T .EFTEKHAR TUMS Male partner of vaginismus women sexual dysfunction
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
is defined as the involuntary spasm of the pelvic muscles surrounding the outer third of the vagina, particularly the perineal muscles and the levator ani muscles (Ellison, 1972; Jeng, 2004; Jeng et al., 2006; Kaplan, 1974; Masters & Johnson, 1970).
Vaginismus is currently defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM 5) as a "GenitoPelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder
the inability of a woman to achieve vaginal penetration despite a desire to do so This results in sexual and non‐sexual (gynecological examination, tampon,dilators) aversion to vaginal penetration owing to actual or anticipated pain
a history of severe pain during intercourse intercourse being impossible. A history of intercourse feeling like "Hitting a brick wall" or "There is no hole down there" is suggestive of vaginal spasm of the introitus and is often diagnostic of severe vaginismus
differentiation from Dyspareunia vulvodynia vestibulodynia.
refers to an inability to tolerate any vaginal penetration and is commonly seen in the more severe forms of vaginismus accompanied by considerable fear and anxiety. mild vaginismus that patients who are able to tolerate some forms of penetration and who have lower pain and anxiety scores tend to be easier to treat in that they are able to cooperate with the proposed treatment
the adductors of the thighs the rectus abdominis the gluteus muscles may be involved. This reflex contraction is triggered by imagined or anticipated attempts at penetration of the vagina or during the act of intromission or coitus (Jeng, 2004).
Compared to women with dyspareunia and women with vaginismus have reported more concerns about loss of control during penetration, negative self‐image as it relates to penetration, more catastrophic pain‐related cognitions, beliefs of genital incompatibility.
the importance of understanding vaginismus as both a physical and a psychological condition women with vaginismus reported more negative emotions, including disgust, threat, worry, and anxiety, in response to viewing erotic films depicting
no significant differences in genital arousal compared to women with dyspareunia and no pain controls. Women with vaginismus reported less difficulty with desire and lubrication compared to the Women in the dyspareunia group. Women with dyspareunia who continue to engage in intercourse despite continued pain may experience a decrease in desire and physiological arousal (lubrication
Lamont grade 1 Patient is able to relax for pelvic examination Lamont grade 2 Patient is unable to relax for pelvic examination Lamont grade 3 Buttocks lift off table. Early retreat Lamont grade 4 Generalized retreat: buttocks lift up, thighs close, patient retreats Pacik grade 5 Generalized retreat as in level 4 plus visceral reaction, which may result in any one or more of the following: palpitations, hyperventilation, sweating, severe trembling, uncontrollable shaking, screaming, hysteria, wanting to jump off the table, a feeling of becoming unconscious, nausea, vomiting, and even a desire to attack the doctor
Women with primary (lifelong) vaginismus have never had pain‐free intercourse, whereas those with secondary vaginismus were comfortable with intercourse at some time in their lives and then progressed to painful intercourse Situational vaginismus refers to an inability to tolerate certain forms of penetration such as intercourse, yet insertion of tampons or finger penetration is possible
vaginismus and sexual pain disorders in females seem to have a cultural component the true incidence of vaginismus is unknown, although it is thought to affect 5– 17 % of women in a clinical setting
is unknown, may be a correlation with sexual molestation strict sexual or religious upbringing, waiting until marriage to have intercourse, fear of first‐time sex (pain, bleeding, tearing, ripping, penis too large, vagina too small,STD, pregnancy) fear of gynecological examinations hearing about these difficulties may manifest as a subsequent fear of penetration.
Undesirable penetration while being restrained at a young age such as urinary catheterization, enemas, and stretching a vagina "that appeared too small“ may set the stage for later vaginismus, as noted by some of our patients
1% suffered from vaginismic symptoms In Scandinavian countries USA,3%-7% of women reported dyspareunia or pain symptoms during intercourse; (Fugl-Meyer & Fugl-Meyer, 2002; Laumann, Paik, & Rosen, 1999; Ventegodt, 1998 27% for sexual pain symptoms in Iranian women, Safarinejad (2006) reported a prevalenc of 43% of Turkish women surveyed reported pain symptoms during sexual intercourse. while Oksuz and Malhan (2006)
women with vaginismus have endorsed negative cognitions and expectations about vaginal penetration negative emotions in response to sexual stimuli anxiety and fear during sexual or non‐sexual vaginal penetration.
Vaginismus treatment variety of effective treatments are available to help women overcome vaginismus. the use of dilators , physical therapy with or without biofeedback, biofeedback, sex counseling psychotherapy hypnotherapy cognitive behavioral therapy. post‐treatment counseling is usually needed regardless of the type of treatment utilized, because of the interplay of the physical and emotional aspects of vaginismus
Frequently, the male partner of vaginismic patients develops secondary impotence as a reaction to their partner’s disorder However, Kaplan has reported that the man’s reaction to this situation may vary depending on his psychological and sexual vulnerability]. He might interpret her dysfunction as a rejection or be frustrated by his inability to penetrate
A more recently published systematic literature review on vaginismus pointed out that partners of women with vaginismus can be described as passive and unassertive men who frequently suffer from sexual dysfunctions themselves (Lahaie et al., 2010).
It is hypothesized that the majority of male partners of women with vaginismus suffer from sexual dysfunctions which predisposes these men to avoid sexual behavior. Furthermore, in most cases, a key component in the formation of the couples is avoidance behavior and a shared fear towards sexual activity.
Turkish sample of male partners of women with vaginismus (n D 32). Male sexual dysfunction, especially premature ejaculation and erectile dysfunction, was actually reported by the majority of male partners. their sexual histories revealed that more than 50% of the sample suffered from insufficient sexual knowledge and sexual problems during their first sexual experience.
Current research results indicate that sexual problems often concur in male and female partners (e.g., Fugl‐Meyer & Fugl‐Meyer, 2002). Therefore, certain therapeutic approaches for the treatment of sexual dysfunctions emphasize that sexual disorders emerge within a relationship, and cannot necessarily be understood as a disorder of a single person, even if only one partner displays clinically relevant symptoms
both partners in couples with vaginismus seem to avoid engaging in vaginal intercourse the male partners have choosen because they are passive and unassertive, and the couples are involved in an unconscious collusion to avoid intercourse
. The majority of men had little or no sexual experience with women prior to their current relationships a large proportion of male partners had never undergone penile intercourse before the current relationship . Furthermore, sexuality had been taboo sex education had been almost non existent in most families of origin
Sexually hostile family environments lack of sex education are possibly related to consequences such as negative attitudes towards sexuality, negative body image negative concepts of masculinity
the lack of sexual experience such as petting and sexual intercourse before the current relationship could contribute to sexually inhibited behavior. study contradict the assumption that male and female sexual dysfunctions cause each other.
Erectile dysfunction was the most frequently reported diagnosis in this sample premature ejaculation. A small percentage of participants reported incestuous sexual experiences with their sister
Malleson ,stated that male partners have roles in the etiology of vaginismus by arguing that the trouble is emotionally infectious [ The male partners of vaginismus patients may potentially cause or exacerbate vaginismus in their female partners by being "under‐ competent, over‐anxious, or too forbearing".
Non‐genital phase Stage 1. Touching your partner without genital contact and for your own pleasure Stage 2. Touching your partner without genital contact, for your own AND your partner’s pleasure Adding the genital component Stage 3. Touching with genital contact included Stage 4. Simultaneous touching with genital contact The gradual inclusion of vaginal intercourse Stage 5 and 6. Vaginal containment
The first stage of therapy, the “non‐genital phase” begins with an agreement between both partners to not attempt intercourse during the early treatment. The purposes of reducing performance anxiety high lighting the value of non‐genital experiences are explained.
when the duration of unconsummated coitus lengthened, the incidence of sexual dysfunction in the male partner was found to be greater. This finding may indicate that male sexual dysfunction appears to be a result of vaginismus. results showed that the number of treatment sessions was not related with the duration of unconsummated coitus, suggesting that male sexual dysfunction does not occur secondary to vaginismus.
the largest sample size and shows a high rate of sexual dysfunction in men,with the most common problem being premature ejaculation. According to our findings, we may conclude that sexual dysfunction in male partners may arise as a result of vaginismus. Thus, sexual dysfunction in the male partner should be carefully evaluated in the management of vaginismus for optimal outcome.
Current research on vaginismus considers male sexual dysfunction in couples in which the woman suffers from vaginismus as resulting from rather than being a cause of vaginismus (e.g., Lamont, 1994). Incontrast, Masters and Johnson (1977) understood vaginismic symptoms as a response to male sexual dysfunction.
Living in a relationship with a woman with vaginismus could “protect” the male partner from having to deal with fears of failure and his own sexual dysfunction male partners are often treated as “the non‐present patient” in the individual therapy setting of women suffering from vaginismus. However, not only can the involvement of the partner in the treatment of vaginismus contribute to therapy success but also the defined treatment goals.
Most studies define penile‐vaginal penetration through intercourse as the therapy outcome success in intercourse as a therapy outcome may implicate the disre gard of women’s pleasure in sexual activities. Moreover, it bears the risk of worsening male sexual dysfunction, as final improvements in female symptoms may lead to an increase in the partner’s sexual difficulties
care of the couple after successful completion of therapy should be an indispensable factor of the therapeutic intervention in order to deal with potential delayed sexual difficulties occurring after the reduction of vaginismic symptoms
Thanks for your attention
You can also read