Navigating Quebec Property Assessments with MNP

Page created by Sergio Marshall
 
CONTINUE READING
Navigating Quebec Property Assessments with MNP
Navigating Quebec Property
Assessments with MNP
Navigating Quebec Property Assessments with MNP
Navigating Quebec Property Assessments with MNP

     MNP’s Property Tax Services (PTS) integrates industry-leading property tax expertise with the thorough management of
     assessment appeal and processes across major Canadian municipalities.

     The PTS team’s in-depth knowledge coupled with leading edge resources and well-established relationships with municipal
     decision makers distinguishes MNP as a leader in the property tax service industry.

Triennial property assessment details

                       2020/2021/2022                             2021/2022/2023                               2022/2023/2024
                       Triennial Rolls for the Entire Island      Triennial Rolls                              Triennial Rolls
                       of Montreal

                       City of Montreal and 15 additional         Outaouais and Eastern Townships              Quebec City, Laval and South Shore
                       municipalities on the Island of Montreal                                                of Montreal

 Notice Mailed:        Fall 2019                                  Fall 2020                                    Fall 2021

 Appeal Deadline:      April 30, 2020                             April 30, 2021                               April 30, 2022

 Taxation Years:       2020/2021/2022                             2021/2022/2023                               2022/2023/2024

 Base Year:            (Reference date): July 1, 2018             (Reference date): July 1, 2019               (Reference date): July 1, 2020

 Assessment Cycle:     Three-year cycle with right of appeal      Three-year cycle with right of appeal only   Three-year cycle with right of appeal only
                       only within first four months of first     within first four months of first taxation   within first four months of first taxation
                       taxation year of each new roll             year                                         year of each new cycle

 Equity Provisions:    No                                         No                                           No

                       2023/2024/2025                             2024/2025/2026                               2025/2026/2027
                       Triennial Rolls for the Entire Island      Triennial Rolls                              Triennial Rolls
                       of Montreal

                       City of Montreal and 15 additional mu-     Outaouais and Eastern Townships              Quebec City, Laval and South Shore of
                       nicipalities on the Island of Montreal                                                  Montreal

 Notice Mailed:        Fall 2022                                  Fall 2023                                    Fall 2024

 Appeal Deadline:      April 30, 2023                             April 30, 2024                               April 30, 2025

 Taxation Years:       2023/2024/2025                             2024/2025/2026                               2025/2026/2027

 Base Year:            (Reference date): July 1, 2021             (Reference date): July 1, 2022               (Reference date): July 1, 2023

 Assessment Cycle:     Three-year cycle with right of appeal      Three-year cycle with right of appeal only   Three-year cycle with right of appeal only
                       only within first four months of first     within first four months of first taxation   within first four months of first taxation
                       taxation year of each new roll             year                                         year of each new cycle

 Equity Provisions:    No                                         No                                           No

There are no province-wide reassessments in Quebec. Instead, there are three assessment cycles covering three geographic regions for
three-year assessment cycles.

NAVIGATING QUEBEC PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS WITH MNP
PRE‐ROLL

 Pre-roll discussions with the assessors often take place for large properties. For portfolio owners, these are usually several months
 before the deposit of each new roll. For Montreal’s 2020 triennial roll, these discussions may start as early as the spring / summer
 of 2019 and last into the fall.

 CHANGES ON THE HORIZON

 A provincial regulation will amend and supplement many of the current assessment processes. Currently, the regulation and its
 content has not been shared with the industry, but it is expected to impact the following procedures:
    • How appeals are filed – electronic versus the traditional paper-based application;
    • The level of disclosure by the appellant required at the time of filing;
 This regulation has passed its first reading and set for the second reading in either October or November. The intent is for this to
 pass so it can be implemented in time for the 2020 roll (Montreal’s re-assessment).

 CERTIFICATE OF MODIFICATION

 Like other jurisdictions, the Quebec assessor has the right to amend and update an assessment to reflect any physical change to
 a property. This is done through a Certificate of Modification.
 Certificates of Modification are effective as of the date of completion of the work or change and rely on city-issued permits.
 Certificates can be contested by filing an Application for Review within 60 days of the sending of the certificate. However, if the
 original assessment was not challenged, only the value of the certificate is open to the review.

 TRANSPARENCY

 Unlike most jurisdictions, there is a lack of clarity to assessment dealing in Quebec. There is no online service to file a request
 for review or an appeal; or to see an appeal’s status. There is no subscription-based portal to obtain copies of the assessor’s
 working papers.
 Everything is still based on paper filings and in-person meetings when documentation is needed.

 ADVOCATE AND EXPERT

 As the legal world tightens the rules on the separation of the advocate and the expert, Quebec has been functioning in that
 context since the late 1980s.
 With less informal dealings after a review has been requested or an appeal has been filed, the use of a lawyer protects the expert
 by keeping them at arm’s-length in the process. The use of a lawyer serves to file any review or motion documents, formalize any
 request for information, meetings or any other procedures required during the review period.
 Also, a title search to match owners names against what is indicated on the notice of assessment is crucial to ensuring any
 request for review or motion to the TAQ are not disqualified.
 Further, the unauthorized practice of law (UPL) is more prevalent in Quebec than any other province. The reason being is Quebec
 is subject to civil law while the remaining provinces follow common law rules and practices.
 Since 2014, we have seen an increase number of reviews / motions being disqualified because it was filed by a consultant. Also,
 we have seen a similar trend with settlement offers that are being executed by the consultant instead of a lawyer or the owner
 and the municipality does not honour the settlement.
 Since there is no paralegal status in Quebec, the recommended approach is to have a lawyer act in an administrative capacity by
 filing the proper documentation and managing the necessary correspondence.

NAVIGATING QUEBEC PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS WITH MNP
PRE‐ROLL

 Pre-roll discussions with the assessors often take place for large properties. For portfolio owners, these are usually several months
 before the deposit of each new roll. For Montreal’s 2020 triennial roll, these discussions may start as early as the spring / summer
 of 2019 and last into the fall.

 CHANGES ON THE HORIZON

 A provincial regulation will amend and supplement many of the current assessment processes. Currently, the regulation and its
 content has not been shared with the industry, but it is expected to impact the following procedures:
    • How appeals are filed – electronic versus the traditional paper-based application;
    • The level of disclosure by the appellant required at the time of filing;
 This regulation has passed its first reading and set for the second reading in either October or November. The intent is for this to
 pass so it can be implemented in time for the 2020 roll (Montreal’s re-assessment).

 CERTIFICATE OF MODIFICATION

 Like other jurisdictions, the Quebec assessor has the right to amend and update an assessment to reflect any physical change to
 a property. This is done through a Certificate of Modification.
 Certificates of Modification are effective as of the date of completion of the work or change and rely on city-issued permits.
 Certificates can be contested by filing an Application for Review within 60 days of the sending of the certificate. However, if the
 original assessment was not challenged, only the value of the certificate is open to the review.

 TRANSPARENCY

 Unlike most jurisdictions, there is a lack of clarity to assessment dealing in Quebec. There is no online service to file a request
 for review or an appeal; or to see an appeal’s status. There is no subscription-based portal to obtain copies of the assessor’s
 working papers.
 Everything is still based on paper filings and in-person meetings when documentation is needed.

 ADVOCATE AND EXPERT

 As the legal world tightens the rules on the separation of the advocate and the expert, Quebec has been functioning in that
 context since the late 1980s.
 With less informal dealings after a review has been requested or an appeal has been filed, the use of a lawyer protects the expert
 by keeping them at arm’s-length in the process. The use of a lawyer serves to file any review or motion documents, formalize any
 request for information, meetings or any other procedures required during the review period.
 Also, a title search to match owners names against what is indicated on the notice of assessment is crucial to ensuring any
 request for review or motion to the TAQ are not disqualified.
 Further, the unauthorized practice of law (UPL) is more prevalent in Quebec than any other province. The reason being is Quebec
 is subject to civil law while the remaining provinces follow common law rules and practices.
 Since 2014, we have seen an increase number of reviews / motions being disqualified because it was filed by a consultant. Also,
 we have seen a similar trend with settlement offers that are being executed by the consultant instead of a lawyer or the owner
 and the municipality does not honour the settlement.
 Since there is no paralegal status in Quebec, the recommended approach is to have a lawyer act in an administrative capacity by
 filing the proper documentation and managing the necessary correspondence.

NAVIGATING QUEBEC PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS WITH MNP
ABOUT MNP

MNP is a leading national accounting, tax and business consulting firm in Canada. We proudly serve and respond to the needs of our
clients in the public, private and not-for-profit sectors. Through partner-led engagements, we provide a collaborative, cost-effective
approach to doing business and personalized strategies to help organizations succeed across the country and around the world.

To find out what MNP can do for you, contact Jo-Ann Lempert, FCPA, FCA, Québec Leader, Real Estate and
Construction, at 514.228.7918 or jo-ann.lempert@mnp.ca

                                                                                                                                                    Visit us at MNP.ca

                          Praxity AISBL is a global alliance of independent firms. Organised as an international not-for-profit entity under Belgium law, Praxity has its executive
                          office in Epsom. Praxity – Global Alliance Limited is a not-for-profit company registered in England and Wales, limited by guarantee, and has its registered
                          office in England. As an Alliance, Praxity does not practice the profession of public accountancy or provide audit, tax, consulting or other professional
                          services of any type to third parties. The Alliance does not constitute a joint venture, partnership or network between participating firms. Because the
                          Alliance firms are independent, Praxity does not guarantee the services or the quality of services provided by participating firms.
You can also read