THE CTC NEWS - The Chamber Of Tax Consultants
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
RNI No. MAHENG/2015/67505I Postal Reg. No. MCS/210/2019-21 Vol. VIII | Issue 1 I July 2020 I Total Pages• 15 I Price: `2/- THE CTC NEWS Monthly Newsletter of The Chamber of Tax Consultants (For Private Circulation - Members Only) “ Before you are a leader, success is all about growing yourself. ” When you become a leader, success is all about growing others. -Jack Welch Chamber's CADRE
FORTHCOMING EVENTS SR. PG. DATE COMMITTEE PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION NO. NO. 1. 24-07-2020 & Student GST Annual Return and GST Audit – 2 day Workshop 5 25-07-2020 2. 24-07-2020 & Accounting & Seminar on Business Valuation – 5 25-07-2020 & Auditing (Jointly with Bombay Chartered Accountants’ Society) 01-08-2020 3. 26-07-2020 Study Circle & Analysis of Judgments under Income - tax 6 Study Group 4. 28-07-2020 Indirect Taxes Taxability of E-Commerce Transactions under GST 6 5. 27-07-2020 Direct Taxes ISG on Recent Important Direct Tax Decisions 6 6. 29-07-2020 Direct Taxes Impact of COVID19 on Direct Tax Laws and Procedures 6 7. 02-08-2020 Commercial & Confluence of Benami Law, Black Money Act and Money Laundering Act with 6 Allied Laws Income - tax Act 8. 06-08-2020 Student UDAAN ~ Learning Today... Leading Tomorrow 7 9. 13-08-2020 Student Income - tax Return – Recent Changes and Do’s & Don’ts – Student’s Perspective 7 10. 26-09-2020 Student Tax Audit – Recent Changes and Do’s & Don’ts 7 11. 24th, 25th, Hyderabad Study Long duration course on FEMA – (Jointly with Foundation of Tax and Accounting 8 31-07-2020 & Group Professionals) 1st, 7th, 8th, 14th, 15th, 21-08-2020 12. 31-07-2020 Membership & Real Estate Virtual Summit 2020 – Footprints for Future – (Jointly with Association 9 01-08-2020 & Public Relations of Corporate Advisers & Executives, All india Federation of Tax Practitioners (EZ), 02-08-2020 Indirect Tax Professionals’ Forum, RERA India Education and Resource Federation, Society For Tax Analysis & Research) 13. — Law & The Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 11 Representation Note : All the events will be held through virtual platform (Zoom App) Kindly enrol at the earliest to avoid disappointment. Participation Fees to be paid online on the website : www.ctconline.org THE CTC NEWS | July 2020 2 www.ctconline.org
BRIEF REPORT OF 93RD ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING At the 93rd Annual General Meeting held on Saturday, 4th July, 2020, the following business was transacted: i) The Annual Report for the year 2019-20 was approved & adopted. ii) The Accounts for the year ended 31st March, 2020 were adopted. iii) CA J. L. Thakkar, was appointed as Auditor for the year 2020-21 and will hold office up to the next AGM iv) Results of the elections for the year 2020-21 were declared by the Election Officer, Shri Keshav Bhujle, Past President as follows: • Anish Thacker was declared elected as President • The following fourteen members were declared elected to the Managing Council 1. Atul Mehta 8. Mehul R. Sheth 2. Dharan Gandhi 9. Neha Gada 3. Dinesh Poddar 10. Nishtha Pandya 4. Haresh P. Kenia 11. Parag Ved 5. Heneel K. Patel 12. Rajesh L. Shah 6. Ketan L. Vajani 13. Rajesh P. Shah 7. Maitri P. Savla 14. Varsha Galvankar Rank Participant Name Topic Associates/College 1 Ms. Joshita Chopra Gandhian Values in Today’s Era GBCA & Associates LLP, Chartered Accountants, Mumbai 2 Ms. Saniya Mary Stanly Artificial Intelligence: Replacement for the BDO India LLP, Chennai Human Mind? 3 Ms. Vanshika Bhanushali USD 5 Trillion Indian Economy: Dream or GBCA & Associates LLP, Chartered Achievable? Accountants, Mumbai THE NEW TEAM FOR 2020-21 i) In the First Managing Council Meeting held on Sunday, 5th July, 2020, the following members were elected as Office Bearers: Sr. Name Designation No. 1. Ketan L. Vajani Vice President 2. Haresh P. Kenia Hon. Jt. Secretary 3. Neha Gada Hon. Jt. Secretary 4. Parag S. Ved Hon. Treasurer ii) The following nine members were Co-opted to the Managing Council for the year 2020-21: 1. Ashok Sharma 2. Hinesh Doshi 3. Hitesh R. Shah 4. K. Gopal 5. Kishor Vanjara 6. Mahendra Sanghvi 7. Nilesh Vikamsey 8. Paras K. Savla 9. Paresh P. Shah THE CTC NEWS | July 2020 3 www.ctconline.org
iii) EDITOR & EDITORIAL BOARD OF THE CHAMBER’S JOURNAL: Mr. Vipul B. Joshi was appointed as the Editor of “The Chamber’s Journal”. The following were appointed as Editorial Board Members: 1. A. S. Merchant 2. K. Gopal 3. Keshav Bhujle 4. Kishor Vanjara 5. Pradip Kapasi The following were appointed as Asst. Editors: 1. Ajay Singh 2. Ameya Kunte 3. Haresh Chedda 4. Manoj Shah 5. Nishit Gandhi 6. Kumarmangalam Vijay 7. Rakesh Upadhyay 8. Sanjay Parikh 9. Vikram Mehta 10. Yatin Vyavaharkar iv) COMMITTEES The following Committees were formed and their Chairpersons & Co-Chairpersons were appointed: Committees Chairman/Chairperson 1. Accounting & Auditing Heneel Patel 2. Commercial & Allied Laws Dharan Gandhi 3. Direct Taxes Dinesh Poddar 4. Indirect Taxes Atul Mehta 5. International Taxation Rajesh L. Shah 6. I.T. Connect Maitri Savla 7. Journal Paras K. Savla 8. Law & Representation Mahendra Sanghvi 9. Membership & Public Relations Nishtha Pandya 10. Office Premises Kishor Vanjara Hitesh R. Shah, Co-Chairman 11. Research & Publication Rajesh P. Shah 12. Residential Refresher Course Mehul Sheth 13. Student Varsha Galvankar 14. Study Circle & Study Group Ashok Sharma 15. International Taxation Journal Paresh P. Shah DELHI CHAPTER The following members were appointed as Core Team of the Delhi Chapter: 1. Vijay Gupta Chairman 2. Sanjiv Chaudhary Vice Chairman 3. Deepender Kumar Jt. Hon. Secretary 4. Prakash Sinha Jt. Hon. Secretary 5. Harpreet Singh Hon. Treasurer LAUNCH OF JIGNYASA - Students E-Journal The Student Committee of the Chamber of Tax Consultants launched the Students’ e-Journal, “Jignyasa - Learning Today... Leading Tomorrow” at the AGM on July 4, 2020. This quarterly E-journal is an endeavour of the Committee to keep the Students up to date in every arena. The Committee also intends to make a part of the journal - by the students, for the students. The Committee would soon release the guidelines for contributing article for the journal by the students and the same shall be uploaded on the website of the Chamber. In the meantime interested students can write to the chamber at office@ctconline.org THE CTC NEWS | July 2020 4 www.ctconline.org
STUDENT Chairperson: Varsha Galvankar | Vice-Chairperson: Niyati Mankad | Vice-Chairman: Vitang Shah Convenors: Raj Khona, Charmi Shah | Advisor: Ajay Singh Days & Dates: Friday, 24th July, 2020 Saturday, 25th July, 2020 GST Annual Return and GST Audit – 2 day workshop Time: 11.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. 5.00 p.m. to 7.00 p.m. With the due dates of filing of GST Annual Returns and Audit GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C clause by clause and would deal with the fast approaching, the Student Committee of the Chamber of Tax various issues/complexities involved by giving practical examples. Consultants is pleased to announce an interactive e-workshop Also, key focus areas which articled students should keep in mind uniquely designed for the articled students. The workshop would while conducting the GST Audit would be explained. be conducted by eminent GST experts who will explain the entire Sr. Topics Speakers No. 1 GST Annual Return CA Jigar Shah 2 GST Audit CA Ankit Chande Fees Student Member Free All Other Participants ` 200 + ` 36 (18% GST) = ` 236/- ACCOUNTING & AUDITING Chairman: Heneel Patel | Vice-Chairmen: Hemal Shah, Tejas Parikh Convenors: Prashant Daftary, Arpita Gadhia, Deepak Shah | Advisor: Jayesh Gandhi Days & Dates: Friday, 24th July, 2020 Seminar on Business Valuation (Jointly with Bombay Chartered Saturday, 25th July, 2020 Accoutants’ Society) Saturday, 01st August, 2020 Time: 4.30 p.m. to 7.45 p.m. Sr. Topics Speakers No. 1 Opening Remarks and Keynote Address on Valuations CA Sujal Shah 2 Intricacies - Valuation Standards and Rules CA Anand Bathiya • Provisions of Companies Act • Valuation Rules including Amendments • Valuation Exams • Overview of Valuation Standards 3 Overview of Valuation Methodologies CA Vikram Jain • Asset Approach • Income Approach • Market Approach • Legal Cases (Cadbury, HLL, Solvey, Mihir Mafatlal, etc.) 4 Measuring the Value of Intangibles CA Ravishu Shah • Types of Intangibles • Methodologies • Case Study and major Issues - Documentation for Valuation 5 Valuations under Specific Situations: CA Pinkesh Billimoria •Mergers / Demergers / SEBI Regulations* •Startups •Insolvency •IND AS / Impairment testing •FEMA •Valuation of Investment Entities •ESOP Valuation Fees Members ` 1,000/- + ` 180/- (18% GST) = ` 1,180/- Non-Members ` 1,500/- + ` 270/- (18% GST) = ` 1,770/- THE CTC NEWS | July 2020 5 www.ctconline.org
STUDY CIRCLE & STUDY GROUP Chairman: Ashok Sharma | Co-Chairman: Dilip Sanghvi | Vice-Chairman: Sanjay Choksi Convenors: Dinesh Shah, Dipesh Vora, Dhaval Shah Day & Date: Sunday, 26th July, 2020 Analysis of Judgments under Income - tax Time: 11.30 am to 1.30 pm Sr. Speaker No. 1 Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court INDIRECT TAXES Chairman: Atul Mehta | Vice-Chairman: Sumit Jhunjhunwala Convenors: Hemang Shah, Kush Vora, Keval Shah | Advisor: Rajiv Luthia Day & Date: Tuesday, 28th July, 2020 Taxability of E-Commerce Transactions under GST Time: 4.00 p.m. to 6.00 p.m. Sr. Speaker No. 1 CA Rajat Tatati DIRECT TAXES Chairman: Dinesh Poddar | Co-Chairman: Ashok Mehta | Vice-Chairman: Abhitan Mehta Convenors: Chintan Gandhi, Nimesh Chothani, Viraj Mehta| Advisor: Mahendra Sanghvi Day & Date: Monday, 27th July, 2020 Recent Important Direct Tax Decisions (For ISG Members Only) Time: 5.00 p.m. to 7.00 p.m. Sr. Topic Speaker No. 1 Recent Important Direct Tax Decisions Fenil Bhatt, Advocate Day & Date: Wednesday, 29th July, 2020 Impact of COVID19 on Direct Tax Laws and Procedures Time: 5.00 p.m. to 7.00 p.m. Sr. Speaker No. 1 Devendra Jain, Advocate COMMERCIAL & ALLIIED LAWS Chairman: Dharan Gandhi | Co-Chairman Makrand Joshi | Vice Chairperson: Mallika Devendra Convenors: Gautam Mota, Tanmay Phadke | Advisors: K. K. Ramani, Sanjay Buch Day & Date: Confluence of Benami Law, Black Money Act and Money Sunday, 2nd August, 2020 Laundering Act with Income - tax Act Time: 11.00 a.m. to 01.00 p.m. Sr. Speaker No. 1 Firoze Andhyarujina, Senior Advocate Fees Members ` 200/- + ` 36/- (18% GST) = ` 236/- Non-Members ` 300/- + ` 54/- (18% GST) = ` 354/- THE CTC NEWS | July 2020 6 www.ctconline.org
STUDENT Chairperson: Varsha Galvankar | Vice-Chairperson: Niyati Mankad | Vice-Chairman: Vitang Shah Convenors: Raj Khona, Charmi Shah | Advisor: Ajay Singh Day & Date: Thursday, 6th August, 2020 UDAAN ~ Learning Today... Leading Tomorrow Time: 5.30 to 6.30 pm Episode 2 of the Chat Show with the Stalwarts of the Profession Leading Tomorrow, we have invited CA Nilesh Vikamsey (Past In the recent years, we have seen a paradigm shift from young President-ICAI) to share his opinion on how relevant the traditional Chartered Accountants entering the arena of practice to now joining form of practice of a Chartered Accountant will be in the years to the industry. come. Apart from covering conventional areas, we shall also chat on the future of existing arenas of modern practice and discuss some With an object of motivating the students to opt for practice, in new upcoming areas of practice. He shall also guide on the steps this second episode of the Chat Show ~ Udaan - Learning Today... and nuances on setting up of one’s own practice. Day & Date: Income - tax Return – Recent Changes and Do’s & Don’ts Thursday, 13th August, 2020 (Student’s Perspective) Time: 5.00 to 7.00 pm With various changes in Income - tax Return forms this year, webinar will be delivered by eminent Income - tax experts who the Students Committee of The Chamber of Tax Consultants is will discuss the changes in the Income - tax return forms and also pleased to announce a webinar for students on Income - tax Return discuss practical difficulties and common errors that are faced while – Recent Changes and Do’s & Don’ts (Student’s Perspective). The filing the returns. Sr. Topic Speakers No. 1 Income - tax Return – Do’s and Don’ts (Student’s Perspective) CA Kalpesh Katira & CA Prashant Shah Fees Student Member Free All Other Participants ` 200 + ` 36 (18% GST) = ` 236/- Day & Date: Saturday 26th September, 2020 Tax Audit (Recent Changes and Do’s & Don’ts) Time: 5.00 to 7.00 pm In the present scenario for the practicing professional, the • Is your articled assistant able to co-relate understanding of responsibility has increased manifold. Cost of negligence is very Income - tax while dealing with Tax Audit? high. Articled assistants are the initial executors for conducting Tax Audit. • Is the articled assistant cautious about preparing proper working file for tax audit? • Is your articled assistant equipped to carry out tax-audit? The Student Committee of The Chamber of Tax Consultants is • Does your articled assistant understand the impact of Auditing pleased to announce a webinar for students on Tax Audit – Recent Standards for carrying out Tax Audit? Changes and Do’s & Don’ts. Sr. Topic Speaker No. 1 Tax Audit (Recent Changes and Do’s & Don’ts) CA Chintan Gandhi Fees Student Member Free All Other Participants ` 200 + ` 36 (18% GST) = ` 236/- THE CTC NEWS | July 2020 7 www.ctconline.org
HYDERABAD STUDY GROUP Co-ordinators: Manindar Kakarla, Neelesh Vithlani, Ram Murthy T., Ravi Ladia, Samba Murthy P. | Advisor: Hinesh R. Doshi Days & Dates: Long duration course on FEMA (Jointly with Foundation of Tax and 24th, 25th, 31st July, 2020 Accounting Professionals) 1st, 7th, 8th, 14th, 15th, 21st August, 2020 FEMA is one of the most evolving areas of practice and with understand the basics and few intricacies of FEMA in depth. It’s a businesses and economies exploring greener pastures offshore it has golden opportunity to learn the important aspects of FEMA. Various become the most sought after need for professionals. However, due important and interesting topics have been included in the course to its complex nature, it continues to be a nightmare for companies with one session dedicated to learning the various forms to be filed and professionals alike. In order to reduce some of the complexities, for practical learning as well. CTC HSG and FTAP together bring a learning course on FEMA to Sr. Dates Time Topics Coverage Scope Speakers No. 1 24th July, Friday 4.30 to 7 p.m. Inauguration and Overview of Key Note Speaker CA Dilip Thakkar* FEMA (Mumbai) Overview and Introduction of FEMA Act 1999 CA Manoj C Shah Mumbai 2 25th July Saturday 5 to 7 p.m. Types of NRI Deposit/ Bank Types of accounts that can be maintained by the CA Naresh Ajwani Accounts & Investments in Residents and Non-Residents & Investments in Mumbai Properties Immovable Properties India and Abroad 3 31st July Friday 5 to 7 p.m. Establishment of Branch office, Establishment of Liaison office, Branch Office, Projects CA Hinesh Doshi Liaison Offices by Residents office, etc., in India and abroad Mumbai and Non-Residents – FEMA Regulations 4 1st Aug Saturday 5 to 7 p.m. Critical Analysis of Borrowings Covering the aspects of ECB, Trade Credit, Lending and CA P Rajendra Prasad under FEMA borrowing in Rupees and FC etc Hyderabad 5 7th Aug Friday 5 to 7 p.m. Analysis of FDI Regulations FDI regulations for Investments in Non-Corporate Entities CA Murali Krishna under FEMA including Partnership and LLP Hyderabad 6 8th Aug Saturday 5 to 7 p.m. Analysis of FDI Regulations FDI Regulations for Investments in Corporate Entities and CA Moin Ladha under FEMA Non-Debt Instruments Mumbai 7 14th Aug Friday 5 to 7 p.m. Analysis of ODI Regulations ODI Investments by the Companies, LLPs, Partnership CA Vishal Gada under FEMA Firms, etc. Mumbai 8 15th Aug Saturday 5 to 7 p.m. Analysis of ODI Regulations Remittances available to Individuals under LRS and CA Rajesh P Shah under FEMA Immigration Investment schemes Drawing, Possession and Mumbai Utilisation of Foreign Currency 9 21st Aug Friday 5 to 7 p.m. Export of Goods Services– Major aspects of FEMA Regulations related to Export of CA Ganesh FEMA Regulations Goods and Services Ramaswamy Bangalore 10 22nd Aug Saturday 5 to 7 p.m. Import of Goods and Services – Major aspects of FEMA Regulations related to Import of CA Shabbir Motorwala FEMA Regulations Goods and Services Mumbai 11 27th Aug Thursday 5 to 7.30 p.m. Compounding of Offences & Offences and adjudications under FEMA, remedial CA Deepender Agarwal Auditor’s Responsibility from measures including Compounding of Offences and New Delhi FEMA perspective Practical Aspects for appearance before ED Authorities. 12 28th Aug Friday 5 to 7 p.m. Filing of various forms under A Practical overview of different forms to be filed under CA Harshal Bhuta FEMA FEMA and FEMA from Auditor’s perspective Mumbai 13 29th Aug Saturday 5 to 7 p.m. Panel Discussion Case Studies on FEMA and Brain Trust Session CA Anup P. Shah & CA Paresh P. Shah Panel Chairman – CA Dilip Thakkar* Fees Members or HSG Members ` 1,000/- + ` 180/- (18% GST) = ` 1,180/- Non-Members ` 1,500/- + ` 270/- (18% GST) = ` 1,770/- THE CTC NEWS | July 2020 8 www.ctconline.org
MEMBERSHIP & PUBLIC RELATIONS Chairperson: Nishtha Pandya | Co-Chairman: Premal Gandhi | Vice-Chairperson: Ashita Shah Convenors: Bandish Hemani, Tanvi Vora | Advisor: Hitesh R. Shah INDIRECT TAXES Chairman: Atul Mehta | Vice-Chairman: Sumit Jhunjhunwala | Convenors: Hemang Shah, Kush Vora, Keval Shah | Advisor: Rajiv Luthia ACAE REAL ESTATE FOOTPRINTS FOR FUTURE VIRTUAL SUMMIT 2020 31st July & 1st Aug IDTPF 5:00 P.M. to 7:30 P.M 2nd Aug 10:30 A.M. to 01:00 P.M. Register 13 Topics including GST, I.Tax, Finance, Accounts, RERA Today !! @Rs.250 (incl GST) Renowned speakers & Experts Fill up the registration form at 15 from across the Country link below to join the event http://acaekolkata.org/virtualconference/ Hrs of Learnings on current 10 topics Association of Corporate Advisers & Executives Jointly with 6 Organisations joining hands All india Federation of Tax Practitioners (EZ) Panel Discussions with Industry Indirect Tax Professionals’ Forum 2 Leaders & Regulators RERA India Education and Resource Federation Society For Tax Analysis & Research For payments by cash or Cheque Contact The Chamber of Tax Consultants Niti Dasgupta +91 9830555232 info@acaekolkata.org OUR VISION ABOUT SUMMIT Virtual Lobby Parallel Sessions | Choose Live or watch later | Short Sessions | Q & A Resource Materials Background Materials| Link to Past Session| Articles & Research Papers |Upload Article | Ask the Expert SESSIONS PANELLIST Features Quiz Competition I Win Prizes Surveys | Group Chat & "Real Estate Industry - Current CA (Dr.) Gaurav Gupta, Delhi Lounge | Watch Later | Link Conundrum" Adv Sumant Batra, Delhi to Advertisers & Sponosrs GST - ITC- Recent Judicial Principles Sri D K Singh, DC MSME* Lobby GST - Antiprofiteering Issues GST Implications on uncertain rental CA Amit Kr. Kedia, Jaipur income & suggested recourse CA Ramesh Prabhu, Mumbai Force Majeure- Implications in Rental Adv V Raghuraman, Bangalore Agreements CA (Dr) Girish Ahuja, Delhi Experience Virtual MSME Perspective in Real Estate JDA - GST Issues and Implications on Sri Yogesh Thar, Mumbai Room Environment Sri Ravindra Chamaria, Kolkata Developers and Owners Urban Planning- New Dimensions in CA Anish Thacker, Mumbai view of ongoing Covid 19 pandemic Adv Sandip Gadodia, Ranchi JDA- Income Tax Implications, Capital CA Manmohan Gupta, Delhi Gains & Other CA Arun Agarwal, Kolkata Real Estate- Accounting Issues, Income Sri H V Patodia, National Recognition & Disclosure (ICDS, AS7,etc.) President (Elect) CREDAI RERA - Challenges & Issues Sri Sumit Sanghai, Mumbai FOOTPRINTS FOR FUTURE IBC Code - Obligations, Exit Routes & Sri Apurva Salarpuria, Kolkata Opportunities Ca Jitendra Lohia, Kolkata Concluding Panel Discussion Current Real Estate Policy - Suggestions * Confirmation awaited THE CTC NEWS | July 2020 9 www.ctconline.org
LAW & REPRESENTATION COMMITTEE Chairman: Mahendra Sanghvi | Co-Chairman: Apurva Shah | Vice-Chairman: Vyomesh Pathak Convenors: Deepak Jain, Adit Shah | Advisor: Vipul Joshi The Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 Dear Member, As you might be aware, The Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Please email your queries to office@ctconline.org and mark the 2020 has now been extended till 31st December 2020. However, email subject as: V2VS URGENT we understand that our members are facing various practical The CTC continues its long standing commitment to understand difficulties while filing forms on behalf of their clients as well as issues faced by members and make suitable representations at from queries which are being raised by Designated Officers/ appropriate forums for redressal in a timely and efficient manner Assessing Officers in charge of the cases where an application and seeks your support for the same. Please bring to our attention is filed and some of these are impractical to deal with during any such issues faced by sending an email to office@ctconline.org lockdowns. with email subject marked as Law and Representation Committee The Chamber of Tax consultants (CTC) is in the process of (LRC) Request. making a representation to bring these difficulties to the attention Sincerely, of the CBDT and seeking appropriate redressal. Team LRC 20-21 In the above connection, we request you to please send us a description of the difficulties faced by you along with supporting President: CA Anish Thacker evidence if any and we shall collate the same and make a suitable Chairman: CA Mahendra Sanghvi representation incorporating all the issues highlighted. IMPORTANT DECISIONS UNDER GST By Vinay Jain & Sachin Mishra, Advocates 1. Whether after the Finance (Amendment) Act, 2020 the aforesaid mistake, however, all such authorities rejected under Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017, mistake the plea of the Petitioner. committed by the assessee at the time of filing of The Department argued that the case of the Petitioner fell GST TRAN-1 can be rectified subsequently? Whether in the category “the taxpayer has successfully filed TRAN-I, the decision in Brand Equity Treaties Ltd. And Ors. but no technical error has been found” as the Petitioner v. Union of India, [2020] 116 taxmann.com 415 (Delhi) did not encounter any technical glitch on the portal, his stands valid after the aforesaid amendment which request to file a revised TRAN-1 form beyond the limitation inserted the words “within such time” in Section 140 period was not accepted. The department also argued that of the CGST Act, 2017, inter-alia empowering the the decision in Brand Equity Treaties Ltd. And Ors. v. Central Government to prescribe the time limit for Union of India, [2020] 116 taxmann.com 415 (Delhi) is filing TRAN-1, retrospectively? no more valid in view of the Finance (Amendment) Act, Facts and Pleadings: M/s SKH Sheet Metals Components 2020 under Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017. According Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘The Petitioner’), to department, with the insertion of the words “within is inter-alia engaged in manufacture of final products and such time” in Section 140 (1) retrospectively, the Central sale to OEMs. In order to avail the credit in the electronic Government has been granted the power to prescribe credit ledger under the GST laws, the Petitioner filed ‘GST the time limit for filing TRAN-1 and hence the finding TRAN-1’ on 27.08.2017. However, on submission of the of this Court in Brand Equity Treaties Case (supra) that said Form, Petitioner realized that as against the total credit the limitation period under Rule 117 for filing TRAN-1 is of Rs. 6,52,58,081/-, only Rs. 1,01,24,382/- was reflected merely directory and not mandatory is no longer valid. on the common GST portal. The CENVAT credit of Rs.5,51,33,6991/- was not displayed in the electronic credit The Appellant relied upon several decisions of the Hon’ble ledger. Petitioner filed a revised declaration in the nature High Court including Brand Equity Treaties Case (supra) to of Form GST TRAN-I on 27.12.2017 and reflected the argue that the several Courts have permitted the similarly correct figures under column 5(a) of the Form, however, situated taxpayers to file the Form GST TRAN-1 beyond the amount was still not transferred to the electronic credit stipulated period of time even to those taxpayers, who may register and was shown as “blocked credit”. The Petitioner not have faced “technical glitch on the portal” but were made several efforts before numerous authorities to rectify otherwise prevented in filing the TRAN-1 form on account THE CTC NEWS | July 2020 11 www.ctconline.org
of certain human errors or factors and reasons which were of India (“RBI”). DICGC protects small depositors in the beyond their control. The Petitioner further submitted event of Appellants’ failure by insuring the deposits up to that irrespective of the said decisions, since admittedly Rs.1,00,000 per depositor (now amended to Rs.5,00,000). the TRAN-1 form in the case of the Petitioner was filed The banks availed Cenvat credit of the service tax charged well before the specified date, notwithstanding the benefit by DICGC on the insurance premium paid. granted by the Court in the said judgment, the Petitioner is The department has denied the said Cenvat credit on entitled to transition the credit. the count that as no consideration was charged by the Judgement: The Hon’ble High Court held that the Appellants in relation to acceptance of deposits, it was presumption of department that the Finance (Amendment) only a transaction in money and therefore, was outside the Act, 2020 under Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017 scope of service tax under Section 66D(n) of the Finance renders the decision of this court in Brand Equity Treaties Act, 1994. The Department also alleged that for any service Case (supra) no longer valid is incorrect. As per the Hon’ble to be qualified as input service, it should be consumed High Court, the relief granted to the taxpayers in Brand or used for providing taxable output services. The input Equity Treaties Case (supra) was not entirely resting on the service should have direct nexus with the output service. fact that CGST Act, 2017 did not prescribe for any time DICGC Insurance is aimed at protecting the interest of the limit for availing the transition of the input tax credit, rather depositors against the failure of the bank i.e. the Appellants the relief was granted on several counts. Hence, Hon’ble and does not provide any protection to the Appellants. High Court held that the decision in Brand Equity Treaties Hence, as per department the service provided by DICGC Case (supra) still holds good. The Hon’ble High Court also would not qualify as a direct input service for the output relied upon the GST Council 32nd Meeting wherein it was services performed by a bank on which service tax is paid. recognized that there could be errors apparent on the face The Appellants argued that DICGC insurance service of the record that could be non-technical in nature and was covered under main part of the definition of ‘input merit leniency. In line with the spirit of the decision of the service’ and was also mentioned in the ‘inclusive portion’. GST Council and the blurring thin line between technical The Appellants further argued that the activity of accepting and non-technical difficulty, keeping in view that entire filing deposits was integrally connected to the lending activities of is electronic, the Hon’ble High Court held that the restrictive the Appellants under which service tax was discharged under applicability of Rule 117 (1A) to be arbitrary. The Hon’ble the category of ‘Banking and Other Financial Services’ on High Court further held that transitional provisions and various incomes. As per the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 the language of Section 140 of the Act in particular, even and Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation after amendment, manifests the intention behind the said Act, 1961, the Appellants are statutorily required to insure provision is to save the accrued and vested ITC under the the deposits. Therefore, it is a statutorily obligation without existing law. The Hon’ble High Court further held that both which the Appellant cannot function at all. The Appellants the Act and Rules do not provide any specific consequence are engaged in “accepting” deposits and not “extending” on failure to adhere to the timelines. Since the consequences deposits and so Section 66D(n) of the Finance Act, 1994 for non-compliance are not indicated, the provision has would not be applicable. The Appellants also argued that to be seen as directory. The Hon’ble High Court further even if it is assumed that some part of the deposit was not held in the present case, the mistake was clerical in nature. used for provision of output services, Cenvat credit cannot Therefore, the revision cannot be treated as a fresh filing. be denied as 50% of the total Cenvat credit was already According, Petitioner was permitted to revise TRAN-1 reversed in view of Rule 6(3B) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, Form on or before 30.06.2020 and transition the entire ITC, 2004. subject to verification by the Respondents. Judgment: The Hon’ble Larger Bench of CESTAT held M/s SKH Sheet Metals Components Private Limited that it is mandatory for all banks to register themselves vs. U.O.I, High Court of Delhi decided in W.P.(C) with the DICGC and failure to pay the premium amount 13151/2019 dated 16.06.2020. to DICGC may lead to cancellation of its licence with RBI. The Hon’ble Larger Bench of CESTAT the insurance 2. Whether the banks can avail credit of service tax service received by the banks from the DICGC is not paid by the banks for the service provided by the only mandatory but was also commercially expedient. The Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation service rendered by the DICGC to the banks would fall (“DICGC”) in relation to insuring banks deposits with in the main part of the definition of ‘input service’ and DICGC? such Cenvat credit would be eligible. The Hon’ble Larger Facts and Pleadings: The Appellants herein are all Bench of CESTAT also held that as per Section 66D(n), banking companies that are inter-alia engaged in the banking the activity of services by way of extending deposits, loans business. The Appellants are mandatorily required to insure or advances is under negative list and will not include the their deposits with Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee activity of accepting deposits from the customers for which Corporation (“DICGC”), a subsidiary of the Reserve Bank the banks pay interest to the customers. The Hon’ble Larger THE CTC NEWS | July 2020 12 www.ctconline.org
Bench of CESTAT further held that when reversal under to the Appellant, thus the consideration for such service Rule 6(3B) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was done by also flows from foreign reinsurer and not from the Indian the Appellants, they were entitled for credit of the entire insurance companies. Further, the Hon’ble CESTAT also amount of service tax paid on input service having nexus held that such cases amount to export of service and that with the provision of output service. the ‘Reinsurance Brokerage’ retained as brokerage in Indian Rupees by deducting instead of remitting the entire amount M/s. South India Bank vs. CC,CE & ST, Calicut, abroad and receiving back foreign currency should be treated Larger Bench of CESTAT, Bangalore decided in as receipts for export in foreign currency. Interim Order Nos. 13 - 31 / 2020 dated 20.03.2020 Bharat Reinsurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE, 3. Whether the services provided by a reinsurance broker CESTAT, Hyderabad, decided in Final Order No. to reinsuring company located abroad and insurance A/30877/2020 dated 10.06.2020. company located in India should be considered as export of service or otherwise when the ‘Reinsurance 4. Whether the service provided by M/s. Karnataka Brokerage’ is received in INR? Industrial Areas Development Board under the Facts and Pleadings: M/s. Bharat Reinsurance Brokers provisions of Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the Appellant”) acts Act, 1966 shall be considered as statutory functions as reinsurance broker and arranges for reinsurance of and hence, not leviable to service tax under the Indian insurance companies with overseas reinsurers. The Finance Act, 1994? appellant identifies appropriate reinsurers located abroad Facts and Pleadings: M/s. Karnataka Industrial Areas for the Indian Insurance companies and negotiates terms Development Board (KIADB, for short) is established under of contracts with them. For this service, the Appellant gets Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (“KIAD a commission called ‘Reinsurance Brokerage’ by deducting Act, 1966”). The Appellant performs various statutory/ his brokerage from the premium received from the insuring sovereign functions assigned to it under provisions of KIAD company and passing the balance to the reinsuring company. Act. Accordingly, the Appellant has provided various taxable Services such as Renting of Immovable Property Services, The department argued that the Appellant provides services Construction of Commercial and Residential Complexes, to the Indian Insurance companies for which remuneration Business Support Services, Management, Maintenance or is received in Indian Rupees from foreign insurance Repair Services, Manpower Recruitment and Supply Services, companies and hence, the same does not qualify for export Works Contract Services, etc., to various clients. of service. In this regard, the Department also relied upon Suprasesh General Insurance Services & Brokers Pvt. The case of the department is that Service Tax is leviable Ltd. [2009(13)S.T.R 641 (Tri.-Chen.)] wherein it was on the said taxable services and payable by the Appellant held that reinsurance brokerage received in Indian rupees as per provisions of law, the Appellant did not discharge does not amount to export of services because the amount any service Tax liability thereon. The department alleged has not been received in convertible foreign exchange and that a conjoint reading of the provisions of the KIAD confirmed the service tax on such amounts. Act clearly indicate that Appellant has its own identity as distinct from the State Government and is a body corporate The Appellant submitted that the aforesaid allegation of with perpetual succession and a common seal, and may the department is not sustainable on the count that the sue and be sued in its corporate name. The receipts of the Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of Suprasesh appellant are credited to its own fund and do not go to the General Insurance Services & Brokers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Consolidated Fund of the State. If that be so, the activities CST, Chennai [2016(41)S.T.R 34 (Mad.)] had reversed undertaken by it cannot be construed as functions of the the aforesaid decision of Hon’ble CESTAT in Suprasesh State. The department also alleged that leasing of land by General Insurance Ser vices & Brokers Pvt. Ltd. the appellant on its own account to private individuals on [2009(13)S.T.R 641 (Tri.-Chen.)] and hence, the same is commercial consideration cannot be said to be a sovereign not correct position of law. function at all as normally understood. The department Judgement: The Hon’ble CESTAT relied upon the decision further alleged that the Appellant being an instrumentality of Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of Suprasesh of the State is not entitled to claim immunity from payment General Insurance Services & Brokers Pvt. Ltd. vs. CST, of service tax. The department also alleged that the Chennai [2016(41)S.T.R 34 (Mad.)] to held that in the appellant does not have the power to acquire the land by present case, the Appellant is rendering services to foreign itself and hence the appellant is not empowered to exercise reinsurance company rather than the Indian insurance the power of ‘eminent domain’ and hence it cannot be companies. The Hon’ble CESTAT further held that even regarded as sovereign authority. though the Appellant gets ‘Reinsurance Brokerage’ by The Appellant mainly contended that the appellant is a deducting his brokerage from the premium received from Government undertaking and being a ‘State’ as defined in the insuring company, the same is paid by foreign reinsurer Article 12 of the Constitution of India are not liable to THE CTC NEWS | July 2020 13 www.ctconline.org
pay service tax. The Appellant also relied upon the decision Facts: The Applicant is a food products company involved of the Bombay High Court in the case of CCE, Nashik in preparation & supply of wide range of ready to cook, Vs. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation fresh foods including whole wheat parota and Malabar [2018(9) GSTL 372 (Bom.)] wherein the Bombay High parota. The aforesaid products whole wheat parota and Court has held that no service tax could be demanded Malabar (refined flour) parota, are made up of whole wheat on the charges collected by Maharashtra Industrial flour and refined flour (maida), respectively. The other Development Corporation in terms of the Maharashtra common ingredients are RO purified water, edible vegetable Industrial Development Act, 1961 towards maintenance oil or refined oil, edible common salt and edible vegetable of the industrial areas, as the same is in the nature of fat. The products are not readily consumable (ready to eat), statutory functions performed in terms of the statute. The but need to be heated before consumption. The instant Appellant also submitted that all other functions rendered application pertains to classification of whole-wheat parota by the appellant being incidental, cannot be brought to tax. & Malabar parotta. Further, the Appellant also stated that it is not carrying out commercial activities for a consideration and the amount of The Applicant contended that the product merits deposit collected by the Appellant is based on principles of classification under Chapter heading 1905, under the rationality and reasonableness. product description of ‘Khakhra, plain chapatti or roti” and therefore are taxable at 5% GST, in terms of entry No.99A Judgement: The Hon’ble CESTAT held that a careful of Schedule I to the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax reading of the aforesaid provisions of KIAD Act and (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The Applicant relied on the ruling KIADB Regulations would clearly go to show that the passed by the Advance Ruling Authority, Maharashtra, in the appellant is a State undertaking and creature of a statute case of M/s Signature International Foods India Private to exercise the power of ‘eminent domain’. The appellant Ltd., wherein it was held that paratha & paratha wraps is engaged in discharging statutory functions under an act are covered by the scope of entry 99A of Notification of Legislature viz. KIAD Act, 1966. It is a statutory body 34/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.10.2017. performing statutory functions and exercising statutory powers. Once carrying out the objectives of the Act, then AAR Observations: The AAR observed that the present it cannot be treated as a service provider under the Finance products having description “parota” cannot be classified Act, 1994. Further, Hon’ble CESTAT held that there is no under the heading 1905 the products covered under heading service provider-client relationship so as to warrant the levy 1905 are already prepared or completely cooked products of service tax under the provisions of Finance Act, 1994. and no further process is required to be done on them Appellant has undertaken various activities and functions for consumption and hence they are ready to use food in the State of Karnataka as per the directions of the State preparations whereas in the instant case, the impugned Government given from time to time under the provisions products are admittedly not ready for consumption, but of the Act and hence their activities cannot be considered need to be heated before consumption. The AAR further as taxable service and no service tax can be levied for these observed that the present products having description activities. Hon’ble CESTAT held that in view of the decision “parota” is best classifiable under heading 2106 90 of the Bombay High Court in the case of CCE, Nashik which covers Preparations for use, either directly or after Vs. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation processing (such as cooking, dissolving or boiling in water, [2018(9) GSTL 372 (Bom.)] when the maintenance of milk, etc.), for human consumption, provided that they are industrial area itself is held to be statutory function, then not covered by any other heading of the Nomenclature. the main function of acquisition of law, development of In the instant case, the impugned goods i.e. ‘parota’ are such land into industrial area and allotment of such land on not covered under any other heading and also need to be lease-cum-sale basis by the Appellant would certainly be a processed for human consumption. Therefore, the impugned statutory function and does not attract levy of service tax. goods are rightly classifiable, more specifically, under heading On the same analogy, Hon’ble CESTAT held that other 2106 90. Further, the AAR also observed that as the present functions being incidental cannot be brought into tax net. products having description “parota” are neither khakhra, plain chaptatti nor roti, hence, the benefit of 5% GST, in M/s. Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board terms of entry No.99A of Schedule I to the Notification vs. CCT, CESTAT Bangalore, decided in Final Order No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 is not No. 20357/2020 dated 09.06.2020. applicable. 5. Whether the preparation of Whole Wheat parota and M/s. ID Fresh Food (India) Pvt Ltd, The Authority for Malabar parota be classified under Chapter heading Advance Ruling in Karnataka, GST decided in Advance 1905, attracting GST at the rate of 5%? Ruling No. KAR ADRG 38/2020 Dated: 22.05.2020. Note : THE FULL DECISIONS CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE WEBSITE WWW.CTCONLINE.ORG UNDER SEMINAR PRESENTATIONS - UNREPORTED DECISIONS THE CTC NEWS | July 2020 14 www.ctconline.org
Registered with Registrar of Newspapers for India under R. NO. MAHENG/2015/67505 Posted at Mumbai Patrika Channel Sorting Office, Mumbai-400 001. Postal Registration No. MCS/210/2019-21 Date of Posting : 1st or 2nd of every month Date of Publishing : 1st of Every Month Non-receipt of the CTC News must be notified within one month from the date of publication, which is 1st of Every Month. Printed by Shri Kishor Dwarkadas Vanjara and published by him on behalf of The Chamber of Tax Consultants (owners), 3, Rewa Chambers, Ground Floor, 31, New Marine Lines, Mumbai-400 020 and Printed at The Great Art Printers, 25, S. A. Brelvi Road, Unique House Opp, Apurva Restaurant, Next to Poddar Chambers, Ground Floor, Fort, Mumbai-400 001. and published at The Chamber of Tax Consultants (owners), 3, Rewa Chambers, 31, New Marine Lines, Mumbai 400 020. Editor : Shri Kishor Dwarkadas Vanjara Posted at Mumbai Patrika Channel Sorting To Office-Mumbai 400 001. Date of Publishing 1st of Every Month Date of Posting : 1st or 2nd July, 2020 If undelivered, please return to : THE CHAMBER OF TAX CONSULTANTS 3, Rewa Chambers, Ground Floor, 31 New Marine Lines, Mumbai 400 020 Tel.: 2200 1787 / 2209 0423 / 2200 2455 E-mail: office@ctconline.org l Visit us at: www.ctconline.org WhatsApp No.: 9004945579 FB Page: https://www.facebook.com/ctcconnect Follow us on: THE CTC NEWS | July 2020 15 www.ctconline.org
You can also read