THE BEST TEACHING MODALITY? - Simulation, Live tissue, Augmented Reality Best Training? - Special Operations Medical ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
6/21/2018 THE BEST TEACHING MODALITY? Simulation, Live tissue, Augmented Reality THE EVIDENCE MAJOR TANIA ROGERSON AUSTRALIAN ARMY Best Training? • Treating real trauma patients in the field under supervision 1
6/21/2018 Next best thing? • Civilian hospitals • Cadavers • Simulators • Live Tissue (LTT) LTT or Simulation - the evidence? • Research difficult to perform. • Ideal measurement of outcome - performance on actual human casualties • Measurement of long term impact of training requires time • Technological developments of simulation 2
6/21/2018 Evaluating teaching programs 1994 Kirkpatrick • Four levels 1. Reaction 2. Learning 3. Behaviour 4. Results • Am Surg 2011;77(5) • Randomised 24 Airmen to LTT or Sim (Trauma MAN) • CRIC and chest tube, then tested on cadavers. • LTT trained group quicker to complete procedures but not statistically significant (may not be the best outcome indicator.) • Small study due to cost of cadavers 3
6/21/2018 • J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015, 79(4) • 20 medics randomised LTT Swine/ Simulator (CAESAR) • No significant difference in performance of 5 TCCC procedures • Participants felt LTT was better for cric, needle decompression, arterial wound packing and IO. No difference for TQ – Realistic tissue handling – Stress associated with bleeding live models • Medics preferred the anatomic accuracy of simulators for TQ. • Training on LTT - more realistic stress response • May provide medics training on how to control their own stress 4
6/21/2018 • Surgery 2016 Oct 160(4) • 742 civilian/military medics randomised to LTT/sim (TraumaFX) • Self reporting, cognitive & psychomotor performance, affective response (electrodermal activity) • 12 procedures (CRIC, thoracostomy, IO, chest seal, amputation management) • No statistical difference with self reporting/ psychomotor response, but majority thought LTT better for 7 of the 12 procedures (chest seal and TQ equivalent) • All thought LTT should be included in training, 96% thought Simulation had a role • Novices showed no benefit from LTT but some benefit from Simulation. Benefits of LTT may be better in the experienced practitioner • Affective response greater in LTT 5
6/21/2018 • Survey of 38 combat medics who had deployed to AFG, 89% having done life saving interventions • Compared LTT/Simulation training • Self perceived confidence higher in LTT group and almost all felt LTT should be part of training • University of Minnesota Combat Casualty Training Consortium • 2017 • 7 procedures • 559 subjects 6
6/21/2018 UMN CCTC • No difference in mannikin vs LTT for Junctional haemorrhage, TQ, Chest seal, NPA, needle decompression • May be a role for LTT for chest tube and CRIC Accuracy of crico- thyroidotomy performed in canine and human cadaver models during surgical skills training. McCarthy MC, Ranzinger MR, Nolan DJ J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:627-9. • 47 surgical airways in canines and human cadavers • 30% misplaced in canine model compared to 3.6% in human cadavers 7
6/21/2018 LTT or Simulation? • Few studies, overall quality low • Studies focused on the lowest level of learning outcomes. • Multiple types of learners, different simulators and LTT models, small sample sizes, lack of controls and blinding, lack of validity and reliability data. • No studies comparing LTT models with each other • Insufficient evidence to determine best practice Research Questions • Which model translates to success on a real patient? • Skill retention? • Frequency of re-training? 8
6/21/2018 Google Glass 2012 CPU creates prism display above the right eye Camera Speakers Microphone Microsoft Hololens 2016 Semitransparent lenses generate colour holograms Sensors to ensure holograms are relevantly placed in the real environment. 11
6/21/2018 Virtual Reality Playstation VR • Fully immersive computer simulated environment • Accelerometers, sensors • Well established in aviation industries Samsung Google Oculus Rift HTC Vive Daydream Gear VR Haptics 12
6/21/2018 Virtual simulation • Oculus VR and Children's Hospital Los Angeles • Paediatric trauma situations • Recreate paramedics handing over, monitors, team discussions, distraught parents. Has to render full representation of the construct Cost and technical difficulties. Trauma Management 13
6/21/2018 14
6/21/2018 Augmented Reality US Army Research Laboratory • Virtual scenarios • Land/Air/Sea/Space synthetic environment • Joint/ Interagency partners • Dense urban areas with large population • Provide realism Visualising anatomy • 3D better than static lecture slides, textbooks. Allows understanding spacial relationships • Limited access to cadavers 15
6/21/2018 Vimidex VR Ultrasound simulator 16
6/21/2018 • Anat Sci Educ 10:549-559 (2017) • Compared anatomy learning between VR, AR and Tablet • Looked at whether the novel technology was distracting or difficult to use • All three modalities equally effective • Some side effects Research in AR • Laparoscopic surgical training • Neurosurgical procedures • Training Echocardiography 17
6/21/2018 • 95 Surgical residents using VR for Le Fort Osteotomy • Required some time for familiarity with the technology • Appreciated the interactive 360 environment, 3D interaction with anatomy and close up visualisation of the surgery. • First year residents showed most significant improvement in their confidence • Paramedic wearing Google Glass during disaster triage, physician via telepresence • Allow receiving hospital to conduct secondary triage • Hardware limitations - need for wifi/bluetooth, video streaming, microphone background noise • Training in Disaster Medicine 18
6/21/2018 • 14 paramedics used Google Glass during mock disaster exercise for telemedicine • Questionnaire – 13 rated the technology as very useful/extremely useful – 9 rated easy/very easy to use – 11 felt that it would minimally impede their duties • Improving telemedicine - provide expert assistance closer to the point of injury • Remote surgeon can see what the practitioner sees, can annotate onto the operating field using tablet • Tablet avoids the need for bulky headwear 19
6/21/2018 System for Telemonitoring with Augmented Reality STAR AR Research • Research to date focused on the development, usability and initial implementation of AR as a learning tool • Most look at particular technical skills • Research doesn’t confirm which type of virtual training is most effective or how training should best be organised • True value in training medicine unknown • Impact on society and medical education in next 5 years 20
6/21/2018 Best modality? Best training method involves care of real trauma casualties - EXPERIENCE Multimodal Training • Neither LTT nor Simulation is complete solution • Lectures, Problem based learning, Hospital placements • Simulation – Mannikins/ Part Task Trainers - Skills training, Resus team – Role Players - Mass casualty, Different evac platforms, PFC • LTT - Experienced practitioners, Procedural skills, Stressful training • Exact anatomy of humans can vary so may be prudent to practice on multiple models • AR 21
6/21/2018 References Barnes SL, Bukoski A, Kerby JD, et al. Live tissue versus simulation training for emergency procedures: is simulation ready to replace live tissue? Surgery 2016;160:997–1007. Block E, Lottenberg L, Flint L, Jakobsen J, Liebnitzky D: Use of a human patient simulator for the advanced trauma life support course. Am Surg 2002; 68(7): 648–51 Barsom, Graafland, M. P. Schijven Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training Surg Endosc (2016) 30:4174–4183 da Luz LT, Nascimento B, Tien H, Kim MJ, Nathens AB, Vlachos S, Glassberg E: Current use of live tissue training in trauma: a descriptive systematic review. Can J Surg 2015; 58(3 Suppl 3): S125–34. Gerhardt RT, Hermstad EL, Oakes M, Wiegert RS, Oliver J: An experi- mental predeployment training program improves self-reported patient treatment confidence and preparedness of army combat medics. Prehosp Emerg Care 2008; 12(3): 359–65 Hall AB: Randomized objective comparison of live tissue training versus simulators for emergency procedures. Am Surg 2011; 77(5): 561–5. Iverson K, Riojas R, Sharon D, Hall AB. Objective comparison of animal training versus artificial simulation for initial cricothyroidotomy training. A mSurg 2015;81:515–8. Kamphuis C, Barsom E, Schijven, M, Noor C Augmented reality in medical education Perspect Med Educ (2014) 3:300–311 Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD: Evaluating Training Programs. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., 1994 McCarthy MC, Ranzinger MR, Nolan DJ, et al. Accuracy of crico- thyroidotomy performed in canine and human cadaver models during surgical skills training. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:627-9. Savage EC, Tenn C, Vartanian O, et al: A comparison of live tissue train- ing and high-fidelity patient simulator: a pilot study in battlefield trauma training. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015; 79: S157–63 Sohn VY, Miller JP, Koeller CA, et al. From the combat medic to the forward surgical team: the Madigan model for improving trauma readiness of brigade combat teams fighting the global war on terror. J Surg Res 2007;138:25-31. Sweet R, Hart D, McClellan M, et al: Priming the pump: improvement in performance of life-saving airway, breathing and hemorrhage skills after pretesting antraining on a simulator versus live tissue: an anal- ysis of critical failures [abstract]. Proceedings of the 2015 annual meeting of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine; 2015 May 12–15; San Diego, CA. Abstract nr 50 Zhu et al. (2014), Augmented reality in healthcare education: an integrative review. PeerJ 2:e469; DOI 10.7717/peerj.469 Wang, Parsons, Stone-McLean, Rogers, Boyd, Hoover, Meruvia-Pastor, Gong, Smith Augmented Reality as a Telemedicine Platform for Remote PRoecural Training . Sensors 2017 17,2294 22
You can also read