MEDIA BACKGROUNDER ON THE BRUSSELS DECLARATION - SEPTEMBER 30, 2021
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
MEDIA BACKGROUNDER ON THE BRUSSELS DECLARATION SEPTEMBER 30, 2021
THE INCREASING THREATS TO JOURNALISTS’ SAFETY AND MEDIA FREEDOM
Physical violence and online harassment against journalists, news crews and media professionals are on the rise worldwide — and this trend is accelerating in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Media freedom alerts to the Council of Europe’s Safety of Journalists Platform rose by almost 40% between 2019 and 2020, with a record number of those alerts involving physical attacks, harassment or intimidation.1 Meanwhile, emergency laws and regulations enacted by governments in response to the pandemic led to “arbitrary interferences in the legitimate work of journalists and news organisations,” resulting in “severe infringements of Convention rights under Article 10” of the European Convention on Human Rights.2 UNESCO also noted “increasing intolerance towards reporting, fostered by a climate of endemic anti-press rhetoric, including by political leaders....”3 This intolerance has been especially exemplified by abuses and insults targeting journalists covering COVID-related protests in Europe and the Black Lives Matter protests in the U.S. 1 Council of Europe, Wanted! Real action for media freedom in Europe, Annual Report by the partner organisations to the Council of Europe Platform to Promote the Protection of Journalism and Safety of Journalists, April 2021, p. 7 2 Council of Europe, p. 6. 3 UNESCO, Highlights from the 2020 UNESCO Director-General’s Report on the Safety of Journalists and the Danger of Impunity.
Fatal attacks against journalists are also no longer confined to war-torn countries. In July 2021, Dutch investigative journalist Peter R. de Vries died after being shot in central Amsterdam, while Georgian cameraman Aleksandre Lashkarava was found dead at his home after being severely beaten by anti-LGBTQ+ protesters during a Pride march in Tbilisi. Earlier in April, Greek crime reporter Giorgos Karaivaz was killed by gunmen on motorbikes near his home in Athens. These fatal attacks are part of a wider trend. UNESCO found that 61% of all journalists killed worldwide in 2019 lost their lives in countries with no armed conflict, up from 50% in 2016.4 The Public Media Alliance noted that the shooting of Mr. De Vries occurred in a context where “attacks on journalists are rising in well-consolidated democracies across Europe – even those who enjoy high levels of press freedom,” citing specific cases of physical violence and legislative threats in countries like the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom.5 4 UNESCO. 5 Public Media Alliance, Threats to Journalists on the Rise Across Europe, July 9, 2021.
Women and under-represented groups as targets of attacks Attacks on journalists disproportionately target women and members of under-represented groups, as documented in a series of reports conducted by UNESCO, the Council of Europe, the International Women’s Media Foundation, Reporters Without Borders and Amnesty International. According to UNESCO, women are more likely to be subjected to “intimidation, threats, and harassment of a sexual or sexist nature, and also to particular forms of online attacks, such as cyberstalking, doxxing and trolling.”6 In 2020, the organization conducted a survey of 714 women journalists in 15 countries and found that 73% of them had experienced online violence, with 25% threatened with physical violence and 18% with sexual violence. 6 UNESCO.
Online attacks often translate into real-life abuses — 20% of women saying they were subjected to offline attacks and abuses in connection with violence they had experienced online.7 In March 2021, Reporters Without Borders noted in a new report that being “a member of a minority constitutes an additional risk for women journalists.” They reported that sexist and sexual violence are often combined with other types of insults: racism, lesbophobia or transphobia, and comments or insults based on religion.8 Racialized women journalists are also more likely to be targeted by online trolling, according to data compiled by Amnesty International. Women of colour in the media or politics were 34% more likely than white women to be mentioned in abusive or problematic tweets, and that number rises to 84% for Black women.9 7 Julie Posetti and al., Online Violence Against Women Journalists: A Global Snapshot of Incidence and Impacts, UNESCO, 2020. 8 Reporters Without Borders, Sexism’s Toll on Journalism, March 2021, p. 20. 9 Amnesty International, Troll Patrol Findings: Using Crowdsourcing, Data Science & Machine Learning to Measure Violence and Abuse Against Women on Twitter, 2018.
Pluralism and democracy at stake States responded to the COVID-19 pandemic in a way that “led to serious challenges to press freedom” and “restricted journalists’ ability to cover the public health situation freely.”10 These restrictions were “implemented deliberately or out of neglect for the media’s crucial role in times of crisis.”11 While lifting those restrictions is critical, it won’t be enough to stop and reverse the current decline in media freedom. Physical violence and online harassment also have tremendous — although more insidious — impacts. After conducting a survey in 12 countries, Reporters Without Borders found that 48% of women journalists already resort to self-censorship to avoid exposing themselves to violence. Another 21% have resigned or are considering not renewing their contracts12. Council of Europe, Wanted! Real action for media freedom in Europe, Annual Report by the partner 10 organisations to the Council of Europe Platform to Promote the Protection of Journalism and Safety of Journalists, April 2021, p. 9. 11 Ibid., p. 6. 12 Reporters Without Borders, p. 25.
Threats to journalists’ safety are eroding media freedom at an escalating pace. The fact that women and members of under- represented groups are more exposed to these threats also limits the ability of news media to report diverse perspectives, shrinking pluralism and weakening democracy.
OBJECTIVES OF THE BRUSSELS DECLARATION
A collective course of action grounded in key principles of public service media The Brussels Declaration is a joint initiative of Canada’s national public broadcaster, CBC/Radio-Canada, and Belgium’s French and Flemish public broadcasters, RTBF and VRT. The Declaration was officially presented to all participants of the Brussels Public Broadcasters International (PBI) conference held online on September 30, 2021. With the theme “A Choice for Democracy,” the event highlighted the role of public media as “a cornerstone of democracy and the rule of law.” The objective of the Brussels Declaration was to express the common concern of signatories regarding the increased threats to journalists’ safety and media freedom. The Declaration also provides a collective course of action to help alleviate the problem. Five (5) key principles were established to guide the signatories’ efforts: 1. Enhancing the safety of journalists, crews and media professionals 2. Standing up for the independence of public service media
3. Fostering an informed and civil democratic debate 4. Supporting a strong news ecosystem with a diversity of sources 5. Promoting diversity, equity and inclusion within our organizations and in the societies we serve The Declaration outlines how public media organizations could translate these principles into action. Signatories of the Declaration are also expected to identify and share best practices, with the goal of maximizing their impact. Fostering global awareness, mobilization and action Public broadcasters are only one part of the solution. Although they can help mitigate some of the worst impacts of the crisis afflicting democracies, they cannot act alone. That’s why another objective of the Brussels Declaration is to raise global awareness of the connection between journalists’ safety, media freedom and democracy. This includes speaking out against elected officials and other actors who directly or indirectly fuel distrust toward news media, attack journalists and media professionals, or act in a way that undermines the independence of public media.
The signatories hope to achieve that objective by fostering global mobilization and triggering action from key stakeholders, including multilateral organizations, NGOs, public officials, private and community news media, and social media companies. The goal is to rally more stakeholders around the principles of the Brussels Declaration, which should be applied not only to public media but to civil society as a whole.
USEFUL LINKS
• UNESCO reports: - Highlight from the 2020 UNESCO Director-General Report on the Safety of Journalists and the Danger of Impunity - Online Violence Against Women Journalists: A Global Snapshot of Incidence and Impacts • Council of Europe resources: - Wanted! Real action for media freedom in Europe - Safety of Journalists Platform • Reporters Without Borders report: Sexism’s Toll on Journalism • Amnesty International report: Troll Patrol Findings • International Women’s Media Foundation report: Attacks and Harassment: The Impact on Female Journalists and Their Reporting • Guardian/Bellingcat report: Attacks on journalists surge in US protests
• Statements by the Global Task Force for public media: - The increasing threats to journalists’ safety - Attacks on public media are an attack on democracy - Mandate and other statements • Public Media Alliance: - Threats to Journalists on the Rise Across Europe - Global Call Out: Information as a Public Good • PBI Brussels 2021
You can also read