Sustainable mobility challenges for the transition targets - Emanuele Proia ASSTRA
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Sustainable mobility challenges
for the transition targets
Current and future challenges to Energy Security – 2nd AIEE Energy Symposium
Roma – Saturday, November 4, 2017
Emanuele Proia‐ ASSTRA
ASSTRA: WHO WE ARE
ASSTRA represents a network of 136 companies running urban, suburban and
extraurban public transport services on:
√ Buses, √ Tramway, √ Trolleybuses, √ Metropolitan railway, √ Light rail (Except those
operated by Trenitalia S.p.A.),
√ Waterborne transport, √ Tourist and school services, √ Parking areas, √ Towing
away of vehicles.
www.asstra.it
ASSTRA: WHAT IT DOES
The Association REPRESENTS THE NEEDS OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT OPERATORS and
defends their interests in front of Institutions, at national and European level.
PROMOTES local public OFFERS technical advice
transport as the way to on social, legal,
sustainability, fostering administrative, financial,
awareness on its and innovation fields
environmental, social and
economic values.
COLLECTS data to assure
DEFENDS the rights and the the punctual analysis of
interests of its Members the sector
BRINGS relevant sector stakeholders together to exchange
ideas and find solutions, being a recognized platform for
knowledge sharing and business networking
Urban Mobility in Italy
Motorization rate
(Cars per 100 inhabitants)
65 61
58 55
54 53 53
49 49 49 47 47 47 46
44 42 41
Source: 14° Rapporto sulla mobilità in Italia, Roma 19 aprile 2017 (ISFORT, ANAV, ASSTRA)
50 61
5 cars cars ROME: 70.7 CARS PER 100 INHABITANTS
cars
in in EUROPE AVERAGE: 40 CARS PER INHABITANTS
in
1961 1991 BERLIN: 35, MADRID: 32; ….
2014
Urban Mobility in Italy
The Modal split
Private car Motor bike Public transport
2016 81,1% 5,3% 13,6%
2015 81,6% 6,5% 11,9%
2008 79,5% 8,0% 12,6%
Source: 14° Rapporto sulla mobilità in Italia, Roma 19 aprile 2017 (ISFORT, ANAV, ASSTRA)
PT MODAL SPLIT
6
THE ITALIAN INFRASTRUCTURAL GAP
Km rete ferroviaria suburbana/milioni
di abitanti (Anno 2015; Km)
25,2 26,4 30,8
10,7 10,9
Italia Francia Germania Regno Spagna
Unito
Km rete tram/milioni di abitanti (Anno 2015; Km rete metropolitana/milioni di abitanti
Km) (Anno 2015; Km)
23,37 12,5
10,5
7,8
11,07 3,8 5,5
3,65 5,05 5,34
Italia Francia Germania Regno Spagna
Regno Unito Spagna Italia Francia Germania
Unito
Fonti: Investire nel TPL, ASSTRA‐CdP, gennaio 2017.
7
PT in Italy (2015)
Average age of fleet (Bus)
[Source: “Investire nel trasporto pubblico – Mezzi e reti per la mobilità” ‐ ASSTRA e CDP – 2017 ]
PT in Europe (2015)
Average age of fleet (Bus)
INFRASTRUCTURAL
11,4 GAP RESPECT TO
OTHER MAIN
8,0 7,8 7,6 6,9 EUROPEAN
COUNTRIES ALWAYS
INCREASES MORE.
ITALIA SPAGNA FRANCIA REGNO UNITO GERMANIA
[Source: “Investire nel trasporto pubblico – Mezzi e reti per la mobilità” ‐ ASSTRA e CDP – 2017 ]
PT in Italy (2015)
The source for energy ‐ Bus (Urban service, 2015)
Hybrid
Electric 1%
1%
CNG
27% RECENT TENDERS IN
BERGAMO, MILANO
AND TORINO HAVE
INCREASED
CONSISTENTLY THE
NUMBERS OF FULL
ELECTRIC BUSES (ABOUT
Diesel 60 VEHICLES)
71%
[Source: “Investire nel trasporto pubblico – Mezzi e reti per la mobilità” ‐ ASSTRA e CDP – 2017 ]
10PT in Italy (2015)
Level of emission ‐ Bus (Urban service, 2015)
Pre Euro 0, Euro I
Euro 0 2%
3%
EEV Euro II
26% 22%
Euro VI
8%
Euro III
Euro V 21%
14% Euro IV
4%
[Source: “Investire nel trasporto pubblico – Mezzi e reti per la mobilità” ‐ ASSTRA e CDP – 2017 ]
11WHY IT IS NECESSARY TO INTERVENE IN PT
12Investing in Public Transportation Provides
Economic Growth and new jobs opportunities
5,6 mld € 137 mila nuove unità di
3,9 mld € di di valore
lavoro annue
investimenti fino al 2033 aggiunto annuo (+0,3% PIL) (+0,6% occupazione)
[Source: “Investire nel trasporto pubblico – Mezzi e reti per la mobilità” ‐
ASSTRA e CDP – 2017 ]
13PT Reduces the congestion and fuel consumption To transport 10.000 passengers Fonte: UITP ‐ Volvo Bus Corporation, MAN Truck & Bus AG, and UITP Bus Committee © 2015
PT Reduces the congestion and emissions
BUS AUTO var
g/km pass g/km pass %
NMVOC 0,041 0,401 +878%
CO 0,168 3,093 +1.741%
CO2 53,328 167,252 +213,6% CO2 CAR = 3 * BUS CO2
PM10 0,021 0,033 +57,1%
PM2,5 0,019 0,027 +42,1%
Source: 14° Rapporto sulla mobilità in Italia, Roma 19 aprile 2017 (ISFORT, ANAV, ASSTRA)
Fonte: UITPPT saves money and increase property values
Family monthly expenditure for transport (Italia
2015;%) ‐ ISTAT
Servizi di Acquisto mezzi
trasporto trasposto
9% 21%
Esercizio mezzi
trasporto
70%
Private car family monthy expenditure : 260 Euro
PT family monthy expenditure : 23 Euro
Residential property values performed 42 percent
better on average if they were located near public
transportation with high‐frequency service.Expecially in Italy
17SOLUTIONS
• To promote the modal shift towards collective and
sustainable mobility systems through the
implementation of a new and modern national
transport plan;
• Promote an expansive investment policy for the
renwal of fleet and construction of new rail, tram an
metro lines;
• Bridging the infrastructure gap of collective mobility
systems with the aim to satisfy the needs of current
and potential demand (quality, quantity, integration
of the offer).
18SOLUTIONS
Increase commercial speed even through new reserved lanes
19SOLUTIONS
• Introduce the indexing the National Transport Fund.
The indexing of the inflative dynamics would avoid
the deterioration of the real value of the fund over
the years;
• Driving a process of industrialization of the TPL
sector through the modernisation of the regulatory
framework, an impetus towards greater and better
competition ;
• Implement the principle of standard costs as soon
as possible.
20Thanks for your attention
21You can also read
