, however, face a logical conundrum. Until Scotland is The old and new countries independent, it has no separate On Scotland's independence, rUK will be personality in public international law and, the "continuator" state as a matter of therefore, no standing to enter into public international law, i.e. it will be the treaties or such like, even with rUK. same legal entity as the UK, with all the Scotland and rUK should be able to UK's existing rights and obligations overcome this issue internally, but to (such as membership of the UN and avoid a gap in its induction into the NATO) but having lost a little over 8% of international order, Scotland may, for its population, slightly under 8% of its example, have to rely on foreign states economic output, as well as 32% of its agreeing to enter into agreements with land mass. The rest of the United the Scottish Government (which may Kingdom continued in this way when the require a transfer of powers from the UK Irish Free State was formed out of the Parliament for this purpose) to take effect (then) United Kingdom of Great Britain with Scotland on independence or and Ireland in 1922 and, similarly, accepting the application to Scotland of Russia was treated as the continuator on existing arrangements immediately the breakup of the Soviet Union. rUK may on independence. need to consider its name, since it will no longer include all of Great Britain – the Laws United Kingdom of England, Northern Laws applicable in Scotland before Ireland and Wales? independence would presumably continue to apply after independence, In contrast, Scotland will be a wholly new but (as with EU law in the UK on Brexit) state, probably not even the revival of the 2 CLIFFORD CHANCE THE EFFECT OF INDEPENDENCE ON SCOTLAND'S INTERNATIONAL STATUS, LAWS, PEOPLE AND COMPANIES
Scotland would need to decide what, People if any, adaptation to its new The Scottish Government set out wide circumstances was appropriate (e.g. criteria for Scottish citizenship at the time companies and insolvency legislation), of the first referendum. So, for example, including transitional provisions. British citizens habitually resident in The UK Parliament would need to amend Scotland on the day of independence the Scotland Act 1998 to enable the would automatically have become Scottish Parliament to pass laws that will Scottish citizens, as would British citizens take effect on independence but that born in Scotland but living outside currently fall outside the Scottish Scotland on the day of independence Parliament's powers. and children born in Scotland to at least Scotland would also need to create one parent with Scottish citizenship. regulatory bodies to replace existing UK rUK would also have to decide upon the institutions that serve the whole UK (e.g. national fate of Britons who acquired the Financial Conduct Authority, the Scottish citizenship (no one should be left Competition and Markets Authority and stateless). For example, should everyone the industry bodies), which may habitually resident in Scotland cease to themselves need to adopt new rules for be British (i.e. rUK) citizens on the entities that they regulate. independence or should they be entitled The need to change its laws would not to retain British citizenship if they so wish be confined to Scotland. rUK would need or if they meet certain criteria, such as to pass laws to modify UK statutes which birth or parental birth in rUK? What about apply throughout the UK to reflect their those living in rUK (or, indeed, elsewhere) reduced territorial scope (e.g. the but born in Scotland? Constitutional Reform Act 2005 alone has Dual British and Scottish citizenship – over 100 references to Scotland), and its if allowed by rUK, as it currently is for continuing regulators would need to other nationalities – could have adapt their rules to reflect their reduced advantages for British citizens. This would remit. rUK regulators may also need to be particularly so if Scotland were to Should everyone habitually reconsider the scope of ongoing resident in Scotland cease to become a member of the EU because a investigations that relate to Scottish businesses. Scottish passport would grant British be British? citizens free movement within the EU. Both Scotland and rUK would need to Many British citizens with Irish decide how to treat matters which are connections obtained Irish passports currently wholly internal domestic issues after the UK's Brexit referendum for and to address this through appropriate that reason. legislation (e.g. enforcement of judgments At a more practical level, many who and insolvency recognition), which may would become Scottish citizens will require additional agreements between already hold British (i.e. rUK) passports, rUK and Scotland. In some cases, turning which could have up to 10 years to run internal domestic issues into cross-border before expiry. It would probably be issues could have a significant financial impracticable to replace all of these with impact, such as tax and pensions, Scottish passports before or at discussed in a subsequent briefing. independence, even if that was what the Businesses would need to track legal holders wanted. Will British passports changes, in Scotland and rUK, that could held by Scots still be valid, whether as affect them, particularly where they result British passports, Scottish passports, or in additional compliance requirements. at all? These may include obligations for a The SNP said at the first referendum that business to inform its customers and it would look to agree a common travel counterparties of how the new legal area with rUK, like that between the regime affects its relationship with them Republic of Ireland and the UK and, as a (e.g. new deposit or investor protection result, that Scotland would not participate arrangements for financial services firms). in the Schengen borderless travel area if and when an independent Scotland joined the EU (see a subsequent briefing). CLIFFORD CHANCE 3 THE EFFECT OF INDEPENDENCE ON SCOTLAND'S INTERNATIONAL STATUS, LAWS, PEOPLE AND COMPANIES
All new members of the EU since 1997 Companies have been required to commit to join the UK companies can currently have their Schengen area, though Bulgaria, Croatia, registered offices in Scotland or in Cyprus and Romania have yet in fact to another part of the UK. On join. Scotland's negotiating position with independence, companies registered in the EU might also be perceived to be Scotland would become, as far as rUK is weak since the SNP has such a clear concerned, foreign companies. In desire – perhaps even need – to join the principle, that would not cause a EU, though Ireland retains a common problem. Scottish companies would be travel area with the UK and is outside recognised and accorded legal Schengen. Membership of Schengen personality in rUK on the same basis as would typically require checks on all companies incorporated under the laws individuals entering Scotland from rUK of Germany, Delaware or Russia. It may and passport stamps, as well as be that Scottish companies that carry on restrictions on the ability of rUK citizens to business within rUK would be required to work in Scotland and even to go to register a branch in the same way that Scotland (the normal Schengen maximum foreign companies must do so, but that is is 90 out of any 180 days). not in itself a heavy burden. A common travel area between rUK and A number of companies registered in Scotland would significantly mitigate the Scotland indicated during the first business impact of independence on referendum that a vote for independence people issues. Employees who are would lead them to move to rUK their Scottish or rUK citizens would retain the places of registration or the companies right to reside in either Scotland or rUK through which they carry on some or all and to travel freely between them, of their business. This may have been for although their employment rights may in regulatory reasons, reasons of public the future depend on the jurisdiction in confidence, the uncertainty over which they live and work. However, other Scotland's currency (see the next briefing nationals, including family members of in this series) or just convenience but, in Scottish or rUK nationals, resident in the financial sector in particular, regulatory Scotland or rUK would not necessarily considerations are likely to have been, have the same freedom of movement, and to continue to be, a key driver. and this could have adverse impacts on Some companies registered in England employees even if their existing rights of and Wales or Northern Ireland may also residence in either Scotland or rUK were wish to move their seat of registration preserved. For example, other nationals to Scotland whether for tax or resident in Scotland may not be able to other reasons. move their residence or travel to rUK on business or for holidays without work The most straightforward way to move permits or visas (or vice versa for non-UK seat would be for the United Kingdom to nationals resident in rUK). pass legislation immediately following an independence vote allowing a move on, These issues may also affect EU nationals say, a company's shareholders passing a resident in Scotland or rUK and currently resolution to that effect. If there is no benefiting from citizens' rights under the legislation to ease the process, EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement unless companies would need to consider how Scotland and rUK agree to continue to best to migrate, a matter that would need apply the provisions of the Withdrawal to be the subject of contingency planning. Agreement on citizens' rights as if What is required will vary from company Scotland remained part of the UK. to company and with how each business The risk of disruption to employees is wants to be structured in the future. much greater if there is no common travel area as all employees may have to make What is done and how it is done will irrevocable choices as to where they wish determine the effect of any migration on to reside or work. contracts (e.g. whether it gives a right of termination) and on counterparties. A legislative change of registered office 4 CLIFFORD CHANCE THE EFFECT OF INDEPENDENCE ON SCOTLAND'S INTERNATIONAL STATUS, LAWS, PEOPLE AND COMPANIES
from Scotland to England may affect, for Conclusion example, the insolvency regime that If Scotland votes for independence, governs a company, but in practice the everyone – companies and individuals immediate consequences for who engage in what will become cross- counterparties of a move are likely to be border activity – will need to consider minimal, except in regulated industries their positions. Should companies migrate where the place of incorporation may one way or the other? If Scotland were affect whether an entity holds Scottish or subsequently to join the EU, how would rUK licences and its ability to operate in that affect the ability of people to cross the other jurisdiction. the border? CLIFFORD CHANCE 5 THE EFFECT OF INDEPENDENCE ON SCOTLAND'S INTERNATIONAL STATUS, LAWS, PEOPLE AND COMPANIES
CONTACTS Chris Bates Melissa Fogarty Kate Gibbons Consultant Joint Head of Corporate, London Partner T: +44 207006 1041 T: +44 207006 4699 T: +44 207006 2544 E: chris.bates@ E: melissa.fogarty@ E: kate.gibbons@ cliffordchance.com cliffordchance.com cliffordchance.com Simon Gleeson Simon James Dan Neidle Partner Partner Practice Area Leader, T: +44 207006 4979 T: +44 207006 8405 TPE London E: simon.gleeson@ E: simon.james@ T: +44 207006 8811 cliffordchance.com cliffordchance.com E: dan.neidle@ cliffordchance.com Mark Poulton Hywel Robinson Phillip Souta Partner Partner Head of UK Public Policy T: +44 207006 1434 T: +44 207006 8387 T: +44 207006 1097 E: mark.poulton@ E: hywel.robinson@ E: phillip.souta@ cliffordchance.com cliffordchance.com cliffordchance.com Nigel Wellings Joint Head of Corporate T: +44 207006 8011 E: nigel.wellings@ cliffordchance.com CLIFFORD CHANCE 6 THE EFFECT OF INDEPENDENCE ON SCOTLAND'S INTERNATIONAL STATUS, LAWS, PEOPLE AND COMPANIES
This publication does not necessarily deal with every important topic or cover every aspect of the topics with which it deals. It is not designed to provide legal or other advice. www.cliffordchance.com Clifford Chance, 10 Upper Bank Street, London, E14 5JJ © Clifford Chance 2021 Clifford Chance LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC323571 Registered office: 10 Upper Bank Street, London, E14 5JJ We use the word ‘partner’ to refer to a member of Clifford Chance LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications If you do not wish to receive further information from Clifford Chance about events or legal developments which we believe may be of interest to you, please either send an email to nomorecontact@cliffordchance.com or by post at Clifford Chance LLP, 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5JJ Abu Dhabi • Amsterdam • Barcelona • Beijing • Brussels • Bucharest • Casablanca • Delhi • Dubai • Düsseldorf • Frankfurt • Hong Kong • Istanbul • London • Luxembourg • Madrid • Milan • Moscow • Munich • Newcastle • New York • Paris • Perth • Prague • Rome • São Paulo • Shanghai • Singapore • Sydney • Tokyo • Warsaw • Washington, D.C. Clifford Chance has a co-operation agreement with Abuhimed Alsheikh Alhagbani Law Firm in Riyadh. Clifford Chance has a best friends relationship with Redcliffe Partners in Ukraine. 2107-001425
You can also read