M&A Insights H1 2020 Adjusting to adversity - Allen & Overy
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Contents A market utterly transformed as M&A deals stall 04 Global M&A snapshot 06 Pipeline gaps and digital will drive life sciences deals 08 Traditional retail faces fight for survival 10 Fintech deals enter temporary lull after Q1 surge 11 Global trends in private M&A: Covid-19 update 12 Foreign direct investment controls in the time of Covid-19 16 Global deal flows 18 U.S. M&A: the land of opportunity meets challenges 19 European M&A set for tough autumn 23 China maintains outward-looking approach 24 allenovery.com/mainsights 3
A market utterly transformed as M&A deals stall The Covid-19 coronavirus pandemic has brought the global M&A market to a juddering halt and is likely to radically change dealmaking for the foreseeable future. The figures for H1 make bleak reading: Q3 may well see these themes intensify, especially with a severe 41 % – global deal value fell by 41% recession in prospect. – the number of transactions And yet, there are reasons to believe Decrease in global deal value declined by 16% H1 2020 vs. H1 2019 that the M&A market will revive, – megadeals over USD10 billion were although not to the level seen in the down by 48%, while those over record-breaking last cycle, which USD5bn were 25% lower began in early 2014. This impact was particularly severe Reasons include: 16 % in Q2, as the crisis peaked. – a likely rise in distressed deals But even on a first-half basis it was and restructurings as vulnerable Decrease in global deal volume dire, hitting all regions and sectors. businesses look for liquidity H1 2020 vs. H1 2019 Domestic deals, which helped the – an upsurge in tech-related deals market to keep ticking over in the latter as digital transformation accelerates part of 2019, declined in value by 50% in sectors such as the life sciences, and in number by 12%. retail and financial services Cross-border deals continued their – the search for cost-efficiencies Note: Figures in this report represent deals announced between 1 January 2020 and 30 June 2020. already steep decline, with deal value through collaborations, joint ventures Data provided by down 15% and volume 24% lower. and consolidations This partly reflects the way investor There is one other vital factor. confidence has been hit. Buyers (notably private equity funds) have plenty of dry powder to deploy “Safety first” is the watchword for most and continue to assess opportunities, businesses. The priority is to conserve once buyer and seller price expectations cash and protect revenue streams line up. Credit markets also remain rather than investing in M&A. pretty robust. Equally, it reflects the logistical The market will revive, but will continue difficulties of transacting in a to look very different. “locked-down” world. Megadeals that are still completing are taking an average of 300 days to close. Last year, the average was 240 days. 4 M&A Insights | H1 2020
For more information, please contact: David Broadley Dirk Meeus Global Co-Head, Corporate/M&A Global Co-Head, Corporate/M&A Tel +44 20 3088 3258 Tel +32 2780 2432 david.broadley@allenovery.com dirk.meeus@allenovery.com allenovery.com/mainsights 5
Global M&A snapshot Split of global M&A deals by value 30% 29% 16% 13% Western Europe U.S. China APAC (excl. China) Deal value: USD365bn Deal value: USD355bn Deal value: USD188bn Deal value: USD163bn 5% 4% 1% 0.26% CEE and CIS MENA Latin America Sub-Saharan Africa Deal value: USD56bn Deal value: USD46bn Deal value: USD11bn Deal value: USD3bn % change from H1 2019 30% Western Europe 69% U.S. 0% China 8% APAC (excl. China) 116% CEE and CIS 60% MENA 72% Latin America 76% Sub-Saharan Africa 6 M&A Insights | H1 2020
Global M&A activity by sector, H1 2020 Energy and Infrastructure TMT Financial Services Consumer and Retail Real Estate Life Sciences 75 109 308 221 228 233 Value (USDbn) % change from H1 2019 51% 38% 19% 24% 36% 79% Energy and TMT Financial Consumer Real Estate Life Sciences Infrastructure Services and Retail allenovery.com/mainsights 7
Pipeline gaps and digital will drive life sciences deals Often seen as a safe haven sector in times of crisis, the life sciences have not only been centre stage during the Covid-19 crisis but are riding it out well. Life sciences megadeal volume Life sciences share prices are back Digital transformation accelerates to 2019 levels, having fallen sharply The lockdown has placed a huge at the outset of the pandemic. USD10bn+ However, transaction value and volume have gone into reverse, premium on technologies that allow healthcare professionals and their patients to interact remotely. H1 2020: 0 falling by 79% and 15%, respectively. This steep rise in adoption seems H1 2019: 8 Some key deals have been delayed, unlikely to be reversed, even once including the planned merger of lockdown measures are eased Pfizer and Mylan. globally. We also expect increased use USD5bn+ of technology to optimise processes The slowdown in deals looks particularly and reduce costs. Diagnostics have stark coming after a very strong 2019, been one of the most active areas, where the USD78bn Bristol Myers H1 2020: 3 and we expect to see rapid adoption Squib acquisition of Celgene became H1 2019: 10 of key technologies, such as: the ninth largest deal on record. – AI/Big Data, not least in a bid to R&D badly hit by the pandemic speed up drug discovery The pandemic has seen many life – 3D printing sciences companies go flat out to – telemedicine develop anti-viral tests and vaccines. In wider consumer health, they Partnerships between pharma have focused on safety equipment, companies and non-traditional industry disinfectants and hand gels. players like big tech will be achieved through M&A or other forms of alliance, With key research staff redirected with the pandemic speeding up to this work, other R&D programmes this trend. have been badly hit and, in an effort to protect participants from the Digital transformation will extend Covid-19 coronavirus, clinical trials this deal activity for some time. are at a near standstill. However, we may see more collaborations rather than cash-driven Companies could therefore face major transactions due to lack of funding. gaps in their R&D pipelines in future, disrupting traditional funding models. In the shorter term, we could also Filling the gaps could involve: see a spike in disputes over agreements done in haste during the crisis, – M&A with companies testing Force Majeure – consolidation deals and material adverse change clauses. – strategic IP collaborations and portfolio reshuffles, driven by cost cutting 8 M&A Insights | H1 2020
“With key research staff redirected to this work, other R&D programmes have been badly hit and, in an effort to protect participants from the virus, clinical trials are at a near standstill.” allenovery.com/mainsights 9
Traditional retail faces fight for survival Few sectors have been harder hit by the Covid-19 crisis than retail. With the exception of pure online grocery retailers, there have been almost no winners from the pandemic. Traditional retailers have been driven Retail’s rapid transition Full steam ahead for digitalisation to close stores and furlough staff, There will be no early let up. The crisis has sped up the digital while desperately trying to preserve transformation of retail by some five cash. Big names have been forced into With recession looming in the autumn, years, and this is where deal activity administration and those with a poor many consumers are likely to rein is likely to grow fastest, including: online presence (or none at all) face a in spending or divert it to home and fight for survival. healthcare products. The impact on – collaborations between tech spending will grow as furloughing delivery platforms and bricks and Big bricks and mortar supermarkets ends and unemployment climbs. mortar retailers have seen footfall drop dramatically due to social distancing. In economies like Germany where – investment in key technologies shops have already re-opened, such as AI, the Internet of Things Even online clothing retailers have seen consumers seem to be staying away, and drones declining sales, with locked-down with safety measures undermining consumers losing their usual appetite – established brands teaming up with the shopping experience they for fast fashion. disruptive partners to communicate once enjoyed. environmental and social values In this febrile environment, it is almost Other likely trends include: to consumers online and through impossible to value assets and the social media impact on transactions has been – faster decline of high streets, profound as the crisis escalated. with retailers closing stores to – distressed deals, with financial buyers Despite this, the numbers tell an focus on high-profile outlets where seeking buy and build opportunities, interesting story: rents have been renegotiated pairing struggling brands with delivery platforms to give them new life online – H1 deal value increased by 24%, – a move by supermarkets away from while volume fell by 21% convenience stores and back to big edge-of-town sites, where shoppers – Q2 transaction value increased can visit less frequently but get wider by 29% choice under one roof The increase in value is widely driven – government measures to protect by the USD81bn Unilever unification food security and supply chains transaction, which has boosted the numbers during this uncertain period. Consumer and Retail M&A activity, H1 2020 24% Increase in deal value 21% Decrease in deal volume vs. H1 2019 vs. H1 2019 10 M&A Insights | H1 2020
Fintech deals enter temporary lull after Q1 surge The start of the year saw a surge in ever-larger fintech deals around the world, with every expectation that this trend would continue. With valuations becoming increasingly However, given the current economic Activity likely to resume inflated in Q1, we were beginning to outlook, fintechs’ (particularly early The pandemic has sped up the see financial institutions opting to build stage companies’) priorities are shifting, adoption of online financial services, their own fintech capabilities or enter with more businesses looking to hunker even among previously reluctant into collaborations, rather than buying down and ensure they have enough consumers. Traditional institutions promising tech companies outright. runway before their next funding round. will need to respond to compete with Changed dynamics Those deals that are done are likely to dedicated online challenger banks. be opportunistic and we see evidence The Covid-19 crisis has changed the In the medium term, that points of that in the recent speculation about dynamics. Dealmaking has entered a to a resurgence in strategic M&A Metro Bank acquiring UK P2P lender, lull, although one that looks temporary. transactions. Until then, investors RateSetter or Western Union’s reported Potential acquirers, including private are likely to be more cautious, with approach to MoneyGram. equity funds, are still assessing deals an emphasis on minority investing, and doing the legwork, ready to move Some areas of the market remain consortium deals and collaborations. quickly once the economic outlook particularly hot, not least the becomes clearer. intersection between ecommerce and payment systems. Valuations are also coming down and the impact of “down rounds” Facebook, for instance, is launching is becoming increasingly relevant, payments services in a number of with companies seeking equity markets. Alongside PayPal, Facebook financing at valuations below also joined the latest funding round for previous funding rounds. Gojek in Indonesia, securing a small stake in GoPay. Well-funded, more mature tech companies are still in a position to buy. Q1 standout deals included: – Visa’s USD5.3bn acquisition of the start-up, Plaid – LendingClub becoming the first fintech to buy a U.S. regulated bank – Worldline buying rival Ingenico for USD8.6bn – The USD7bn purchase of Credit Karma/Intuit allenovery.com/mainsights 11
Global trends in private M&A: Covid-19 update Analysis of private M&A deals signed so far this year shows just how fundamentally the market has changed since the onset of the Covid-19 crisis. Over the last eight years, we have produced a special update comparing A number of auction processes still analysed around 1,300 private M&A deals signed so far this year with those at an early stage saw competition deals that Allen & Overy advised signed in 2019 and previous years. between bidders diminish almost on globally. immediately, as doubts over valuations Dramatic decline in grew and as corporates refocused on Usually, we report on M&A buy-side competition cash preservation. trends annually. When the pandemic first hit, many deals But the Covid-19 pandemic has close to signing went ahead, though brought about such significant changes some in sectors that looked set to be in market practice that we have badly affected were put on hold. Deals conducted by auction 40% 41% 53% 46% 39% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Highly competitive auctions 65% 55% 53% 45% 27% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 12 M&A Insights | H1 2020
Deal structures changing with We already have some evidence Pre-Covid deals in heavily impacted slight uptick in distressed M&A that deal structures are changing. sectors unravelling This includes: Many potential M&A investors have The vast majority of deals that were been thinking about using deal – an increase in stake sales, including signed pre-Covid are proceeding as structures that allow them to realise the minority investments expected. However, some in the most benefits of M&A without full exposure to heavily impacted sectors (including – some planned acquisitions being the downside. retail, travel and tourism) are unravelling turned into long-term collaborations or being renegotiated. In particular, parties are seeking to solve or supply arrangements valuation issues, while also mitigating Some buyers are hoping that “material – a slight uptick in distressed M&A, solvency risk and, in some cases, adverse change” provisions will take with more likely to follow committing less funding. Just as in them out of deals, but many are also the wake of the financial crisis, investors running an alternative argument: alleged are debating whether to acquire, invest breaches of pre-closing “ordinary or collaborate. course” covenants. Deal structure 2019 2020 53% 100% 48% share sale Minority Investment: 45% 31% Stake sale 38% 50%+ Investment: 55% 16% Other 14% allenovery.com/mainsights 13
2016 9% In other deals, buyers are getting Certainty of funds is also critical, Many governments are introducing, or 2017 16% creative when deal terms provide no and financing conditions have become increasing the scope of existing, foreign Earn-out 19% obvious get out. The outcomes of these even rarer. 2018 direct investment regimes,20% fearing: situations also vary, and some are still to And termination rights linked to material – threats to national security play out through litigation 80% or otherwise. 2019 9% adverse change or material breach of 76% – loss of control over But they point to areas of an M&A 73% warranty are scarcer than ever. 2020 critical infrastructure 19% deal that might merit more focus70% 2016 One 9%surprise finding is that we have during negotiations over the coming – the potential for opportunistic not so far seen a coronavirus-related months, particularly if a second wave of acquisitions, especially by buyers 2017 increase in the Deferred 31%use 16%of reverse break Covid-19 hits. affiliated with a foreign government Earn-out 19% fees. But if more buyers refuse to Sellers now have laser focus 2018 complete despite conditions20%having The pandemic is also impacting deal on execution risk been satisfied, more sellers may start timetables, as the ability for some 2019 9% pressing for these. authorities to conduct merger reviews With sellers now focusing intently has become more constrained. on execution risk, a buyer able 2020 to Governments and regulators 19% offer an unconditional deal will be at moving the goalposts This means it is taking longer than ever an enormous advantage. In higher to close M&A deals. Over the last few years, we have value deals, where some degree of Deferred 31% seen a swing towards protectionism, Long-stop periods in our 2020 deals conditionality is almost inevitable, particularly in the U.S. and Europe. ranged from one to 24 months, with an substantive deal risk is being Covid-19 has accelerated and average period of seven months. That heavily scrutinised. By closing 50% expanded that trend. is one month longer than the equivalent period in 2019. Earn-out 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Deferred consideration By closing 50% 2016 2016 9% 9% 2016 11% 2017 2017 16% 16% 2017 11% 2018 20% 2018 10% 2018 20% 2019 9% 2019 15% 2019 9% 2020 19% 2020 31% 2020 19% 2020 Reason for earn-out Reason for deferred consideration 2016 11% 2017 11% 2018 10% 2019 15% 2020 31% Bridge valuation gap 83% Payment contingent on future event 30% Incentivise management 17% Vendor finance 30% Security for warranty/indemnity claims 20% Management retention 10% Other 10% 14 M&A Insights | H1 2020
Valuation challenges turn pricing increased, making dispute resolution Overall a nuanced picture structures on their head mechanisms especially important at There has been speculation that the moment. Companies have found it difficult to the short to medium-term economic assess, with any certainty, what impact Significant movement in changes brought about by Covid-19 the pandemic will have on their future warranty packages might result in a shift to a fully-fledged earnings. Without reliable financial buyer’s market for private M&A Much market commentary has projections, it is very hard to price a deal. deal terms. But the picture is far suggested that buyers might more nuanced. Consequently, where deals are going succeed in obtaining stronger ahead, parties are looking to pricing warranty and indemnity packages Buyers are focused primarily on the risk structures that will help to mitigate risk in the current climate. of overpaying, and are mitigating that and bridge valuation gaps. through new pricing structures. But close analysis of our deals shows In a marked increase on previous years: that, while most trade sellers are still Sellers are keenly focused on the risk of providing a decent set of operational a failed deal, and are pushing back hard – half our 2020 deals involved warranties, they are pushing back on termination rights and unnecessary an earn-out or deferred hard on warranty repetition, buyer’s conditionality. They are also focused consideration structure awareness and liability caps. on contractual risk allocation, intent on – half (excluding private equity exits) avoiding deal value being eroded as a We have also seen a temporary reversal involved a price adjustment result of significant future liabilities under of the trend towards W&I insurance, warranties and indemnities. The financial metrics involved as underwriters seek to exclude liability have changed too. related to the one issue that is currently top of mind: Covid-19. As a result of these “future pricing” structures the risk of disputes has Timing of payment “Buyers are focused primarily on the risk of overpaying, and are 2016 9% mitigating that through new 2017 16% Earn-out 19% 2018 20% 80% 76% pricing structures.” 2019 9% 73% 2020 19% 70% Deferred 31% Elizabeth Wall Michael Parshall Counsel & Head Know-How, Corporate Partner – Corporate Tel +44 20 3088 3075 Tel +612 9373 7738 elizabeth.wall@allenovery.com michael.parshall@allenovery.com By closing 50% For a full briefing on our survey of global trends in private M&A during the Covid-19 pandemic, please talk to your 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 usual A&O contact. allenovery.com/mainsights 15 2016 11%
Foreign direct investment controls in the time of Covid-19 New measures to control foreign direct investment (FDI) have been unveiled around the globe during the coronavirus crisis. Is this a new wave of protectionism under the cover of Covid-19 or appropriate scrutiny in today’s world? Many governments across the – statements by the European Impact on dealmaking world have been tightening controls Commission urging all EU during the crisis on FDI – typically on national security Member States to set up FDI review Some of the measures that have grounds – for some years now. procedures and to use them to the been announced are Covid-specific, Countries without FDI regimes are fullest extent, when a new EU regime such as the new Australian regime. catching up and introducing a comes into force in October It has been provoked by fears that legal framework, often as a matter – reports that the EU will demand distressed companies will be taken of urgency. mandatory notification of any over during a moment of extreme This trend has accelerated during the acquisition where the buyer is based vulnerability, perhaps with the loss of coronavirus pandemic, raising concerns outside the EU and in receipt of companies considered vital to national that we are entering a period of subsidies from its home state – economic or security interests. growing protectionism and potentially a significant strengthening of its However, the Australian government greater political interference in position and a strategically different has made it clear it does not want to international M&A. stance from the much lighter-touch discourage foreign investment and there approach reflected in the framework Actions and announcements, either is no evidence, yet, that the regime is it set out last year public or rumoured in recent months, slowing down processes unduly. all confirm the game-changing, – strong indications that the long-awaited The same is true in Japan. accelerated approach to FDI. new and much more extensive control These include: measures in the UK remain on the Despite China’s relatively strict FDI cards, with a Bill to introduce them and foreign exchange regulatory – a move by the U.S. Senate to prohibit expected imminently control regimes, the great majority of foreign state-controlled enterprises inbound deals do get cleared by the listing on American exchanges Although not all countries explicitly Chinese authorities, at a time when the single out a specific government as the – continued enforcement by the government in China is signalling that it key driver to increase the FDI regime, Committee on Foreign Investment in wants to maintain an outward-looking some do. Concerns around lack of the U.S. (CFIUS), still the most active and international approach symmetry or reciprocity is one key regime in the world to investment. concern, while some governments have – emergency measures in Australia been particularly vocal on a perceived Indeed, that is the mood more widely making all foreign takeover proposals, need to curtail Chinese investments in in Asia, where many governments want no matter what the value or nature of some sectors. China, itself, of course, the region to remain open, particularly the investment, subject to up to six continues to screen proposed as companies look to regionalise supply months’ scrutiny inbound investment very vigorously. chains to make them more secure. – Japan’s move to lower the threshold These are unsettling developments for investigations into proposed for investors. foreign takeovers of listed companies 16 M&A Insights | H1 2020
“The pandemic has given more and more governments a licence to intervene to a degree not seen in many decades.” We have seen a continuing decline Interventionism on an Often governments demand a price for in cross-border transactions globally. unprecedented scale such support. For instance, a bailed out But this predates the crisis, even if airline might be asked to move faster in With the exception of those dealmaking has declined still further cutting its emissions. The EU’s recently governments pursuing a clear because of the logistical difficulties of published Recovery Plan has a powerful protectionist agenda – of which transacting in the current environment. environmental flavour to it. the Trump administration is one – China’s position is seventh in the the strengthening of FDI regimes In that environment, governments now outbound acquirers’ league table, seems, in many cases, to be about have a springboard for much more which resembles the position it held applying appropriate scrutiny rather intervention and that can be ad hoc some five to ten years ago, despite the than out-and-out protectionism. and unpredictable. sharp decline in investment into the U.S. However, there is one noticeable The impact of this will be felt because of the harsher CFIUS controls. change, which has been exacerbated more broadly than just in the realm However, the general reduction in by the Covid-19 coronavirus crisis of FDI controls. activity since the boom of two years and is likely to persist as the world ago is as much to do with China’s own Investors will need to get used to hovers on the brink of what could be controls on capital outflows as hostile operating in a much more politicised a deep recession. FDI regimes. and fragmented world with new The pandemic has given more and regulatory challenges that can, Still, there are significant practical more governments a licence to and probably will, evolve. In this new issues for investors to consider here. intervene to a degree not seen in world, there are a number of new Strengthened regimes are adding many decades. rules to navigate. There are also new a level of complexity to transactions, opportunities to seize. Keeping up to not least in competitive bid situations State mechanisms to support date with the fast-moving changes in where a buyer with no FDI hurdles to businesses through the crisis – the global market will enable investors jump through will clearly have the inside such as the provision of grants, to stay ahead of the curve and make lane in any race to buy an asset. loans, furlough schemes and even the most of these opportunities. partial renationalisation of vulnerable companies – have risen on an unprecedented scale and will have a lasting effect. Dominic Long Helga Van Peer François Renard Ken Rivlin Matthew Townsend Partner – Corporate Antitrust Partner – Corporate Partner – Corporate Antitrust Partner – International Trade Partner – International Trade Tel +44 20 3088 3626 Tel +32 2 780 24 67 Tel +852 2974 7110 and Regulatory Law and Regulatory Law dominic.long@allenovery.com helga.vanpeer@allenovery.com françois.renard@allenovery.com Tel +1 212 610 6460 Tel +44 20 3088 3174 ken.rivlin@allenovery.com matthew.townsend@allenovery.com allenovery.com/mainsights 17
(2) France 237 (4) Germany (6) Canada 322 (3) Japan 347 209 (10) China 172 (12) Singapore (11) Hong Kong 212 Global deal flows (-) Netherlands 139 98 (-) South Korea 121 (8) Australia 46 (13) Denmark 24 (-) Saudi Arabia (7) Switzerland 160 Value of deals USDm Number of deals 0 30,000 60,000 90,000 120,000 150,000 *(Position by deal value in H1 2019) Inbound target markets, H1 2020 134 *(13) Netherlands 837 *(1) U.S. *(5) Germany 305 442 *(2) UK 176 *(8) India 269 *(6) Mainland China 99 *(4) Switzerland *(12) Spain 149 *(10) UAE 35 *(9) France 192 *(11) Australia 196 *(-) Italy 158 *(15) Hong Kong SAR 90 128 *(-) Singapore *(-) Japan 82 0 30,000 60,000 90,000 120,000 150,000 Value (USDm) Outbound acquirers, H1 2020 485 *(9) UK 1,031 *(1) U.S. 263 *(2) France 237 *(4) Germany *(6) Canada 322 *(3) Japan 347 209 *(10) China *(12) Singapore 172 *(11) Hong Kong 212 *(-) Netherlands 139 *(-) South Korea 98 *(8) Australia 121 46 *(13) Denmark 24 *(-) Saudi Arabia *(7) Switzerland 160 0 30,000 60,000 90,000 120,000 150,000 Value (USDm) 18 M&A Insights | H1 2020
U.S. M&A: the land of opportunity meets challenges The impact on U.S. transactions has been severe, with activity unlikely to recover until market conditions stabilise. But opportunities are emerging for certain players. U.S. market hits the brakes Elsewhere the effect has been even U.S. M&A activity, more pronounced: H1 2020 The Covid-19 pandemic has had a multitude of impacts on the U.S. – In travel and leisure, Mirae, the Korean M&A market, presenting challenges asset manager, is attempting to pull for parties at every stage of the deal out of buying a portfolio of luxury process, including: – valuation hotels for USD5.8bn. – In the fitness industry, Level 4 alleges that CorePower is using the enforced 69% Decrease in deal value – access to and the terms of financing vs. H1 2019 closure of its facilities as a reason – conducting due diligence to avoid purchasing a number of yoga studios. – obtaining regulatory approvals and third party consents – In retail, where lockdowns became 9% widespread and consumer confidence – complying with pre-completion dried up virtually overnight, Sycamore covenants Partners cited numerous breaches of We have seen buyers seek to avoid the purchase agreement due to store Decrease in deal volume completing high-profile transactions vs. H1 2019 closures and employee furloughs to while sellers have filed suit trying to claim it no longer had to buy Victoria’s force them to do so. Secret. L Brands has since let the buyer walk away. High-profile deals fall through Few industries have been immune, with both strategic and private equity It will take time for court cases to play out. The threshold in U.S. courts for 29% U.S. market share establishing material adverse effect players affected. of global M&A and the exceptions related to general – In the technology sector, Xerox economic impacts (including some terminated its USD34bn hostile bid specific references to pandemics) is for HP at the end of March, having high. So many of these cases may previously raised its bid. hinge on “ordinary course of business” covenants, which require: – In cybersecurity, Advent International tried to terminate its agreement to – target companies to operate in the take Forescout Technologies private. ordinary course of business between signing and closing – that certain actions may not be taken without the buyer’s consent allenovery.com/mainsights 19
In addition, there are complexities. Other deals stay the course A golden opportunity for some Target companies forced to shutter While numerous potential deals Despite the widespread disruption, or significantly cut back their businesses have been shelved, we have seen new opportunities are emerging may, arguably, not be operating in the agreements signed before the crisis for those who can deploy ordinary course of business. However, took hold continue to completion. resources and capitalise on they can counter claim that they are For example: reduced company valuations. complying with other pre-completion covenants, including abiding by any – Greif, Inc., a global leader in industrial For private equity firms, many laws or government directives, which packaging, completed the sale of its armed with record amounts of cash, drove many of their actions. Consumer Packaging Group business Private Investment in Public Equity in April (PIPE) transactions are on the rise. The outcome of these cases will likely Competition here is so fierce that depend on how courts seek to compare – Xperi completed its merger with TiVo processes are often being run like M&A the conduct of each business. They – State Grid International Development auctions, with multiple firms vying for a may, for instance: is on track to acquire Sempra piece of the most desirable companies. – use the way other businesses in Energy’s Chilean business by the PIPE transactions often increase when the sector have acted during the end of June uncertainty plagues traditional financial pandemic as a measure Notably, many of the completed markets. It happened during the 2008 – look at how the specific business transactions have involved strategic financial crisis, as well. has operated historically acquisitions between companies in the Dramatically decreased stock prices same sector, facing similar economic – take into account the length of in travel, retail and entertainment prospects. the pandemic companies are also providing opportunities for investors. – assess how quickly the business can recover These deals are often in the form of an investment rather than a takeover, – consider whether the parties allowing the buyer to acquire a large have acted and communicated stake at a discount and the target to in good faith raise cash quickly. Recent deals include Wayfair’s private equity-led raising of USD535 million, and preferred stock issuances by Cheesecake Factory (USD200m) and Expedia (USD1.1bn). 20 M&A Insights | H1 2020
“Despite the pandemic throwing many deals off course, new opportunities are emerging for those who can deploy resources to capitalise on reduced public company valuations.” Post-pandemic landscape Despite ongoing public health concerns, high rates of unemployment and decreased consumer confidence, equity markets have stabilised in recent weeks, largely due to massive federal government stimulus programmes. However, M&A activity has been slower to rebound due to continued concerns about underlying economic and social conditions. Though anecdotal evidence suggests certain players, particularly private equity, are quietly gearing up for a spurt of deal activity, a sustained and distributed recovery depends on a variety of factors. These include the stabilisation of valuations (at levels where buyers and sellers can agree), financial market conditions and, most importantly, evidence that the market is returning to growth. allenovery.com/mainsights 21
22 M&A Insights | H1 2020
European M&A set for tough autumn European M&A markets performed more strongly than expected in H1, buoyed by a small number of very big transactions. However, the underlying picture was far less rosy, and the short-term outlook is uncertain. Western Europe M&A activity, Deal value in Western Europe rose by Safety first for investors H1 2020 30%. However, a steep 29% decline in The pandemic has forced nervous deal volume, perhaps, provides a more investors to take a “safety first” accurate picture of underlying activity. approach and has left businesses Big transactions that did complete focused primarily on conserving 30% were, generally, well advanced cash rather than M&A. before the Covid-19 pandemic took Deals are getting done. With share hold or had to be completed for Increase in value prices recovering, potential public deals strategic reasons. vs. H1 2019 are under review. Well-funded private That is true of Thermo Fisher’s equity houses also continue to assess USD11.5bn acquisition of Qiagen. significant “take-private” deals, Even more so for ThyssenKrupp’s when prices stabilise. EUR17.2bn sale of its lift business to Targets with business plans that 29% an investor group, led by Advent and remain viable are still attracting Cinven. Without a deal, the group attention, notably in the healthcare would be in severe financial difficulties. Decrease in volume and technology sectors. vs. H1 2019 The GBP31bn merger of Virgin Media More fragile sectors – such as and O2 in the UK reflects the continuing aviation, leisure, hotels, travel and rapid convergence of mobile, fixed automotive supply – are off the radar. broadband and entertainment services. However, we could see consolidation Placing a value on the alliance was and distressed deals, and, in some made easier since it was free of any cases, government intervention in cash element. More widely, valuing these areas. assets has become difficult given the uncertain economic outlook. An uncertain outlook It will take time for M&A activity to revive and Q3 is likely to be a tough one, with investor confidence remaining subdued. “It will take time for M&A That is even more likely with major political uncertainty hanging over activity to revive and Q3 is likely future trading plans and the need to reconfigure supply chains. to be a tough one, with investor Most businesses are now banking on a hard Brexit, given the lack of confidence remaining subdued.” progress in the EU/UK trade talks as the end-of-year deadline looms. This will prolong uncertainty. allenovery.com/mainsights 23
China maintains outward-looking approach The Covid-19 crisis has slowed Chinese deal activity. Activity remains sluggish even though the country is emerging from the crisis earlier than the rest of the world. – While deal value for China was Deals in strategic sectors designed to Open to inbound investors stable in H1, with a 0% change, upscale and bring new technologies China continues to ease restrictions volume fell 13%. to Chinese industries are expected to on inbound investment. continue, such as those targeting: – The picture was worse for outbound Regulations governing the deals, with value and volume down – Technologies pharmaceutical sector, for instance, by 26% and 25%, respectively. – Renewable energy have been modernised and we are seeing strong activity here. The clean – Infrastructure Despite tougher controls on FDI in energy and infrastructure sectors also many countries, it is expected that – Advanced manufacturing technologies remain active. China will continue, as part of its – Biotech and healthcare Multinational companies that no longer ongoing strategy, its international see China as a cost-effective base are and outward-looking approach to The need to raise additional capital making an exit, in a trend accelerated outbound and inbound M&A. could also see a growth in international by the crisis. fundraising; for instance through With the economy shrinking for the first cross-border listings. One example However, those wanting a stronger time in decades (GDP fell by 6.8% in is the Shanghai-London Stock presence in China are finding it an Q1), strategic M&A transactions will play Connect programme. increasingly investor-friendly market. an important part in the recovery. But outbound investors face a range That seemed to be the message from of hurdles, alongside tougher FDI May’s National People’s Congress, China top three target markets controls that have been erected where the government did not publish (H1 2020) by other countries. a target for GDP growth. Increased competition for assets, USD5.1bn In part, that reflects deep uncertainty particularly from nimble and well-funded 52 about how quickly the Chinese private equity funds, will require buyers domestic economy can return to normal to be more flexible over pricing and and where the global economy is going. deal terms. It also indicates that China wants to avoid the often speculative investment As the bitter trade standoff with the boom following the financial crisis. U.S. continues – exemplified by the USD2.8bn battle over Huawei’s involvement in Support for strategic outbound deals western 5G networks – Chinese buyers 21 also face the task of building trust in China is likely to back sensible overseas markets. USD857m outbound investments in key jurisdictions and sectors, not least 11 as part of the ongoing Belt and Road initiative. China will be much more careful in how it describes its U.S. Hong Kong SAR Singapore engagement with both the developing and developed world. Value of deals USD Number of deals 24 M&A Insights | H1 2020
GLOBAL PRESENCE Allen & Overy is an international legal practice with approximately 5,500 people, including some 550 partners, working in over 40 offices worldwide. Allen & Overy means Allen & Overy LLP and/or its affiliated undertakings. Allen & Overy LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC306763. Allen & Overy (Holdings) Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales with registered number 07462870. Allen & Overy LLP and Allen & Overy (Holdings) Limited are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales. The term partner is used to refer to a member of Allen & Overy LLP or a director of Allen & Overy (Holdings) Limited or, in either case, an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications or an individual with equivalent status in one of Allen & Overy LLP’s affiliated undertakings. A list of the members of Allen & Overy LLP and of the non-members who are designated as partners, and a list of the directors of Allen & Overy (Holdings) Limited, is open to inspection at our registered office at One Bishops Square, London E1 6AD. UK © Allen & Overy LLP 2020. This document is for general guidance only and does not constitute definitive advice. CS2005_CDD-59969_ADD-90610_6 July
You can also read