SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES? CONFLICTING TARGETS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS - JUSER

Page created by Shirley Lawson
 
CONTINUE READING
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES? CONFLICTING TARGETS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS - JUSER
Forschungszentrum Jülich / Sascha Kreklau

Sustainable energy technologies? Conflicting targets
and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
Christina Wulf∣ 1 st of July 2022
Institute of Energy and Climate Research: Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK -STE)
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES? CONFLICTING TARGETS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS - JUSER
Introducing myself
◼ Postdoc at the Institute of Energy and Climate Research –
 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)
◼ Research fields:
 − Life Cycle (Sustainability) Assessment
 − Multi-Criteria Decision-Analysis
 − Specialized in hydrogen energy systems
◼ Background

 − PhD in Energy and Environmental Engineering from the
 Hamburg University of Technology

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 2
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES? CONFLICTING TARGETS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS - JUSER
Agenda

 1 Introduction Forschungszentrum Jülich and IEK-STE

 2 Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

 3 Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment and the Sustainable Development Goals

 4 Case study

 5 Results

 6 Conclusions

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 3
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES? CONFLICTING TARGETS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS - JUSER
Jülich - Chihuahua

 9000 km

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 4
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES? CONFLICTING TARGETS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS - JUSER
At first glance

 Around 6800 employees

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 5
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES? CONFLICTING TARGETS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS - JUSER
Page 6
04.07.2022

 At first glance

 Research priorities:
 information, energy,
 bioeconomy

 Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 6
 Jülich, 1st of July 2022
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES? CONFLICTING TARGETS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS - JUSER
Page 7
04.07.2022

 We love research
 WE

 2650
 scientists

 Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 7
 Jülich, 1st of July 2022
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES? CONFLICTING TARGETS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS - JUSER
Page 8
04.07.2022

 We love research
 WE

 1500
 people in technical
 and laboratory
 professions

 Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 8
 Jülich, 1st of July 2022
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES? CONFLICTING TARGETS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS - JUSER
Page 9
04.07.2022

 We love research
 WE

 850
 colleagues in the
 field of
 administration

 Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 9
 Jülich, 1st of July 2022
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES? CONFLICTING TARGETS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS - JUSER
Page 10
04.07.2022

 We work Hand in Hand
 WE

 International:

 670 visiting scientists
 from 62 countries and

 312 postdocs,
 45 % of them from abroad

 1100 doctoral researchers,
 44 % of them from abroad

 Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 10
 Jülich, 1st of July 2022
Page 11
04.07.2022

 We work Hand in Hand
 WE

 Interdisciplinary:

 physics,
 computer science,
 biology,
 medicine,
 chemistry,
 engineering,
 neuroscience,
 mathematics,
 geology,
 social sciences
 (…)

 Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 11
 Jülich, 1st of July 2022
Institute of Energy and Climate Research
System analysis and technology evaluation (IEK-STE)

 Energy system

 Energy systems and the Energy technologies and
 Socio-technical system Energy infrastructures
 land-water-energy nexus life cycles

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 12
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
Interdisciplinary team at IEK-STE

 Background
 ▪ Physicists

 ▪ Engineers

 ▪ Economists

 ▪ Social scientists

 ▪ Political scientists

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 13
Jülich, 1st of July 2022 00. Monat 2017 Seite 13
Personnel composition at IEK-STE

 Composition
 ▪ Ca. 40 employees
 ▪ Ca. 38% women
 ▪ Researchers: Senior scientists, Post-
 docs, PhDs, Master students, interns
 ▪ Diverse nationalities (China, Germany,
 Italy, Morocco, Paraguay, United
 Kingdom, Pakistan, USA)

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 14
Jülich, 1st of July 2022 00. Monat 2017 Seite 14
Method and Models

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 15
Jülich, 1st of July 2022 00. Monat 2017 Seite 15
Technology assessment as part of system assessment

 Sustainability
 Social

 Economy

 Environment
 Life Cycle Sustainability
 Assessment
Benitez, A., Wulf, C., de Palmenaer, A., Lengersdorf, M., Röding, T., Grube, T., Robinius, M., Stolten, D., Kuckshinrichs, W., 2021. Ecological
assessment of fuel cell electric vehicles with special focus on type IV carbon fiber hydrogen tank. Journal of Cleaner Production 278, 123277.

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 16
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
Conflicting targets in sustainability assessment
◼ Construction of LNG terminals in Germany

 − Diversification of energy supply → security of energy supply
 − Causes local environmental damage
 − High investment costs
◼ Electricity generation from wind power

 − Low greenhouse gas emissions Source: Marco Sabadin/AFP

 − Local source of energy
 − Disturbance of residence through moving shadows and noise
 − Impact on birds and bats
 − Higher demand of metal resources

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 17
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
Comparing assessment
◼ Multi-Criteria Decision-Analysis (MCDA)
 − Guidance to find compromise in case of conflicting targets
 − Mathematical methods for the assessment of alternatives (products, technologies,
 strategies etc.)
 − Aggregation of single criteria to make a recommendation
◼ Simplest form: Weighted sum
◼ = σ =1 ∗ 
 − wi: weighting factor of criterion i
 − ai: result of criterion i
 − ASus: Sustainability index

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 18
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
MCDA approach
 Goal and problem defintion
Based on Haase, M., Baumann, M., Wulf, C., Rösch, C., Zapp, P., 2021.

 Selection of alternatives
Technikfolgenabschätzung, Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp. 306-320.
Multikriterielle Analysen zur Entscheidungsunterstützung in der

 Iterative
 process Identification of criteria
 Methods for analysis
 Stakeholder

 Selection of MCDA method • Literature research
 • Life Cycle
 Assessment
 Aggregation/quantification of • Interviews
 Weighting of criteria
 criteria by different methods • Survey
 • Techno-economic
 Results models
 • Recommendations • Optimizations
 • Ranking of alternatives • …
 • Analysis of the decision process
 • Sensitivity analysis

 Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 19
 Jülich, 1st of July 2022
Selection of MCDA method
◼ Weighted sum
 − Indicator compensation
 − Easy to perform, comprehensible for outsiders
 − Additional normalization step is necessary
◼ TOPSIS - Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal
 Solution
 − Toned down compensation of indicators
 − More complex, but still illustrative
 − Problem: Rank reversal
◼ PROMETHEE - Preference Ranking Organisation Method for

 Source: www.mcda.it
 Enrichment Evaluation
 − Outranking
 − Complex, results hard to understand for outsiders
 − Robust results
Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 20
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
Weighting of criteria
◼ Equal weighting
 − Every criteria is equally important
 − Within a hierarchy: Each cluster/group is equally important, within each cluster all criteria
 are equally important
◼ Stakeholder integration
 − Survey among experts/users/neighbours/decision makers
 − Different methods for the elicitation of weighting factors
 ▪ AHP: Analytical Hierarchy Process
 ▪ SMART: Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique
 ▪…
 − Methods have different degree of complexity: Selection depends on number of criteria
 and time/money for the survey
Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 21
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment

 Social

 Economy

 Environment

 Benitez, A., Wulf, C., de Palmenaer, A., Lengersdorf, M., Röding, T., Grube, T., Robinius, M., Stolten, D., Kuckshinrichs, W., 2021.
 Ecological assessment of fuel cell electric vehicles with special focus on type IV carbon fiber hydrogen tank. Journal of Cleaner
 Production 278, 123277.

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 22
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
Approach Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment

 Indicator
 SDGs
 Selection

 LCA S-LCA LCC

 Weighting
 Thresholds PROMETHEE Factors

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 23
Jülich, 1st of July 2022 IEK-STE
LCSA indicator selection based on SDGs

 Fair salary
 Levelized cost of hydrogen Abiotic resource depletion
 Unemployment

 Human toxicity, cancer + non-cancer
 Ionizing radiation Assoc. + barg. rights
 Ozone depletion Child labour, total
 Particulate matter Fair salary Climate change
 Photochemical ozone creation Goods produced by forced labour
 Health expenditure Frequency of forced labour
 Safety measures Social security expenditures
 Sanitation coverage Trade unionism
 Social security expenditures Trafficking in persons Ecotoxcity, fw.
 Violations of employment laws Eutrophication, fw
 Illiteracy, total Weekly hours of work per employee Eutrophication, marine
 Youth illiteracy, total Net present value
 Profitability index

 Acidification
 Marginal cost
 Women in the sectoral labour force Eutrophication, terrestrial
 Gender wage gap

 Assoc. + barg. rights
 Indigenous rights Trade unionism
 Drinking water coverage
 Violations of employment laws
 Sanitation coverage
 and regulations

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 24
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
Case study
Comparison of hydrogen production with an alkaline water electrolyzer in three different
countries
◼ Industrial hydrogen production by alkaline
 water electrolysis
◼ Comparison of Germany, Spain and Austria
 as production sites → different structures of
 electricity generation
◼ Same electrolyzer for all sites
◼ 1 kg hydrogen as functional unit
 Source: FZJ
◼ Main inputs electricity and water

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 25
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
Results case study
Environment

 60
 Environmental impact per kg H2

 50

 40

 30

 20

 10

 0
 A mMole CC kg ET f EP f 10 EP m g N- EP t 10 HT c HT c 100 IR 100 Bq OD ng PM 100 POF g RD 10 mg PED 10 Water m³
 H+ eq. CO2-eq CTUe mg P eq eq mMole N nCTUh nCTUh U235 eq CFC-11 mg NMVOC Sb-eq kJ world eq.
 eq. eq PM2.5-Eq
 Germany Austria Spain

 Wulf, C., J. Werker, P. Zapp, A. Schreiber, H. Schlör, and W. Kuckshinrichs. 2018. Sustainable Development Goals as a Guideline for Indicator Selection in Life
 Cycle Sustainability Assessment. Procedia CIRP 69: 59-65.

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 26
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
Results case study
Social

 40
 med. risk hours per kg H2

 35
 30
 25
 20
 15
 10
 5
 0

 Germany Austria Spain

 Werker, J., Wulf, C., Zapp, P., 2019. Working conditions in hydrogen production: A social life cycle assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology 23(5), 1052-1061.

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 27
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
Results case study
Economy Germany Austria Spain
 10

 0
 Economic impact per kg H2

 -10

 -20

 -30

 -40

 -50

 -60
 Levelized cost of hydrogen Net present value Profitability index Marginal cost
 €2015/kg H2 m€2015/kg H2 €2015/kg H2
 Kuckshinrichs, W., T. Ketelaer, and J. C. Koj. 2017. Economic Analysis of Improved Alkaline Water Electrolysis. Frontiers in Energy Research 5(1).

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 28
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
PROMETHEE Results
 SDG Weighting Dimension Weighting
 0.6 0.6

 0.5 0.5

 0.4 0.4

 0.3 0.3
 Outranking flow Φ

 Outranking flow Φ
 0.2 0.2

 0.1 0.1

 0 0
 DE AT ES DE AT ES
 -0.1 -0.1

 -0.2 -0.2

 -0.3 -0.3

 -0.4 -0.4
 Φ+ Φ- Φnet Φ+ Φ- Φnet

 Wulf, C., Zapp, P., Schreiber, A., Kuckshinrichs, W., 2022. Integrated Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Hydrogen Production as a Showcase for an Emerging
 Methodology, in: Klos, Z.S., Kalkowska, J., Kasprzak, J. (Eds.), Towards a Sustainable Future - Life Cycle Management: Challenges and Prospects. Springer
 International Publishing, Cham, pp. 97-106.

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 29
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
Conclusions
◼ Sustainability strongly depends on the viewpoint and the integrated stakeholders

◼ MCDA methods help to guide and quantify through an assessment process with conflicting
 targets and multiple stakeholders

◼ Example illustrates: Classification according to SDGs results different recommendation
 than classification according to sustainability dimensions

◼ Limitations to SDG approach: SDGs do not cover corruption and stakeholder group
 consumers

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 30
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
Forschungszentrum Jülich / Sascha Kreklau

Questions?

Christina Wulf∣ c.wulf@fz-juelich.de
Institute of Energy and Climate Research: Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK -STE)
Backup

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 32
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
PROMETHEE
◼ Outranking verschiedener Optionen - kein vollständiger
 Ausgleich zwischen den Indikatoren
◼ Instrument zur Unterstützung der Entscheidungsfindung
 durch Aufdeckung der Konflikte und Synergien des Problems
 1
◼ Lineare Präferenz mit Indifferenzschwelle für die
 Präferenzfunktion
◼ Indifferenzschwelle q = 5 % von xmin
◼ Präferenzschwelle p = 10 % von xmin 0

 Wulf, C., Werker, J., Zapp, P., Schreiber, A., and Kuckshinrichs, W. (2018). "Application of multi-criteria decision-analysis methods for Life Cycle Sustainability
 Assessment of hydrogen production", in: International Sustainable Production and Consumption Conference. (Manchester).

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 33
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
PROMETHEE II
◼ Aufsummieren aller Einzelvergleiche
 
 , = ෍ ∗ , 
 =1
◼ Gewichtung kann hinzugefügt werden

 DE AT ES
 DE 0 0 0,66
 AT 0,66 0 1
 ES 0,33 0 0

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 34
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
PROMETHEE II
◼ Aufsummieren aller Einzelvergleiche
 
 , = ෍ ∗ , 
 =1

◼ Gewichtung kann hinzugefügt werden
◼ Berechnung der Aus- und Eingangsflüsse Φ+ und Φ-
 1 1 
Φ + = ෍ , Φ − = ෍ , DE AT ES Φ+
 − 1 =1 − 1 =1
 DE 0 0 0,66 0,33
 AT 0,66 0 1 0,83
 ES 0,33 0 0 0,17
 1.0 Φ- 0,50 0 0,83

 0.0
 DE AT ES
 -1.0
 Phi + Phi - Phi netto

Christina Wulf| Seminario CIMAV Slide 35
Jülich, 1st of July 2022
You can also read